Abstract
With the recent upsurge in interest in agents for ‘serious games,’ there has been a focus on the ‘believability’ of agents in these settings. In this paper, I argue that when evaluating agents in this context, believability is often in fact of relatively minor importance, and indeed that focusing on this criteria can detract from the ultimate goals of the games. I present this argument in the context of a project for which the aim was to extend the BDI agent framework to better support human modelling in serious games.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
Bates, J., Loyall, A.B., Reilly, W.S.: An architecture for action, emotion, and social behavior. In: Castelfranchi, C., Werner, E. (eds.) MAAMAW 1992. LNCS, vol. 830. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)
Sawyer, B., Smith, P.: Serious games taxonomy. Presented at the Game Developers Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA (February 19, 2008)
Norling, E.: Modelling Human Behaviour with BDI Agents. PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne (forthcoming, 2009)
Cohen, P.R.: Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
Cohen, P.R.: Heuristic Reasoning about Uncertainty: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Pitman, London (1985)
Epic Games: Unreal Technology - Unreal Engine 2 (2000–2008), http://www.unrealtechnology.com/features.php?ref=past-versions
Heinze, C.: Modelling Intention Recognition for Intelligent Agent Systems. PhD, The University of Melbourne (2003)
Norling, E., Sonenberg, L., Rönnquist, R.: Enhancing multi-agent based simulation with human-like decision-making strategies. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1979, pp. 214–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Murray, G., Steuart, S., Appla, D., McIlroy, D., Heinze, C., Cross, M., Chandran, A., Raszka, R., Tidhar, G., Rao, A., Pegler, A., Morley, D., Busetta, P.: The challenge of whole air mission modelling. In: Proceedings of the Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Melbourne, Australia (1995)
McIlroy, D., Heinze, C.: Air combat tactics implementation in the Smart Whole AiR Mission Model (SWARMM). In: Proceedings of the First International SimTecT Conference, Melbourne, Australia (1996)
Tidhar, G., Heinze, C., Selvestrel, M.: Flying together: Modelling air mission teams. Applied Intelligence 8(3), 195–218 (1998)
Heinze, C., Goss, S., Josefsson, T., Bennett, K., Waugh, S., Lloyd, I., Murray, G., Oldfield, J.: Interchanging agents and humans in military simulation. AI Magazine 23(2), 37–47 (2002)
Watson, M., Lui, F.: Knowledge elicitation and decision-modelling for command agents. In: Palade, V., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds.) KES 2003. LNCS, vol. 2774, pp. 704–713. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Goss, S., Heinze, C., Murray, G., Appla, D.: Agent enabled simulation, modeling and experimentation. In: Proceedings of the Eight International SimTecT Conference (2004)
Ritter, F.E., Baxter, G.D., Jones, G., Young, R.M.: Supporting cognitive models as users. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7(2), 141–173 (2000)
Masson, T.: Artificial intelligence – the Q-learning algorithm (2003), http://thierry.masson.free.fr/IA/en/qlearning_about.htm
Ross, K.G., Klein, G.A., Thunholm, P., Schmitt, J.F., Baxter, H.C.: The recognition-primed decision model. Military Review LXXXIV(4), 6–10 (2004)
Klein, G.A.: A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In: Klein, G.A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., Zsambok, C.E. (eds.) Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, pp. 138–147. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Greenwich (1993)
Laird, J.E.: It knows what you’re going to do: Adding anticipation to a quakebot. Technical Report SS-00-02, AAAI (2000)
Gamebots: Gamebots homepage (2002), http://gamebots.sourceforge.net/
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Norling, E. (2009). On Evaluating Agents for Serious Games. In: Dignum, F., Bradshaw, J., Silverman, B., van Doesburg, W. (eds) Agents for Games and Simulations. AGS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5920. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11198-3_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11198-3_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11197-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11198-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)