Skip to main content

A Reference Methodology for Conducting Ontological Analyses

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling – ER 2004 (ER 2004)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 3288))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The ontological analysis of conceptual modelling techniques is of increasing popularity. Related research did not only explore the ontological deficiencies of classical techniques such as ER or UML, but also business process modelling techniques such as ARIS or even Web services standards such as BPEL4WS. While the selected ontologies are reasonably mature, it is the actual process of an ontological analysis that still lacks rigor. The current procedure leaves significant room for individual interpretations and is one reason for criticism of the entire ontological analysis. This paper proposes a procedural model for the ontological analysis based on the use of meta models, the involvement of more than one coder and metrics. This model is explained with examples from various ontological analyses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., et al.: Pattern Based Analysis of BPML (and WSCI). Brisbane, Queensland University of Technology (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bansler, J.P., Bodker, K.: A reappraisal of structured analysis: Design in an organizational context. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 11(2), 165–193 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Burton-Jones, A., Meso, P.: How good are these UML diagrams?: An empirical test of the Wand and Weber good decomposition model. In: Proc. 23rd International Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gorla, N., Pu, H.-C., Rom, W.O.: Evaluation of process tools in systems analysis. Information and Software Technology 37(2), 119–126 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Green, P.F.: Use of Information Systems Analysis and Design (ISAD) Grammars in Combination in Upper CASE Tools - An Ontological Evaluation. In: Proc. 2nd CaiSE/IFIP8.1 International Workshop on the Evaluation of Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design, Barcelona, pp. 1–12 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Green, P.F., Rosemann, M.: Integrated Process Modelling: An Ontological Evaluation. Information Systems 25(2), 73–87 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Green, P.F., Rosemann, M.: Perceived ontological weaknesses of process modeling techniques: Further evidence. In: Proc. 10th European Conference on Information Systems, Poland, pp. 312–321 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Green, P., Rosemann, M., Indulska, M., et al.: Candidate Interoperability Standards: An Ontological Overlap Analysis, Working Paper, The University of Queensland (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gruninger, M., Lee, J.: Ontology: Applications and Design. Communications of the ACM 45(2), 39–41 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Guarino, N., Welty, C.: Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. Communications of the ACM 45(2), 61–65 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Karam, G.M., Casselman, R.S.: A cataloging framework for software development methods. IEEE Computer, 34–46 (February 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Olle, T.W., Hagelstein, J., Macdonald, I.G., et al.: Information Systems Methodologies: A Framework for Understanding. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Opdahl, A.L., Henderson-Sellers, B.: Grounding the OML metamodel in ontology. Journal of Systems and Software 57(2), 119–143 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Opdahl, A.L., Henderson-Sellers, B.: Ontological evaluation of the UML using the Bunge-Wand-Weber Model. Software and Systems Modeling 1(1), 43–67 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parsons, J., Wand, W.: Using objects in systems analysis. Communications of the ACM 40(12), 104–110 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Developing a meta model for the Bunge-Wand-Weber ontological constructs. Information Systems 27(2), 75–91 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Scheer, A.-W.: ARIS - Business Process Modeling. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Shanks, G., Tansley, E., Nuredini, J., et al.: Representing part-whole relationships in conceptual modelling: An empirical evaluation. In: Proc. 23rd International Conference on Information Systems, Barcelona (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: An ontological evaluation of systems analysis and design methods. In: Falkenberg, E.D., Lindgreen, P. (eds.) Information System Concepts: An In-depth Analysis, pp. 79–107. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Mario Bunge’s Ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts. In: Weingartner, P., Dorn, G.J.W. (eds.) Studies on Mario Bunge’s Treatise, Atlanta, Rodopi, pp. 123–149 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: An ontological model of an information system. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 16(11), 1281–1291 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the ontological expressiveness of information systems analysis and design grammars. Journal of Information Systems 3(4), 217–237 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: On the deep structure of information systems. Information Systems Journal 5, 203–223 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Weber, R.: Ontological Foundations of Information Systems. Melbourne, Vic., Coopers & Lybrand and the Accounting Association of Australia and New Zealand (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Weber, R., Zhang, Y.: An analytical evaluation of NIAM’s grammar for conceptual schema diagrams. Information Systems Journal 6(2), 147–170 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., et al.: Pattern Based Analysis of BPEL4WS. Brisbane, Queensland University of Technology (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Rosemann, M., Green, P., Indulska, M. (2004). A Reference Methodology for Conducting Ontological Analyses. In: Atzeni, P., Chu, W., Lu, H., Zhou, S., Ling, TW. (eds) Conceptual Modeling – ER 2004. ER 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3288. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30464-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-23723-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-30464-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics