Abstract
Among the various analytical dimensions purporting to an appraisal of the replication potential of eParticipation projects, institutional factors deserve considerably more attention by theorists and practitioners alike. This paper introduces a “process oriented” definition of sustainable eParticipation, based on five key attributes: juridical compliance, legitimacy, social value, efficiency, and productivity. These can be used to assess the level of potential integration of a participatory practice or trial within the legal, political, social and organisational contexts of the public sector institutions involved. We posit that sustainable participation will emerge whenever these five dimensions are not jeopardised, compromised, or are left unaltered, by the introduction of participatory elements into any decision-making process regarding issues of public relevance. Empirical investigation is recommended to assess the impact of specific Preparatory Actions on eParticipation by using the five propositions introduced.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aichholzer, G., Westholm, H.: Evaluating eParticipation Projects: Practical Examples and Outline of an Evaluation Framework. European Journal of ePractice 7 (March 2009) ISSN: 1988-625X
Aichholzer, G., Allhutter, D., Freschi, A.C., Lippa, B., Macintosh, A., Moss, G., Westholm, H.: eParticipation Evaluation and Impact. DEMO-Net Project Deliverable No. 13.3 (2008)
Bicking, M., Wimmer, M.: eParticipation Projects Evaluation Methodology. MOMENTUM Deliverable No. 2.5 (2008), http://www.ep-momentum.eu (accessed)
Coleman, S., Macintosh, A., Schneeberger, A.: eParticipation Research Direction based on Barriers, Challenges and Needs. DEMO-Net Project Deliverable No. 12.3 (2007)
Development Researchers’ Network: Monitoring and Evaluation for NGOs Projects. A Manual for FORUM SOLINT, Forum Valutazione No. 14, pp. 105–173 (2002)
European Commission: Evaluation in the European Commission: A Guide to the Evaluation Procedures and Structures currently operational in the Commission’s External Cooperation Programmes. Brussels, EuropeAid Evaluation Office (2001)
Ferro, E., Molinari, F.: Making Sense of Gov 2.0 Strategies: No Citizens, No Party. In: Proceedings of the eDEM09 Conference on Electronic Democracy, Vienna, Austria, September 7-8 (2009)
Henderson, M., Henderson, P.: Associates: E-democracy Evaluation Framework (2005) (unpublished manuscript )
IDEAL-EU Project Consortium: Deliverable D7.1 Sustainability Report (2009)
Interamerican Development Bank: Evaluation: A Management Tool for Improving Project Performance. IBD Evaluation Office (1997)
Islam, M.S.: Towards a sustainable e-Participation Implementation Model. European Journal of ePractice 5 (October 2008) ISSN: 1988-625X
Kalampokis, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: A Domain Model for eParticipation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services (2008)
Kaufmann, M.R., Graham, R.T., Boyce Jr., D.A., Moir, W.H., Perry, L., Reynolds, R.T., Bassett, R.L., Mehlhop, P., Edminster, C.B., Block, W.M., Corn, P.S.: An ecological basis for ecosystem management. Fort Collins, Colorado: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station and Southwestern Region. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report RM-246 (1994)
Macintosh, A.: Characterizing e-Participation in Policy-Making. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2004), http://csdl2.computer.org/comp/proceedings/hicss/2004/2056/05/205650117a.pdf
MOMENTUM White Paper: Report on the Objectives, Structure and Status of eParticipation Initiative Projects in the European Union eParticipation Workprogramme (June 2009), http://www.ep-momentum.eu (accessed)
OECD: Citizens as Partners: Information, Consultation and Public Participation in Policy-making. OECD Publishing, Paris (2001a)
OECD: Engaging Citizens in Policy-making: Information, Consultation and Public Participation. OECD Public Management Policy Brief No. 10. (2001b), http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/24/34/2384040.pdf (accessed )
Osimo, D.: Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? JRC/IPTS Scientific and Technical Reports (2008) ISSN 1018-5593
Panopoulou, E., Tambouris, E., Tarabanis, K.: Framework for eParticipation Good Practice. European eParticipation Study Deliverable D4.1b, 2nd version (November 2008)
Sommerlad, E., et al.: A guide to local evaluation. London, Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Evaluation Development and Review Unit (1992)
Tambouris, E., Liotas, N., Tarabanis, K.: A Framework for Assessing eParticipation Projects and Tools. In: Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2007a)
Tambouris, E., Liotas, N., Kaliviotis, D., Tarabanis, K.: A Framework for Scoping eParticipation. In: Proceedings of the 8th Annual International Digital Government Research Conference (2007b)
Wimmer, M.A.: Ontology for an e-Participation Virtual Resource Centre. In: Proceedings of the ICEGOV2007, Macao, China, December 10-13 (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Molinari, F. (2010). On Sustainable eParticipation. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Glassey, O. (eds) Electronic Participation. ePart 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6229. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15158-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15158-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15157-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15158-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)