Abstract
Subjects with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD) usually show weaknesses in inferential abilities. In this paper we try to interpret this deficit by using a new theoretical perspective. According to our study, pragmatic deficits of autistic subjects are linked to difficulties in integrating background knowledge in the context if they are not stored in visuospatial memory. First, we analysed some of the more recent methods to explore inferential abilities in subjects with ASD. After we hypothesize a deficit in the integration of linguistic background knowledge and an intact integration of visual information in the context and we try to interpret some empirical data in this perspective. Finally, we analyse two models of perception that differ just for the exclusion (direct social perception model) or inclusion (predictive model) of inferential abilities in perceptive processes. We found that more recent studies on inferential abilities of subjects with ASD are oriented towards a grounding ecological validity that includes various kinds of thought (and not only linguistic thought). Moreover, based on our hypothesis, we propose that physical causation inferences are – for subjects with ASD – easier than emotional inferences that are in turn easier than intentional inferences; based on the engagement of linguistic thought that the specific task requires. Finally, we sustained that if the predictive model of perception will be scientifically confirmed, we will have another reason to study perception to understand pragmatic deficits of subjects with ASD.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For a brief survey of perceptive differences between subjects with ASD and TD see Pennisi 2014
- 2.
Participants must ask some question about a description of an event of witch they heard a description. To execute the task, participants must make causal inferences.
- 3.
ADOS
- 4.
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule
Abbreviations
- ASD:
-
Autism Spectrum Disorders
- PPD:
-
Primary Pragmatic Disabilities
- SPD:
-
Secondary Pragmatic Disabilities
- TD:
-
Typically Developing
- TOPL:
-
Test of Pragmatic Language
- SST:
-
Strange Stories Test
- SNAP:
-
Strong Narrative Assessment Procedure
- PIT:
-
Pittsburgh Inference Test
- TLC-E:
-
Test of Language Competence – Expanded Edition
- RMEt:
-
Reading Mind in the Eyes task
- ToM:
-
Theory of Mind
- TASIT:
-
The Awareness of Social Inference Test
- PRS:
-
Pragmatic Rating Scale
- VIQ:
-
Verbal Intelligence Quotient
- CARS:
-
Childhood Autism Rating Scale
- ADI-R:
-
Autism Diagnostic Interview Revised
- ADOS:
-
Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule
References
Ames, C. S., & Jarrold, C. (2009). Identifying symbolic relationships in autism spectrum disorders: A deficit in the identification of temporal co-occurrence? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(12), 1723–1734.
Åsberg, J. (2010). Patterns of language and discourse comprehension skills in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 51(6), 534–539.
Baron-Cohen, S. (2003). The essential difference: The truth about the male and female brain. New York: Basic Books.
Baron-Cohen, S., O’Riordan, M., Stone, V., Jones, R., & Plaisted, K. (1999). Recognition of faux pas by normally developing children and children with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(5), 407–418.
Bodner, K. E., Engelhardt, C. R., Minshew, N. J., & Williams, D. L. (2015). Making inferences: Comprehension of physical causality, intentionality, and emotions in discourse by high-functioning older children, adolescents, and adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(9), 2721–2733.
Bogdashina, O. (2005). Communication issues in autism and Asperger syndrome: Do we speak the same language? London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Caron, M. J., Mottron, L., Rainville, C., & Chouinard, S. (2004). Do high functioning persons with autism present superior spatial abilities? Neuropsychologia, 42(4), 467–481.
Cassidy, S., Ropar, D., Mitchell, P., & Chapman, P. (2014). Can adults with autism spectrum disorders infer what happened to someone from their emotional response? Autism Research, 7(1), 112–123.
Castelli, F., Frith, C., Happé, F., & Frith, U. (2002). Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes. Brain, 125(8), 1839–1849.
Chevallier, C., Wilson, D., Happé, F., & Noveck, I. (2010). Scalar inferences in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(9), 1104–1117.
Couture, S. M., Penn, D. L., Losh, M., Adolphs, R., Hurley, R., & Piven, J. (2010). Comparison of social cognitive functioning in schizophrenia and high functioning autism: More convergence than divergence. Psychological Medicine, 40(04), 569–579.
Craig, J. S., Hatton, C., Craig, F. B., & Bentall, R. P. (2004). Persecutory beliefs, attributions and theory of mind: Comparison of patients with paranoid delusions, Asperger’s syndrome and healthy controls. Schizophrenia Research, 69(1), 29–33.
Cummings, L. (2009). Clinical pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
David, N., Aumann, C., Bewernick, B. H., Santos, N. S., Lehnhardt, F. G., & Vogeley, K. (2010). Investigation of mentalizing and visuospatial perspective taking for self and other in asperger syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(3), 290–299.
Edgin, J. O., & Pennington, B. F. (2005). Spatial cognition in autism spectrum disorders: Superior, impaired, or just intact? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(6), 729–745.
Gallagher, S. (2008). Direct perception in the intersubjective context. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(2), 535–543.
Gardner, H. (2011). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Grandin, T. (1995). Thinking in pictures: And other reports from my life with autism. New York: Doubleday.
Grandin, T., & Panek, R. (2013). The autistic brain: Exploring the strength of a different kind of mind. London: Rider Books.
Grynszpan, O., & Nadel, J. (2015, January). An eye-tracking method to reveal the link between gazing patterns and pragmatic abilities in high functioning autism spectrum disorders. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1067.
Happé, F. G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters' thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(2), 129–154.
Hartley, C., & Allen, M. L. (2014). Intentions vs. resemblance: Understanding pictures in typical development and autism. Cognition, 131(1), 44–59.
Holland, L., & Low, J. (2010). Do children with autism use inner speech and visuospatial resources for the service of executive control? Evidence from suppression in dual tasks. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(Pt 2), 369–391.
Hurlburt, R. T., Happe, F., & Frith, U. (1994). Sampling the form of inner experience in three adults with Asperger syndrome. Psychological Medicine, 24, 385–395.
Järvinen-Pasley, A., Pasley, J., & Heaton, P. (2008). Is the linguistic content of speech less salient than its perceptual features in autism? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(2), 239–248.
Joseph, R. M., Steele, S. D., Meyer, E., & Tager-Flusberg, H. (2005). Self-ordered pointing in children with autism: Failure to use verbal mediation in the service of working memory? Neuropsychologia, 43(10), 1400–1411. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.01.010.
Joseph, R. M., Keehn, B., Connolly, C., Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2009). Why is visual search superior in autism spectrum disorder? Developmental Science, 12(6), 1083–1096.
Kamio, Y., & Toichi, M. (2000). Dual access to semantics in autism: Is pictorial access superior to verbal access? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41(07), 859–867.
Kana, R. K., Keller, T. A., Cherkassky, V. L., Minshew, N. J., & Just, M. A. (2006). Sentence comprehension in autism: Thinking in pictures with decreased functional connectivity. Brain, 129(Pt 9), 2484–2493. doi:10.1093/brain/awl164.
Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., & Volkmar, F. (2003). The enactive mind, or from actions to cognition: Lessons from autism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 358(1430), 345–360.
Krawczyk, D. C., Kandalaft, M. R., Didehbani, N., Allen, T. T., McClelland, M. M., Tamminga, C. A., et al. (2014, August). An investigation of reasoning by analogy in schizophrenia and autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 517.
Lam, Y. G., & Yeung, S. S. S. (2012). Towards a convergent account of pragmatic language deficits in children with high-functioning autism: Depicting the phenotype using the pragmatic rating scale. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(2), 792–797.
Landa, R., Piven, J., Wzorek, M. M., Gayle, J. O., Chase, G. A., & Folstein, S. E. (1992). Social language use in parents of autistic individuals. Psychological Medicine, 22(01), 245–254.
Loukusa, S., & Moilanen, I. (2009). Pragmatic inference abilities in individuals with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. A Review Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 3(4), 890–904.
Marsh, L. E., Pearson, A., Ropar, D., & Hamilton, A. F. C. (2014). Predictive gaze during observation of irrational actions in adults with autism spectrum conditions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(1), 245–261.
Mathersul, D., McDonald, S., & Rushby, J. A. (2013). Understanding advanced theory of mind and empathy in high-functioning adults with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(6), 655–668.
McDonald, S., Flanagan, S., & Rollins, J. (2002). The awareness of social inference test. Sydney: Harcourt Assessment.
McKenzie, R., Evans, J. S. B. T., & Handley, S. J. (2010). Conditional reasoning in autism: Activation and integration of knowledge and belief. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 391–403.
McKenzie, R., Evans St, J. B. T., & Handley, S. J. (2011). Autism and performance on the suppression task: Reasoning, context and complexity. Thinking and Reasoning, 17(2), 182–196.
Mitchell, P., & Ropar, D. (2004). Visuo-spatial abilities in autism: A review. Infant & Child Development, 13(3), 185–198.
Moilanen, L., Loukusa, S., Leinonen, E., Moilanen, I., Ebeling, H., & Kunnari, S. (2014). Characteristics of narrative language in autism spectrum disorder: Evidence from the Finnish. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 8(8), 987–996.
O’riordan, M. A. (2004). Superior visual search in adults with autism. Autism, 8(3), 229–248.
Paganini, C., & Gaido, D. (2013). Perception in autism: An interactive global research between folk psychology and folk physics. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology, 7(2), 175–195.
Palmer, C. J., Seth, A. K., & Hohwy, J. (2015). The felt presence of other minds: Predictive processing, counterfactual predictions, and mentalising in autism. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 376–379.
Pellicano, E., & Burr, D. (2012). When the world becomes ‘too real’: A Bayesian explanation of autistic perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(10), 504–510.
Pennisi, P. (2014). La percezione visiva nei soggetti con autismo: osservare i volti umani attraverso un diaframma chiuso. In A. Falzone, S. Nucera, & P. Parisi (Eds.), Le ragioni della natura. La sfida naturalistica delle scienze della vita. Rome/Messina: Corisco.
Perkins, M. R. (2000). The scope of pragmatic disability: A cognitive approach. In N. Müller (Ed.), Pragmatics and clinical applications (pp. 7–28). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Phelps-Terasaki, D., & Phelps-Gunn, T. (2004). Test of pragmatic language: TOPL. Austin: Pro-Ed.
Quattrocki, E., & Friston, K. (2014). Autism, oxytocin and interoception. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 47, 410–430.
Sahyoun, C. P., Soulières, I., Belliveau, J. W., Mottron, L., & Mody, M. (2009). Cognitive differences in pictorial reasoning between high-functioning autism and Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 39(7), 1014–1023.
Sahyoun, C. P., Belliveau, J. W., Soulières, I., Schwartz, S., & Mody, M. (2010). Neuroimaging of the functional and structural networks underlying visuospatial vs. linguistic reasoning in high-functioning autism. Neuropsychologia, 48(1), 86–95.
Saldaña, D., & Frith, U. (2007). Do readers with autism make bridging inferences from world knowledge? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96(4), 310–319.
Sansosti, F. J., Was, C., Rawson, K. A., & Remaklus, B. L. (2013). Eye movements during processing of text requiring bridging inferences in adolescents with higher functioning autism spectrum disorders: A preliminary investigation. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 7(12), 1535–1542.
Silk, T. J., Rinehart, N., Bradshaw, J. L., Tonge, B., Egan, G., O’Boyle, M. W., et al. (2006). Visuospatial processing and the function of prefrontal-parietal networks in autism spectrum disorders: A functional MRI study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(8), 1440–1443.
Skewes, J. C., Jegindø, E. M., & Gebauer, L. (2014). Perceptual inference and autistic traits. Autism, 19, 301–307. doi:10.1177/1362361313519872.
Solomon, M., Frank, M. J., Smith, A. C., Ly, S., & Carter, C. S. (2011). Transitive inference in adults with autism spectrum disorders. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 11(3), 437–449.
Strong, C. J. (1998). The strong narrative assessment procedure. Madison, WI: Thinking Publications.
Taylor, M. J., Charman, T., Robinson, E. B., Hayiou-Thomas, M. E., Happé, F., Dale, P. S., et al. (2014). Language and traits of autism spectrum conditions: Evidence of limited phenotypic and etiological overlap. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric Genetics, 165(7), 587–595.
Whitehouse, A. J., Maybery, M. T., & Durkin, K. (2006). Inner speech impairments in autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47(8), 857–865. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01624.x.
Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. (1989). Test of Language Competence (TLC): Expanded edition. New York: Psychological Corporation.
Competing Interests
The author declares that she has no competing interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pennisi, P. (2016). Inferential Abilities and Pragmatic Deficits in Subjects with Autism Spectrum Disorders. In: Allan, K., Capone, A., Kecskes, I. (eds) Pragmemes and Theories of Language Use. Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43491-9_37
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43490-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43491-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)