Skip to main content

The Biopolitics of Animal Love: Two Settler Stories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Animals and Literature

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

Abstract

Towards the elaboration of a literary history of loving biopower, I compare two novels from dramatically different historical and geographical settings—Jack London’s White Fang (1906) and J.M. Coetzee’s Disgrace (1999). Comparing two stories that bookend the twentieth century, I trace how fictions of human-animal love and the literary productions of animal affect are imbricated in settler-colonialism, particularly the shift in the second half of the century to feeling acts of apology and reconciliation by liberal settler subjects and states. While fictions of animal love run the risk of affectively redeeming settler subjectivities at a moment of historical accounting, they also hold the potential for imagining a form of decolonial love that, by virtue of including animals, may be more unsettling than reconciliation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Hardt and Negri, Multitude, 352.

  2. 2.

    See Lazzarato, Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity and Federici, Revolution At Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle.

  3. 3.

    Berlant, The Female Complaint, 171.

  4. 4.

    See, for instance, Boggs, Animalia Americana: Animal Representations and Biopolitical Subjectivity.

  5. 5.

    Derrida, On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness, 3.

  6. 6.

    Foucault, The History of Sexuality, Volume 1.

  7. 7.

    Trouillot, “Abortive Rituals,” 173.

  8. 8.

    Kreilkamp, “Petted Things,” 103.

  9. 9.

    Boggs, Animalia Americana, 35.

  10. 10.

    Foucault, The History of Sexuality.

  11. 11.

    London, White Fang, 206.

  12. 12.

    When truth commissions are Indigenous-led, the politics of truth-telling and of affect are far more unsettling of the liberal subject. See Susan McHugh’s study of the Inuit-led Qikiqtani Truth Commission (QTC), which inquired into a massacre of sled dogs by the Canadian Mounted Police. “‘A flash point in Inuit memories’: Endangered Knowledges in the Mountie Sled Dog Massacre,” 149–175.

  13. 13.

    Derrida, On Cosmopolitanism, 30.

  14. 14.

    Berlant, “A Properly Political Concept of Love,” 683–691.

  15. 15.

    See Lutts, The Nature Fakers, 93.

  16. 16.

    The Letters of Jack London, 18.

  17. 17.

    London, White Fang, 100.

  18. 18.

    Gooder and Jacobs. “‘On The Border Of The Unsayable’: The Apology in Postcolonizing Australia,” 232.

  19. 19.

    Seltzer, Bodies and Machines, 169.

  20. 20.

    Attwell, J.M. Coetzee and the Life of Writing, 58.

  21. 21.

    Coetzee, Disgrace, 52.

  22. 22.

    It is important to note claims by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Nelson Mandela that the TRC was also guided by the African philosophy of Ubuntu.

  23. 23.

    Coetzee, Disgrace, 89.

  24. 24.

    Attwell refers to “a struggle for control over the resources of fictionality itself” in relation to Coetzee’sLife & Times of Michael K. See Attwell’s J.M. Coetzee: South Africa and the Politics of Writing, 92.

  25. 25.

    Coetzee, The Lives of Animals, 80.

Works Cited

  • Attwell, David. 2015. J.M. Coetzee and the Life of Writing: Face-to-Face with Time. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. J.M. Coetzee: South Africa and the Politics of Writing. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, Lauren. 2008. The Female Complaint: The Unfinished Business of Sentimentality in American Culture. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. A Properly Political Concept of Love: Three Approaches in Ten Pages. Cultural Anthropology 26 (4): 683–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, Colleen Glenney. 2013. Animalia Americana: Animal Representations and Biopolitical Subjectivity. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, J.M. 1999. Disgrace. London: Secker & Warburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coetzee, J.M., Barbara Smuts, Marjorie Garber, Peter Singer, and Wendy Doniger. 1999. The Lives of Animals. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2001. On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness. Trans. Mark Dooley, and Michael Hughes. Preface by Simon Critchley and Richard Kearny. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am (More to Follow), Edited by Marie-Louise Mallet. Trans. David Wills. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, Silvia. 2012. Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle. Oakland: PM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1980. The History of Sexuality, Volume 1. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2005. Multitude: War and Democracy in the Age of Empire. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooder, Haydie, and Jane M. Jacobs. 2000. ‘On The Border of The Unsayable’: The Apology in Postcolonizing Australia. Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 2: 229–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kreilkamp, Ivan. Spring 2005. Petted Things: Wuthering Heights and the Animal. The Yale Journal of Criticism 18 (1): 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, Maurizio. 2014. Signs and Machines: Capitalism and the Production of Subjectivity. Trans. Joshua David Jordan. Cambridge: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • London, Jack. 1994. White Fang (1904). New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1988. The Letters of Jack London. Volume 1, 1896–1905. In, ed. Earle Labor, Robert C. Leitz III, and Irving Milo Shepard. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutts, Ralph H. 1990. The Nature Fakers: Wildlife, Science & Sentiment. Charlottesville: The University Press of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, Susan. March 2013. ‘A Flash Point in Inuit Memories’: Endangered Knowledges in the Mountie Sled Dog Massacre. English Studies in Canada 39 (1): 149–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer, Mark. 1992. Bodies and Machines. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trouillot, Michel-Rolf. 2000. Abortive Rituals: Historical Apologies in the Global Era. Interventions: International Journal of Postcolonial Studies 2: 171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Recommended Further Reading

  • Ahuja, Neel. 2009. Postcolonial Critique in a Multispecies World. PMLA 124 (2): 556–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs, Colleen Glenney. 2017. Love Triangle With Dog: Whym Chow, the “Michael Fields,” and the Poetic Potential of Human-Animal Bonds. In Animalities: Literary and Cultural Studies Beyond the Human, ed. Michael Lundblad. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrulew, Matthew, and Dinesh Joseph Wadiwel, eds. 2016. Foucault and Animals. Leiden/Boston: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall-Morwick, Kara. Spring 2013. Jack London, Nature Fakery, and the Stakes of Animal Narrative. The Evolutionary Review 4 (1): 67–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettman, Dominic. 2017. Creaturely Love: How Desire Makes Us More and Less Than Human. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, Wendy. 2017. ‘The Only Facts are Supernatural Ones’: Dreaming Animals and Trauma in Some Contemporary Southern African Texts. In Indigenous Creatures, Native Knowledges, and the Arts: Animal Studies in Modern Worlds, ed. Wendy Woodward and Susan McHugh. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicole Shukin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shukin, N. (2021). The Biopolitics of Animal Love: Two Settler Stories. In: McHugh, S., McKay, R., Miller, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Animals and Literature. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39773-9_38

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics