Skip to main content

Abduction, the Logic of Scientific Creativity, and Scientific Realism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Abduction in Cognition and Action

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 59))

Abstract

A fundamental question for philosophy of science asks, How is knowledge of the world created? A pragmatist approach is constructed to show how discovery and justification are tightly related during the creation of scientific knowledge. Procedural abduction, at the scientific level of Strict Abduction and higher, integrates the learnable (postulations undergoing conceptual development) and the logical (hypotheses undergoing rational scrutiny) quite thoroughly. Discovery and justification are functionally fused together within the organized process of procedural abduction by scientific communities. Four questions posed at the start are answered by this pragmatist philosophy of science as follows. (1) Is scientific creativity methodologically related to scientific justification? Answer: scientific creativity is integral to abductive procedures yielding scientific justification. (2) Can a distinction between genuine science and pseudo-science be clearly defined? Answer: genuine science is distinguished by the application of procedural abduction at the level of Strict Abduction or higher. (3) Does scientific knowledge achieve the legitimacy of scientific realism? Answer: procedural abduction legitimates the credibility of highly-confirmed hypotheses and hence justifies scientific realism. (4) How are scientific communities responsible for establishing scientific knowledge? Answer: scientific communities using procedural abduction realize (in both cognitive and constructive senses) scientific knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    An entryway into the literature could start by consulting Magnani [18], Paavola [19], Barrena and Nubiola [20], Park [21].

  2. 2.

    Prominent philosophers of science who stress the epistemic link between realistic modelling and controlled experimental conditions include Hacking [22], Geire [23], Cartwright [24].

  3. 3.

    See Nickels [25], Snyder [26], Schickore and Steinle [27].

  4. 4.

    Whewell [28, vol. 2, p. 186].

  5. 5.

    Popper [29, p. 32].

  6. 6.

    Popper [29, pp. 7–8].

  7. 7.

    Recent studies linking scientific realism with abductive inquiry include Magnani and Betolotti [30], Niiniluoto [31].

References

  1. Hintikka, J.: What is abduction? The fundamental problem of contemporary epistemology. Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc. 34, 503–533 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aliseda, A.: The logic of abduction: An introduction. In: Magnani, L., Bertolotti, T. (eds.) Handbook of Model-based Science, pp. 219–230. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2017)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brockhaus, R.: Realism and psychologism in 19th century logic. Philos. Phenomenological Res. 51, 493–524 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Peirce, C. S.: The collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, vol. 8. In: Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P, Burks, A.W. (eds.) Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA (1931–1935, 1958). (Citations are to volume and paragraph numbers)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Peckhaus, V.: Psychologism and the distinction between discovery and justification. In: Schickore, J., Steinle, F. (eds.) Revisiting Discovery and Justification, pp. 99–116. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Pietarinen, A., Belluci, F.: New light on Peirce’s conceptions of retroduction, deduction, and scientific reasoning. Int. Stud. Philos. Sci. 28, 353–373 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, S., Zenker, F.: Peirce knew why abduction isn’t IBE: a scheme and critical questions for abductive argument. Argumentation 32, 569–587 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Plutynski, A.: Four problems of abduction: a brief history. HOPOS: J. Int. Soc. Hist. Philos. Sci. 1, 227–248 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, D.R.: Creativity and the Philosophy of C. S. Peirce. Martinus Nijhoff, Dordrecht (1987)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, D.R.: The evolution of Peirce’s concept of abduction. Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc. 22, 145–164 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tschaepe, M.: Guessing and abduction. Trans. Charles S. Peirce Soc. 50, 115–138 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tschaepe, M.: Gradations of guessing: preliminary sketches and suggestions. Contemp. Pragmatism 10, 135–154 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shook, J.R.: Abduction, complex inferences, and emergent heuristics of scientific inquiry. Axiomathes 26, 157–186 (2016). Reprinted in this volume

    Google Scholar 

  14. Peirce, C. S.: The Carnegie application for logic research, Draft E” MS L75.163-173, held by The Peirce Edition Project at Indiana University Indianapolis (1902). Accessed online at http://arisbe.sitehost.iu.edu/menu/library/bycsp/L75/ver1/l75v1-06.htm

  15. Shook, J.R.: Varieties of twentieth century American naturalism. Pluralist 6, 1–17 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Worrall, J.: The no miracles intuition and the no miracles argument. In: Dieks, D. (ed.) Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation, pp. 11–21. Springer, Dordrecht (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Shook, J.R.: Reasoning is communal in method and spirit. In: Thellefsen, T., Sorensen, B. (eds.) Charles Sanders Peirce in His Own Words, pp. 70–83. Mouton De Gruyter, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Magnani, L.: The Abductive Structure of Scientific Creativity. Springer, New York (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Paavola, S.: On the Origin of Ideas: An Abductivist Approach to Discovery, 2nd edn. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing, Saarbrücken, Germany (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barrena S., Nubiola J.: Abduction, the logic of creativity. In: Bloomsbury Companion to Contemporary Peircean Semiotics, pp. 185–203. Bloomsbury, London (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Park, W.: Abduction in Context: The Conjectural Dynamics of Scientific Reasoning. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2017)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Hacking, I.: Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (1983)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Giere, R.N.: Science Without Laws. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cartwright, N.: Nature’s Capacities and Their Measurement. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nickles, T.: The strange story of scientific method. In: Meheus, J., Nickles, T. (eds.) Models of Discovery and Creativity, pp. 167–207. Springer, Dordrecht, Germany (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Snyder, L.J.: Hypotheses in 19th century British philosophy of science: Herschel, Whewell, Mill. In: Heidelberger, M., Schiemann, G. (eds.) The Significance of the Hypothetical in Natural Science, pp. 59–76. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Schickore, J., Steinle, F.: Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction. Springer, Berlin (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  28. Whewell, W.: The Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences. J.W. Parker, London (1840)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Popper, K.: The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Routledge, London (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Magnani, L., Bertolotti, T. (eds.): Springer Handbook of Model-based Science. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Niiniluoto, I.: Truth-Seeking by Abduction. Springer, Cham, Switzerland (2018)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Shook .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shook, J.R. (2021). Abduction, the Logic of Scientific Creativity, and Scientific Realism. In: Shook, J.R., Paavola, S. (eds) Abduction in Cognition and Action. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61773-8_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics