Abstract
The aim the GAP project is to promote and enable processes for open and effective participation of stakeholders in research and management. This case study builds on mutual learning as a basic principle of transdisciplinarity that incorporates the processes, methodologies, knowledge and goals of stakeholders from science, industry and politics. This paper addresses mutual learning as an important element of the Maritime Spatial Planning processes. A step-by-step approach towards collaboration is based on understanding the other side’s thinking, focusing on shared interests and looking for solutions to common problems. It is technically supported by the participatory Geographic Information System (GIS)-based mutual learning methodology. The results of integrating fisheries into the real process of MSP in Estonia are presented and discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aps R, Lassen H (2012) Towards smart management of the Baltic Sea fishery. In: Intilli JS (ed) Fishery management. Nova Science Publisher Inc, New York, pp 97–107
Aps R, Kotta J, Lauringson V, Oganjan K, Pärnoja M, Kartau K (2014) Planning marine space for mussel farming with focus on use of scientific knowledge – Estonian Case Study. ICES CM 2014/3654 K:02
EC (2008a) Communication from the commission: roadmap for maritime spatial planning: achieving common principles in the EU. COM (2008) 791 final, Brussels
EC (2008b) Directive 2008/56/EC of the European Parliament and of the council of 17 June 2008 establishing a framework for community action in the field of marine environmental policy (Marine Strategy Framework Directive). Off J Eur Union 164:19–40
EC (2012) Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. Blue Growth – opportunities for marine and maritime sustainable growth. COM (2012) 494 final, Brussels
EC (2014) Directive 2014/89/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 23 July 2014 establishing a framework for maritime spatial planning. Brussels
Ehler C, Douvere F (2007) Visions for a sea change. Report of the First International Workshop on Marine Spatial Planning. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. IOC manual and guides. UNESCO, Paris
Fisher R, Ury W (1991) Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books, New York
Gil Y (2011) Interactive knowledge capture in the new millennium: how the Semantic Web changed everything. Knowl Eng Rev 26(1):45–51
Harvey F (2009) Of boundary objects and boundaries: local stabilization of the polish cadastral infrastructure. Inf Soc 25(5):315–327
Harvey F, Chrisman N (1998) Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS Technology. Environ Plan 30:1683–1694
Hirsch-Hadorn G, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Hoffmann-Riem H, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E (2008) The emergence of transdisciplinarity as a form of research. In: Hadorn GH, Hoffmann-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Pohl C, Wiesmann U, Zemp E (eds) Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Springer Verlag, New York, pp 19–39
Hjerne O, Hansson S (2002) The role of fish and fisheries in Baltic Sea nutrient dynamics. Limnol Oceanogr 47(4):1023–1032
ICES (2014) Baltic Sea, herring in subdivision 28.1 (Gulf of Riga), advice for 2015. ICES Advice 2014, Book 8
Kopti M, Aps R, Fetissov M, Suursaar Ü (2011) Integration of fishery management into the process of Maritime Spatial Planning. In: Brebbia CA, Zubir SS (eds) Management of natural resources, sustainable development and ecological hazards III. Southampton, WIT Press, pp 183–194
Martin G, Aps R, Kopti M, Kotta J, Remmelgas L, Kuris M (2012) Towards a pilot maritime spatial plan for the Pärnu Bay. BaltSeaPlan report no 13
Martin G, Kotta J, Aps R, Kopti M, Martin K, Remmelgas L, Kuris M (2013) Marine spatial planning as a tool for promoting sustainable economic development including tourism and recreation in a coastal area: an example from Pärnu Bay, NE Baltic Sea. In: Brebbia CA, Beriatos E (eds) Sustainable development and planning VI. Southampton, WIT Press, pp 393–404
NOAA (1998) A primer for federal agencies, essential fish habitat: new marine fish habitat conservation mandate for federal agencies. National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Regional Office, Long Beach
Oganjan K, Lauringson V (2014) Grazing rate of zebra mussel in a shallow eutrophicated bay of the Baltic Sea. Mar Environ Res 102:43–50
Panzarasa P, Jennings NR (2001) Negotiation and joint commitments in multi-agent systems. Sozionikaktuell 3:65–81
Panzarasa P, Jennings NR, Norman TJ (2002) Formalizing collaborative decision-making and practical reasoning in multi-agent systems. J Logic Comput 12(1):55–117
Rahwan I, Sonenberg L, Dignum F (2003) Towards interest-based negotiation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Melbourne, Australia. ACM Press, New York, pp 773–780
Rinner C (2001) Argumentation maps: GIS-based discussion support for on-line planning. Environ Plan B Plan Des 28(6):847–863
Rinner C (2006) Argumentation mapping in collaborative spatial decision making. In: Dragicevic S, Balram S (eds) Collaborative GIS. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, pp 85–102
Scholz RW (2000) Mutual learning as a basic principle of transdisciplinarity. In: Scholz RW, Häberli R, Bill A, Welti M (eds) Transdisciplinarity: joint problem-solving among science, technology and society. Workbook II: mutual learning sessions. Haffmans Sachbuch Verlag, Zurich, pp 13–19
UN (1991) UN Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment in a Transboundary Context. United Nations, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Crown
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aps, R., Fetissov, M., Kopti, M. (2020). From Planning for Society to Planning with Society. Integration of Coastal Fisheries into the Maritime Spatial Planning. In: Holm, P., Hadjimichael, M., Linke, S., Mackinson, S. (eds) Collaborative Research in Fisheries. MARE Publication Series, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26784-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26784-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-26783-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-26784-1
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)