Abstract
The integration of media logic in mediatization studies has been fiercely debated. First of all, the applicability of the concept has been contested on the grounds that media logic is advancing a linear conceptualisation of mediatization. In addition, discussions of how social systems adapt to media logic have resulted in rather ambivalent notions of autonomy and functional differentiation. Consequently, mediatization studies have been divided in two opposite views regarding the relevance and applicability of media logic in studying processes of mediatization; one camp generally rejects the notion, while another has accepted the concept cautiously. This paper intends to overcome this division by acknowledging both the pitfalls and potentials of the concept of media logic. For such an endeavor to succeed a major re-interpretation of the concept of media logic is required. The paper suggests that the systems theoretical notion of structural coupling offers such a starting point. It describes how social systems are increasingly becoming structurally tied to the media system while upholding their operational autonomy. Thus mediatization designates a process of structural adaptation to the logic of the media systems, which is always context and systems specific, determined by the self-sustained structures of a given social system. The argument proceeds by discussing both the resemblances and differences between mediatization and media logic as well as looking into some of the critique raised against the use of media logic in mediatization studies. Following this review, the paper proposes an alternative approach to studying media logic based on the systems theoretical notion of structural coupling. The paper then goes on to show how such a model implies a fundamental change in our perspectives on media logic, from a simple conceptualization of media adaptation as a zero-sum game to a more complex notion of structural interaction. It also implies an analytical re-orientation away from questions of power and dominance towards questions of co-evolution. Finally, the paper demonstrates that the notion of mediatization as structural coupling allows for a plurality of media logics, opening up for an understanding of media logic as a more diverse concept, which nevertheless maintains a systematic description of mediatization. In the final section, this mainly theoretical argument will be illustrated by a case study of organizational adaptation to mediatization, which also serves to demonstrate the analytical potential of the isomorphic vocabulary of systems thinking.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altheide, D. L. (2004). Media logic and political communication. Political Communication, 21(3), 293–296.
Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. B. (1979). Media logic. Sage library of social research. London: Sage.
Asp, K. & Esaiasson, P. (1996). The modernization of Swedish campaigns: Individualization, professionalization, and medialization. In P. Mancini & D. L. Swanson (Eds.), Politics, media and modern democracy. An iIternational study of innovations in electoral campaigning and their consequences, (pp. 73–90). Westport: Praeger.
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2013). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Cambridge studies in contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). On television and journalism. London: Pluto Press.
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Castells, M. (2000a). Materials for an exploratory theory of network society. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 5–24.
Castells, M. (2000b). The rise of the network society (2nd ed. Vol 1. 3 vols). Oxford: Blackwell.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Couldry, N. (2012). Media, society, world: Social theory and digital media practice. Cambridge: Polity.
Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2013). Conceptualizing mediatization: Contexts, traditions, Arguments. Communication Theory, 23(3), 191–202.
Deacon, D., & Stanyer, J. (2014). Mediatization: Key concept or conceptual bandwagon? Media, Culture and Society, 36(7), 1032–1044.
Dijck, J. V. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donges, P. & Jarren, O. (2014). Mediatization of political organizations: Changing parties and interest groups? In F. Esser & J. Strömbäck (Eds.), Mediatization of Politics. Understanding the Transformation of Western Democracies, (pp. 181–199). Houndmills: Paradigm Publishers.
Eskjær, M. F. (2016). Medialisering af Frivillige Organisationer. In S. Hjarvard (Ed.), Medialisering. Mediernes Rolle i Social og Kulturel Forandring, (pp. 241–270). København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Eskjær, M. F., Hjarvard, S. & Mortensen, M. (Eds.). (2015). The Dynamics of Mediatized Conflicts (vol. 3). Global Crises and the Media. New York: Peter Lang.
Fahlenbrach, K., Sivertsen, E. & Werenskjold, R. (Eds.) (2014). Media and Revolt: Strategies and Performances from the 1960s to the Presentt. Protest, Culture and Society, 11. New York: Berghahn.
