Skip to main content

Decision

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Terms in Futures Studies

Abstract

Decision-making processes are both, ubiquitous and contingent. They can be described as social action, communicative act, or cultural technique. Most importantly, they need to be analyzed as historically and culturally embedded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balke, Friedrich, Gregor Schwering, and Urs Stäheli, eds. 2004. Paradoxien der Entscheidung. Wahl/Selektion in Kunst, Literatur und Medien. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Michael J.R., Holly L.R. O’Broin, Nick Lee, and Carl Senior. 2015. How organizational cognitive neuroscience can deepen understanding of managerial decision-making: A review of the recent literature and future directions. International Journal of Management Reviews 18: 542–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Michael D., James G. March, and Johan P. Olson. 1972. A garbage can model of organization choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, Antonio, Hanna Damasio, and Y. Christen, eds. 1996. Neurobiology of decision-making. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer, Gerd, and Reinhard Selten. 2001. Bounded rationality: The adaptive toolbox. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann-Rehnitz, Philip, André Krischer, and Matthias Pohlig. 2018. Entscheiden als Problem der Geschichtswissenschaft. Zeitschrift für Historische Forschung 45 (2): 217–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, Daniel. 2011. Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehler, Derek J., and Nigel Harvey, eds. 2004. The Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krischer, André, and Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger, eds. 2010. Herstellung und Darstellung von Entscheidungen. Verfahren, Verwalten und Verhandeln in der Vormoderne. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lübbe, Hermann. 1965. Zur Theorie der Entscheidung. In Collegium Philosophicum. Studien Joachim Ritter zum 60. Geburtstag, 118–140. Basel/Stuttgart: Schwabe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1993. Die Paradoxie des Entscheidens. Verwaltungs-Archiv 84: 287–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Die Politik der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G. 1994. A primer on decision making: How decisions happen. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., and Johan P. Olsen. 1984. The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review 78 (3): 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, James G., and Herbert A. Simon. 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, John W., and Brian Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized organizations. Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83: 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimank, Uwe. 2005. Entscheidungsgesellschaft: Komplexität und Rationalität der Moderne. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert A. 1959. Theories of decision-making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review 49: 253–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stollberg-Rilinger, Barbara. 2016. Cultures of decision-making. London: German Historical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, Amos, and Daniel Kahneman. 1974. Judgement under uncertainty. Heuristics and biases. Science 185: 1124–1131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl E. 1995. Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Stollberg-Rilinger, B. (2019). Decision. In: Paul, H. (eds) Critical Terms in Futures Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28987-4_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics