Skip to main content

Assessing the Role of Wearable Robotics in the Construction Industry: Potential Safety Benefits, Opportunities, and Implementation Barriers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Automation and Robotics in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry

Abstract

High rate of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) remains a major concern of practitioners and researchers in the construction industry. Among current developments in automation and robotics, wearable robots (exoskeletons) have gained some traction as a viable tool that could improve construction workers’ safety, health, and productivity at work. However, limited studies have explored the efficacy and effectiveness of existing exoskeletons in reducing risks of WMSD in the construction domain. Also, information on factors that prevent the successful implementation of wearable robots on construction projects is scarce. To bridge this gap, the present study presents the result of a multiphase process aimed at providing an in-depth perception-based evaluation of the capability of commercially available wearable robots. This process comprises of a detailed literature review, insights from an online survey, and usability studies from a lab-simulated construction task. First, 11 wearable robots with potential utility in construction operations were identified followed by a detailed assessment of the potential role these technologies could play in reducing well-established risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal injuries. Also, the authors evaluated the suitability of these robots for construction work involving heavy or repetitive lifting, and prolonged stooped postures, and synthesized the barriers to the acceptance of these robots. Results from the present study indicate that wearable robots could prevent about 60% of construction-related WMSDs impacting the different body regions (lower and upper back, feet and ankle, wrist and hand, and shoulder) and 30–40% of accidents associated with critical WMSD risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S. Kim, A. Moore, D. Srinivasan, A. Akanmu, A. Barr, C. Harris-Adamson, D.M. Rempel, M.A. Nussbaum, Potential of exoskeleton technologies to enhance safety, health, and performance in construction: Industry perspectives and future research directions. IISE Trans Occup Ergonomic & Human Factor 7(3-4), 185–191 (2019 Oct 2). https://doi.org/10.1080/24725838.2018.1561557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Kanan, O. Elhassan, R. Bensalem, An IoT-based autonomous system for workers’ safety in construction sites with real-time alarming, monitoring, and positioning strategies. Automat Construct 88, 73–86 (2018 Apr 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2017.12.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2019. U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC. 2020. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/news.release/archives/osh_11042020.pdf on December 14, 2020.

  4. P. Dasgupta, M. Sample, B. Buchholz, M. Brunette, Is worker involvement an ergonomic solution for construction intervention challenges: a systematic review. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 18(5), 433–441 (2017 Sep 3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2016.1274452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Esmaeili, M.R. Hallowell, Diffusion of safety innovations in the construction industry. J Construct Eng & Manag 138(8), 955–963 (2012 Aug 1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000499

  6. I. Okpala, C. Nnaji, A.A. Karakhan, Utilizing emerging technologies for construction safety risk mitigation. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 25(2), 04020002 (2020 May 1). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000468

  7. T. Bock, T. Linner, W. Ikeda, Exoskeleton and humanoid robotic technology in construction and built environment. Futur Humanoid Robot-Res & Appl, 111–144 (2012 Jan 20). https://doi.org/10.5772/27694

  8. T. Bock, The future of construction automation: Technological disruption and the upcoming ubiquity of robotics. Automat Construct 59, 113–121 (2015 Nov 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2015.07.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Karvouniari, G. Michalos, N. Dimitropoulos, S. Makris, An approach for exoskeleton integration in manufacturing lines using Virtual Reality techniques. Procedia CIRP. 78, 103–108 (2018 Jan 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.08.315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. C. Wang, L. Ikuma, J. Hondzinski, M. de Queiroz, Application of assistive wearable robotics to alleviate construction workforce shortage: Challenges and opportunities, in Computing in Civil Engineering, (2017), pp. 358–365. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480830.044

  11. J.M. Delgado, L. Oyedele, A. Ajayi, L. Akanbi, O. Akinade, M. Bilal, H. Owolabi, Robotics and automated systems in construction: Understanding industry-specific challenges for adoption. J Build Eng 26, 100868 (2019 Nov 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Occupational Safety and Health Definitions 2016. U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC. 2020. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshdef.htm on December 14, 2020.

  13. CPWR (Center for Construction Research and Training). The Construction Chart Book. 2016. Retrieved from https://www.cpwr.com/research/data-center/the-construction-chart-book/the-construction-chart-book-6th-edition-foreword/ on December 14, 2020.

  14. BLS (Bureau of Labor Statistics). National census of fatal occupational injuries in 2019. U.S. Dept. of Labor, Washington, DC. 2020. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/iif/oshwc/case/msds.htm on March 1, 2021.

  15. M. Middlesworth, The cost of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) [Infographic]. EgroSolution (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  16. M.D. Hossain, A. Aftab, M.H. Al Imam, I. Mahmud, I.A. Chowdhury, R.I. Kabir, M. Sarker, Prevalence of work related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) and ergonomic risk assessment among readymade garment workers of Bangladesh: A cross sectional study. PLoS One 13(7), e0200122 (2018 Jul 6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200122

  17. A.R. Anita, A. Yazdani, K.S. Hayati, M.Y. Adon, Association between awkward posture and musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) among assembly line workers in an automotive industry. Malays J Med & Health Sci 10(1), 23–28 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. CPWR (Center for Construction Research and Training). Preventing Musculoskeletal Disorders in Construction Workers. Retrieved from http://elcosh.org/document/1648/d000560/preventing-muskuloskeletal-disorders-in-construction-workers.html on December 14, 2020.

  19. Wesslén J. Exoskeleton exploration: Research, development, and applicability of industrial exoskeletons in the automotive industry. 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-40093

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kobayashi H, Uchimura A, Shiiba T. Development of muscle suit for upper body. In Proceedings 2003 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2003) (Cat. No. 03CH37453) 2003 Oct 27 (Vol. 4, pp. 3624–3629). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IROS.2003.1249718

  21. Cho YK, Kim K, Ma S, Ueda J. A robotic wearable exoskeleton for construction worker’s safety and health. In ASCE Construction Research Congress 2018 (pp. 19–28). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481288.03.

  22. S. Alabdulkarim, M.A. Nussbaum, Influences of different exoskeleton designs and tool mass on physical demands and performance in a simulated overhead drilling task. Appl. Ergon. 74, 55–66 (2019 Jan 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2018.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Brooke, Sus: a “quick and dirty” usability. Usability Eval Indus 11, 189 (1996 Jun)

    Google Scholar 

  24. S. Spada, L. Ghibaudo, S. Gilotta, L. Gastaldi, M.P. Cavatorta, Investigation into the applicability of a passive upper-limb exoskeleton in automotive industry. Procedia Manuf 11, 1255–1262 (2017 Jan 1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. R. Bogue, Exoskeletons – a review of industrial applications. Indus Robot: Int J (2018 Aug 20). https://doi.org/10.1108/IR-05-2018-0109

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the Pilot/Small Project Research Training Grant #T42OH008436 from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and the CPWR through NIOSH cooperative agreement OH009762. Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of CPWR or NIOSH. The grants are administered by CPWR, and the Deep South Center for Occupational Health and Safety at the UAB, School of Public Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ifeanyi Okpala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Okpala, I., Nnaji, C., Ogunseiju, O., Akanmu, A. (2022). Assessing the Role of Wearable Robotics in the Construction Industry: Potential Safety Benefits, Opportunities, and Implementation Barriers. In: Jebelli, H., Habibnezhad, M., Shayesteh, S., Asadi, S., Lee, S. (eds) Automation and Robotics in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction Industry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77163-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics