Abstract
A new model for engineering education is implemented to introduce the professional practice and simulate a work environment in post-secondary undergraduate education. More precisely, cross-disciplinary project-based learning has been introduced into the curriculum of three undergraduate engineering programs, namely, Biotechnology, Automotive and Vehicle Technology, and Automation Engineering Technology. In this, students from the three streams undertake a collaborative effort to design an in-house electrochemical biosensor device that can be used in a series of disjoint experiments performed by the student participants of this study. An open-ended research project was issued to the students for evaluation of the course. To ensure continuous progress by the students, weekly reports, regular presentations, assignments, and lab reports were submitted towards a final grade. The entire exercise implements Bloom’s taxonomy on learning in a top-down approach, leading to a more challenging but extremely satisfying learning experience that will promote the retention of the concepts for a longer duration. By offering the students an opportunity to expand on innovative ideas that scaffold technical development through the use of experimental research and design, the project-based learning methodology will enhance the engineering learning environment for post-secondary education
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Case, J.M., Light, G.: Emerging research methodologies in engineering education research. J. Eng. Educ. 100(1), 186–210 (2011)
Splitt, F.G.: The Challenge to change: on realizing the new paradigm for engineering education. J. Eng. Educ. 92(2), 181–187 (2003)
Williams, J.M.: Transformations in technical communication pedagogy: engineering, writing, and the ABET engineering criteria 2000. Tech. Commun. Q. 10(2), 149–167 (2001)
Lima, R.M., Andersson, P.H., Saalman, E.: Active learning in engineering education: a (re)introduction. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 42(1), 1–4 (2017)
Lacuesta, R., Palacios, G., Fernández, L.: Active learning through problem based learning methodology in engineering education. In: 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1–6 (2009)
Borrego, M., Newswander, L.K.: Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering education collaborations. J. Eng. Educ. 97, 123–134 (2008)
Fruchter, R.: Dimensions of teamwork education. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 17(4/5), 426–430 (2001)
Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J.: Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6), 1017–1054 (2006)
Edström, K., Kolmos, A.: PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 39(5), 539–555 (2014)
Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., Olkinuora, E.: Project-based learning in post-secondary education – theory, practice and rubber sling Shots. High. Educ. 51, 287–314 (2006)
Savery, J., Duffy, T.: Problem based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educ. Technol. 35(5), 31–38 (1995)
Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., Palincsar, A.: Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing supporting the learning. Educ. Psychol. 26(3–4), 369–398 (1991)
Srinivasan, S., Rajabzadeh, A.R., Centea, D.: A project-centric learning strategy in biotechnology. In: Auer, M.E., Hortsch, H., Sethakul, P. (eds.) ICL 2019. AISC, vol. 1134, pp. 830–838. Springer, Cham (2020)
Fruhling, Z.: Bloom’s taxonomy: bottom-up or top-down?. Resilient educator (2018). https://resilienteducator.com/instructional-design/blooms-taxonomy-bottom-up-or-top-down/. Accessed 28 May 2020
Wright, S.: Flipping bloom’s taxonomy. powerful learning practice (2012). https://plpnetwork.com/2012/05/15/flipping-blooms-taxonomy/. Accessed 28 May 2020
Crawley, E.F., Hosoi, A., Long, G.L., Kassis, T., Dickson, W., Mitra, A.B.: Moving forward with the new engineering education transformation (NEET) program at MIT - building community, developing projects, and connecting with industry. In: ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2019)
Srinivasan, S., Muhammad, N.: Implementation of a course in computational modeling of biological systems in an undergraduate engineering program. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 36(3), 857–864 (2020)
Olusegun, B.S.: Constructivism learning theory: a paradigm for teaching and learning. ISOR J. Res. Method. Educ. 5(6), 66–70 (2015)
Beichner, R.: The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project (2007)
Sidhu, G., Srinivasan, S.: An intervention-based active-learning strategy to enhance student performance in mathematics. Int. J. Pedagog. Teach. Educ. 2, 277–288 (2018)
Burrowes, P.A.: A student-centered approach to teaching general biology that really works: lord’s constructivist model put to a test. Am. Biol. Teach. 65, 491–502 (2003)
Cummings, K., Marx, J., Ronald, T., Dennis, K.: Evaluating innovation in studio physics. Am. J. Phys. 67, S38–S44 (1999)
Srinivasan, S., Centea, D.: Applicability of principles of cognitive science in active learning pedagogies. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop Active Learning in Engineering. (1 edn.) Aalborg Universitetsforlagpp, pp. 99–104 (2015)
Srinivasan S., Centea D.: An active learning strategy for programming courses. In: Auer, M., Tsiatsos, T. (eds.) Mobile Technologies and Applications for the Internet of Things. IMCL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 909, pp. 327–336 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bogoslowski, S., Geng, F., Gao, Z., Rajabzadeh, A.R., Srinivasan, S. (2021). Integrated Thinking - A Cross-Disciplinary Project-Based Engineering Education. In: Auer, M.E., Centea, D. (eds) Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0. ICBL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1314. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67209-6_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67209-6_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-67208-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-67209-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)