Abstract
We analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the world economic system through the three lenses of globalization, discussing economic, social and political aspects, respectively. The pandemic and the policy responses have hit these aspects to different degrees.
-
Economically, the multilateral system has been under pressure; the quick recovery of world merchandise trade stands out, but FDI remains subdued.
-
Socially, the reduction in tourism is the largest shock but here a sharp recovery is possible.
-
Politically, the end of US membership of the WHO and the difficulty of global economic coordination in the G20 are key drivers. The election of a new US President allows for a quick reversal.
The outlook for openness of the world economy is still very much better than in the 1930s. Yes, deglobalization exists. Yes, overall globalization will probably be lower for the foreseeable future. Our societies will, however, remain much more open than at the start of the globalization wave in 1990, connected via the internet with an intensity never seen before in history.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
We deviate from the common procedure in the literature on globalization to include remittances and (official development) assistance
- 2.
https://www.unwto.org/unwto-world-tourism-barometer-data accessed 1 April 2021.
- 3.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/14/coronavirus-eu-abandoning-italy-china-aid/, accessed 31 March 2021.
- 4.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/14/coronavirus-eu-abandoning-italy-china-aid/, accessed 31 March 2021.
- 5.
https://healthpolicy-watch.news/countries-pledge-7-36-billion-euro-towards-global-covid-19-response/, accessed 31 March 2021.
- 6.
The impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis on development finance,” Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 24 June 2020, http://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-impact-of-the-coronavirus-covid-19-crisis-on-development-finance-9de00b3b/ accessed 1 April 2021.
- 7.
- 8.
https://borgenproject.org/the-netherlands-foreign-aid/ accessed on 1 April 2021.
References
Adam, C., Henstridge, M., & Lee, S. (2020). After the lockdown: Macroeconomic adjustment to the COVID-19 pandemic in sub-Saharan Africa. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36, S338–S358.
Afesorgbor, S. K., & Beaulieu, E. (2021). Role of international politics on Agri-food trade: Evidence from US–Canada bilateral relations. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 69(1), 27–35.
Ariu, A. (2016). Crisis-proof services: Why trade in services did not suffer during the 2008–2009 collapse. Journal of International Economics, 98, 138–149.
Biscop, S. (2020). Coronavirus and power: The impact on international politics. Egmont Institute.
Borjas, G. J., & Cassidy, H. (2020). The adverse effect of the covid-19 labour market shock on immigrant employment (No. w27243). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Brown, S. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on development assistance. International Journal, 0020702020986888.
Brown, G., & Susskind, D. (2020). International cooperation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 36, S64–S76.
Capps, R., Batalova, J., & Gelatt, J. (2020). COVID-19 and unemployment: Assessing the early fallout for immigrants and other US workers. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
Committee for Development Policy. (2020). Development policy and multilateralism after COVID-19. United Nations.
Demena, B. A. (2017). Essays on intra-industry spillovers from FDI in developing countries: A firm- level analysis with a focus on Sub-Saharan Africa, PhD diss., Erasmus University, The Hague.
Demena, B. A., Floridi, A., & Wagner, N. (2021). The short-term impact of COVID-19 on labour market outcomes: Comparative systematic evidence. In E. Papyrakis (Ed.), Covid-19 and international development. Springer.
Dreher, A. (2006). Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10), 1091–1110.
Dreher, A., Gaston, N., & Martens, P. (2008). Measuring globalisation. Gauging its consequences. Springer.
Gygli, S., Haelg, F., Potrafke, N., & Sturm, J. E. (2019). The KOF globalisation index–revisited. The Review of International Organizations, 14(3), 543–574.
Horsley, J. P. (2020). Let’s end the COVID-19 blame game: Reconsidering China’s role in the pandemic. The Brookings Institution. Accessed 31st Mar 2021 from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/08/19/lets-end-the-covid-19-blame-game-reconsidering-chinas-role-in-the-pandemic/
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S., Jr. (2000). Globalization: What’s new? What’s not? (And so what?). Foreign Policy, 118, 104–119.
Kerr, W. A. (2020). The COVID‐19 pandemic and agriculture: Short‐and long‐run implications for international trade relations. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d’agroeconomie, 68(2), 225–229.
KOF Globalisation Index – Revisited’, KOF Working Paper 439, ETH Zurich.
Lipscy, P. Y. (2020). COVID-19 and the politics of crisis. International Organization, 74(S1), 1–30.
Meijerink, G., Hendriks, B., & van Bergeijk, P. A. G., (2020). Covid-19 and world merchandise trade: Unexpected resilience. https://voxeu.org/article/covid-19-and-world-merchandise-trade
OECD. (2020). The impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) crisis on development finance. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/the-impact-of-the-coronavirus-covid-19-crisis-on-development-finance-9de00b3b/
Orozco, M. (2002). Globalization and migration: The impact of family remittances in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society, 44(2), 41–66.
Shingal, A. (2020). Services trade and COVID-19. VOX EU. Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) Policy Brief. Accessed 28th Mar 2021 https://voxeu.org/article/services-trade-and-covid-19
Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. Norton.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2018). Globalization and its discontents revisited. Anti-globalization in the era of trump. Norton.
United Nation Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on trade and development. Transitioning to a new normal. Accessed 18 Mar 2021. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/osg2020d1_en.pdf
United Nation Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2021). Investment Trends Monitor’, Issue 38. Accessed 18 March 2021. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/diaeiainf2021d1_en.pdf
Van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (2013). Earth economics: An introduction to demand management, long-run growth and global economic governance. Edward Elgar.
van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (2019). Deglobalization 2.0: Trade and openness during the great depression and the great recession. Edward Elgar.
van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (2021). Pandemic economics. Edward Elgar.
van Bergeijk, P. A. G., Brakman, S., & van Marrewijk, C. (2017). Heterogeneous economic resilience and the great recession’s world trade collapse. Papers in Regional Science, 96(1), 3–12.
van der Hoeven, R., & Vos, R. (2021). Reforming the international financial and fiscal system for better COVID-19 and post-pandemic crisis responsiveness. In E. Papyrakis (Ed.), Covid-19 and international development. Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Afesorgbor, S.K., van Bergeijk, P.A.G., Demena, B.A. (2022). COVID-19 and the Threat to Globalization: An Optimistic Note. In: Papyrakis, E. (eds) COVID-19 and International Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82339-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-82339-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-82338-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-82339-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)