Abstract
A new paradigm with a considerable influence on the industrial value creation is begun to evolve. Industry 4.0 represents the development to the fourth industrial revolution. A new shift in business and technology trends is confirmed. With this new paradigm of high-tech industry, supply chains will develop into highly adaptive networks. Lean and Green supply chain management should have better opportunities to be performed, becoming more efficient and competitive. The aim of this study is to link the lean and green supply chain characteristics to the Industry 4.0. This paper has twofold: first, presents an overview of the phenomenon Industry 4.0 and the lean and green supply chain management. Next, a conceptual model is developed which incorporates the Industry 4.0 topics to the well-known lean and green supply chain. This paper provides an understanding of the role of lean and green paradigms in the new era of industrialization.
Access provided by CONRICYT-eBooks. Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Today we face a new paradigm introduced by Germany in 2011, the Industry 4.0. This represents the beginning of the fourth industrial revolution and is driven by modern information and communication technology (ICT) [21, 26, 27]. By Industry 4.0 intends the optimization of value chains by implementing an autonomously controlled and dynamic production [21], through a full automation and digitalization processes. This paradigm is based on the idea that communication via internet allows a continuous exchange of information applying cyber-physical systems (CPS) [27, 30]. The CPS provides the source for the creation of internet of things and services and their combination makes possible the Industry 4.0 [15, 27]. CPS integrates networking, computation and physical processes and take them together to create a global value chain networked [15, 27, 30].
According to [34] to establish the global value chain networks, the Industry 4.0 describes a production oriented CPS that integrates production facilities, warehousing and logistics systems and even social requirements. In addition, Germany Trade & Invest (GTAI) [15] mention that the industrial value chain, product life cycles and business information technology combination must integrate the processes from the product design to production, supply chain management, aftermarket service and training [15]. An intelligent factory is in development and is coined as smart factory. With this concept, others appear and are important for the establishment of implementation of Industry 4.0, as for example smart products, smart manufacturing and smart data.
The authors [27] mentioned that this implementation is still in progress. That’s why it is important to understand the role of lean and green supply chain management in Industry 4.0. For example, the lean waste would be recognized with the smart factory implementation [28]. The resource efficiency which is a lean and green concept, are in the focus of the design of smart factories [27]. This study intends to understand if the Industry 4.0 allows the lean and green supply chains concepts become more important. That is, if it enables more easily the deployment of lean and green characteristics. A number of characteristics were presented on model, namely: (i) manufacturing, (ii) logistics and supply, (iii) product and process design, (iv) product, (v) customer, (vi) supplier, (vii) employee, (viii) information sharing and (ix) energy.
The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: in Sect. 2, a theoretical background on Industry 4.0 and lean and green supply chain are presented; in Sect. 3, a combination between lean and green supply chain and Industry 4.0 is developed; Finally, some concluding remarks are drawn.
2 Industry 4.0 Paradigm
The Industry 4.0 is considered the paradigm of the fourth stage of industrialization and describes a vision of future production [21, 30]. The core idea of Industry 4.0 is the integration and application of information and communication technologies to implement Internet of Things and Services so that business process and engineering process are deeply integrated making an environment intelligent [28, 34]. The concept of industry 4.0 which represents the integration of the virtual and physical worlds in a way that together create a truly networked environment and where intelligent objects communicate and interact with each other, is a Cyber-physical systems [15]. According to [19] the Industry 4.0 “will involve the technical integration of CPS into manufacturing and logistics and the use of the Internet of Things and Services in industrial processes. This will have implications for value creation, business models, downstream services and work organization.”
The Industry 4.0 is represented by three features [19, 30, 34]: (i) horizontal integration across the entire value networks; (ii) vertical integration and networked manufacturing system; and (iii) end-to-end digital integration of engineering across the entire value chain or product life cycle.
The horizontal integration across the entire value network refers to the integration of the various systems used in the different stages of the manufacturing and business planning processes that involve an exchange of materials, energy and information both within a company as logistics, production, and marketing, and between several different companies; The idea is that information, material and money can flow easily among different companies creating new value networks as well as business models. This can result in an efficient ecosystem [19, 30, 34].
The vertical integration refers to the integration of the various information and physical systems at the different hierarchical levels, as for example the production management, manufacturing and execution, and corporate planning. This integration is inside a factory to create flexible and reconfigurable manufacturing system [19, 30, 34].
The goal of the horizontal and vertical integration is to deliver an end-to-end solution. The end-to-end solution refers to the digital integration of engineering across the entire value chain to support product customization: from the raw material acquisition to manufacturing product, and product in use and in the end of life [19, 30, 34].
Through these features, the Industry 4.0 expects to implement an environment more flexible, efficient, and sustainable. The idea is to individualize the customer requirements, as a customized product through a mass customization, improving productivity and achieving higher levels of quality with a manufactured profitably result [6, 19]. Indeed, by applying advanced information and communication technologies and systems in the manufacturing and supply chain operations, the industry 4.0 addresses the smart factory [28]. Smart factory is designed according to sustainable and business practices, insisting upon, flexibility, adaptability and self-adaptability, learning characteristics, fault tolerance, and risk management [15]. Therefore, standards are essential to ensure the exchange of data between machines, systems and software and guarantee that product moves within a network value chain [6].
That is, high levels of automation come as standard [15]. Automation systems, manufacturing and product management are integrated and are the base of the smart factory [6]. Manufacturers can now add sensors and microchips to tools, materials, machines, vehicles and buildings to communicate with each other in real-time to make smart products [15].
According to [36], “products know their histories and their routes, and thereby not only greatly simplify the logistic chain but also form the basis for product life cycle data memories”. Also, the products can be manufactured because smart factory is being supplied with energy from smart grids [30].
Not only smart factory and smart product were defined in this new industrialized era. Others concepts connected to them are considered in the literature. For their work development, Kolberg and Zuhlke [21] considered four different smart concepts to define the smart factory, namely, smart planned, smart product and smart machine, and smart operators. The authors [30] make mention of the smart grid, smart logistics and smart data. Sanders et al. [28] mention others concepts as the smart systems, smart environment, smart machine and smart devices, and smart task. Table 1 compiles several concepts of Industry 4.0.
Through the integration of the industry concepts and technologies it should be possible provide a customized or individualized product or service and at the same time be highly adaptive to demand changes [15]. These changes must be made on all stages of product life cycle: design phase, raw material acquisition phase, manufacturing phase, logistics and supply phase, and the use and end of life phases [15, 30]. Therefore, the requirements for design and operations of our factories become crucial for the success [36].
3 Lean and Green Supply Chain Paradigms
Nowadays, lean and green supply chain is an integrated approach; they have different objectives and principles but they complement each other [7, 9, 10, 12,13,14, 31]. Lean supply chain is about to increase value for customers by adding product or service features, with the elimination of waste or non-value steps along the value chain [11]. Green supply chain regards to reducing environmental impacts and risks while improve ecological efficiency of the organizations and their partners, and try to achieve corporate profit and market share objectives [35].
These two paradigms are often seen as compatible because of their joint focus on waste reduction [5]. Lean paradigm is concerning to the elimination of waste in every area of design, manufacturing, and supplier network and factory management [13]. The basic forms on the reduction and elimination of waste are [17]: production, waiting, transportation, unnecessary inventory, inappropriate processing, defects and unnecessary motions. One more waste is pointed by [31] as the unused employee creativity. Green considers ways to eliminate waste from the environment’s perspective [11]. The waste generation have the form of [16]: Greenhouse gases, eutrophication, excessive resource usage, excessive water usage, excessive power usage, pollution, rubbish and poor health and safety. In their research [12] mention that the two paradigms have the same type of wastes: (i) inventory; (ii) transportation, and (iii) the production of by-product or non-product output. According to [5] the removal of non-value adding activities suggested by lean paradigm can provide substantial energy savings which integrates the principles of green paradigm.
The combination of lean and green supply chain practices have better results than the total from the implementation of each, but separately [12]. The two paradigms have similar characteristics. According to [4] both paradigm practice contribute for: (i) the increase of information frequency, (ii) the increase of the level of integration in supply chain, (iii) the decrease of production and transportation lead time, (iv) the reduction in the supply chain capacity buffers; (v) and the decrease of inventory levels. Another practice that contributes for the better employ and use of all tools is the involvement of the employees [12]. Both paradigms look into how to integrate product and process redesign in order to prolong product use, to allow easily the recycling or re-use of products, and to make processes with less wasteful [12]. In the supply chain both paradigms ask for a closed collaboration with partners [22]. In addition, waste reduction, lead time reduction, and use of techniques and approaches to manage people, organizations, and supply chain relations are synergies mention by [13].
Commitments must be made within factory, supplier network and customer, for the better deployment of lean and green practices in way to achieve the best supply chain efficiency. In the authors previous study [11] it was presented a table comparing the different characteristics between lean and green. Others important studies [3, 4, 12, 18, 22] were inspire for the development of a comparison between lean and green paradigms. Several lean and green supply chain characteristics are considered in Table 2.
4 Combining Industry 4.0 and Lean and Green Supply Chain
The future must become leaner in organization accurately in planning and technology [36]. The authors [21] mentioned that the paradigm Industry 4.0 solutions not only can be integrated in lean manufacturing but can be beyond that improve lean manufacturing. Also Sanders et al. [28] considered that industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing can be integrated to achieve a successful production management. However, they are not mutually exclusive [28].
Definitely, several researches mention the benefits of the integration of lean and green in different stages of the company or the supply chain [1, 9, 12, 13, 20]. Kainuma and Tawara [20] studied the lean and green supply chain incorporating there cycling or re-use during the life cycle of products and services. It represents the different phases of a product life cycle, consisting in [20]: (i) the acquisition of the raw material, (ii) the manufacturing, (iii) the distribution, (iv) the retailer, (v) the use, (vi) the collection, (vii) the transportation, (viii) the dismantling and (ix) the decomposition.
Stock and Seliger [30] presented the opportunities for the realization of a sustainable manufacturing in the Industry 4.0. For them the life cycle (in the end-to-end solution) consists in different phases [30]: (i) the raw material acquisition, (ii) the manufacturing, (iii) the transport (between all phases), (iv) the use and the service phase, and (v) the end-of-life phase (containing the reuse, remanufacturing, recycling, recovery and disposal). In addition, the environmental/green dimension of the sustainability is better considered because the allocation of resources as products, materials, energy and water can be realized in a more efficient way [30]. The adoption of smart energy systems facilitates the energy use [23].
In fact energy models would assist the analysis of green factory designs, especially for evaluating alternatives during early design stages [25]. The design of lean and green supply chain, special in the early design stages for the products and the processes is a very important issue for the elimination of waste. In a lean and green environment [7] mention that “eliminating the use of toxics through product or process re-design could mean reduced worker health and safety risks, reduced risks to consumers and lower risk of product safety recalls and reducing process wastes in manufacturing often find more opportunities to reduce waste throughout the life cycle of the product, thereby having a possible domino effect on the entire supply chain”. Industry 4.0 is in line with these ideas. According to [27], Industry 4.0 processes will change the entire supply chains, from suppliers to logistics and to the life cycle management of a product. It helps to streamline the process, with more transparency and flexibility.
Lean and green supply chain requires manufacturing technologies to make processes and products more environmentally responsible [22]. In addition they ask for a flexible information system [17]. The technology is a driver of the Industry 4.0 [15, 34]. With smart technologies which include the use of electronics and information technologies [27] will help the implementation of a more efficient lean and green supply chain.
Also the collaboration with suppliers which is a lean and green characteristic is considered by Industry 4.0. Through a better communication mechanisms, with a high compatibility issues of hardware and software which should required standardized interfaces, and synchronisation of data, allow that lean and green suppliers get better synchronisation with manufacturers [28, 32].
The author [14] concludes that lean and green “is an effective tool to improve processes and reduce costs, by not only reducing non-value-added activities but also physical waste created by systems”. Industry 4.0 is in line with this statement due this paradigm make all but in a better way, more sustainable, faster and efficient. According to [21] lean allows the organizations to be more standardized, transparent and having only the essential work which result in an organization less complex and support the installation of industry 4.0 processes and solutions. The green also support the implementation of the Industry 4.0 due it allows to reduce the negative environmental impacts.
The customer type is a concern in the lean and green supply chain. Of course that lean and green aim is to satisfy the customer needs, but this satisfaction is relative to: in the lean paradigm is based on cost and lead time reduction [9] and in the green paradigm is based on helping customers to being more environmentally friendly [13]. The Industry 4.0 will go to improve in this subject. It allows a better understanding of the customer needs and allows the immediate sharing of the demand data throughout complex supply chains [15]. According to [27] with the full automation and digitalization systems, it allows an individual customer-oriented adaptation of products that will increase the value added for organizations and customers. Customers instead of choose from a fixed product spectrum set by the manufacturer, they will be able to individually combine single functions and components and define their own product [15].
Another characteristic of lean and green supply chain is the employee involvement and empowerment [12]. According to [8] employee commitment and motivation, and employee empowerment and participation are elements of lean and green organization. Also [24] mention that connections between lean and green practices are shown through: (i) employee involvement, (ii) learning by doing, (iii) continuous improvement, and (iv) problem-solving tools. [36] mention that lean means reducing complexity, avoiding waste and strictly supporting the employees in their daily work. Also the reduction of environment impacts improves the health and safety of employees [31]. These aspects are in line of what is an employee in the four industrial revolution. Indeed, employees may find greater autonomy and more interesting or less arduous work [6]. Industry 4.0 needs employees not only with creativity and decision-making skills, encountered as a lean and green supply chain characteristic, as well as technical and ICT expertise [6].
There are in literature some studies that try to make the bridge between lean paradigm and green paradigm with Industry 4.0. [28] used 10 lean concepts in their research in way to validated for attainability through Industry 4.0 paradigm. Kolberg and Zühlke [21] described the lean automation and Industry 4.0 and give an overview of the links between them. [30] present an overview of sustainable manufacturing with the future requirements of Industry 4.0. Figure 1 illustrates an attempt to link lean and green supply chain characteristics to Industry 4.0 concepts.
5 Conclusion
Today, the term Industry 4.0 describes a vision of future of the supply chains. There is a strong conviction that the definition of lean and green supply chain will not disappear, it will be evolve and adapt to the new trends that the new industrial era will require. Lean and green supply chain is focussed on organization and in the flow of information, material and money between partners. That is, more directed to physical processes and less for virtual and technology. Even so there are in literature some examples that try to make the bridge between lean paradigm or green paradigm with Industry 4.0. This paper bridges the gap between the well-known lean and green supply chain management and the new era of industrial revolution.
A conceptual model was developed linking the lean and green supply chain characteristics to the Industry 4.0 concepts. Several characteristics were presented on model, namely: (i) manufacturing, (ii) logistics and supply, (iii) product and process design, (iv) product, (v) customer, (vi) supplier, (vii) employee, (viii) information sharing and (ix) energy. Those who understand the relationships between these two topics will have a greater chance of influencing their supply chains into a source of competitive advantage and help in a better way on the deployment of the Industry 4.0 paradigm.
Future research is needed. Understand which lean and green characteristics are more important for the development of Industry 4.0 is required. It would be also beneficial to understand the priority between characteristics on the implementation of this new paradigm and in different entities in the supply chain. Industry 4.0 will be a step forward for the effectiveness and competitiveness of the lean and green supply chains.
References
Azevedo SG, Carvalho H et al (2012) Influence of green and lean upstream supply chain management practices on business sustainability. IEEE Trans Eng Manage 59(4):753–765
Bortolotti T, Boscari S, Danese P (2015) Successful lean implementation: organizational culture and soft lean practices. Int J Prod Econ 160(12):182–201
Carvalho H, Azevedo SG, Cruzmachado V (2010) Supply chain performance management: lean and green paradigms. Int J Bus Perform Supply Chain Model 2(3):304–333
Carvalho H, Duarte S, Machado VC (2011) Lean, agile, resilient and green: divergencies and synergies. Int J Lean Six Sigma 2(2):151–179
Carvalho H, Azevedo S, Cruz-Machado V (2014) Trade-offs among lean, agile, resilient and green paradigms in supply chain management: a case study approach. Lect Notes Electr Eng 242:953–968
Davis R (2015) Industry 4.0, digitalisation for productivity and growth. European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), Members’ Research Service, European Union
Dhingra R, Kress R, Upreti G (2014) Does lean mean green? J Cleaner Prod 85:1–7
Duarte S, Cruz-Machado V (2013) Lean and green: a business model framework. Lect Notes Electr Eng 185:751–759
Duarte S, Cruz-Machado V (2013) Modelling lean and green: a review from business models. Int J Lean Six Sigma 4(3):228–250
Duarte S, Cruz-Machado V (2015) Investigating lean and green supply chain linkages through a balanced scorecard framework. Int J Manage Sci Eng Manage 10(1):20–29
Duarte S, Machado VC (2011) Manufacturing paradigms in supply chain management. Int J Manage Sci Eng Manage 6(5):328–342
Dües CM, Tan KH, Ming L (2013) Green as the new lean: how to use lean practices as a catalyst to greening your supply chain. J Cleaner Prod 40(2):93–100
Garzareyes J (2014) Lean and green-synergies, differences, limitations, and the need for six sigma. IFIP Adv Inf Commun Technol 439:71–81
Garzareyes JA (2015) Green lean and the need for six sigma. Int J Lean Six Sigma 6(3):226–248
Germany Trade & Invest (GTAI) (2014) Industry 4.0-Smart Manufacturing for the future. Germany Trade and Invest
Hines P (2009) Lean and Green, 3rd edn. Sapartner, New York
Jasti NVK, Kodali R (2015) Lean production: literature review and trends. Int J Prod Res 53(3):867–885
Johansson G, Winroth M (2009) Lean vs. green manufacturing: Similarities and differences. In: International euroma conference: implementation - realizing operations management knowledge
Kagermann H, Helbig J et al (2013) Recommendations for implementing the strategic initiative german industrie 4.0. final report of the industrie 4.0 working group. Technical report, Forschungsunion
Kainuma Y, Tawara N (2006) A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply chain management. Int J Prod Econ 101(1):99–108
Kolberg D, Zühlke D (2015) Lean automation enabled by industry 4.0 technologies. IFAC Papers Online 48(3):1870–1875
Mollenkopf D, Stolze H et al (2010) Green, lean, and global supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Log Manage 40(1/2):14–41
Noppers EH, Keizer K et al (2016) The importance of instrumental, symbolic, and environmental attributes for the adoption of smart energy systems. Energy Policy 98:12–18
Pampanelli AB, Found P, Bernardes AM (2014) A lean & green model for a production cell. J Cleaner Prod 85:19–30
Prabhu VV, Jeon HW, Taisch M (2012) Modeling green factory physics - an analytical approach. In: IEEE international conference on automation science and engineering, pp 46–51
Qin J, Liu Y, Grosvenor R (2016) A categorical framework of manufacturing for industry 4.0 and beyond. Procedia Cirp 52:173–178
Roblek V, Me\(\check{s}\)ko M, Krape\(\check{z}\) A (2016) A complex view of industry 4.0. Sage Open 6
Sanders A, Elangeswaran C, Wulfsberg J (2016) Industry 4.0 implies lean manufacturing: research activities in industry 4.0 function as enablers for lean manufacturing. J Ind Eng Manage 9(3):811
Shrouf F, Ordieres J, Miragliotta G (2014) Smart factories in industry 4.0: A review of the concept and of energy management approached in production based on the internet of things paradigm. In: IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, pp 697–701
Stock T, Seliger G (2016) Opportunities of sustainable manufacturing in industry 4.0. Procedia Cirp 40:536–541
Verrier B, Rose B, Caillaud E (2015) Lean and green strategy: the lean and green house and maturity deployment model. J Cleaner Prod 116:150–156
Veza I, Mladineo M, Gjeldum N (2016) Selection of the basic lean tools for development of croatian model of innovative smart enterprise. Tehnicki Vjesnik 23(5):1317–1324
Vonderembse MA, Uppal M et al (2006) Designing supply chains: towards theory development. Int J Prod Econ 100(100):223–238
Wang S, Wan J et al (2016) (2016), Implementing smart factory of industrie 4.0: an outlook. Int J Distrib Sensor Netw 4:1–10
Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai KH (2008) Confirmation of a measurement model for green supply chain management practices implementation. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):261–273
Zuehlke D (2010) Smartfactory-towards a factory-of-things. Annu Rev Control 34(1):129–138
Acknowledgements
Authors would like to acknowledge to UNIDEMI–Research and Development Unit for Mechanical and Industrial Engineering (UID/EMS/00667/2013).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Duarte, S., Cruz-Machado, V. (2018). Exploring Linkages Between Lean and Green Supply Chain and the Industry 4.0. In: Xu, J., Gen, M., Hajiyev, A., Cooke, F. (eds) Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. ICMSEM 2017. Lecture Notes on Multidisciplinary Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59280-0_103
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59280-0_103
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-59279-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-59280-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)