Abstract
As climate projections indicate increased severity on land-based livelihoods, the importance of innovation in building resilience and enhancing productivity cannot be overemphasized. This is even more urgent for the smallholder systems which sustain 90% of Africa’s agriculture and are crucial for enhanced food security as per the Sustainable Development Goals. This study uses the multi-method approach involving 150 farmers to investigate factors affecting uptake of innovation in smallholder systems and the implications on farm output and livestock productivity. Innovation policies will have maximum impact when targeted at the household head instead of a household member. Chi-square results indicate that age, educational levels, household head social capital, and multiple information sources have a significant association with the uptake of innovation. They represent a cocktail of factors that enhance the adoption of innovation in smallholder systems. These factors thus need to be integrated and foregrounded in adoption policies. However, the household head-related social capital is the trump card for innovation uptake as it is the single factor with a significant effect after controlling for other variables in a generalized linear model. Moreover, the lack of financial resources and information are the key challenges to the adoption of innovation among respondents with extensive innovation use. However the innovation use was investigated among crop production systems and may not suggest that in mixed smallholder systems, high innovation in plant cultivation translates into innovation in livestock production. Moreover in the agriculture sector, livestock production is the most vulnerable to climate impacts unlike crop production. There is therefore the need for capacity building in terms of knowledge and managerial and allied skills to help smallholder systems enhance productivity in both crop and animal production.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson W, Krathwohl R (2001) A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Addison Wesley Longman, New York
Bryceson DF (2002) The scramble in Africa: reorienting rural livelihoods. World Dev 30(5): 725–739
Census (2011) Mpakeni. https://census2011.adrianfrith.com/place/874067. Accessed on 08.05.2017
Christoplos I (2010) Mobilising the potential of rural and agricultural extension. FAO, Rome. www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1444e/i1444e00.pdf. Accessed on 04.07.2017
Cousins B, Walker C (2015) Introduction in land divided land restored land reform in South Africa for the 21st century (1–23). Jacana Media, Johannesburg
DEA (2011) South Africa’s second national communication under the United Nations framework convention on climate change. Department of Environmental Affairs. https://www.environment.gov.za/sites/default/files/docs/climatechnageadpation_costscoping.pdf. Accessed on 04.07.2017. Pretoria
Donkor FK, Balkwill K, Twine W (2018) Strategic location of a resource nurtures a community of practice to stimulate innovation. J Peasant Stud. (In press)
Dunlap R, Van Liere K (1978) The ‘new environmental paradigm’: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Environ Educ 9:10–19
Hampson J, Challis W, Blundell G, De Rosner C (2001) The rock art of Bongani Mountain lodge and its environs, Mpumalanga Province, South Africa: an introduction to problems of southern African rock-art regions. S Afr Archaeol Bull 57(175):15–30
Hoffman MT (2015) Environmental change in the twentieth-century South Africa and its implications for land reform. In: Land divided land restored land reform in South Africa for the 21st century. Jacana Media, Johannesburg, pp 56–67
IIED (2017) Smallholder innovation for resilience (SIFOR). https://www.iied.org/smallholder-innovation-for-resilience-sifor. Accessed on 08.05.2017
Kirkland T, Hunter LM, Twine W (2007) “The bush is no more”: insights on institutional change and natural resource availability in rural South Africa. Soc Nat Resour 20(4):337–350
Kolade O, Harpham T (2014) Impact of cooperative membership on farmers’ uptake of technological innovations in. Southwest Niger Dev Stud Res 1(1):340–353
Kousky C (2014) Informing climate adaptation: a review of the economic costs of natural disasters. Energy Econ 46:576–592
NAS (2012) Aging, productivity, and innovation. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK148825/. Accessed on 09.05.2017
Roberts B, Walton K, Viechtbauer W (2006) Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychol Bull 132(1):1–25
Rodina L (2017) Cape Town needs a new approach to manage water. https://theconversation.com/cape-town-needs-a-new-approach-to-manage-water-79441?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20July%203%202017%20%2077596143&utm_content=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20July%203%202017%20%2077596143+CID_28bc28f8f73d08c527fd83c3a019b307&utm_source=campaign_monitor_africa&utm_term=Cape%20Town%20needs%20a%20new%20approach%20to%20manage%20water. Accessed on 05.07.2017
SANBI (2007) Threatened terrestrial ecosystems for South Africa: croc gorge granite mountainlands (MP 14). http://bgis.sanbi.org/ecosystems/showecosystem.asp?CODE=MP%2014. Accessed on 25.02.2016
Sayiner S (2015) Physical space drives innovation: how the environment can. Increase an Organization’s productivity, creativity and innovation. Intersect 8(2). http://web.stanford.edu/group/ojs3/bin/ojs/index.php/intersect/article/view/699/621. Accessed on 25.02.2016
Schubert T, Andersson M (2014) Old is gold? The effects of employee age on innovation and the moderating effects of employment turnover. Econ Innov New Technol 24(1–2):95–113
Twine W, Moshe D, Netshiluvhi T, Siphugu V (2003) Consumption and direct-use values of savanna bio-resources used by rural households in Mametja, a semi-arid area of Limpopo Province, South Africa. Research letters. S Afr J Sci 99. http://pdf.wri.org/ref/twine_03_consumption.pdf accessed on 25.02.2016
UN (2017) Sustainable development goals. http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/. Accessed on 08.05.2017
Van Riet W, Claassen P, Van Rensburg J, Viljoen T, Du Plessis L (1997) Environmental potential atlas for South Africa. J.L. van Schaik, Pretoria
Villamor G (2017) Men and women farmers in Benin are responding differently to mate-change. https://theconversation.com/men-and-women-farmers-in-benin-areresponding-differently-to-climate-change-72110. Accessed on 09.05.2017
Ziervogel G, Ericksen P (2010) Adapting to climate change to sustain food security. WIREs 2010(1):525–540. http://web.csag.uct.ac.za/~gina/Gina_Ziervogels_publications/Publications_files/Ziervogel%20Ericksen%20WILEY%202010.pdf. Accessed on 09.05.2017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Donkor, F.K., Mearns, K. (2018). Household Head-Related Social Capital: The Trump Card for Facilitating Actual Uptake of Innovation in Rural Smallholder Systems. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Resilience. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71025-9_88-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71025-9_88-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71025-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71025-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Earth and Environm. ScienceReference Module Physical and Materials ScienceReference Module Earth and Environmental Sciences