Abstract
In this chapter the main trends in entrepreneurial dynamics and development of entrepreneurial environment in Slovakia over the last 5 years are analyzed. Generally, entrepreneurship in Slovakia is characterized by relatively high levels of entrepreneurial activity throughout all its types and phases of the entrepreneurial process. However, the overall high activity is unevenly distributed across age groups and genders. Thus, a specific attention in this chapter is also paid to inclusivity of entrepreneurship, with the main focus on disadvantaged groups such as women, youth, and seniors. Also, entrepreneurial environment in the country, despite some favorable conditions, shows generally insufficient support of entrepreneurial activity. Moreover, societal attitudes and cultural and social norms related to entrepreneurship do not stimulate but rather inhibit individuals from engagement in entrepreneurial efforts. In the following paragraphs, we provide a closer analysis of the abovementioned trends and develop recommendations for policy makers to tackle them.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Independent entrepreneurial activity is measured through total early-stage entrepreneurial activity—TEA—established business ownership rate, and discontinuation rate.
- 2.
Motivational index = necessity-driven entrepreneurs/improvement-driven entrepreneurs.
- 3.
Innovation = percentage from TEA or established entrepreneurs at which these entrepreneurs introduce product or services that are new to some or all customers and that are offered by a few or no competitors.
- 4.
Internationalization = percentage of entrepreneurs who report that 25% or less of their sales come from outside their economy (reverse item).
- 5.
EEA = percentage of employees from population or total employees who in the past 3 years were actively involved in and had a leading role in either the idea development for a new activity or the preparation and implementation of a new activity in organization.
- 6.
Inclusivity index = TEA or EB within each cohort (women, youth, seniors)/TEA or EB of the overall adult population.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
Alvaréz, S., & Barney, S. (2007). Discovery and creation. Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26.
Amaro da Luz, H. (2014). The “inclusive entrepreneurship”: Empowerment, social change and innovation strategies of the social economy. Proceedings from the conference The Welfare State in Portugal in the Age of Austerity.
Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247.
Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.
Business Environment Index. (2016). Business Alliance of Slovakia (BAS). Accessed May 13, 2016, from http://alianciapas.sk/category/pravidelne_aktivity/index_podnikatelskeho_prostredia/
Coulter, M. K. (2001). Entrepreneurship in action. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dew, N., et al. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making. Differences between experts and novices. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 287–309.
European Commission. (2016). 2016 SBA fact sheet—Slovakia. European Commission. Accessed December 19, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/20302/attachments/31/translations/en/renditions/native
Gaglio, C. M., & Katz, J. A. (2001). The psychological basis of opportunity identification: Entrepreneurial alertness. Small Business Economics, 16(2), 95–111.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture’s consequences: International differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (Rev. 3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Holienka, M. (2015). Entrepreneurial environment in Slovakia: Multi-perspective comparison with innovation-driven economies. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34, 437–444.
Kelley, D., et al. (2013). Global entrepreneurship monitor 2012 women’s report. London: GERA.
Kwon, S., & Arenius, P. (2010). Nations of entrepreneurs: A social capital perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(3), 315–330.
Nielsen, S. L., et al. (2012). Entrepreneurship in theory and practice. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pilkova, A., et al. (2014). Podnikanie na Slovensku: aktivita, inkluzivita, prostredie. Bratislava: Univerzita Komenskeho v Bratislave, Fakulta managementu.
Schwab, K. (2015). The global competitiveness report 2015–2016. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Shane, S. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. The Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency under the contract No. APVV-14-0647.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pilkova, A., Holienka, M. (2017). Entrepreneurship Development in Slovakia. In: Sauka, A., Chepurenko, A. (eds) Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies. Societies and Political Orders in Transition. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57342-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57342-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57341-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57342-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)