Skip to main content

The Perils of Reification: Identity Categories and Identity Construction in Migration Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Boundaries within: Nation, Kinship and Identity among Migrants and Minorities

Part of the book series: IMISCOE Research Series ((IMIS))

Abstract

Studies of migration rely heavily on the use of identity categories. Yet the uncritical use of such categories has had serious negative consequences for the understanding of migration and related social processes. This chapter examines the tendency to treat often ill-defined identity categories as reflecting an external reality, and the danger of ignoring the fact that people’s identities are multiple, situational, prone to change, and affected by a variety of political power-holders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    We further develop some of our perspectives on the politics of identity categorization in censuses in Kertzer and Arel (2006).

  2. 2.

    Duster (2005: 1050) reminds us of Whitehead’s warning.

  3. 3.

    Statistics New Zealand, n.d.

  4. 4.

    In the original article Hicks and I used the pseudonym of ‘Monhegan Indians’ for the Narragansetts.

  5. 5.

    Wimmer (2007: 15) also makes this point.

  6. 6.

    This formulation of the religion question brings up many of the same issues of reification of social identities that apply to the use of ethnic categorization.

  7. 7.

    Quoted by Mora (2014: 9). This account is based on Mora’s article.

Bibliography

  • Anwar, M. (1993). Muslims in Britain: 1991 census and other statistical sources. Birmingham: Centre for the Study of Islam and Christian-Muslim Relations Papers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aspinall, P. (2000). Should a question on ‘religion’ be asked in the 2001 British census? A public policy case in favour. Social Policy Administration, 34(5), 584–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, F. (1969). Ethnic groups and boundaries. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1999). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourhis, R. Y. (2003). Measuring ethnocultural diversity using the Canadian census. Canadian Ethnic Studies, 35(1), 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. K., & Langer, A. (2010). Conceptualizing and measuring ethnicity. Oxford Development Studies, 38(4), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brubaker, R. (2009). Ethnicity, race, and nationalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadogan, M. (2008). Fixity and whiteness in the ethnicity question of Irish census 2006. Translocations, 3(1), 50–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M. E., & Rogalin, C. (2006). Categorical imperatives: Interaction of Latino and racial identification. Social Science Quarterly, 87(5), 1030–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duster, T. (2005). Race and reification in science. Science, 307(5712), 1050–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, C. L., & Harawa, N. T. (2010). A new conceptualization of ethnicity for social epidemiologic and health equity research. Social Science & Medicine, 71(2), 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick Schiller, N., Caglar, A., & Guldbrandsen, T. C. (2006). Beyond the ethnic lens: Locality, globality, and born-again incorporation. American Ethnologist, 33(4), 612–633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, G. L., & Kertzer, D. I. (1972). Making a middle way: Problems of Monhegan identity. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 28(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, D. I., & Arel, D. (2002). Censuses, identity formation, and the struggle for political power. In D. I. Kertzer & D. Arel (Eds.), Census and identity: The politics of ethnicity, race, and language in national censuses (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kertzer, D. I., & Arel, D. (2006). Population composition as an object of political struggle. In R. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contextual political analysis (pp. 664–677). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King-O’Riain, R. C. (2007). Counting on the ‘Celtic Tiger’: Adding ethnic census categories in the Republic of Ireland. Ethnicities, 7(4), 516–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Bean, F. (2004). America’s changing color lines: Immigration, race/ethnicity, and multiracial identification. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 221–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacInnes, J. (2011). Who are the British? In P. Axelsson & P. Sköld (Eds.), Indigenous peoples and demography: The complex relation between identity and statistics (pp. 273–294). New York: Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, F. (2007). Census and sensibilities in Sarajevo. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 49(1), 40–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T., Beishon, S., & Virdee, S. (1994). Changing ethnic identities. London: Policy Studies Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mora, G. C. (2014). Cross-field effects and ethnic classification: The institutionalization of Hispanic panethnicity, 1965 to 1990. American Sociological Review, 79(2), 183–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez, A. D., & Hirschman, C. (2009). The changing racial and ethnic composition of the U.S. population: Emerging American identities. Population and Development Review, 35(1), 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Hispanic Center. (2012). When labels don’t fit: Hispanics and their views of identity. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prewitt, K. (2013). What is your race? The census and our flawed efforts to classify Americans. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schor, P. (2005). Mobilizing for pure prestige? Challenging federal census ethnic categories in the USA (1850–1940). International Social Science Journal, 57(1), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, P. (2012). Collecting ethnic statistics in Europe: A review. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(8), 1366–1391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skerry, P. (2000). Counting on the census? Race, group identity, and the evasion of politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics New Zealand (n.d.). Classifications and related statistical standards: Ethnicity. http://www.stats.govt.nz/methods/classifications-and-standards/classification-related-stats-standards/ethnicity/definition.aspx. Accessed 22 Oct 2016.

  • Visser, M. A. (2014). Two plus two equals three: Classification error and the Hispanic undercount in United States census surveys. American Review of Public Administration, 44(2), 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A. (2007). How (not) to think about ethnicity in immigrant societies: A boundary making perspective. ESRC Centre on Migration, Policy and Society, University of Oxford, Working Paper no. 44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David I. Kertzer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kertzer, D.I. (2017). The Perils of Reification: Identity Categories and Identity Construction in Migration Research. In: Decimo, F., Gribaldo, A. (eds) Boundaries within: Nation, Kinship and Identity among Migrants and Minorities. IMISCOE Research Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53331-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53331-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53329-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53331-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics