Abstract
Fluorescent dyes provide a convenient and sensitive method for assessing cell viability and visualizing organellar distribution and dynamics. This chapter describes various fluorescent dyes that are widely used to stain and image living plant cells and tissues.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Fluorescence is the luminescence emitted when photons are absorbed and released by molecules known as fluorochromes (fluorophores); as a consequence of energy transference, the wavelengths of the fluorescent light are longer. Fluorescence imaging has many benefits, one of which being the high degree of sensitivity. Fluorochromes can be excited repeatedly, thus, a single molecule can absorb and release thousands of detectable photons. As a result of the amplified signal, fluorochromes allow for highly specific cellular and organellar differentiation with limited background. Additionally, fluorochrome detection is nonlethal and does not require chemical fixation, allowing for noninvasive in vivo and real-time imaging. This chapter highlights common fluorochromes, particularly fluorescent dyes, and how they can be applied to plant cell imaging.
1.1 Autofluorescence Imaging in Living Plant Tissues
When examining plant cells using fluorescence microscopy, one can excite fluorochromes already present or introduce them. The first option makes use of autofluorescence , wherein endogenous molecules absorb light in the UV and visible light spectra. The most abundant example of autofluorescence is chlorophyll fluorescence. While the majority of light energy absorbed by chlorophyll is allocated to photosynthesis, some of the absorbed energy can be dissipated as heat or luminescence (fluorescence). Even with only 1–2 % of absorbed light being diverted to chlorophyll fluorescence, the sensitive nature of fluorescence imaging allows for easy chlorophyll detection [1]. As chlorophyll molecules are embedded in the thylakoids of chloroplasts, red fluorescence emitted by chlorophyll (Table 9.1) allows for dye-free imaging of the entire plastid (Fig. 9.1). Other plant structures that can be imaged by autofluorescence include: cuticles of aerial organs (cutin [2]), pollen exine wall (sporopollenin [3]), secondary cell walls (lignin [4]), periderm (suberin [5]), and vacuoles (anthocyanin [6], flavonol [7]).
1.2 Exogenous Fluorochrome Application in Living Plant Tissues
If a cellular structure cannot be visualized through autofluorescence alone, exogenous fluorochromes are introduced. Synthetic organic dyes were the first fluorochromes applied to biological research. Over the past 100 years, derivatives of the original dyes have been further modified and novel probes developed. Fluorescent dyes are still commonly used for observing plant cells today, as they are convenient and easily applied to both living and chemically fixed tissues. The majority of fluorescent dyes are small (~ 0.5 nm) organic molecules [8] that can passively enter the cell or be taken up via active transport. Due to their small size, common fluorescent dyes such as fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and tetramethyl rhodamine isothiocyanate (TRITC) can also be conjugated to other biomolecules such as antibodies, without interfering in their biological functions. Cross-linking fluorescent dyes to protein-based probes allows for highly specific detection, however, exogenous protein application in living plant cells is problematic. Although semipermeable, plant primary cell walls only allow molecules and proteins up to 60–120 kDa in size to enter [9, 10], making them impermeable to antibodies exceeding this size limit. Thus, to increase the access of antibody, cell walls can be enzymatically removed and the released protoplasts studied [11].
For live-cell imaging, the expression of biological fluorochromes has become a valuable and powerful alternative to immunofluorescence. In 1994, green fluorescent protein (GFP) was cloned from jellyfish (Aequorea victoria) and used as a fluorescent reporter [12]. Since its early use, derivatives of the original GFP and many other fluorescent proteins have been developed for biological expression systems. Biological fluorochromes can be introduced to a large variety of species and expressed alone or fused to a protein of interest allowing protein function to be investigated [13]. Despite their numerous benefits, biological fluorochromes have limitations; most notably, stable transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens can be time consuming and some plant species remain recalcitrant to this method. Additionally, expressing large amounts of light-emitting proteins can induce artificial responses or cell toxicity. Finally in protein fusion studies, the size of the fluorescent protein can also affect biological functions, ultimately altering the behavior of the protein [14].
1.3 Fluorescent Staining of Plant Structures and Organelles
When selecting a fluorescent dye, the spectral properties of the fluorochrome should be closely examined . One major concern is ensuring that a fluorescent dye’s emission spectrum does not overlap with that of another. Maximum wavelengths of absorption and emission are typical terms used to refer to a fluorochrome, however emission spectra can be very broad [8]. To avoid fluorochrome “bleed-through,” it is important to ensure that the microscope is equipped with appropriate optical filters or light sources and the dyes in use exhibit distinct emission spectra. Special care needs to be taken in photosynthetic tissues as the strong chlorophyll fluorescence often masks photon emissions from other fluorochromes [15]. As chlorophyll fluoresces at > 600 nm, dyes emitting red light are particularly affected, but fluorescence of all color spectra can be reduced as a result of autofluorescence . To increase fluorescence signals, ethanol treatment can be used to lower chlorophyll levels, however such treatment impairs cellular metabolism and causes cell damage. As an alternative to pigment removal, non-photosynthetic cells can be studied and/or only dyes with strong fluorescence utilized. Here we describe several common fluorescent stains that are routinely used to facilitate microscopic observation of plant structures.
1.3.1 Cell Wall
Primary cell walls are mainly composed of cellulose, hemicellulose, and pectin. Unlike the heavily lignified secondary walls of wood tissues which produce endogenous fluorescence, primary cell walls do not typically autofluoresce. For live-cell imaging of primary walls, calcofluor white (Fluorescent Brightener 28) is one of the most widely used fluorescent dyes. Calcofluor white binds to β-linked cellulose [16] where it exhibits a broad excitation and emission spectra; calcofluor white has an excitation maximum of 410 nm (Table 9.1) but any filter set with UV or violet/blue excitation wavelengths will generate strong blue fluorescence (Fig. 9.1a, b, and c). Due to the dye’s emission spectrum, calcofluor white pairs nicely with other fluorescent dyes that emit 500 nm and above. Finally, as calcofluor white binds to the outer cell wall, membrane permeability is not an issue and the dye is readily taken up by tissues and individual cells (Table 9.2).
1.3.2 Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER)
In 1984, 40 years after the endoplasmic reticulum was first discovered by transmission electron microscopy, fluorescence imaging of the membrane network was achieved using 3,3′-dihexyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DiOC 6 ; [17]). DiOC6 had been previously characterized as a mitochondrial dye [17], but higher concentrations of the fluorochrome resulted in ER localization [18]. Unlike earlier attempts using immunofluorescence, which required treatments with organic solvents and detergents to increase antibody permeability, DiOC6 stained both living and glutaraldehyde-fixed cells without damaging the ER membrane (Fig. 9.1d; [18]). Although immunofluorescence and fluorescent proteins have since been further developed, DiOC6 is still commonly used. DiOC6 is a potential membrane-sensitive, cationic fluorescent dye. It is the dye’s hydrophilic groups that allow it to strongly accumulate in intracellular membranes where it absorbs blue light and emits a strong green fluorescence signal (Table 9.1). DiOC6 only works with living cells but they can quickly become damaged from photodynamic toxicity; to prevent cell death, it is recommended to limit excitation times. Finally, DiOC6 is a strong dye but it is not very photo-stable thus anti-fade reagents may be added to the mounting medium.
1.3.3 Mitochondria
Detection of mitochondria exploits the electron transport system and their accumulation of positively charged redox dyes inside the inner membrane. Similar to DiOC6, Rhodamine 123 (R123) is another potential membrane-sensitive, cationic green fluorescent dye (Table 1) that is readily sequestered by active mitochondria (Fig. 9.1e, f; [19]). As a result of electric potential across the mitochondrial membranes, R123 selectively accumulates in the mitochondria. Moreover, under recommended concentrations and incubation times, stained cells often exhibit no accumulation of the dye in other subcellular compartments. However, it has been reported that exposure of plant cells to R123 over long periods of time results in vacuolar accumulation [20]. Although R123 has no cytotoxic effect, the dye and hence fluorescence intensity are easily lost once the mitochondria experience a loss of membrane potential and thus the dye requires living cells with functional mitochondria [20].
1.3.4 Nucleus
The porous nuclear envelope readily allows fluorescent dyes to passively enter the nucleus. Fluorochromes for visualizing nuclei bind to and sometimes alter nucleic acids, making long-term exposure toxic to living tissues. One commonly used nuclear dye is acridine orange, a cationic dye that binds to both DNA and RNA via electrostatic attractions [21]. When bound to double-stranded DNA, acridine orange has an excitation and emission maxima of 502 and 525 nm (green), respectively (Fig. 9.1g, h), but it has an excitation of 460 nm and emission of 650 nm (red) when bound to the phosphate groups of single-stranded DNA or RNA [21]. Acridine orange is readily taken up by both living and fixed cells (Table 9.2), and its detection of both RNA and DNA makes it ideal for cell cycle studies [21]. A potential drawback to using acridine orange is signal overlap with other fluorochromes with similar emission spectrum.
4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) is a classic nuclear stain for fluorescence microscopy in both living and fixed cells [22]. DAPI strongly binds to the minor groove of double-stranded DNA, particularly adenine- and thymine-rich regions, and absorbs light in the UV spectrum (Table 9.1); despite excitation maximum being in the UV spectrum, DAPI will readily absorb violet light. Once excited, DAPI emits blue or cyan fluorescence making it ideal for pairing with other fluorochromes that emit longer wavelengths (Fig. 9.1i). Additionally, when bound to DNA, fluorescence emitted from DAPI is 20 times greater than that of unbound, greatly reducing background signals [23]. Thus, its selectivity for DNA and high cell permeability allow for efficient staining of nuclei with limited cytosolic fluorescence.
1.3.5 Vacuole
Accumulation of pigments in the vacuole often provides some autofluorescent activity [6, 7], however the levels of these metabolites are dependent on the cell type and the stage of development. An alternative method for vacuole detection exploits the organelle’s acidity and subsequent accumulation of basic dye such as acridine orange and neutral red [24] . Proton motive force, which drives the transport of protons from the cytosol to the vacuole, regulates the cytoplasmic pH and facilitates the movement of solutes into and out of the vacuole. As a consequence of protonation, the vacuole becomes acidic (pH 5–5.5) and acts as an ion trap for membrane-permeable bases. Therefore, vacuolar dyes are often used as pH indicators. As discussed in Sect. 1.3.4, acridine orange is a nuclear stain ; however, when applied under basic conditions (Table 9.2), the dye also accumulates in the vacuole [25] and emits red fluorescence (Table 9.1). Neutral red is used for both its strong red fluorescence (Table 9.1; [26]) and its distinctive red color that can be observed under bright-field microscope (Fig. 9.1j). Since neutral red requires active transport into the vacuole, only living cells may accumulate the dye. However, the working concentrations of neutral red vary depending on the tissue types and plant species under investigation. For example, low concentrations are used to stain Arabidopsis cell suspensions , 0.1 mg/L [27, 28], Brassica protoplasts, 1 mg/L [29], and Arabidopsis roots, 1 mg/L [30], whereas high concentrations are required for onion parenchyma cells, 4 mg/L [31] and whole carrots seedlings and embryos, 20 mg/L [25].
5-(and-6)-carboxy-2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (carboxy-DCFDA) is another group of vacuolar stains that rely on intracellular esterases to release negatively charged carboxyfluorescein fluorochromes. Carboxy-DCFDA is nonfluorescent until the acetate groups of the fluorochrome are released by intracellular esterases [32]. Once cleaved, carboxy-DCFDA becomes 5-(and-6)-carboxy-2′-dichlorofluorescein, a fluorochrome that absorbs blue light and emits green fluorescence (Table 1, Fig. 9.1k, l, and m). Carboxy-DCFDA is membrane-permeable and the fluorescein derivatives are strongly sequestered in the vacuole using anionic transporters (Table 9.2).
1.4 Fluorescent Staining to Assess Cell Viability
Viability, or the ability of an organism or a cell to maintain itself, can be an important factor in experimental procedures. Fluorescent dye such as R123 requires mitochondrial activity [19] and can be used as indicators of cell viability ; however, fluorescein diacetate (FDA) is the most routinely used for assessing cell viability. FDA is a cell-permeant dye that exhibits no fluorescence until intracellular esterases release fluorescein [33]. The strong green fluorescence of fluorescein (Table 9.1) is used as an indicator of both enzymatic activity and membrane permeability, as intact membranes allow fluorochrome accumulation. Once cleaved, fluorescein localizes to the cytosol, nucleus, and vacuole of the living cell (Fig. 9.1n, o, and p).
2 Materials
2.1 Equipment
Major equipment: confocal microscope (optional) or compound microscope equipped with light source capable of delivering excitation wavelengths near UV and blue range, pH meter, and centrifuge with swing-bucket rotor (optional).
2.2 Supplies for Tissue Preparation
Laboratory supplies: double-edge stainless steel razor blade (Electron Microscopy Sciences 72000), mortar and pestle, Pasteur pipettes, microcentrifuge tube (1.5 mL), nylon mesh (40 μm; Spectrum Laboratories Inc. 146502), staining dishes, fine-tipped forceps, glass slides and cover slips, depression slides, and number 1 Whatman filter paper.
2.3 Chemical Reagents
-
1.
Solvents (acetone, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), methanol, ethanol, or deionized water).
-
2.
Chemicals for buffer preparations: 4-(2-hydroxyethyl)piperazine-1-ethanesulfonic acid (HEPES; Sigma H4034); 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid (MES; BioShop MES503); 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid (PIPES; Sigma P6757); dibasic sodium phosphate (Na2HPO4·7H2O; BioShop SPD579); monobasic sodium phosphate (NaH2PO4·H2O; BioShop SPM400); sodium chloride (NaCl; BioShop SOD002); ethylene glycol-bis(2-aminoethylether)-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid (EGTA; BioShop EGT202); magnesium sulfate (MgSO4; Fisher 964443); D-mannitol (Fisher 937002); and potassium hydroxide (KOH; BioShop PHY202).
-
3.
Fluorescent dyes: acridine orange (Sigma A6014), carboxy-DCFDA (Invitrogen C369), DAPI (Sigma D9564), DiOC6 (Sigma 318426), FDA (Sigma F7378), Fluorescent brightener 28 (Sigma F3543), Neutral red (Sigma 4638), and R123 (Sigma R8004).
2.4 Solution Preparation
-
1.
0.1 M HEPES buffer, pH 7–8.2: For 100 mL, dissolve 2.38 g of HEPES in 90 mL of deionized water, adjust the pH to the desired value with 1 M KOH and then adjust the volume to 100 mL with deionized water.
-
2.
0.1 M MES buffer, pH 5.5: For 100 mL, dissolve 2.13 g of MES in 90 mL of deionized water, adjust the pH to 5.5 with 1 M KOH and then add deionized water to 100 mL.
-
3.
0.1 M PIPES buffer, pH 7–7.5: For 100 mL, dissolve 3.02 g of PIPES in 90 mL of deionized water, add 1 M KOH until the desired pH is obtained and then adjust the volume to 100 mL with deionized water.
-
4.
0.1 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7–7.8: (a) Prepare the 0.1 M solution of NaH2PO4·H2O (monobasic) by dissolving 1.38 g in 100 mL of deionized water. (b) Prepare the 0.1 M solution of Na2HPO4·7H2O (dibasic) by dissolving 2.68 g in 100 mL of deionized water. For 100 mL, the desired pH can be obtained by mixing the monobasic and dibasic solutions as follow:
pH | Monobasic (mL) | Dibasic (mL) |
---|---|---|
7.0 | 39 | 61 |
7.1 | 33 | 67 |
7.2 | 28 | 72 |
7.3 | 23 | 77 |
7.4 | 19 | 81 |
7.5 | 16 | 84 |
7.6 | 13 | 87 |
7.7 | 10.5 | 89.5 |
7.8 | 8.5 | 91.5 |
-
5.
Stabilization buffer: For 100 mL, dissolve 0.877 g NaCl (final 150 mM), 0.38 g EGTA (final 10 mM), 0.06 g MgSO4 (final 5 mM), 5.47 g D-mannitol (final 300 mM) in 0.1 M HEPES, pH 7. Store solution at 4 °C to reduce potential contamination.
-
6.
Staining solution: The fluorescent dye solutions are prepared as 1000-fold stock solutions; for example, dissolve 100 mg of DAPI in 10 mL deionized water for a concentration of 10 mg/mL (please refer to Table 9.2 for appropriate concentrations and solvents). To remove precipitate, filter stock solution with Whatman paper (No. 1) and store in the dark, ≤ 4 °C. To obtain working concentration of dye, mix 1 µL of 1000-fold stock solution with 999 µL buffer (Table 9.2).
3 Methods
3.1 Fluorescent Staining of B. sinuspersici Chlorenchyma Cells
-
1.
Excise four mature leaves (> 2 cm) and gently crush in 2 mL of stabilization buffer (see Note 1) using a mortar and pestle.
-
2.
With a Pasteur pipette, transfer the cell homogenate onto a 40-µm nylon mesh filter. Discard broken cells of the flow-through and collect intact cells in 1.5-mL centrifuge tube by washing the mesh with 1 mL stabilization buffer.
-
3.
Add appropriate amount of fluorescent dye to cells (Table 9.2). Gently mix by inverting the tube twice.
-
4.
Incubate cells in the dark for 5–30 min at room temperature.
-
5.
After cells have settled to the bottom of the tube, discard the supernatant and wash with 1 mL of fresh stabilization buffer. Gently mix and allow cells to settle for 10 min (see Note 2).
-
6.
Repeat step 5.
-
7.
After washing cells twice in stabilization buffer (see Note 3), resuspend cells in 50 µl of stabilization buffer.
-
8.
Using a Pasteur pipette, transfer the stained cells in stabilization buffer to a depression slide (see Note 4) and place a glass cover slip over the sample.
-
9.
Image cells using compound or confocal microscope immediately after staining (see Note 5).
3.2 Fluorescent Staining of Free-Hand Leaf Sections of K. blossfeldiana, K. daigremontiana, or S. aralocaspica
-
1.
Cut freshly excised leaf (4–5 cm long) into 0.1–0.2 mm thick sections using a double-edged razor blade (see Note 6).
-
2.
Place leaf sections into staining dish containing the buffer with an appropriate pH (Table 9.2) and incubate for 5 min (see Note 7).
-
3.
Move sections to a well containing fluorescent dye diluted in appropriate buffer (Table 9.2). Incubate in the dark for 5–30 min at room temperature.
-
4.
Wash leaf sections twice in fresh buffer without the dye for 10 min each (see Note 3).
-
5.
Mount leaf sections on a depression slide, cover samples with fresh buffer, and place a glass cover slip on top.
-
6.
Observe leaf sections using either a compound or confocal microscope, image sections within an hour of preparation (see Note 8).
4 Notes
-
1.
HEPES can be replaced with PIPES, sodium phosphate, or MES buffer but consult Table 9.2 for the appropriate pH. Some plant species may also prefer sucrose as an osmoticum in place of mannitol.
-
2.
As an alternative to allowing cells to naturally settle to the bottom of the tube, cells may be pelleted at 100 g for 2 min using a swing-bucket rotor. The use of fixed-angle rotor generally results in higher number of damaged cells.
-
3.
Fluorochrome detection can be obscured by high background fluorescence if unbound dye is not sufficiently removed. By replacing staining solution, excess stain is diluted and background fluorescence is greatly reduced. If background is still too high, additional wash steps can be performed or the concentration of dye used can be lowered.
-
4.
When working with non-fixed cells, one need to be careful not to crush cells by applying cover slip on a conventional glass slide. A depression slide is recommended because it provides the minimum space of 0.1 mm needed between the slide and the cover slip.
-
5.
Observation and imaging should be done as soon as possible to ensure fluorescent dye is retained and cell death is minimized. Since fluorescent dyes are prone to photobleaching, minimize time of exposure of stained cells to the excitation wavelength.
-
6.
Ideally, tissue sections should be 2–3 cell layers thick so that the dye has proper access and that the cellular detail can be revealed. For plant tissues that are not strong enough for free-hand sectioning, other support material such as Styrofoam or carrot root can be used. Alternatively, a vibratome may be used if the desired thickness is difficult to obtain using free-hand sectioning. To avoid crushed and damaged cells, leaf sections must be cut with a fresh razor blade.
-
7.
Typically buffer alone is sufficient for staining of leaf sections. If an osmoticum is required, then 0.3 M mannitol or sucrose can be added to buffer.
-
8.
If the uptake of dye is low, infiltration can be improved by: increasing dye concentration, adding 0.01 % (v/v) DMSO or 0.1 % (v/v) Triton X-100 to fluorescent dye incubation buffer and/or vacuum-infiltrate leaf sections with fluorescent dye for 5–15 min. If membrane permeability is required for fluorescent dye uptake, one must include controls with just the DMSO or detergent alone to ensure the signal observed is not an artifact due to cell damage.
5 General Comments
This chapter is intended to serve as a general guideline for staining of living plant cells or tissue sections and that there may be some variation with the overall results for other plant species. Thus, in order to obtain reliable and reproducible results, parameters such as osmolarity , buffer pH, dye concentration, incubation time, and wash procedure need to be empirically determined and optimized. For example, the optimum time of staining varies for different plant tissues and should be tested individually. Too long staining time will lead to over-staining and nonspecific staining whereas too short will result in under-staining. Another factor affecting the staining specificity of cellular structures is the pH of the buffer. In particular, pH sensitive dyes such as carboxy-DCFDA which has a low pKa and can be loaded into cells under acidic condition. It is extremely useful for monitoring pH changes in acidic organelles such as vacuoles . When optimizing a fluorescent staining protocol, it is of great importance to include appropriate controls. The preparation and observation of unstained samples alongside that of your stained specimen can be crucial in differentiating true signal from that of background autofluorescence or artifacts .
References
Maxwell K, Johnson GN (2000) Chlorophyll fluorescence—a practical guide. J Exp Bot 51:659–668
Fernández S, Osorio S, Heredia A (1999) Monitoring and visualizing plant cuticles by confocal laser scanning microscopy. Plant Physiol 37:789–794
Singh J, Devi S (1992) Development of fern sporangia: a fluorescence microscopy study. Biotech Histochem 67:261–264
Donaldson LA, Radotic K (2013) Fluorescence lifetime imaging of lignin autofluorescence in normal and compression wood. J Microsc 251:178–187
Biggs AR (1985) Detection of impervious tissue in tree bark with selective histochemistry and fluorescence microscopy. Stain Technol 60:299–304
Poustka F, Irani NG, Feller A, Lu Y et al (2007) A trafficking pathway for anthocyanins overlaps with the endoplasmic reticulum-to-vacuole protein-sorting route in Arabidopsis and contributes to the formation of vacuolar inclusions. Plant Physiol 145:1323–1335
Palevitz BA, O’Kane DJ, Kobres RE, Raikhel NV (1981) Vacuole movements and changes in morphology in differentiating cells as revealed by epifluorescence, video and electron microscopy. Protoplasma 109:23–55
Resch-Genger U, Grabolle M, Cavaliere-Jaricot S, Nitschke R, Nann T (2008) Quantum dots versus organic dyes as fluorescent labels. Nat Methods 5:763–775
Tepfer M, Taylor IE (1981) The permeability of plant cell walls as measured by gel filtration chromatography. Science 213:761–763
Baron-Epel O, Charyal PK, Schindler M (1988) Pectins as mediators of wall porosity in soybean cells. Planta 175:389–395
Brière C, Barthou H, Petitprez M (2004) A new tool for plant cell biology: In vivo antibody uptake in plant protoplasts. Plant Cell Rep 12:878–884
Chalfie M, Tu Y, Euskirchen G, Ward WW, Prasher DC (1994) Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression. Science 263:802–805
Tsien RY (1998) The green fluorescent protein. Ann Rev Biochem 67:509–544
Brandizzi F, Fricker M, Hawes C (2002) A greener world: the revolution in plant bioimaging. Nature 3:520–530
Held MA, Boulaflous A, Brandizzi F (2008) Advances in fluorescent protein-based imaging for the analysis of plant endomembranes. Plant Physiol 147:1469–1481
Herth W, Schnepf E (1980) The fluorochrome, calcofluor white, binds oriented to structural polysaccharide fibrils. Protoplasma 105:129–133
Matzke MA, Matzke AJM (1986) Visualization of mitochondria and nuclei in living plant cells by the use of a potential-sensitive fluorescent dye. Plant Cell Environ 9:73–77
Terasaki M, Song J, Wong JR, Weiss MJ, Che LB (1984) Localization of endoplasmic reticulum in living and glutaraldehyde-fixed cells with fluorescent dyes. Cell 38:101–108
Johnson LV, Walsh ML, Chen LB (1980) Localization of mitochondria in living cells with rhodamine 123. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 77:990–994
Wu FS (1987) Localization of mitochondria in plant cells by vital staining with rhodamine 123. Planta 171:346–357
Traganos F, Darzynkiewicz Z, Sharpless T, Melamed MR (1977) Simultaneous staining of ribonucleic acids in unfixed cells using acridine orange in flow cytofluorometric system. J Histochem Cytochem 25:45–56
Kapusicinski J (1995) DAPI: a DNA-specific fluorescent probe. Biotech Histochem 70:220–233
Barcellona ML, Cardiel G, Gratton E (1990) Time-resolved fluorescence of DAPI in solution and bound to polydeoxynucleotides. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 170:270–280
Timmers ACJ, Tirlapur UK, Schel JHN (1995) Vacuolar accumulation of acridine orange and neutral red in zygotic and somatic embryos of carrot (Daucus carota L.). Protoplasma 188:236–244
Moore A, Donahue CJ, Bauer KD, Mather JP (1998) Simultaneous measurement of cell cycle and apoptotic cell death. Methods Cell Biol 57:265–278
Verbelen JP, Tao W (1998) Mobile arrays of vacuole ripples are common in plant cells. Plant Cell Rep 17:917–920
El-Maarouf-Bouteau H, Moreau E, Errakhi R, Sallé G (2008) A diffusible signal from germinating Orobanche ramose elicits early defense responses in suspension-cultured Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Signal Behav 3:189–193
Lee EK, Jin YW, Park JH, Yoo YM et al (2010) Cultured cambial meristematic cells as a source of plant natural products. Nature Biotech 28:1213–1217
Chen S, Halkier BA (2000) Characterization of glucosinolate uptake by leaf protoplasts of Brassica napus. J Biol Chem 275:22955–22960
Dubrovsky JG, Guttenberger M, Saralegui A, Napsucialy-Mendivil S, Voigt B, Baluska F, Menzel D (2006) Neutral red as a probe for confocal laser scanning microscopy studies of plant roots. Ann Bot 97:1127–1138
Gonzalez ME, Jernstedt JA, Slaughter DC, Barrett DM (2010) Microscopic quantification of cell integrity in raw and processed onion parenchyma cells. J Food Sci 75:E402–E408
Inselman AL, Gathman AC, Lilly WW (1999) Two fluorescent markers identify the vacuolar system of Schizophyllum commune. Curr Microbiol 38:295–299
Widholm JM (1972) The use of fluorescein diacetate and phenosafranine for determining the viability of cultured cells. Stain Technol 47:189–194
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by Discovery Grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) and the University of Waterloo Start-Up Fund to SDXC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schoor, S., Lung, SC., Sigurdson, D., Chuong, S. (2015). Fluorescent Staining of Living Plant Cells. In: Yeung, E., Stasolla, C., Sumner, M., Huang, B. (eds) Plant Microtechniques and Protocols. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19944-3_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19944-3_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19943-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19944-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)