Summary
Models of ant foraging and recruitment behaviour have demonstrated how simple algorithms can produce complex foraging patterns. In the absence of hierarchical control, self-organisation enables a colony to establish a foraging strategy, through the interaction of ants using simple signals that indicate success in foraging. In this paper we investigate a model of ant foraging, and demonstrate how the effectiveness of the foraging strategy of a colony can be increased by reducing the persistence of foraging signals. In addition we investigate the theoretical possibility that ants might employ “negative” signals to indicate their failure in foraging. Such behaviour has neither been recorded nor refuted in real ant species and remains an intriguing possibility, since we can demonstrate how this can be overwhelmingly the most effective strategy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM, Verhaeghe JC (1983) Probabilistic behaviour in ants: a strategy of errors? J Theor Biol 105: 259–271
Deneubourg JL, Aron S, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the Argentine Ant. J Insect Behav 3: 159–168
Pasteels JM, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1987) Self-organisation mechanisms in ant societies (I): trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources. In: JM Pasteels, JL Deneubourg (eds): From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, 155–175
Goss S, Aron S, Deneubourg JL, Pasteels JM (1989) Self-organized shortcuts in the Argentine Ant. Naturwissenschaften 76: 579–581
Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S, Pasteels JM (1990) Collective decision making through food recruitment. Insect Soc 37: 258–267
Franks NR, Gomez N, Goss S, Deneubourg JL (1991) The blind leading the blind in army ant raid patterns—a model of self-organization (Hymenoptera, Formi-cidae). J Insect Behav 4: 583–607
Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1992a) Trails and u-turns in the selection of a path by the ant Lasius niger. J Theor Biol 159: 397–415
Beckers R, Deneubourg JL, Goss S (1992b) Trail laying behaviour during food recruitment in the ant Lasius niger (L). Insect Soc 39: 59–72
Stickland TR, Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) A path choice algorithm for ants. Naturwissenschaften 79: 567–572
Stickland TR, Tofts C, Franks NR (1993) Algorithms for ant foraging. Naturwissenschaften 80: 427–430
Stickland TR, Britton NF, Franks NR (1995) Complex trails and simple algorithms in ant foraging. Proc R Soc Lond B 260: 53–58
Edelstein-Keshet L, Watmough J, Ermentrout GB (1995) Trail following in ants: individual properties determine population behaviour. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36: 119–133
Camazine S, Sneyd J (1991) A model of collective nectar source selection by honey bees: self-organisation through simple rules. J Theor Biol 149: 547–571
Seeley TD, Camazine S, Sneyd J (1991) Collective decision making in honeybees— how colonies choose among nectar sources. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 28: 277–290
Franks NR, Wilby A, Silverman W, Tofts C (1992) Self-organising nest construction in ants: sophisticated building by blind bulldozing. Anim Behav 44: 357–375
Franks NR, Sendova-Franks AB (1992) Brood sorting by ants: distributing the workload over the work-surface. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 30: 109–123
Hatcher MJ, Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) Mutual exclusion as a mechanism for information exchange within ant nests. Naturwissenschaften 79: 32–34
Tofts C, Franks NR (1992) Doing the right thing — ants, honeybees and naked mole rats. Trends Ecol Evol 7: 346–349
Bartholdi JJ, Seeley TD, Tovey CA, Vande Vate JH (1993) The pattern and effectiveness of forager allocation among tlower patches by honey bee colonies. J Theor Biol 160: 23–40
Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1993) Task allocation in ant colonies within variable environments (a study of temporal polyethism: experimental). Bull Math Biol 55: 75–96
Sendova-Franks AB, Franks NR (1994) Social resilience in individual worker ants, and its role in division of labour. Proc R SocLond B. 256: 305–309
Tofts C (1993a) Algorithms for task allocation in ants (a study of temporal polyethism: theory). Bull Math Biol 55: 891–918
Tofts C (1993b) The efficiency of ant path finding algorithms. Proc 1st European Conference on Computer Simulation in Biology, Ecology and Medicine
Veena T, Ganeshaiah KN (1991) Non-random search pattern of ants foraging on honeydew of aphids on cashew inflorescences. Anim Behav 41: 7–15
Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1990) The ants. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Lopez F, Serrano JM, Acosta FJ (1994) Parallels between the foraging strategies of ants and plants. Trends Ecol Evol 9: 150–153
Traniello JFA, Robson SK (1995) Trail and territorial communication in social insects. In: RT Carde, WJ Bell (eds): Chemical ecology of insects 2. Chapman and Hall, 241-286
Hangartner W (1969) Structure and variability of the individual odor trail in Solenopsis geminata Fabr. (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Z Vergl Physiol 62: 111–120
Hölldobler B (1976) Recruitment behaviour, home range orientation, and territoriality in harvester ants, Pogonomyr-mex. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 1: 3–44
Crawford DL, Rissing SW (1983) Regulation of recruitment by individual scouts in Formica oreas Wheeler (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Insect Soc 30: 177–183
Breed MD, Fewell JH, Moore AJ, Williams KR (1987) Graded recruitment in a Ponerine ant. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20: 407–411
Baroni-Urbani C, Nielsen MG (1990) Energetics and foraging behaviour of the European seed harvesting ant Messor capitatus. II. Do ants optimise their harvesting? Physiol Entomol 15: 449–461
Seeley TD (1985) Honeybee Ecology: A Study of Adaptation in Social Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Wilson EO (1971) The insect societies. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Becker GS (1991) A note on restaurant pricing and other examples of social influences on price. J. Political Econ. 99: 1109–1116
Kirman A (1993) Ants, rationality and recruitment. Quart J Econ 108: 137–156
Deneubourg J-L, Goss S, Pasteeis JM, Fresneau D, Lachaud JP (1987) Self-organisation mechanisms in ant societies (II): Learning in foraging and division of labour. In: JM Pasteeis, JL Deneubourg (eds): From individual to collective behaviour in social insects. Birkhäuser, Basel, 177–196
Hasseil MP (1978) The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator-Prey Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Price PW (1970) Trail odours: recognition by insects parasitic on cocoons. Science 170: 546–547
Giurfa M, Nunez JA (1992) Honeybees mark with scent and reject recently visited flowers. Oecologia 89: 113–117
Britton, Stickland TR, Franks NR (1998) Analysis of ant foraging algorithms. J Biol Sys 6: 315–336
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1999 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stickland, T.R., Britton, N.F., Franks, N.R. (1999). Models of information flow in ant foraging: the benefits of both attractive and repulsive signals. In: Detrain, C., Deneubourg, J.L., Pasteels, J.M. (eds) Information Processing in Social Insects. Birkhäuser, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-8739-7_5
Publisher Name: Birkhäuser, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0348-9751-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-0348-8739-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive