Skip to main content

PELA-USAL: A Methodological Tool for the Study of Elites

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Politics and Political Elites in Latin America

Abstract

This introductory chapter presents the Parliamentary Elites of Latin America (PELA-USAL) project, which has conducted interviews with Latin American legislators in the lower chambers of political representation for more than 20 years. The following emphasizes the PELA-USAL project’s methodology, as well as its most important inputs and future challenges. Based on the experience of researchers from the project, our aim here is to re-think several issues (such as data mining) that arise during the research process, taking into account the wealth of available information (after two decades of development) and the particularities that parliamentary elites present as an object of study. First we consider the main issues inherent in the study of elites from a theoretical-methodological perspective. Second, the principles treated in the first section are related directly to the PELA-USAL project. Finally, discussion of the main challenges and future agenda for the project is provided. All of this is supported by the specialized bibliography, as well as by data from the project itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Politicians can be analyzed in two ways: as actors who explain political phenomena, or as actors who can be explained in and of themselves. On the one hand, political problems can be understood by way of the actions of politicians within the system. On the other hand, politicians themselves can be explained by their own processes of professionalization (Alcántara 2006).

  2. 2.

    The PELA Project has always had public funding. Over its more than 20 years of activity, the following projects have been financed: SEC94/0284, SEC95/0845, SEC02/3484, SEJ 2005-08313, C/POL, CSO 2009-08971, and CSO2012-39377-C02-02.

  3. 3.

    See Alcántara and Rivas Otero (2018a, b) and Bohigues (2018).

  4. 4.

    Examples of added questions: “In terms of your career, what would you like your next office to be?” or “From the following characteristics here presented (education, political expertise, honesty, charisma, or political leadership), which do you think is most important to winning an election? And to win second place?”

  5. 5.

    http://www.vanderbilt.edu/lapop/index.php

  6. 6.

    A good example here would be the question related to the advantages and disadvantages of a democratic regime: “I am going to show you a list of possible advantages of democratic regimes, and I would like to know which, in your opinion, would represent the main advantage. And the second?” At the beginning of the research, in 1994, these questions responded to the interest in democratic consolidation following transitions, and to the level of institutionalization of the state when facing possible threats. However, more than two decades later, challenges have evolved beyond the consolidation of democracy.

  7. 7.

    http://www.bvm-net.de/user/dokumente/kodex-Q02D.pdf

  8. 8.

    At present, a new axis of analysis has been incorporated: that of gender, with the objective of analyzing the characteristics of women legislators in Latin America as well as their attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions on different dimensions of the political system, comparing these with those of their male counterparts.

  9. 9.

    See, among others, Coppedge (1998), Alcántara (2004), Ruiz Rodríguez (2003), Freidenberg et al. (2006), and Colomer and Escabel (2005).

  10. 10.

    For further information, see: https://oir.org.es/pela/publicaciones/

  11. 11.

    See Alcántara and García Díaz (2008), Alcántara and Tagina (2011, 2013, 2016), and Alcántara et al. (2018).

References

  • Alcántara, M. (2004). Quality of democracy or quality of politics? In G. O’Donnell & J. V. Cullell (Eds.), The quality of democracy. Theory and applications (pp. 234–238). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M. (2006). Partidos políticos en América Latina: Precisiones conceptuales, estado actual y retos futuros. In Communication in the Seminario Permanente de Partidos Políticos y Sistemas Electorales. Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M. (2011). El oficio del político. Madrid: Tecnos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M., & Rivas, C. (2007). Las dimensiones de la polarización partidista en América Latina. Política y gobierno, 14(2), 349–390.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M., & García Díaz, F. (2008). Elecciones y política en América Latina. Mexico: Instituto Electoral del Estado de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M., & Llamazares, I. (1997). El análisis de los diputados latinoamericanos en el contexto de los estudios sobre la clase política. Características, objetivos y estrategias de investigación. América Latina Hoy, 16, 15–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M., & Llamazares, I. (2006). Los partidos de la derecha en los legislativos latinoamericanos. In M. Alcántara (Ed.), Políticos y política en América Latina. Madrid: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M., & Rivas Otero, C. (2018a). Despenalización del aborto en América Latina: Proceloso camino. In Latinoamérica Análisis de Política Exterior. Retrieved from https://www.politicaexterior.com/latinoamerica-analisis/despenalizacion-del-aborto-america-latina-proceloso-camino/.

  • Alcántara, M., & Rivas Otero, C. (2018b). Migración en América Latina: Percepciones de la clase política. In Latinoamérica Análisis de Política Exterior. Retrieved from https://www.politicaexterior.com/latinoamerica-analisis/migracion-america-latina-percepciones-la-clase-politica/.

  • Alcántara, M., & Tagina, M. L. (2011). América Latina: Política y elecciones del bicentenario (2009-2010). Madrid: Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M., & Tagina, M. L. (2013). Elecciones y política en América Latina (2009-2011). Mexico: Instituto Federal Electoral.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M., & Tagina, M. L. (2016). Elecciones y cambios de elites en América Latina, 2014 y 2015. Salamanca: Ediciones de la Universidad de Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M., Barragán, M., & Sánchez, F. (2014). Latin American Presidents Leadership (1983-2013): A comparative perspective. In Communication in the ECPR Joint Session. Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcántara, M., Buquet, D., & Tagina, M. L. (2018). Elecciones y partidos en América Latina en el cambio de ciclo. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anduiza, E. (1999). ¿Individuos o sistemas?: Las razones de la abstención en la Europa Occidental. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barragán, M. (2016). Carreras políticas en países descentralizados. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barragán, M & Alcántara, M. (2019). ¿Nuevos socios o viejas alianzas?: El impacto de la crisis en los intereses políticos y económicos de los Estados. In: Sánchez, F. & García Montero, M. Los ciclos políticos y económicos de América Latina y el boom de las materias primas. Madrid: Tecnos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, H., & Cotta, M. (2000). Parliamentary representation in Europe. 1848-2000. Legislative recruitment and careers in eleven European countries. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, H., & Cotta, M. (2007). Democratic representation in Europe diversity. change and convergence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohigues, A. (2018). El matrimonio igualitario en las elecciones de Costa Rica. In Latinoamérica Análisis de Política Exterior. Retrieved from https://www.politicaexterior.com/latinoamerica-analisis/matrimonio-igualitario-las-elecciones-costa-rica/.

  • Bohigues, A. (2019). El papel de las élites políticas en el fortalecimiento de la democracia en América Latina. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). Sociología y cultura. Mexico: Consejo Nacional para la Cultura de México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabezas, L. (2012). Profesionalización de las élites legislativas en Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador y Perú. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabezas, L., & Barragán, M. (2014). Repensando la profesionalización de los políticos. Iberoamericana, 14(54), 164–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascante, M. J. (2014). La competencia partidista en América Central desde la óptica subestatal. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colomer, J., & Escabel, L. (2005). The left-right dimension in Latin America (Working Paper). Mexico: CIDE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge, M. (1998). The dynamic diversity of Latin American party systems. Party Politics, 4(4), 547–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowther, W., & Matonyte, I. (2007). Parliamentary elites as a democratic thermometer: Estonia, Lithuania y Moldova compared. Communist and Postcommunist Studies, 40, 281–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czudnowski, M. (1983). Political elites and social change. Studies of elite roles and attitudes. DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Heaven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy toward consolidation. Baltimore; London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldersved, S. (1989). Political elites in modern societies. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eztione-Harlevy, E. (1993). The elite connection. Problems and potential of western democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freidenberg, F., García, F., & Llamazares, I. (2006). Instituciones políticas y cohesión ideológica. Un análisis multinivel de la heterogeneidad ideológica en los partidos latinoamericanos. In M. Alcántara (Ed.), Políticos y política en América Latina (pp. 255–280). Madrid: Siglo XXI.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, F., & Mateos, A. (2001). Elites Parlamentarias en América Latina. Revista Española de Ciencia Política, 5, 173–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • García, F., Mateos, A., & Rivas, C. (2013). “Veinte años de élites parlamentarias en América Latina” (1994-2014). Revista de las Cortes Generales, 15, 135–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grilli, L., & Pratesi, M. (2004). Weighed estimation in multilevel ordinal and binary models in the presence of informative sampling designs. Survey Methodology, 30(1), 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagopian, F. (1998). Democracy and political representation in Latin America in the 1990s: Pause, reorganization or decline? In F. Auyero & J. Stark (Eds.), Fault lines of democracy in post-transition Latin America (pp. 99–143). Coral Gables: North-South Centre Press, University of Miami.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highley, J., & Gunther, R. (1992). Elites and democratic consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highley, J., Pakulski, J., & Wesolowski, W. (1998). Postcommunist elites and democracy in Eastern Europe. Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R., & Kungemann, H. D. (1976). Party Identification, ideological preference and the left-right dimension among western mass publics. In I. Budge & D. Farlie (Eds.), Party identification and beyond: Representation, voting and party competition. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kernecker, T. (2018). Political representation in Latin America: Legislative behavior and party strategy. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitschelt, H., & Hellemans, S. (1990). The left-right semantics and the new politics cleavage. Comparative Political Studies, 23, 210–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, S., Bejarano, A. M., & Pizarro, E. (2006). The crisis of democratic representation in the Andes: An overview. In S. Mainwaring (Ed.), The crisis of democratic representation in the Andes (pp. 1–44). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, P. (1997). Party system change. Approaches and interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Hernández, A. (2017). El éxito electoral de los partidos políticos en América Latina durante las décadas de cambio político (1988-2016). Organización, programa y niveles de competencia. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez Rosón, M. (2011). Ambición política y lealtad: Influencia sobre el comportamiento político. Política y Gobierno, 18(2), 231–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G. (1999). Horizontal accountability and new polyarchies. In A. Schedler, L. J. Diamond, & M. F. Plattner (Eds.), The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies (pp. 29–52). Boulder; London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Páramo, R. (2004). Estándares de calidad, accesibilidad y usabilidad para la realización y el desarrollo de encuestas por internet. Retrieved from http://www.netquest.com/papers/Rparamo_Estandares_enconline.pdf.

  • Putnam, R. (1973). The beliefs of politicians. Ideology, conflict and democracy in Britain and Italy. New Heaven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas, C. (2015). Élites Parlamentarias y democracia en América Latina. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, C. (2014). El papel de la oposición parlamentaria en las legislaturas subnacionales argentinas. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Rodríguez, L. (2003). La coherencia de los partidos políticos. Estructuración interna de la élite parlamentaria latinoamericana. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos, A. (2010). Democracia y poder legislativo en Chile. De la representación política a la conformación de las élites (1990-2009). Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, G. (1976). Parties and party system. A framework for analisis. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1982). Teoría de la Constitución. Madrid: Alianza Universidad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semenova, E., Edinger, M., & Best, H. (2013). Parliamentary elites in Central and Eastern Europe. Recruitment and representation. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, S., & Wlezein, C. (2011). Degrees of democracy: Politics, public opinion and policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, K., & Steinmo, S. (1992). Institutionalism in comparative politics. In S. Steinmo, K. Thelen, & F. Longstreth (Eds.), Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treminio, I. (2012). Llegaron para quedarse … los procesos de reforma de la reelección presidencial en América Latina (1999-2011). Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallés, M. (2005). El reto de la calidad en la investigación social cualitativa: De la retórica a los planteamientos de fondo y las propuestas técnicas. Revista Española de investigaciones sociológicas, 110(1), 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez, C. (2015). La influencia legislativa de la oposición en las iniciativas presidenciales: El caso de los gobiernos en minoría en México, 1997-2002. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Salamanca.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mélany Barragán .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barragán, M., Rivas Pérez, C., Rivas Otero, J.M. (2020). PELA-USAL: A Methodological Tool for the Study of Elites. In: Alcántara, M., García Montero, M., Rivas Pérez, C. (eds) Politics and Political Elites in Latin America. Latin American Societies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51584-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51584-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51583-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51584-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics