Skip to main content

Network Orientors: Theoretical and Philosophical Considerations why Ecosystems may Exhibit a Propensity to Increase in Ascendency

  • Conference paper
Eco Targets, Goal Functions, and Orientors

Abstract

Three disparate metaphors have dominated the discourse on ecosystem dynamics: The ecosystem as (1) machine, (2) organism, or (3) stochastic assemblage. Motivated, in part, by ambiguities of this nature, Karl Popper suggested the notion of “propensity” to generalize the Newtonian concept of force. Using propensities one can articulate a theory of ecosystem development that encompasses all three analogies. Probabilistic indices borrowed from information theory can be used to quantify the degree of trophic constraint operating in an ecosystem, the amount of flexibility available for it to adapt to new circumstances, and, ultimately, the propensity for each transfer to occur. Consequently, the ascendency of an ecosystem may be defined as the flow-averaged system level propensity for activity. Under this rubric, the observed propensity for ascendency to increase over time becomes the probabilistic counterpart for living systems to Newton’s second law in mechanics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen TFH, Starr TB (1982) Hierarchy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. p 310

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbour MG (1996) American ecology and American culture in the 1950s: Who led whom? Bull Ecol Soc Am 77(1):44–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossel H (1987) Viability and sustainability: Matching development goals to resource constraints. Futures 19:114–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carnot S (1824) Reflections on the Motive Power of Heat (translated 1943). ASME, NY. 107 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke GL (1954) Elements of Ecology. John Wiley, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements FE (1916) Plant Succession: An Analysis of the Development of Vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clements FE, Shelford VE (1939) Bio-ecology. John Wiley and Sons, New York, p 425

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH, Slatyer RO (1977) Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. Am Nat 111:1119–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depew DJ, Weber BH (1994) Darwinism Evolving: System Dynamics and the Genealogy of Natural Selection. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p 588

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleason HA (1917) The structure and development of the plant association. Bull Torrey Botanical Club 44:463–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagen JB (1992) An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology. Rutgers University Press, New Bunswick, NJ, p 245

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirata H, Ulanowicz RE (1984) Information theoretical analysis of ecological networks. Int J Systems Sci 15:261–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1986) The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems: local surprise and global change. pp 292–317. In: Clark WC, Munn RE (eds) Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPlace PS (1814) A Philosophical Essay on Probabilities. Dover Publications, Inc., NY, p 196

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock JE (1979) Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford University Press, NY, p 157

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1969) The strategy of ecosystem development. Science 164:262–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP (1977) The emergence of ecology as a new integrative discipline. Science 195:1289–1293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Odum HT (1960) Ecological potential and analogue circuits for the ecosystem. Am Sci 48:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Onsager L (1931) Reciprocal relations in irreversible processes. Physical Review A 37:405–426

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce CS (1877) The fixation of belief. Popular Science Monthly 12:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1990) A World of Propensities. Thoenunes, Bristol, p 51

    Google Scholar 

  • Smuts JC (1926) Holism and Evolution. MacMillan, NY, p 362

    Google Scholar 

  • Tribus M, McIrvine EC (1971) Energy and information. Sci Am 225(3):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1980) An hypothesis on the development of natural communities. J theor Biol 85:223–245

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1986) Growth and Development: Ecosystems Phenomenology. Springer, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1989) A phenomenology of evolving networks. Systems Research 6:209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1997) Ecology, the Ascendent Perspective. Columbia University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE, Abarca-Arenas LG (1997) An informational synthesis of ecosystem structure and function. Ecological Modelling 95:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE, Norden J (1990) Symmetrical overhead in flow networks. Int J Systems Sci 21 (2):429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson EO (1975) Sociobiology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, p 697

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ulanowicz, R.E. (1998). Network Orientors: Theoretical and Philosophical Considerations why Ecosystems may Exhibit a Propensity to Increase in Ascendency. In: Müller, F., Leupelt, M. (eds) Eco Targets, Goal Functions, and Orientors. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58769-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58769-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-63720-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-58769-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics