Abstract
Selection of appropriate project become a real challenge for multi-criteria group decisions if the group of decision-makers indicate their precedencies depending on the character of alternatives and various attributes in relation to their information of them. The goal of the project selection process is to analyze the vitality of a project and to approve or reject project suggestions on base of determined criteria. This decision is very complex because they need the determination, consideration and analysis of different tangible and intangible attributes. This article represents a multi-criteria group technique to decision-making for the problem of choosing a project in a fuzzy environment of the second type. A step-by-step procedure is used to rank and evaluate alternatives in the offered technique, and the best decision is selected taking into account both beneficial and unfavorable criteria. We use four sets of criteria weights to analyze the robustness of the used technique.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Li, X., Fang, S.C., Guo, X., et al.: An extended model for project portfolio selection with project divisibility and interdependency. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 25, 119–138 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11518-015-5281-1
Huang, X.: Optimal project selection with random fuzzy parameters. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 106(2), 513–522 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.06.011
Carlsson, C., Fullér, R., Heikkilä, M., Majlender, P.: A fuzzy approach to R&D project portfolio selection. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 44(2), 93–105 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-34783-6_2
Huang, X., Zhao, T.: Project selection and scheduling with uncertain net income and investment cost. Appl. Math. Comput. 15(247), 61–71 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2014.08.082
Rafiee, M., Kianfar, F.: A scenario tree approach to multi-period project selection problem using real-option valuation method. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 56(1), 411–420 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3177-x
Perez, F., Gomez, T.: Multiobjective project portfolio selection with fuzzy constraints. Ann. Oper. Res. 245(1–2), 7–29 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-014-1556-z
Wang, J., Hwang, W.L.: A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model. Omega 35(3), 247–257 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2005.06.002
Wey, WM.: A multiobjective optimization model for urban renewal projects selection with uncertainty considerations. In: Fourth International Conference on Natural Computation. ICNC 2008, 18 October 2008, vol. 6, pp. 423–427. IEEE (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/icnc.2008.554
Mendel, J.M., John, R.I.B.: Type-2 fuzzy sets made simple. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Systems 10, 117–127 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1109/91.995115
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Aliyeva, K. (2021). Fuzzy Type-2 Decision Making Method on Project Selection. In: Aliev, R.A., Yusupbekov, N.R., Kacprzyk, J., Pedrycz, W., Sadikoglu, F.M. (eds) 11th World Conference “Intelligent System for Industrial Automation” (WCIS-2020). WCIS 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1323. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68004-6_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68004-6_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-68003-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-68004-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)