Abstract
For the last two decades, research on legume–rhizobia symbiosis has outlined opportunities for biotechnological approaches to supply nitrogen to crop plants. New research results on legume and rhizobial diversity suggest about the conserved genes/proteins in host and symbionts and help to determine whether the nitrogen-fixing ability can be transferred to non-legume crops. In addition, the wild rhizobia with specific characters are a source for genetic information to improve symbiotic characters of other rhizobia and may be also used for other biotechnological approaches. These approaches include the production of polysaccharides, phytohormones, metabolites, bioremediation, etc. This field of research will be the focus of future investigations for biotechnological purposes.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
12.1 Introduction
Soil microbial populations are involved in fundamental activities that ensure the stability and productivity of both agricultural systems and natural ecosystems. Certain cooperative microbial activities can be exploited as a low-input biotechnology to help sustainable and eco-friendly practices. Much attention is created toward biological legume–rhizobia symbiosis. In this symbiosis, bacteria fix nitrogen from the atmosphere and the process is known as biological nitrogen fixation (BNF). BNF is an efficient source of fixed N2 and has the greatest quantitative impact on the nitrogen cycle; values commonly fall in the range 200–300 kg N ha−1 per year (Peoples et al. 1995). In addition to fix nitrogen, legume symbiosis has potential for reforestation and to control soil erosion. The root nodule bacteria can be used in several other biotechnological niches such as production of industrially important polysaccharides, polymers such as poly-hydroxy butyrate, organic acids, and antibiotics (Gopalakrishnan et al. 2015). It has been observed that rhizobia could express several plant growth-promoting characteristics like increase in the availability of plant nutrients, biocontrol, and production of phytohormones, lipochitooligosaccharides (LCOs), lumichrome, siderophores, hydrogen cyanide (HCN), exopolysaccharides (EPS), and enzymes, which are involved in plant growth promotion and yield by direct or indirect ways. A better understanding about the rhizobia spp. and their interactions with other soil microorganisms may lead to new biotechnological approaches to improve the growth and yield of plants. This chapter presents a discussion on the Rhizobium–legume symbiosis and their biotechnological perspectives. The mechanism of rhizobia as plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) and their interactive effects with other PGPRs and arbuscular mycorrhiza (AM) to enhance crop production have also been discussed.
12.2 Legume–Rhizobia Symbiosis: General Information
The legume symbiosis process is driven by bacteria that possess the key enzyme nitrogenase, which specifically reduces atmospheric N2 to ammonia in the symbiotic root nodules. These bacteria belong to the genera Rhizobium, Sinorhizobium, Bradyrhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Azorhizobium and collectively termed rhizobia (Karmakar et al. 2015). These bacteria interact with legume roots leading to the formation of N2-fixing nodules. The symbiosis begins with the release of root exudates such as sugars, amino acids, several classes of flavonoids, and phenolic compounds (Junior et al. 2015). These compounds behave as chemo-attractant for rhizobia and act as nodulation gene inducers (Hirsch and Fujishige 2012). These exudates are continuously secreted into the rhizosphere and their concentration increases when compatible bacteria are detected by the plant (Hassan and Mathesius 2012). These compounds activate nodABC genes in rhizobia that are required for the synthesis of Nod factor backbone. nodA encodes an N-acyltransferase, nodB encodes a chitooligosaccharide deacetylase, and nodC encodes an N-acetylglucosaminyl-transferase (Mus et al. 2016). The bacterial Nod factor perception is mediated by Nod factor receptors (NFRs) , which are present in plant plasma membrane. Hence, NFRs act as host determinants for symbiotic specificity. NFRs are serine/threonine kinases like receptors and contain LysM motifs in their extracellular domains (Arrighi et al. 2006). Nod factors induce curling of root hairs and allow entry of rhizobia into infection threads.
The success of the symbiotic process depends on the compatibility and effectiveness of rhizobia with their host legume. The compatibility of this symbiosis depends on a vast range of compounds secreted by both plants and bacteria. The host produced lectins have the ability to recognize and bind to specific Rhizobium sp. cells due to their different carbohydrate-binding specificities. For example, soybean lectin, a galactosamine-binding protein, differs from pea lectin, a Glc-/Man-binding protein, and they both differ from their Rhizobium sp. also (Junior et al. 2015). In addition to Nod factors, several other bacterial compounds also affect the interaction, including EPS and nodulation outer membrane proteins (NOPs) (Fraysse et al. 2003; Downie 2010). EPS is a bacterial cellular wall constituent, which is involved in both early and late stages of symbiosis. M. loti EPS mutants was found to fail nodule formation in L. leucocephala (Hotter and Scott 1991). NOPs are reported to contribute in legume immune suppression during symbiosis development and modulate root cell cytoskeletal rearrangement (Gourion et al. 2015). In addition, rhizobial population also differs in the same host due to variability in soil and environmental conditions. For example, Glycine max is usually nodulated by B. japonicum globally, while in the Xinjiang region of China, Mesorhizobium tianshanense and Sinorhizobium fredii have also been recovered from this legume (Naamala et al. 2016). In another example, Cicer arietinum has been reported with Mesorhizobium ciceri and Mesorhizobium mediterranean, but Sinorhizobium meliloti was also reported from nodules of this legume under water-deficient conditions (Romdhane et al. 2009).
12.3 Biotechnological Perspectives
12.3.1 Genetic Engineering
Biotechnology embraces a wide range of genetic engineering techniques offering opportunities for researchers to increase the efficiency of BNF and reduce overall dependency on man-made forms of N fertilizer. In genetic engineering, both microsymbiont and host plant can be manipulated for increased nitrogen fixation capacity. Identification and analysis of host plant genes involved in nodule morphogenesis and functioning will be useful for genetic manipulation. On the other hand, rhizobial Nod genes are required for gene engineering (Mabrouk and Belhadj 2012).
Wild legumes in arid climate have specific traits, which may be transferred to crop legumes to improve their tolerance to the stress conditions. In addition, rhizobial strains from these wild legumes are good candidates for establishing functional symbiosis in the presence of unfavorable conditions. Mabrouk and Belhadj (2012) paid attention toward the demand of rhizobial species that could also work under stressed soil environment so that the productivity of the inoculated legumes does not suffer under derelict soils. A chromosomal DNA from the salt-tolerant Bacillus species was successfully transferred into R. leguminosarum. This rhizobial strain became salt tolerant and when inoculated with lentil, it improved plant yield and nitrogen content of soil and plant in desert soil (Talaat El-Saidi and Ali 1993). Defez et al. (2000) have successfully transferred a 10 kb DNA fragment from a wild-type strain of Sinorhizobium into Rhizobium etli, which showed multiple resistance to several antibiotics, 4% NaCl, low and high pHs, heavy metals, and high temperature. Two strains of M. ciceri, namely, EE-7 (salt sensitive) and G-55 (salt tolerant), were transformed with an exogenous 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase gene (acdS) and found to enhance shoot dry weight of plants as compared with the plants inoculated with the native strain in the presence of salt (Brígido et al. 2013).
12.4 Microbial Cooperation in the Rhizosphere
The application of appropriate rhizobia together with plant growth-promoting microorganisms is considered an effective and environment-friendly approach to increase the efficiency of the symbiotic processes and the crop yield by different mechanisms of actions under variable conditions. Multi-microbial interactions, including arbuscular mycorrhizae and PGPR, have been tested with Rhizobium spp. In such interactions, local isolates are recommended because of their physiological and genetic adaptation to the environment. These combinations are effective in improving plant development, nutrient uptake, N2 fixation (15N), or root system quality . Two types of cooperations are discussed here: (1) the cooperation between rhizobia and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and (2) interaction between PGPR and rhizobium.
12.5 Rhizobia and Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) Cooperation
The occurrence of AMF in nodulated legumes is universally recognized that explored the research on the tripartite symbiosis of legume–AM fungi–rhizobia from the last two decades (Barea et al. 2005). The findings of tripartite symbiosis suggested the similar patterns of evolution and interaction of both the N2-fixing and mycorrhizal symbioses (Parniske 2000). Gianinazzi-Pearson and Dénarié (1997) hypothesized that legume–rhizobia symbiosis events have evolved from already established AM symbiosis. Most of the studies have used mycorrhiza-defective mutants and isotope 15N, which allowed dissecting the common cellular and genetic programs responsible for the legume symbioses and quantify the amount of N that is fixed in that particular situation (Gollotte et al. 2002). Some AM fungi have established a specific type of symbiosis with a particular rhizobium such as Burkholderia genus. These bacteria have specific metabolic genes that influence AM functions (Bianciotto and Bonfante 2002). This tripartite symbiosis not only enhances N content but also improves soil fertility and quality (Requena et al. 2001). AM inoculation also improved legume–rhizobia symbiosis under stress conditions such as low water potential and salinity (Augé et al. 2001; Ruiz-Lozano 2003). For example, inoculation of AM fungi was found to protect soybean plants against the negative effects of drought stress and reduced premature nodule senescence (Porcel and Ruiz-Lozano 2004). Soliman et al. (2012) reported that the co-inoculation of S. terangae and AMF mitigated the salinity effect in Acacia saligna. They found that the co-inoculation improved nodulation, chlorophyll, carbohydrate, and proline; increased N, P, K, and Ca contents; and reduced the Na accumulation.
12.6 PGPR–Rhizobium Cooperation to Improve N2 Fixation
PGPRs share common habitats with rhizobia in the root–soil interface. These PGPRs enhance the performance of rhizobia by suppressing/eliminating the effect of other rhizosphere strains and adverse environmental factors. Azospirillum is a widely recognized PGPR for its ability to improve nodulation and biomass of legumes as a co-inoculant of rhizobia (Remans et al. 2008). Many species of Azospirillum like A. lipoferum, A. brasilense, A. amazonense, A. halopraeferens, and A. irakense have been identified as co-inoculant of rhizobia (Gopalakrishnan et al. 2015). These bacteria produce plant hormones and siderophores and enhance total nutrient availability, which have been claimed as a mechanism for growth and biomass enhancement of various legumes (Wani et al. 2007; Dardanelli et al. 2008; Cassan et al. 2009). Other bacterial genera like Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Azotobacter, Serratia, and Enterobacter have also been reported as a co-inoculant of rhizobia (Naveed et al. 2015). Bano and Fatima (2009) studied the co-inoculation effect of Rhizobium and Pseudomonas on alleviation of salinity stress in maize. They observed increase uptake of Ca, P, and K and decreased leakage of electrolytes in maize. Such type of bacterial cooperations promote nodulation and biomass of various legumes via improving rhizobial colonization, number of infection sites, biocontrol of diseases, and efficient uptake of nutrients (Naveed et al. 2015).
12.7 Rhizobia as a Plant Growth Promoter
Besides nitrogen fixation , rhizobia have also been reported for plant growth promotion in legumes and non-legumes. Their associations modify the physiology and biochemistry of crop plants which enhanced plant growth under normal as well as stress conditions. Rhizobia can affect the plant growth in two different ways: directly or indirectly.
The direct growth promotion of the plant is regulated by producing plant hormones, regulating endogenous ethylene level, enhancing total available nutrient contents, and releasing other useful compounds like EPS, lumichrome, riboflavin, etc. (Gopalakrishnan et al. 2015). During rhizobial infection, ethylene was produced in infected roots and several times caused inhibition of nodulation in various legumes (Glick 2014). Elsheikh and Ibrahim (1999) have suggested the isolation and introduction of efficient rhizobial cultures with ACC deaminase to improve the nodulation status, seed quality, and legume productivity. There are several rhizobial strains including R. japonicum, R. leguminosarum, R. hedysari, R. gallicum, B. japonicum, B. elkanii, M. loti, and S. meliloti having an enzyme ACC deaminase which could reduce this stress by decreasing the level of ethylene in the host plant (Gopalakrishnan et al. 2015). The EPS producing rhizobial strains can relieve the effect of water deficit stress by altering soil properties. Sandhya et al. (2009) have reported the capability of EPS producing rhizobial strain for improving water-holding capacity of the rhizosphere by developing microaggregates and biofilm around the plant roots. In another study, rhizobia alleviated water stress by altering root morphology, carbon assimilation rate, transpiration rate, and leaf stomatal conductance in non-nodulating crops (Chi et al. 2005). Various Rhizobium spp. are also studied for plant growth promotion via producing multiple phytohormones such as auxins, abscisic acid, cytokinins, gibberellins, ethylene, and nitric oxide (Khalid et al. 2006; Perrine-Walker et al. 2007). In addition, Rhizobium spp . have been found to produce lumichrome compounds, which act as an enhancer of plant growth prior to the onset of nitrogen fixation (Cooper 2007). Gouws et al. (2012) recovered lumichrome from Rhizobium spp. which was found to enhance nodule number when applied to Lotus japonicus. Rhizobium spp. have the ability to sequestrate and transport iron into plant cell via siderophores and solubilize/mineralize phosphates by releasing phosphatases or organic acids in the rhizosphere (Naveed et al. 2015).
Rhizobia can benefit plant growth indirectly by several mechanisms such as antibiosis, parasitism, competition for nutrients, and induction of systemic resistance (ISR). Rhizobium spp., namely, R. leguminosarum, S. meliloti, and B. japonicum, have been found to show parasitism against fungal pathogens belonging to genera Macrophomina, Rhizoctonia, and Fusarium (Siddiqui et al. 2000; Özkoç and Deliveli 2001). Several studies have demonstrated that Rhizobium spp. enhanced defense mechanisms of plant via ISR in non-leguminous crops (Reitz et al. 2002; Mishra et al. 2006). Siderophores are also reported to inhibit a widely occurring plant pathogen, Macrophomina phaseolina, by chelating irons in deficient environments (Arora et al. 2001).
12.8 Bioremediation
Legumes have attracted attention for their use in metal phytostabilization . Legume plants accumulate most of the metals in their roots and show low level of metal translocation to the shoot. The activity of phytostabilization is mainly due to their attached rhizobia spp. Different rhizobial strains were reported as an efficient biosorbent for Cd2+, Ba2+, Zn2+, Al3+, Ni2+, and Co2+ (Pajuelo et al. 2011). Several studies have reported the alleviation of different metal stress in legume plants by inoculating Rhizobium spp. (Ausili et al. 2002; Panigrahi and Randhawa 2010; Dary et al. 2010). Rhizobia also produced some specific compounds such as EPS and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) that chelate different metal ions in the rhizosphere. These compounds are biopolymers that possess negatively charged ligands which instantly form complexes with metal ions through electrostatic interactions (Liu et al. 2001; Sutherland 2001).
Different approaches are used to improve metal bioremediation potential of legumes. Inoculation of legume plants with metal resistant microbes including Rhizobium, AMF , endophytes, and other PGPR has been proved to be a promising and cost-effective technology for metal phytostabilization and allowing the re-vegetation of metal-contaminated areas (Pajuelo et al. 2011). The genetic engineering of rhizobia approach has been used to improve the legume–Rhizobium symbiosis for bioremediation purposes. Sriprang et al. (2002) constructed a genetically modified strain of M. huakii subsp. rengei B3 by the expression of metallothionein (MTL4) gene on the cell surface. This strain was found to accumulate 1.7-fold increase in Cd into nodules and root of Astragalus sinicus plants. In another study, the same strain was engineered with a phytochelatin synthase gene from A. thaliana (Sriprang et al. 2003).
12.9 Engineering the Legume Symbiosis into Cereals
Advances in our understanding of the rhizobium–legume infection process have given rise to different biotechnological approaches to develop symbiotic nitrogen fixation in cereals. The engineering of nitrogenase-encoding bacterial nif genes into plants is a direct approach for creating nitrogen fixation in cereals. A wide study on nitrogenase biosynthesis identified the common core set of genes and their products, which makes engineering strategy feasible into cereals (Rubio and Ludden 2008; Curatti and Rubio 2014). Both legumes and cereals have symbiosis signaling pathway for AMF association, but cereals are unable to form nitrogen-fixing nodules from this association. Hence, the perception of rhizobial signaling molecules provides an opportunity to engineer this pathway for recognition of rhizobia by cereal crops. In this regard, several studies performed engineering in plants to secrete specialized root exudates that specifically enhanced the compatibility of newly introduced nitrogen-fixing microbes in the rhizosphere (Oger et al. 1997; Savka and Farrand 1997; Mondy et al. 2014). In addition, Nod factor proteins (NFP) and their receptors are other targets for engineering the symbiosis in cereals. Since NFPs are required for responses to LCOs produced by AMF during associations, it suggests the importance of Nod receptor in cereal engineering (Maillet et al. 2011; den Camp et al. 2011).
12.10 Conclusions and Future Prospects
All strategies for transferring nitrogen fixation to non-legume crops have complex engineering problems. However, they have the potential to change the growing pattern of cereal crops and provide sustainable food production for the growing global population. Future developments in this field require collaborative and multidisciplinaryefforts involving researchers with diverse skills and expertise. Further studies in functional genomics will be useful to identify the genes expressed in the rhizosphere that will allow the engineering of host and symbionts for beneficial purposes.
References
Arora NK, Kang SC, Maheshwari DK (2001) Isolation of siderophore producing strains of Rhizobium meliloti and their biocontrol potential against Macrophomina phaseolina that causes charcoal rot of groundnut. Curr Sci 81:673–677
Arrighi JF, Barre A, Amor BB, Bersoult A, Soriano LC, Mirabella R, de Carvalho-Niebel F, Journet EP, Ghérardi M, Huguet T, Geurts R (2006) The Medicago truncatula lysine motif-receptor-like kinase gene family includes NFP and new nodule-expressed genes. Plant Physiol 142:265–279
Augé RM, Stodola AJ, Tims JE, Saxton AM (2001) Moisture retention properties of a mycorrhizal soil. Plant Soil 230:87–97
Ausili P, Borisov A, Lindblad P, Mårtensson A (2002) Cadmium affects the interaction between peas and root nodule bacteria. Acta Agric Scand Sect B Soil Plant Sci 52:8–17
Bano A, Fatima M (2009) Salt tolerance in Zea mays (L). following inoculation with Rhizobium and Pseudomonas. Biol Fertil Soil 45:405–413
Barea JM, Pozo MJ, Azcon R, Azcon-Aguilar C (2005) Microbial co-operation in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot 56:1761–1778
Bianciotto V, Bonfante P (2002) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi: a specialised niche for rhizospheric and endocellular bacteria. A Van Leeuw 81:365–371
Brígido C, Nascimento FX, Duan J, Glick BR, Oliveira S (2013) Expression of an exogenous 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase gene in Mesorhizobium spp. reduces the negative effects of salt stress in chickpea. FEMS Microbiol Lett 349:46–53
Cassan F, Perrig D, Sgroy V, Masciarelli O, Penna C, Luna V (2009) Azospirillum brasilense Az39 and Bradyrhizobium japonicum E109, inoculated singly or in combination, promote seed germination and early seedling growth in corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.). Eur J Soil Biol 45:28–35
Chi F, Shen SH, Cheng HP, Jing YX, Yanni YG, Dazzo FB (2005) Ascending migration of endophytic rhizobia from roots to leaves, inside rice plants and assessment of benefits to rice growth physiology. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:7271–7278
Cooper JE (2007) Early interactions between legumes and rhizobia: disclosing complexity in a molecular dialogue. J Appl Microbiol 103:1355–1365
Curatti L, Rubio LM (2014) Challenges to develop nitrogen-fixing cereals by direct nif-gene transfer. Plant Sci 225:130–137
Dardanelli MS, de Cordoba FJ, Espuny MR, Carvajal MA, Díaz ME, Serrano AM, Okon Y, Megías M (2008) Effect of Azospirillum brasilense coinoculated with Rhizobium on Phaseolus vulgaris flavonoids and Nod factor production under salt stress. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2713–2721
Dary M, Chamber-Pérez MA, Palomares AJ, Pajuelo E (2010) “In situ” phytostabilisation of heavy metal polluted soils using Lupinus luteus inoculated with metal resistant plant-growth promoting rhizobacteria. J Hazard Mater 177:323–330
Defez R, Senatore B, Camerini D (2000) Genetically modified rhizobia as a tool to improve legume growth in semi-arid conditions. In: Mediterranean Conference of rhizobiology workshop on symbiotic nitrogen fixation for Mediterranean area
den Camp RO, Streng A, De Mita S, Cao QQ, Polone E, Liu W, Ammiraju JSS, Kudrna D, Wing R, Untergasser A et al (2011) LysM type mycorrhizal receptor recruited for rhizobium symbiosis in nonlegume Parasponia. Science 331:909–912
Downie JA (2010) The roles of extracellular proteins, polysaccharides and signals in the interactions of rhizobia with legume roots. FEMS Microbiol Rev 34:150–170
Elsheikh EA, Ibrahim KA (1999) The effect of Bradyrhizobium inoculation on yield and seed quality of guar (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L.). Food Chem 65:183–187
Fraysse N, Couderc F, Poinsot V (2003) Surface polysaccharide involvement in establishing the rhizobium–legume symbiosis. FEBS J 270:1365–1380
Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Dénarié J (1997) Red carpet genetic programmes for root endosymbioses. Trends Plant Sci 2:371–372
Glick BR (2014) Bacteria with ACC deaminase can promote plant growth and help to feed the world. Microbiol Res 169:30–39
Gollotte A, Brechenmacher L, Weidmann S, Franken P, Gianinazzi-Pearson V (2002) Plant genes involved in arbuscular mycorrhiza formation and functioning. In: Mycorrhizal technology in agriculture. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 87–102
Gopalakrishnan S, Sathya A, Vijayabharathi R, Varshney RK, Gowda CL, Krishnamurthy L (2015) Plant growth promoting rhizobia: challenges and opportunities. 3 Biotech 5:355–377
Gourion B, Berrabah F, Ratet P, Stacey G (2015) Rhizobium–legume symbioses: the crucial role of plant immunity. Trends Plant Sci 20:186–194
Gouws L, Botes E, Wiese AJ, Trenkamp S, Torres-Jerez I, Tang Y, Hills PN, Usadel B, Lloyd JR, Fernie A, Kossmann J (2012) The plant growth promoting substance, lumichrome, mimics starch and ethylene-associated symbiotic responses in lotus and tomato roots. Front Plant Sci 3:120
Hassan S, Mathesius U (2012) The role of flavonoids in root–rhizosphere signalling: opportunities and challenges for improving plant–microbe interactions. J Exp Bot 63:3429–3444
Hirsch AM, Fujishige NA (2012) Molecular signals and receptors: communication between nitrogen-fixing bacteria and their plant hosts. In: Biocommunication of plants. Springer, Berlin, pp 255–280
Hotter GS, Scott DB (1991) Exopolysaccharide mutants of Rhizobium loti are fully effective on a determinate nodulating host but are ineffective on an indeterminate nodulating host. J Bacteriol 173:851–859
Junior L, Nascimento LRSA, Fracetto GGM (2015) Legume-rhizobia signal exchange: promiscuity and environmental effects. Front Microbiol 6:945
Karmakar K, Rana A, Rajwar A, Sahgal M, Johri BN (2015) Legume-rhizobia symbiosis under stress. In: Plant microbes symbiosis: applied facets. Springer, India, pp 241–258
Khalid A, Arshad M, Ahmad Zahir Z (2006) Phytohormones. In: Biological approaches to sustainable soil systems. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 207–220
Liu Y, Lam MC, Fang HHP (2001) Adsorption of heavy metals by EPS of activated sludge. Water Sci Technol 43:59–66
Mabrouk Y, Belhadj O (2012) Enhancing the biological nitrogen fixation of leguminous crops grown under stressed environments. Afr J Biotechnol 11:10809–10815
Maillet F, Poinsot V, Andre O, Puech-Pages V, Haouy A, Gueunier M, Cromer L, Giraudet D, Formey D, Niebel A et al (2011) Fungal lipochitooligosaccharide symbiotic signals in arbuscular mycorrhiza. Nature 469:58–63
Mishra RP, Singh RK, Jaiswal HK, Kumar V, Maurya S (2006) Rhizobium-mediated induction of phenolics and plant growth promotion in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Curr Microbiol 52:383–389
Mondy S, Lenglet A, Beury-Cirou A, Libanga C, Ratet P, Faure D, Dessaux Y (2014) An increasing opine carbon bias in artificial exudation systems and genetically modified plant rhizospheres leads to an increasing reshaping of bacterial populations. Mol Ecol 23:4846–4861
Mus F, Crook MB, Garcia K, Costas AG, Geddes BA, Kouri ED, Paramasivan P, Ryu MH, Oldroyd GE, Poole PS, Udvardi MK (2016) Symbiotic nitrogen fixation and the challenges to its extension to nonlegumes. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:3698–3710
Naamala J, Jaiswal SK, Dakora FD (2016) Microsymbiont diversity and phylogeny of native Bradyrhizobia associated with soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) nodulation in South African soils. Syst Appl Microbiol 39:336–344
Naveed M, Mehboob I, Hussain MB, Zahir ZA (2015) Perspectives of rhizobial inoculation for sustainable crop production. In: Plant microbes symbiosis: applied facets. Springer, India, pp 209–239
Oger P, Petit A, Dessaux Y (1997) Genetically engineered plants producing opines alter their biological environment. Nat Biotechnol 15:369–372
Özkoç İ, Deliveli MH (2001) In vitro inhibition of the mycelial growth of some root rot fungi by Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar phaseoli isolates. Turk J Biol 25:435–445
Pajuelo E, Rodríguez-Llorente ID, Lafuente A, Caviedes MÁ (2011) Legume–rhizobium symbioses as a tool for bioremediation of heavy metal polluted soils. In: Biomanagement of metal-contaminated soils. Springer, Netherlands, pp 95–123
Panigrahi DP, Randhawa GS (2010) A novel method to alleviate arsenic toxicity in alfalfa plants using a deletion mutant strain of Sinorhizobium meliloti. Plant Soil 336:459–467
Parniske M (2000) Intracellular accommodation of microbes by plants: a common developmental program for symbiosis and disease? Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:320–328
Peoples MB, Herridge DF, Ladha JK (1995) Biological nitrogen fixation: an efficient source of nitrogen for sustainable agricultural production? Plant Soil 174:3–28
Perrine-Walker FM, Gartner E, Hocart CH, Becker A, Rolfe BG (2007) Rhizobium-initiated rice growth inhibition caused by nitric oxide accumulation. Mol Plant Microb Interact 20:283–292
Porcel R, Ruiz-Lozano JM (2004) Arbuscular mycorrhizal influence on leaf water potential, solute accumulation, and oxidative stress in soybean plants subjected to drought stress. J Exp Bot 55:1743–1750
Reitz M, Oger P, Meyer A, Niehaus K, Farrand SK, Hallmann J, Sikora RA (2002) Importance of the O-antigen, core-region and lipid A of rhizobial lipopolysaccharides for the induction of systemic resistance in potato to Globodera pallida. Nematol 4:73–79
Remans R, Ramaekers L, Schelkens S, Hernandez G, Garcia A, Reyes JL, Mendez N, Toscano V, Mulling M, Galvez L, Vanderleyden J (2008) Effect of Rhizobium–Azospirillum coinoculation on nitrogen fixation and yield of two contrasting Phaseolus vulgaris L. genotypes cultivated across different environments in Cuba. Plant Soil 312:25–37
Requena N, Perez-Solis E, Azcón-Aguilar C, Jeffries P, Barea JM (2001) Management of indigenous plant-microbe symbioses aids restoration of desertified ecosystems. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:495–498
Romdhane SB, Trabelsi M, Aouani ME, De Lajudie P, Mhamdi R (2009) The diversity of rhizobia nodulating chickpea (Cicer arietinum) under water deficiency as a source of more efficient inoculants. Soil Biol Biochem 41:2568–2572
Rubio LM, Ludden PW (2008) Biosynthesis of the iron-molybdenum cofactor of nitrogenase. Annu Rev Microbiol 62:93–111
Ruiz-Lozano JM (2003) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and alleviation of osmotic stress. New perspectives for molecular studies. Mycorrhiza 13:309–317
Sandhya VZ, Grover M, Reddy G, Venkateswarlu B (2009) Alleviation of drought stress effects in sunflower seedlings by the exopolysaccharides producing Pseudomonas putida strain GAP-P45. Biol Fertil Soil 46:17–26
Savka MA, Farrand SK (1997) Modification of rhizobacterial populations by engineering bacterium utilization of a novel plant-produced resource. Nat Biotechnol 15:363–368
Siddiqui IA, Ehteshamul-Haque S, Zaki MJ, Ghaffar A (2000) Effect of urea on the efficacy of Bradyrhizobium sp. and Trichoderma harzianum in the control of root infecting fungi in mungbean and sunflower. Sarhad J Agric 16:403–406
Soliman AS, Shanan NT, Massoud ON, Swelim DM (2012) Improving salinity tolerance of Acacia saligna (Labill.) plant by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium inoculation. Afr J Biotechnol 11:1259–1266
Sriprang R, Hayashi M, Yamashita M, Ono H, Saeki K, Murooka Y (2002) A novel bioremediation system for heavy metals using the symbiosis between leguminous plant and genetically engineered rhizobia. J Biotechnol 99:279–293
Sriprang R, Hayashi M, Ono H, Takagi M, Hirata K, Murooka Y (2003) Enhanced accumulation of Cd2+ by a Mesorhizobium sp. transformed with a gene from Arabidopsis thaliana coding for phytochelatin synthase. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:1791–1796
Sutherland IW (2001) Exo-polysaccharides in biofilms, flocs and related structure. Water Sci Technol 43:77–86
Talaat El-Saidi M, Ali AM (1993) Growing different field crops under high salinity levels and utilization of genetically engineered Rhizobia and Azotobacter salt drought tolerant strains. Towards the rational use of high salinity tolerant plants. Part of the Tasks for vegetation science book series (TAVS), vol 28, pp 59–65
Wani PA, Khan MS, Zaidi A (2007) Synergistic effects of the inoculation with nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilizing rhizobacteria on the performance of field-grown chickpea. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 170:283–287
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vaishnav, A., Hansen, A.P., Agrawal, P.K., Varma, A., Choudhary, D.K. (2017). Biotechnological Perspectives of Legume–Rhizobium Symbiosis. In: Hansen, A., Choudhary, D., Agrawal, P., Varma, A. (eds) Rhizobium Biology and Biotechnology. Soil Biology, vol 50. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64982-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64982-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-64981-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-64982-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)