Abstract
This chapter analyzes Jair Bolsonaro’s presidency in Brazil using two interpretations of the concept of populism: the ideational approach (thin-centered ideology) and the political style approach. The author is interested in the way in which the Brazilian president associates a populist rhetoric aimed at disrupting the political game (politics) and populist practices aimed at breaking the classical patterns of democratic representation and reorienting public action (policies). Bolsonaro’s populist style is rooted in a radical ideological base that has polarized Brazilian society and rattled the political community (polity). The author first shows how the representation of the world underlying Bolsonaro’s populism was structured during his personal trajectory, until his victory in the 2018 presidential election. It then presents some features of the populist rhetoric Bolsonaro has developed since he took office as President of Brazil (January 2019). Finally, it assesses the way in which Bolsonaro exercises power and exerts pressure on the main democratic institutions of his country. The author thus highlights the existence of an intimate link between Bolsonaro’s populist style and the authoritarian temptation that drives him.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The video is available on You Tube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-tkPPwT9Xw, accessed May 31, 2021.
- 2.
Pastor Everaldo was imprisoned in August 2020 for corruption and moneylaundering during the Covid-19 pandemic.
- 3.
Jair Bolsonaro’s website: https://www.bolsonaro.com.br/.
- 4.
Johns Hopkins Coronavirus Resource Center (https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/map.html, accessed May 31, 2021).
- 5.
“Governismo em plenário,” Congresso em Foco-Radar do Congresso, 19 November 2020 (https://radar.congressoemfoco.com.br/governismo/camara, accessed May 31, 2021).
- 6.
Contrary to what its name might suggest, the centrão group (“big center”) gathers the political parties that are situated to the right of the Brazilian political spectrum and associated with traditional politics (pejoratively described as “old politics”). In 2020, it was mainly composed of the following parties: Progressista Party- (40 deputies in Congress), Republicans (31 deputies), Solidarity (14 deputies), Brazilian Labor Party (12 deputies). Other political forces ally with them in certain configurations: Social Democratic Party (36 deputies), Brazilian Democratic Movement (34 deputies), Democrats (28 deputies), Republican Party of the Social Order (10 deputies), etc.
- 7.
The President’s Secretariat of Social Communications—SECOM’s Instagram account, Presidência da República. (www.instagram.com/p/B-xVGBrpB_s/?utm_source=ig_embed, accessed May 31, 2021).
- 8.
An initial sign of these oppositions was observed concerning relations between China and Brazil: as the government’s ideological wing—led by the Foreign Affairs Minister E. Araújo—suddenly turned its back on China, increasing declarations of hostility, the agro-exporting elites, who have powerful leverage within the government, and the military, were alarmed by the potentially harmful consequences of this diplomatic shift.
References
Academic References
Anderson, Perry. 2019. “Bolsonaro’s Brazil.” London Review of Books 41 (3).
Couffignal, Georges. 2013. La Nouvelle Amérique latine. Laboratoire politique de l’Occident. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
Da Silva, Yago Matheus. 2020. “Bolsonaro and Social Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Brazilian President’s Populist Communication on Twitter.” Master Degree Dissertation, Uppsala University.
De la Torre, Carlos. 2010. Populist Seduction in Latin America. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Freidenberg, Flavia. 2007. La tentación populista. Una vía al poder en América Latina. Madrid: Síntesis.
Jansen, Robert. 2011. “Populist Mobilization: A New Theoretical Approach to Populism.” Sociological Theory 29 (2): 75–96.
Feres Júnior, João, and Juliana Gagliardi. 2021. “Populism and the Media in Brazil: The Case of Jair Bolsonaro.” In Kohl, Christoph, Barbara Christophe, Heike Liebau and Achim Saupe (eds.), The Politics of Authenticity and Populist Discourses. Media and Education in Brazil, India and Ukraine. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hunter, Wendy, and Timothy Power. 2019. “Bolsonaro and Brazil’s Illiberal Backlash.” Journal of Democracy 30 (1): 68–82.
Levitsky, Steven, and Lucan Way. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism. Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Louault, Frédéric. 2018. “Corruption et réforme politique: l’inertie politique du Brésil avant les élections de 2018.” Les Etudes du CERI 233–234: 16–22.
Louault, Frédéric. 2019. “Brésil: l’arrivée au pouvoir de l’extrême droite.” Les Etudes du CERI 239–240: 68–72.
Mendonça, Ricardo, and Renato Caetano. 2020. “Populism as Parody: The Visual Self-Presentation of Jair Bolsonaro on Instagram.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 26 (1): 210–235.
Mény, Yves, and Yves Surel (ed.). 2002. Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mudde, Cas. 2017. The Populist Radical Right: A Reader. London: Routledge.
Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. 2012. Populism in Europe and the Americas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mudde, Cas, and C. Rovira Kaltwasser. 2017. Populism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nascimento, Lenoardo et al. 2018. “‘Não falo o que o povo quer, sou o que o povo quer’: 30 anos (1987–2017) de pautas políticas de Jair Bolsonaro nos jornais brasileiros.” Plural 25 (1): 135–171.
Panizza, Francisco (ed.). 2005. Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso.
Rouquié, Alain, and René Quatrefages. 1978. “État et pouvoir militaire en Amérique Latine: le modèle brésilien.” Mélanges de la Casa de Velázquez (14): 625–648.
Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy (ed). 2017. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Solano Gallego, Esther. 2019. La Bolsonarización de Brasil. Instituto Universitario de Investigación en Estudios Latinoamericanos—Universidad de Alcalá. Documentos de Trabajo IELAT, No. 121.
Taggart, Paul. 2004. “Populism and Representative Politics in Contemporary Europe.” Journal of Political Ideologies 9 (3): 269–288.
Taguieff, Pierre-André. 2007. L’illusion populiste. Essai sur les démagogies de l’âge démocratique. Paris: Flammarion.
Tomini, Luca, and Claudius Wagemann. 2018. “Varieties of Contemporary Democratic Breakdown and Regression: A Comparative Analysis.” European Journal of Political Research 57: 687–716.
Touraine, Alain. 1988. La Parole et le sang. Politique et société en Amérique latine. Paris: Odile Jacob.
Urbinati, Nadia. 2019. Me the People. How Populism Transforms Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weyland, Kurt. 2001. “Clarifying a Contested Concept: ‘Populism’ in the Study of Latin American Politics.” Comparative Politics 34 (1): 1–22.
Weyland, Kurt. 2003. “Neopopulism and Neoliberalism in Latin America: How Much Affinity.” Third World Quarterly 24 (6): 1095–1115.
Press Articles and Institutional Sources
Araújo, Ernesto. 2019 (10/12). Sequestrar e perverter. Blog Metapolítica 17. Contra o globalismo.
Barbosa, Rafael, Motoryn Paulo, and Mali Tiago. 2020 (09/01). Viagens de Bolsonaro disparam depois de coronavoucher e alta na aprovação. Poder360.
Cavalcanti, Leonardo, and Victor, Nathan. 2020 (07/17). Bolsonaro mais que dobrou contingente de militares no governo, aponta TCU, Poder360.
Ceolin, Monalisa. 2019 (09/23). Desmatamento no Brasil: qual a situação? Politize.
INPE. 2019 (08/01). Comunicado à imprensa. São José dos Campos-SP. www.Inpe.br/noticias/noticia.php?Cod_Noticia=5178.
Deutsche Welle. 2019 (08/01). Preocupado com imagem do país, governo volta a contestar dados de desmatamento.
Deutsche Welle. 2019 (10/24). Sem provas, Salles insinua que Greenpeace é culpado por manchas de óleo.
Folha de São Paulo. 2017 (05/16). Bolsonaro era agressivo e tinha ‘excessiva ambição’, diz ficha militar.
Gugliano, M. 2020. VOU INTERVIR! O dia em que Bolsonaro decidiu mandar tropas para o Supremo. Revista Piauí, no. 167 https://piaui.folha.uol.com.br/materia/vou-intervir.
Ostiguy, Pierre. 2017. “Populism: A Socio-Cultural Approach.” In Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal, Paul Taggart, Paulina Oc oa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy (ed). The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Presidência da República Federativa do Brasil. Secretariat of Social Communications. 2021 (05/31). SECOM’s Instagram account (https://www.instagram.com/p/B-xVGBrpB_s/?utm_source=ig_embed).
World Health Organization (WHO). 2020 (11/30). COVID-19 Virtual Press conference transcript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Louault, F. (2022). Populism and Authoritarian Drift: The Presidency of Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil. In: Dieckhoff, A., Jaffrelot, C., Massicard, E. (eds) Contemporary Populists in Power. The Sciences Po Series in International Relations and Political Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84079-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84079-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84078-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84079-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)