Skip to main content

Integrated Thinking - A Cross-Disciplinary Project-Based Engineering Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0 (ICBL 2020)

Abstract

A new model for engineering education is implemented to introduce the professional practice and simulate a work environment in post-secondary undergraduate education. More precisely, cross-disciplinary project-based learning has been introduced into the curriculum of three undergraduate engineering programs, namely, Biotechnology, Automotive and Vehicle Technology, and Automation Engineering Technology. In this, students from the three streams undertake a collaborative effort to design an in-house electrochemical biosensor device that can be used in a series of disjoint experiments performed by the student participants of this study. An open-ended research project was issued to the students for evaluation of the course. To ensure continuous progress by the students, weekly reports, regular presentations, assignments, and lab reports were submitted towards a final grade. The entire exercise implements Bloom’s taxonomy on learning in a top-down approach, leading to a more challenging but extremely satisfying learning experience that will promote the retention of the concepts for a longer duration. By offering the students an opportunity to expand on innovative ideas that scaffold technical development through the use of experimental research and design, the project-based learning methodology will enhance the engineering learning environment for post-secondary education

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Case, J.M., Light, G.: Emerging research methodologies in engineering education research. J. Eng. Educ. 100(1), 186–210 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Splitt, F.G.: The Challenge to change: on realizing the new paradigm for engineering education. J. Eng. Educ. 92(2), 181–187 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Williams, J.M.: Transformations in technical communication pedagogy: engineering, writing, and the ABET engineering criteria 2000. Tech. Commun. Q. 10(2), 149–167 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lima, R.M., Andersson, P.H., Saalman, E.: Active learning in engineering education: a (re)introduction. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 42(1), 1–4 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lacuesta, R., Palacios, G., Fernández, L.: Active learning through problem based learning methodology in engineering education. In: 39th IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1–6 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borrego, M., Newswander, L.K.: Characteristics of successful cross-disciplinary engineering education collaborations. J. Eng. Educ. 97, 123–134 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fruchter, R.: Dimensions of teamwork education. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 17(4/5), 426–430 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J.: Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6), 1017–1054 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Edström, K., Kolmos, A.: PBL and CDIO: complementary models for engineering education development. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 39(5), 539–555 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., Olkinuora, E.: Project-based learning in post-secondary education – theory, practice and rubber sling Shots. High. Educ. 51, 287–314 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Savery, J., Duffy, T.: Problem based learning: an instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educ. Technol. 35(5), 31–38 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blumenfeld, P.C., Soloway, E., Marx, R.W., Krajcik, J.S., Guzdial, M., Palincsar, A.: Motivating project-based learning: sustaining the doing supporting the learning. Educ. Psychol. 26(3–4), 369–398 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Srinivasan, S., Rajabzadeh, A.R., Centea, D.: A project-centric learning strategy in biotechnology. In: Auer, M.E., Hortsch, H., Sethakul, P. (eds.) ICL 2019. AISC, vol. 1134, pp. 830–838. Springer, Cham (2020)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Fruhling, Z.: Bloom’s taxonomy: bottom-up or top-down?. Resilient educator (2018). https://resilienteducator.com/instructional-design/blooms-taxonomy-bottom-up-or-top-down/. Accessed 28 May 2020

  15. Wright, S.: Flipping bloom’s taxonomy. powerful learning practice (2012). https://plpnetwork.com/2012/05/15/flipping-blooms-taxonomy/. Accessed 28 May 2020

  16. Crawley, E.F., Hosoi, A., Long, G.L., Kassis, T., Dickson, W., Mitra, A.B.: Moving forward with the new engineering education transformation (NEET) program at MIT - building community, developing projects, and connecting with industry. In: ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Srinivasan, S., Muhammad, N.: Implementation of a course in computational modeling of biological systems in an undergraduate engineering program. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 36(3), 857–864 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Olusegun, B.S.: Constructivism learning theory: a paradigm for teaching and learning. ISOR J. Res. Method. Educ. 5(6), 66–70 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beichner, R.: The student-centered activities for large enrollment undergraduate programs (SCALE-UP) project (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sidhu, G., Srinivasan, S.: An intervention-based active-learning strategy to enhance student performance in mathematics. Int. J. Pedagog. Teach. Educ. 2, 277–288 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Burrowes, P.A.: A student-centered approach to teaching general biology that really works: lord’s constructivist model put to a test. Am. Biol. Teach. 65, 491–502 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cummings, K., Marx, J., Ronald, T., Dennis, K.: Evaluating innovation in studio physics. Am. J. Phys. 67, S38–S44 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Srinivasan, S., Centea, D.: Applicability of principles of cognitive science in active learning pedagogies. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop Active Learning in Engineering. (1 edn.) Aalborg Universitetsforlagpp, pp. 99–104 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Srinivasan S., Centea D.: An active learning strategy for programming courses. In: Auer, M., Tsiatsos, T. (eds.) Mobile Technologies and Applications for the Internet of Things. IMCL 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 909, pp. 327–336 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fei Geng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bogoslowski, S., Geng, F., Gao, Z., Rajabzadeh, A.R., Srinivasan, S. (2021). Integrated Thinking - A Cross-Disciplinary Project-Based Engineering Education. In: Auer, M.E., Centea, D. (eds) Visions and Concepts for Education 4.0. ICBL 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1314. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67209-6_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics