Skip to main content

Undecidability of Algebras of Binary Relations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hajnal Andréka and István Németi on Unity of Science

Part of the book series: Outstanding Contributions to Logic ((OCTR,volume 19))

Abstract

Let S be a signature of operations and relations definable in relation algebra (e.g. converse, composition, containment, union, identity, etc.), let R(S) be the class of all S-structures isomorphic to concrete algebras of binary relations with concrete interpretations for symbols in S, and let F(S) be the class of S-structures isomorphic to concrete algebras of binary relations over a finite base. To prove that membership of R(S) or F(S) for finite S-structures is undecidable, we reduce from a known undecidable problem—here we use the tiling problem, the partial group embedding problem and the partial group finite embedding problem to prove undecidability of finite membership of R(S) or F(S) for various signatures S. It follows that the equational theory of R(S) is undecidable whenever S includes the boolean operators and composition. We give an exposition of the reduction from the tiling problem and the reduction from the group embedding problem, and summarize what we know about the undecidability of finite membership of R(S) and of F(S) for different signatures S.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    One such variant is when (i) the instances are restricted to those \(\tau \) that contain a special tile whose four sides all have a fixed ‘white’ colour that occurs only on this one tile, and (ii) \(\tau \) is a yes-instance iff each tile in \(\tau \) occurs in some tiling of the plane. This is the variant actually used in the proof, but these extra particulars will not concern us in this outline.

  2. 2.

    A relation algebra is integral if its identity element \(1'\) is an atom.

References

  1. Andréka, H., Givant, S., & Németi, I. (1997). Decision problems for equational theories of relation algebras. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, 126(604).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andréka, H., Givant, S., & Németi, I. (2020). Nonrepresentable relation algebras from group system. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 13(4), 861–881. arXiv:1809.05473

  3. Andréka, H., Monk, J., & Németi, I. (eds.). (1991). Algebraic logic. In Colloquia Mathematica Societatis Janos Bolyai (Vol. 54). North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Andréka, H., & Németi, I. (2013). Reducing first-order logic to \({{\sf Df\it }_{3}}\). In H. Andréka, M. Ferenczi, & I. Németi (Eds.), Cylindric-like algebras and algebraic logic (Vol. 22, pp. 15–35). Bolyai Society Mathematical Studies. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Berger, R. (1966). The undecidability of the domino problem, Memoirs (Vol. 66). Providence, Rhode Island: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Comer, S. (1984). Combinatorial aspects of relations. Algebra Universalis, 18, 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Evans, T. (1953). Embeddability and the word problem. Journal of the London Mathematical Society, 28, 76–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Givant, S. (1988). Tarski’s development of logic and mathematics based on the calculus of relations. In Andréka et al. (Eds.), Colloquia Mathematica Societatis Janos Bolyai (Vol. 54, pp. 189–215). North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Givant, S. (2006). The calculus of relations as a foundation for mathematics. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 37(4), 277–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Givant, S., & Andréka, H. (2002). Groups and algebras of binary relations. The Bulletin of Symbolic Logic, 8, 38–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hall, T. E., Kublanovskii, S. I., Margolis, S., Sapir, M. V., & Trotter, P. G. (1997). Algorithmic problems for finite groups and finite 0-simple semigroups. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 119, 75–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirsch, R. (1995). Completely representable relation algebras. Bulletin of the Interest Group in Propositional and Predicate Logics, 3(1), 77–92.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hirsch, R. (2018). Decidability of equational theories for subsignatures of relation algebra. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Relational and Algebraic Methods in Computer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hirsch, R., & Hodkinson, I. (2002). Relation algebras by games. North-Holland, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hirsch, R., & Jackson, M. (2012). Undecidability of representability as binary relations. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 77, 1211–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jackson, M. (1999). Some undecidable embedding problems for finite semigroups. Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, 42, 113–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jackson, M. (2000). The embeddability of ring and semigroup amalgams is undecidable. Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society, Series A, 69, 272–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson, M., & Volkov, M. V. (2009). Undecidable problems for completely 0-simple semigroups. Journal of Pure and Applied Algebra, 213, 1961–1978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jónsson, B., & Tarski, A. (1952). Boolean algebras with operators, II. American Journal of Mathematics, 74, 127–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kharlampovich, O., & Sapir, M. V. (1995). Algorithmic problems in varieties. International Journal of Algebra and Computation, 5(4–5), 379–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kublanovsky, S., & Sapir, M. V. (1998). Potential divisibility in finite semigroups is undecidable. International Journal of Algebra and Computation, 8, 671–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Maddux, R. D. (1980). The equational theory of \({\rm {CA}}_{3}\) is undecidable. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 45(2), 311–316. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2273191.

  23. Maddux, R. D. (1982). Some varieties containing relation algebras. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 272(2), 501–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Maddux, R. D. (1994). A perspective on the theory of relation algebras. Algebra Universalis, 31, 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Németi, I. (1986). Free algebras and decidability in algebraic logic. Doctor of Science dissertation, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Neuzerling, M. (2016). Undecidability of representability for lattice-ordered semigroups and ordered complemented semigroups. Algebra universalis, 76, 431–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Post, E. (1947). Recursive unsolvability of a problem of Thue. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 12(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sapir, M. V. (1996). Eventually \({\mathscr{H}}\)-related sets and systems of equations over finite semigroups and rings. Journal of Algebra, 183, 365–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Slobodskoĭ, A. M. (1981). Undecidability of the universal theory of finite groups. Algebra i Logika, 20(207–230), 251.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tarski, A., & Givant, S. (1987). A formalization of set theory without variables. No. 41 in Colloquium Publications. American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vaught, R. (1962). On a theorem of Cobham concerning undecidable theories. In Logic, methodology and philosophy of science, Proceedings of the 1960 International Congress (pp. 14–25). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin Hirsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hirsch, R., Hodkinson, I., Jackson, M. (2021). Undecidability of Algebras of Binary Relations. In: Madarász, J., Székely, G. (eds) Hajnal Andréka and István Németi on Unity of Science. Outstanding Contributions to Logic, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64187-0_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics