Abstract
The chapter of Markus Kotzur examines solidarity as a legal concept. Whereas the Treaty of Lisbon contains manifold references to the notion of solidarity, Kotzur argues that a precise meaning of or conceptual framework for this notion is anything but clear. The question of which overall expectations, moral obligations, political assumptions and normative forces can be attributed to “solidarity” needs, therefore, to be addressed. Against this backdrop, the chapter aims, firstly, to introduce conceptual approaches to solidarity on the national, regional and international planes; secondly, to identify text-based legal substantiations of solidarity within the EU and beyond; and, finally, to frame solidarity as a constitutional paradigm. In doing so, the paper follows a leitmotif once expressed by Jacques Delors in the saying “solidarity mechanisms are not based on pure generosity, but on enlightened self-interest”.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
As to the Union’s value orientation R. Geiger, in: id./D.-E. Khan/M. Kotzur, European Union Treaties. A Commentary, 2015, Art. 2 TEU para 1 et subsequent.
- 3.
The following reflections on solidarity are partly based upon Kotzur and Schmalenbach (2014, pp. 68).
- 4.
See Theresa May’s Brexit-Speech on Jan. 17, 2017: “A little over six months ago, the British people voted for change. They voted to shape a brighter future for our country. They voted to leave the European Union and embrace the world” (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/full-text-theresa-may-brexit-speech-global-britain-eu-european-union-latest-a7531361.html, last visit on Jan. 19, 2017).
- 5.
Christopoulos and Souvlis (2016).
- 6.
Wiener (2014).
- 7.
Schmalenbach, et al. (2016) and below footnote 16.
- 8.
Häberle (1990, pp. 35).
- 9.
É. Durkheim, De la division du travail social, 1893; see A. v. Bogdandy, Opening Address, in: R. Wolfrum/Ch. Kojima (eds.), Solidarity: A Structural Principle of International Law, 2010, pp. 1 at 1.
- 10.
For reference see ibidem.
- 11.
Giddens (2007, p. 112).
- 12.
Krüger (1971, pp. 249).
- 13.
U. Haltern, Finalität, in: v. Bogdandy/Bast, Europäisches Verfassungsrecht, 2nd ed. 2009, pp. 279 at 323 (with reference to ICJ, case C-184/99—Grzelczyk, ibidem para 44).
- 14.
D. Senghaas, Weltinnenpolitik—Ansätze für ein Konzept, in: Europaarchiv 1992, pp. 643 speaks of a global “Schicksalsgemeinschaft” (p. 646 and subsequent).
- 15.
Mavelli and Wilson (2016).
- 16.
Weiler (2000).
- 17.
Ross (2010, p. 23).
- 18.
Wellens and R. St. J. Macdonald (2005); Wellens (2010); for further orientation: Volkmann (1998); aus der (europarechtlichen) Literatur A. v. Bogdandy, Europäische Prinzipienlehre, in: ders. (ed.), Europäisches Verfassungsrecht, Berlin u. a. 2003, 149 ff., 182 ff.; vorher bereits Ch. Tomuschat, Solidarität in Europa, in: Capotorti u. a. (ed.), Liber Amicorum P. Pescatore, Baden-Baden 1987, S. 729 ff.; R. Bieber, Solidarität als Verfassungsprinzip, in: v. Bogdandy/Kadelbach (ed.), Solidarität und Europäische Integration, München 2002, 38 ff.
- 19.
http://www.uni-salzburg.at/portal/page?_pageid=465,1835853&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL (last visit May 15, 2016).
- 20.
A term introduced by K. Popper in his famous 1945 work on “The Open Society and its Enemies”.
- 21.
D. Campanelli, Solidarity, Principle of, in: MPEIL 2012 para 5; in general U. Volkmann, Solidarität—Programm und Prinzip der Verfassung, 1998, pp. 52.
- 22.
Ibidem.
- 23.
Wellens (2010, pp. 3 at 4); M. Virally, Le rôle des “principes” dans le développement du droit international, in: Recueil d’études de droit international en hommage à Paul Guggenheim, 1968, pp. 531 at 542/543; more generally J. E. Viñuales, ‘The Secret of Tomorrow’: International Organization through the Eyes of Michel Virally, in: he European Journal of International Law Vol. 23 (2012), pp. 543.
- 24.
Peters (2006, pp. 579 at 601).
- 25.
Ross (2010, pp. 23).
- 26.
Wolfrum, (2006, pp. 1087).
- 27.
Ross (2010, pp. 23).
- 28.
Wellens (2010, pp. 3 at 4).
- 29.
- 30.
R. Geiger, in: id./D.-E. Khan/M. Kotzur, European Union Treaties. A Commentary, 2015, Art. 2 TEU para 4; Ch. Calliess, Europa als Wertegemeinschaft—Integration und Identität durch europäisches Verfassungsrecht?, JZ 2004, pp. 1033; Ch. Mandry, Europa als Wertegemeinschaft, 2009.
- 31.
On the current debate, see the examples discussed in: A. Héritier (ed.), Common Goods: Reinventing European and International Governance, 2002.
- 32.
On the humankind orientation of Kantian legal theory: I. Kant, Metaphysik der Sitten, 1797, Einleitung in die Metaphysik der Sitten. For Kant it is the quality of being part of humankind that gives the individual his or her inalienable freedom. However, already for Kant the personal freedom of the individual was in practical need for an “allgemeines Gesetz” that could harmonize the spheres of freedom of the various individuals: “Tritt in einen Zustand, worin Jedermann das Seine gegen jeden Anderen gesichert sein kann”, the so-called “Lex iustitiae”, ibid. Eintheilung der Rechtslehre, lit. A.
- 33.
- 34.
Smith (2008).
- 35.
- 36.
E. Regelsberger/D. Kugelmann, in: R. Streinz (ed.), EUV/AEUV, 2nd ed. 2012, Art. 31 TEU para 6.
- 37.
Myrdal and Rhinard (2010); J. Wouters/S. Bijlmakers/K. Meuwissen, The EU as a Multilateral Security Actor after Lisbon: Constitutional and Institutional Aspects, Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, Working Paper no. 80, February 2012, pp. 9; in general S. v. Kielmannsegg, Die Verteidigungspolitik der Europäischen Union, 2005.
- 38.
Kotzur (2015).
- 39.
See, e.g., U. Häde, Die Wirtschafts- und Währungsunion im Vertrag von Lissabon, EuR 2009, pp. 200; id., Haushaltsdisziplin und Solidarität im Zeichen der Finanzkrise, EuZW 2009, pp. 399.
- 40.
J. F. Braun, EU Energy Policy under the Treaty of Lisbon Rules: Between a new policy and business as usual, in: Politics and Institutions, EPIN Working Papers, No. 31/2011.
- 41.
For the general scope of EU disaster preparedness, disaster response and civil protection, see also the Statements of the Commission, e.g. COM (2010) 600 final.
- 42.
Myrdal and Rhinard (2010, p. 6).
- 43.
- 44.
- 45.
Lüder (2009, pp. 251).
- 46.
Biscop (2005, p. 124).
- 47.
Hatje (2001, pp. 16).
- 48.
Weiler (1991).
- 49.
- 50.
Konstantinides (2011, p. 7).
- 51.
Slaughter (2005, pp. 619).
- 52.
Already a classic is C.W. Jenks, The Common Law of Mankind, London, 1958; more recently Antônio A. Cançado Trindade, International Law for Humankind: Towards a New Jus Gentium, 2010.
- 53.
Delors (2012).
References
Biscop, S. (2005). The European security strategy: A global agenda for positive power (p. 124). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Christopoulos, D., & Souvlis, G. (2016). Europe’s solidarity crisis: A perspective from Greece. Last visit January 19, 2017, from https://roarmag.org/essays/europe-refugee-solidarity-crisis-greece/
Delors, J. (2012). In S. Fernandes & E. Rubio (Eds.), Solidarity within the Eurozone: How much, what for, for how long? Report by Notre Europe. Retrieved May 16, 2012, from http://www.notre-europe.eu/uploads/tx_publication/SolidarityEMU_S.Fernandes-E.Rubio_NE_Feb2012.pdf
Giddens, A. (2007). Europe in the global age (p. 112). Cambridge: Polity.
Giegerich, T., Gstrein, O. J., & Zeitman, S. (Eds.). (2014). The EU between “an ever closer union” and inalienable policy domains of member states. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Häberle, P. (1990). 1789 als Teil der Geschichte, Gegenwart und Zukunft des Verfassungsstaates. JöR, 37, 35.
Häberle, P., & Kotzur, M. (2016). Europäische Verfassungslehre (8th ed., pp. 939). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Hatje, A. (2001). Loyalität als Rechtsprinzip der EU (pp. 16).
Konstantinides, Th. (2011). Civil protection in Europe and the Lisbon “solidarity clause”. A genuine legal concept or a paper exercise (Uppsala Faculty of Law Working Paper no. 3, p. 7).
Kotzur, M. (2015). In R. Geiger, D.-E. Khan, & M. Kotzur (Eds.), European Union treaties. A commentary (Art. 80 TFEU para 1).
Kotzur, M., & Schmalenbach, K. (2014). Solidarity among Nations. Archiv des Völkerrechts, 52(2014), 68.
Krüger, H. (1971). Brüderlichkeit—das dritte, fast vergessene Ideal der Demokratie. In Festschrift Maunz (pp. 249).
Lais, M. (2007). Das Solidaritätsprinzip im europäischen Verfassungsverbund. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
Lüder, S. R. (2009). Katastrophenschutz in der Europäischen Union und seine Auswirkungen auf das nordrhein-westfälische Recht. In NWVBl (pp. 251).
Maduro, M. (2001). Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s constitutional pluralism in action. In N. Walker (Ed.), Sovereignty in transition (p. 21). Portland: Hart Publishing.
Mavelli, L., & Wilson, E. (Eds.). (2016). The refugee crisis and religion. Secularism, security, and hospitality in question. London: Rowman & Littlefield.
Myrdal, S., & Rhinard, M. (2010). The European Union’s solidarity clause: Empty letter or effective tool? (UI Occasional Papers no. 2, p. 6).
Pernice, I. (1999). Multilevel constitutionalism and the treaty of Amsterdam: European constitution-making revisited. Common Market Law Review, 36, 703.
Pernice, I. (2009). The treaty of Lisbon: Multilevel constitutionalism in action, Columbia. Journal of European Law, 15, 349.
Peters, A. (2006). Compensatory constitutionalism: The function and potential of fundamental international norms and structures. Leiden Journal of International Law, 19, 579 at 601.
Regelsberger, E., & Kugelmann, D. (2012). In R. Streinz (Ed.), EUV/AEUV (2nd ed. Art. 31 TEU para 6).
Report of the International Law Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS) (2001) The Responsibility to Protect.
Ross, M. (2010). Solidarity—A new constitutional paradigm for the EU. In M. Ross & Y. Borgmann-Prebil (Eds.), Promoting solidarity in the European Union (pp. 23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schmalenbach, K., Puntscher Riekmann, S., & Wydra, D. Last visit May 15, 2016., from http://www.uni-salzburg.at/portal/page?_pageid=465,1835853&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL
Slaughter, A.-M. (2005). Security, solidarity and sovereignty: The grand themes of UN reform. The American Journal of International Law, 99, 619.
Smith, K. (2008). European Union foreign policy in a changing world (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
Stahn, C. (2007). Responsibility to Protect. Political Rhetoric or Emerging Legal Norm. The American Journal of International Law, 101, 99.
UN Doc. GA/Res. 60/1 (2005 world Summit and Outcome)
Volkmann, U. (1998). Solidarität—Programm und Prinzip der Verfassung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
von Arnauld, A. (2009). Souveränität und die responsibility to protect. Die Friedenswarte, 84, 11.
von Bogdandy, A. (2009). Grundprinzipien. In: A. von Bogdandy & J. Bast (Eds.), Europäisches Verfassungsrecht (2nd ed., pp. 13 at 69–71). Berlin: Springer.
Walker, N. (2002). The idea of constitutional pluralism. Modern Law Review, 65, 317.
Weiler, J. H. H. (1991). The transformation of Europe. Yale Law Journal, 100, S. 2403 ff., at 2471.
Weiler, J. (2000). Federalism and constitutionalism: Europe’s Sonderweg (Jean Monnet Working Paper 10/00, p. 14).
Wellens, K. (2010). Revisiting solidarity as a (re-)emerging constitutional principle: Some further reflections. In R. Wolfrum & C. Kojima (Eds.), Solidarity: A structural principle of international law (pp. 3 at 4). Berlin: Springer.
Wellens, K. (2005). Solidarity as a Constitutional Principle: Its Expanding Role and Inherent Limitations. In Ronald St. J. Macdonald & D. M. Johnston (Eds.), Towards world constitutionalism: Issues in the Legal Ordering of the World Community (p. 775). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Wiener, A. (2014). A theory of contestation. Berlin: Springer.
Wolfrum, R. (2006). Solidarity amongst states: An emerging structural principle of public international law. In P.-M. Dupuy (Ed.), Völkerrecht als Weltordnung. Festschrift für Christian Tomuschat (pp. 1087).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kotzur, M. (2017). Solidarity as a Legal Concept. In: Grimmel, A., Giang, S. (eds) Solidarity in the European Union. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57036-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57036-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-57035-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-57036-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)