Abstract
Global population growth and economic growth increase the demand for more buildings and thus more construction materials. Increases in production of construction materials lead also to greenhouse gas emission rise and depletion of natural resources. One of these materials is insulation, which increasingly plays a vital role in the energy performance of buildings and in the process reducing negative environmental impacts of the built environment. A number of studies have focused on finding substitutions for petrochemicals as a source for manufacturing building insulation. Some investigations have identified insulation materials that have lower environmental costs, for example, those that are made of natural or recycled materials. Manufacturing building insulation from agricultural by-product s is one such approach. However, these are in their early stages of development, and there is a long way to have them on the market.
Alongside identifying matters that require additional research to enhance technical reliability, this study explores issues that can improve the market viability and help make natural and recycled materials more attractive alternatives. There are some common themes among these materials and earlier studies have revealed that each of these agricultural wastes has some advantages that can be exploited for specific purposes alongside disadvantages that must be overcome. From another perspective, it is important to compare the performance of these new materials with that of more conventional options. This is one of the first steps needed to modify the industry. This chapter refers to earlier studies discussed in the literature in discussing the technical behavior of bio-based insulations in four categories: thermal, acoustic, environmental, and mechanical behavior. This research reveals the hotspots where evidence is currently lacking and how to find evident opportunities for this market, thereby suggesting where future research should be directed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ryan C (2011) Traditional construction for a sustainable future. Spon Press, Routledge
Berardi U, Iannace G (2015) Acoustic characterization of natural fibers for sound absorption applications. Build Environ 94:840–852
Schmidt AC et al (2004) A comparative life cycle assessment of building insulation products made of stone wool, paper wool and flax. Int J Life Cycle Assess 9(1):53–66
Balador z et al (2017) Research hotspots on agro-waste based building insulation products _ a meta-review. In: International conference on advances on sustainable cities and buildings development. Green Lines Institute, Porto
Asdrubali F (2011) Green and sustainable porous materials for noise control in buildings: a state of the art. In Sapem, Italy
Joshi SV et al (2004) Are natural fiber composites environmentally superior to glass fiber reinforced composites? Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 35(3):371–376
Korjenic A et al (2011) Development and performance evaluation of natural thermal-insulation materials composed of renewable resources. Energ Buildings 43(9):2518–2523
Loorbach D, Frantzeskaki N, Avelino F (2017) Sustainability transitions research: transforming science and practice for societal change. Annu Rev Env Resour 42(1):599–626
Rotmans J, Kemp R, Van Asselt M (2001) More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight 3(1):15–31
Brown RR, Farrelly MA, Loorbach DA (2013) Actors working the institutions in sustainability transitions: the case of Melbourne‘s stormwater management. Glob Environ Chang 23(4):701–718
Scarlat N, Martinov M, Dallemand J-F (2010) Assessment of the availability of agricultural crop residues in the European Union: potential and limitations for bioenergy use. Waste Manag 30(10):1889–1897
Lal R (2005) World crop residues production and implications of its use as a biofuel. Environ Int 31(4):575–584
Rotmans J (1998) Methods for IA: the challenges and opportunities ahead. Environ Model Assess 3(3):155–179
Sandhu S et al (2010) Consumer driven corporate environmentalism: fact or fiction? Bus Strateg Environ 19(6):356–366
Freeman RE (2010) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, New York
Community Recycling Network, Mission (2017) Community Recycling Network: New Zealand
NZAIA, Aims (2016) New Zealand Association for Impact Assessment New Zealand
BBE, Objectives (2017) The Building Biology and Ecology Institute
Addis B (2012) Building with reclaimed components and materials: a design handbook for reuse and recycling. Routledge
Slaughter G (2005) Construction of New Zealand’s first 100% recycled road. Fulton Hogan Ltd, Dunedin
Albino V, Balice A, Dangelico RM (2009) Environmental strategies and green product development: an overview on sustainability-driven companies. Bus Strateg Environ 18(2):83–96
Rodriguez-Melo A, Mansouri SA (2011) Stakeholder engagement: defining strategic advantage for sustainable construction. Bus Strateg Environ 20(8):539–552
Asdrubali F, D’Alessandro F, Schiavoni S (2015) A review of unconventional sustainable building insulation materials. Sustain Mater Technol 4:1–17
Paiva A et al (2012) A contribution to the thermal insulation performance characterization of corn cob particleboards. Energ Buildings 45:274–279
Pinto J et al (2011) Corn‘s cob as a potential ecological thermal insulation material. Energ Buildings 43(8):1985–1990
Pinto J et al (2012) Characterization of corn cob as a possible raw building material. Constr Build Mater 34:28–33
Lertsutthiwong P et al (2008) New insulating particleboards prepared from mixture of solid wastes from tissue paper manufacturing and corn peel. Bioresour Technol 99(11):4841–4845
Khedari J, Charoenvai S, Hirunlabh J (2003) New insulating particleboards from durian peel and coconut coir. Build Environ 38(3):435–441
Manohar K (2012) Experimental investigation of building thermal insulation from agricultural by-products. Br J Appl Sci Technol 2(3):227–239
Sampathrajan A, Vijayaraghavan N, Swaminathan K (1992) Mechanical and thermal properties of particle boards made from farm residues. Bioresour Technol 40(3):249–251
Navacerrada MA, Díaz C, Fernández P (2014) Characterization of a material based on short natural fique fibers. Bioresources 9(2):3480–3496
Hajj NE et al (2011) Development of thermal insulating and sound absorbing agro-sourced materials from auto linked flax-tows. Ind Crop Prod 34(1):921–928
Kymäläinen H-R, Sjöberg A-M (2008) Flax and hemp fibres as raw materials for thermal insulations. Build Environ 43(7):1261–1269
Stevulova N et al (2013) Lightweight composites based on rapidly renewable natural resource. Chem Eng 3535:589–594. https//:doi.org/10.3303/CET1335098
Benfratello S et al (2013) Thermal and structural properties of a hemp–lime biocomposite. Constr Build Mater 48:745–754
Evon P et al (2014) New thermal insulation fiberboards from cake generated during biorefinery of sunflower whole plant in a twin-screw extruder. Ind Crop Prod 52:354–362
Mati-Baouche N et al (2016) Sound absorption properties of a sunflower composite made from crushed stem particles and from chitosan bio-binder. Appl Acoust 111:179–187
Yarbrough DW et al (2005) Apparent thermal conductivity data and related information for rice hulls and crushed pecan shells. Thermal Conductivity 27:222–230
Liu D et al (2012) Manufacturing of a biocomposite with both thermal and acoustic properties. J Compos Mater 46(9):1011–1020
Panyakaew S, Fotios S (2011) New thermal insulation boards made from coconut husk and bagasse. Energ Buildings 43(7):1732–1739
2011 14/12/2017. Available from: http://www.rolite.eu/en
Bodner, L. 2005 14/12/2017. Available from: http://www.leobodner.it/
Agoudjil B et al (2011) Renewable materials to reduce building heat loss: characterization of date palm wood. Energ Buildings 43(2):491–497
Luamkanchanaphan T, Chotikaprakhan S, Jarusombati S (2012) A study of physical, mechanical and thermal properties for thermal insulation from narrow-leaved cattail fibers. APCBEE Procedia 1:46–52
Kumfu S, Jintakosol T (2012) Thermal insulation produced from pineapple leaf fiber and natural rubber latex. In: Advanced materials research. Trans Tech Publications, Durnten-Zurich
Tangjuank S (2011) Thermal insulation and physical properties of particleboards from pineapple leaves. Int J Phys Sci 6(19):4528–4532
Faustino J et al (2012) Impact sound insulation technique using corn cob particleboard. Constr Build Mater 37:153–159
Chabriac PA et al (2016) Agricultural by-products for building insulation: acoustical characterization and modeling to predict micro-structural parameters. Constr Build Mater 112:158–167
Buksnowitz C et al (2010) Acoustical properties of Lyocell, hemp, and flax composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 29(20):3149–3154
Oldham DJ, Egan CA, Cookson RD (2011) Sustainable acoustic absorbers from the biomass. Appl Acoust 72(6):350–363
Brenci LM et al (2013) New composite structures designed for building acoustic insulation. In: Pro Ligno, Editura Universitatii “Transilvania” din Brasov, pp 483–490
Iannace G, Maffei L, Trematerra P (2012) On the use of “green materials” for the acoustic correction of classrooms. In: Proceedings of European conference on noise control, Prague, pp 89–94
Deveikytė S, Mažuolis J, Vaitiekūnas P (2012) Experimental investigation into noise insulation of straw and reeds. Mokslas – Lietuvos Ateitis 4(5):415–422
Doost-hoseini K, Taghiyari HR, Elyasi A (2014) Correlation between sound absorption coefficients with physical and mechanical properties of insulation boards made from sugar cane bagasse. Compos Part B 58:10–15
Jayamani E et al (2015) Study of sound absorption coefficients and characterization of rice straw stem fibers reinforced polypropylene composites. Bioresources 10(2):3378–3392
Sampathrajan A, Vijayaraghavan N, Swaminathan K (1991) Acoustic aspects of farm residue-based particle boards. Bioresour Technol 35(1):67–71
Fouladi MH, Ayub M, Nor MJM (2011) Analysis of coir fiber acoustical characteristics. Appl Acoust 72(1):35–42
Ramis J et al (2014) A model for acoustic absorbent materials derived from coconut fiber. Mater Constr 64(313):008
Chen C et al (2016) Windmill palm fiber/polyvinyl alcohol coated nonwoven mats with sound absorption characteristics. Bioresources 11(2):4212–4225
Iannace G (2015) Characterization of natural fibers for sound absorption. In: 22nd International Congress on sound and vibration, Florence
Thompson R, Thompson M (2013) Sustainable materials, processes and production. Thames & Hudson, London
Bribián IZ, Capilla AV, Usón AA (2011) Life cycle assessment of building materials: comparative analysis of energy and environmental impacts and evaluation of the eco-efficiency improvement potential. Build Environ 46(5):1133–1140
Pargana N et al (2014) Comparative environmental life cycle assessment of thermal insulation materials of buildings. Energ Buildings 82:466–481
Lazzarin RM, Busato F (2008) Life cycle assessment and life cycle cost of buildings’ insulation materials in Italy. Int J Low Carbon Technol 3(1):44–58
Asdrubali F (2009) The role of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in the design of sustainable buildings: thermal and sound insulating materials. In Euronoise Edinburgh, Scotland, pp 26–28
Asdrubali F, Schiavoni S, Horoshenkov K (2012) A review of sustainable materials for acoustic applications. Building Acoust 19(4):283–312
Schiavoni S et al (2016) Insulation materials for the building sector: a review and comparative analysis. Renew Sust Energ Rev 62:988–1011
González-García S et al (2010) Life cycle assessment of raw materials for non-wood pulp mills: hemp and flax. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(11):923–930
Ip K, Miller A (2012) Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of hemp–lime wall constructions in the UK. Resour Conserv Recycl 69:1–9
van der Werf HMG, Turunen L (2008) The environmental impacts of the production of hemp and flax textile yarn. Ind Crop Prod 27(1):1–10
Van der Werf HM (2004) Life cycle analysis of field production of fibre hemp, the effect of production practices on environmental impacts. Euphytica 140(1–2):13–23
Zampori L, Dotelli G, Vernelli V (2013) Life cycle assessment of hemp cultivation and use of hemp-based thermal insulator materials in buildings. Environ Sci Technol 47(13):7413–7420
Chiew YL, Shimada S (2013) Current state and environmental impact assessment for utilizing oil palm empty fruit bunches for fuel, fiber and fertilizer – a case study of Malaysia. Biomass Bioenergy 51:109–124
Yang F et al (2014) Selected properties of corrugated particleboards made from bamboo waste (Phyllostachys Edulis) laminated with medium-density fiberboard panels. Bioresources 9(1):1085–1096
Wang D, Sun XS (2002) Low density particleboard from wheat straw and corn pith. Ind Crop Prod 15(1):43–50
Segovia C et al (2016) Evaluating mold growth in tannin-resin and flax fiber biocomposites. Ind Crop Prod 83:438–443
Le AT et al (2014) Experimental investigation on the mechanical performance of starch–hemp composite materials. Constr Build Mater 61:106–113
Mgbemene C et al (2014) Feasibility study on the production of particleboard from maize cobs, rice husks, and groundnut shells using acacia mimosa tannin extract as the bonding adhesive. J Archit Eng 20(1):04013006
Arnaud L, Gourlay E (2012) Experimental study of parameters influencing mechanical properties of hemp concretes. Constr Build Mater 28(1):50–56
Shahzad A (2012) Hemp fiber and its composites–a review. J Compos Mater 46(8):973–986
Balador Z et al (2017) Agricultural By-products for the Production of Building Insulation in New Zealand – A first Look. In: 51st international conference of the Architectural Science Association (ANZAScA). School of Architecture, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Balador, Z., Gjerde, M., Isaacs, N., Imani, M. (2018). Thermal and Acoustic Building Insulations from Agricultural Wastes. In: Martínez, L., Kharissova, O., Kharisov, B. (eds) Handbook of Ecomaterials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48281-1_190-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48281-1_190-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48281-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48281-1
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EngineeringReference Module Computer Science and Engineering