Gitlin, T. (1980). The whole world is watching. Mass media in the making and unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.
Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hepp, A. (2012). Mediatization and the ‘molding Force’ of the media. Communications, 37, 1–28.
Hjarvard, S. (2008). The Mediatization of Society. A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.
Hjarvard, S. (2010). The views of the news: The role of political newspapers in a changing media landscape. Northern Lights, 8, 25–48.
Hjarvard, S. (2013). The mediatizaiton of culture and society. London: Routledge.
Hjarvard, S. (2014). Mediatization and cultural and social change: An institutional perspective. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of communication (pp. 199–226). Berlin: De Groyter Mouton.
Hjarvard, S., & Löwheim, M. (2012). Mediatization and religion. Nordic perspectives. Göteborg: Nordicom.
Ihlen, Ø. & Pallas, J. (2014). Mediatization of Corporations. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of Communication, (pp. 423–441). Berlin and Boston: De Groyter Mouton.
Jensen, K. B. (2013). Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations of mediatization: Definitive and sensitizing conceptualizations. Communication Theory, 23(3), 203–222.
Kepplinger, H. M. (2002). Mediatization of politics: Theory and data. Journal of Communication, 52, 972–986.
Kneer, G. & Nassehi, A. (1997). Niklas Luhmann. Introduktion Til Teorien Om Sociale Systemer. Trans. Nils Mortensen. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Krotz, F. (2007). The meta-process of ‘mediatization’ as a conceptual frame. Global Media and Communication, 3(3), 256–260.
Livingstone, S. & Lunt, P. (2014). Mediatization: An emerging paradigm for media and communication research? In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization of Communication, (pp. 703–723). Berlin and Boston: De Groyter Mouton.
Luhmann, N. (1996). Die Realität der Massenmedien. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. (2000). Sociale Systemer. Grundrids Til En Almen Teori. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Luhmann, N. (2002). Einführung in die Systemtheorie. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag.
Lundby, K. (2009a). Media logic: Looking for social interaction. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization. Concept, change, consequences, (pp. 101–119). New York: Peter Lang.
Lundby, K. (2009b). Mediatization. Concept, change, consequences. New York: Peter Lang.
Lundby, K. (2014). Mediatization of communication. In K. Ludnby (Ed.), Meditization of Communication, (pp. 3–35). Berlin and Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Maturana, H. R. & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living 42. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht and Boston: D. Reidel.
Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). Mediatization’ of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16, 247–261.
Pallas, J., & Fredriksson, M. (2013). Corporate media work and micro-dynamics of mediatization. European Journal of Communication, 28(4), 420–435.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.
Schillemans, T. (2012). Mediatization of public services. How organiations adapt to news media. Frankfurt a.M.: Peter Lang.
Silverstone, R. (2007). Media and Morality. On the Rise of the Mediapolis. Cambridge: Polity.
Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246.
Strömbäck, J., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). Mediatization and media interventionism: A comparative analysis of Sweden and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 30–49.
Thorbjornsrud, K., Figenshou, T., & Ihlen, Ø. (2014). Mediatization in public bureaucracies: A typology. Communications—The European Journal of Communication Research, 39(1), 3–22.
Tilly, C. (2007). Contentious Politics. Boulder, Colo: Paradigm Publishers.
Vestergaard, A. (2014). Mediatized humanitarianism: Trust and legitimacy in the age of suspicion. Journal of Business Ethics, 120(4), 509–525.
Waisbord, S. (2011). Can NGOs change the news? International Journal of Communication, 5, 142–165.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Eskjær, M.F. (2018). Mediatization as Structural Couplings: Adapting to Media Logic(s). In: Thimm, C., Anastasiadis, M., Einspänner-Pflock, J. (eds) Media Logic(s) Revisited. Transforming Communications – Studies in Cross-Media Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65756-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65756-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-65755-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-65756-1
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)