Abstract
The process-centered design of organizations and information systems is globally seen as an appropriate response to the increased economic pressure on organizations. At the methodological core of process-centered management is process modeling. However, business process modeling in large initiatives can be a time-consuming and costly exercise, making it potentially difficult to convince executive management of its benefits. To date, and despite substantial interest and research in the area of process modeling, the understanding of the actual benefits of process modeling in academia and practice is limited. To address this gap, this paper explores the perception of benefits derived from process modeling initiatives, as reported through a global Delphi study. The study incorporates the views of three groups of stakeholders – academics, practitioners and vendors. Our findings lead to the first identification and ranking of 19 unique benefits associated with process modeling. The study in particular found that process modeling benefits vary significantly between practitioners and academics. We argue that the variations may point to a disconnect between research projects and practical demands.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Green, P.: Business Process Modeling: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10, 333–363 (2009)
Dumas, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M. (eds.): Process Aware Information Systems: Bridging People and Software Through Process Technology. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey (2005)
Davenport, T.H., Short, J.E.: The New Industrial Engineering: Information Technology and Business Process Redesign. Sloan Management Review 31, 11–27 (1990)
Rabhi, F.A., Yu, H., Dabous, F.T., Wu, S.Y.: A Service-oriented Architecture for Financial Business Processes: A Case Study in Trading Strategy Simulation. Information Systems and E-Business Management 5, 185–200 (2007)
Gartner Group: Meeting the Challenge: The 2009 CIO Agenda. EXP Premier Report January, 2009. Gartner, Inc., Stamford (2009)
Davies, I., Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., Gallo, S.: How do Practitioners Use Conceptual Modeling in Practice? Data & Knowledge Engineering 58, 358–380 (2006)
Recker, J.: Opportunities and Constraints: The Current Struggle with BPMN. Business Process Management Journal 16 (in press, 2010)
Indulska, M., Chong, S., Bandara, W., Sadiq, S., Rosemann, M.: Major Issues in Business Process Management: An Australian Perspective. In: Spencer, S., Jenkins, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 17th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Australasian Association for Information Systems, Adelaide, Australia (2006)
Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Process Modeling: Current Issues and Future Challenges. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering - CAiSE. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 501–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Friedman, M.: The Methodology of Positive Economics. In: Friedman, M. (ed.) Essays in Positive Economics, pp. 3–43. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1953)
Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.: An Experimental Application of the Delphi Method to the Use of Experts. Management Science 9, 458–467 (1963)
Murphy, M.K., Black, N.A., Lamping, D.L., McKee, C.M., Sanderson, C.F.B., Askham, J., Marteau, T.: Consensus Development Methods, and their Use in Clinical Guideline Development. Health Technology Assessment 2, 1–88 (1998)
van de Ven, A.H., Delbecq, A.L.: The Effectiveness of Nominal, Delphi, and Interacting Group Decision Making Processes. Academy of Management Journal 17, 605–621 (1974)
Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi Method as a Research Tool: an Example, Design Considerations and Applications. Information & Management 42, 15–29 (2004)
Powell, C.: The Delphi Technique: Myths and Realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing 41, 376–382 (2003)
Hoe, S.L.: The Boundary Spanner’s Role in Organizational Learning: Unleashing Untapped Potential. Development and Learning in Organizations 20, 9–11 (2006)
Richards, J.I., Curran, C.M.: Oracles on “Advertising": Searching for a Definition. Journal of Advertising 31, 63–76 (2002)
Hall, C., Harmon, P.: The 2007, Enterprise Architecture, Process Modeling, and Simulation Tools Report. BPTrends.com (2007)
Blechar, M.J.: Magic Quadrant for Business Process Analysis Tools. Gartner Research Note G00148777. Gartner, Inc., Stamford (2007)
Cochran, S.W.: The Delphi Method: Formulation and Refining Group Judgments. Journal of Human Sciences 2, 111–117 (1983)
Linstone, H.A., Turoff, M. (eds.): The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications [Online Reproduction from 1975]. Addison-Wesley, London (2002)
de Bruin, T., Rosemann, M.: Using the Delphi Technique to Identify BPM Capability Areas. In: Toleman, M., Cater-Steel, A., Roberts, D. (eds.) Proceedings of the 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, The University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Australia, pp. 643–653 (2007)
Shang, S., Seddon, P.B.: Assessing and Managing the Benefits of Enterprise Systems: The Business Managers Perspective. Information Systems Journal 12, 271–299 (2002)
Murphy, K.E., Simon, S.J.: Intangible Benefits Valuation in ERP Projects. Information Systems Journal 12, 301–320 (2002)
Ward, J., Taylor, P., Bond, P.: Evaluation and Realization of IS/IT Benefits: An Empirical Study of Current Practice. European Journal of Information Systems 4, 214–225 (1996)
Brennan, R.L., Prediger, D.J.: Coefficient Kappa: Some Uses, Misuses, and Alternatives. Educational and Psychological Measurement 41, 687–699 (1981)
Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33, 159–174 (1977)
Ouyang, C., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Mendling, J.: From Business Process Models to Process-Oriented Software Systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering Methodology 19 (in press, 2009)
Wynn, M.T., Verbeek, H.M.V., Van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Edmond, D.: Business Process Verification – Finally a Reality! Business Process Management Journal 15, 74–92 (2009)
Ono, R., Wedemeyer, D.J.: Assessing the Validity of the Delphi Technique. Futures 26, 289–304 (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Indulska, M., Green, P., Recker, J., Rosemann, M. (2009). Business Process Modeling: Perceived Benefits. In: Laender, A.H.F., Castano, S., Dayal, U., Casati, F., de Oliveira, J.P.M. (eds) Conceptual Modeling - ER 2009. ER 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5829. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04840-1_34
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04839-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04840-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)