Skip to main content

Multivariate Selection of Students in a Racist Society: A Systematically Unfair Approach

  • Chapter
Multiple Criteria Decision Making Kyoto 1975

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 123))

Abstract

In American society, minority group members are underrepresented in academic settings—as undergraduates, as graduate students, and as faculty members. This underrepresentation has many pernicious effects. For example: (i) the subsequent earning power of minority group members is lower than that of majority group members, (ii) there is an underrepresentation of minority group members in important positions in society, (iii) there is an underrepresentation in high status occupations in general, and (iv) consequently, minority group children do not have as many high prestige models as do majority group children. Women are also underrepresented in academic settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Claudy, J. G. A comparison of five variable weighting procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1972, 32, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. A. Test bias: Prediction of grades of Negro and white students in integrated colleges. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968, 5, 115–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L. G., Kendrick, S. A., & Wesman, A. Educational use of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 15–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, N. S. Bias in selection. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1973, 10, 237–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, R. B. Another look at “Culture Fairness”. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971, 8, 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darlington, R. B. Is culture fairness objective or subjective? (Talk delivered February 26, 1973 at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, Louisana.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. IQ: Methodological and other issues. Science, 1972, 178, 229–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 1974, 81, 95–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. Graduate admission variables and future success. Science, 1975a, 187, 721–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M. Shallow psychology. Oregon Research Institute Research Bulletin, 1975b, 15 (2). (Paper also presented at the Eleventh Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, Carnegie-Mellon University, April, 1975.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Einhorn, H. J., & Hogarth, R. M. Unit weighting schemes for decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1975, 13, 171–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, R. R. Yet another look at clinical and statistical prediction: Or, is clinical psychology worthwhile? American Psychologist, 1970, 25, 337–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R. C. Test bias and the predictors of grades in law school. (Paper presented at the Conference on the Future of Law School Admissions Council Research, September 27–28, 1974.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorer, L. G. A circuitous route to bootstrapping selection procedures. Oregon Research Institute Research Bulletin, 1972, 12 (9). (Also presented at the “Conference on Personality Measurement in Medical Education,” Des Piaines, Illinois, 1971 and appears in Haley, H. B., D’Costa, A. G., & Shafer, A. M. (Eds.) Personality Measurement in Medical Education. Des Plaines, Illinois: Association of American Medical Colleges, 1971.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, F. L. The relevant efficiency of regression in simple unit predictor weights in applied differential psychology. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1971, 31, 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thorndike, R. L. Concepts of culture-fairness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1971, 8, 63–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, H. Estimating coefficients in linear models: It don’t make no nevermind. Psychological Bulletin, 1975, in press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1976 Springer-Verlag Berlin · Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dawes, R.M., Eagle, J. (1976). Multivariate Selection of Students in a Racist Society: A Systematically Unfair Approach. In: Zeleny, M. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making Kyoto 1975. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 123. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45486-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45486-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-07684-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45486-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics