Abstract
Neurocognitive deficits affect nearly every aspect of psychosocial and functional outcomes in schizophrenia. In particular, deficits to executive functioning and verbal memory have been found to predict clinical and psychosocial outcomes at every stage of the psychosis spectrum, from clinically high-risk populations to chronic schizophrenia. Baseline cognitive indices provide clinical and prognostic information about daily functioning, community integration, and quality of life and can serve as predictors of health-care-related outcomes as well. While psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia are amenable to pharmacologic interventions, treatment strategies for cognitive symptoms are lacking. From a drug discovery perspective, modulation of glutamatergic and cholinergic pathways is promising, but there are no current FDA-approved medications for the treatment of cognitive symptoms in schizophrenia. As therapeutic options for this disorder continue to grow, including pharmacology, neuromodulation, cognitive remediation, and combinations thereof, these treatments will be made particularly potent if they are applied to biomarker-identified sensitive subgroups of patients.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
Introduction
Schizophrenia is a debilitating neurodevelopmental disorder that affects many aspects of psychosocial and interpersonal life. Cognitive and motivational disturbances are conceivably the most debilitating and pervasive aspects of the schizophrenia syndrome, in the midst of the other better-recognized psychotic symptoms (i.e., delusions and multimodal hallucinations). Whereas psychotic symptoms often fluctuate with clinical state, cognitive symptoms are present early in the disease course and persist even in the absence of the more clinically apparent psychotic symptoms. Current pharmacologic therapies largely target the positive symptoms and have little effect on cognitive and motivational aspects of the disorder. Neurocognitive disturbances, particularly to executive function, contribute to substantial disability and loss of functioning in schizophrenia. Here, we will discuss that cognitive and executive functioning affect treatment outcomes and functional impact in schizophrenia, and we will also discuss current treatment strategies for cognitive and psychosocial intervention.
Metrics of Functional Outcomes in Schizophrenia
A central problem in schizophrenia research has been the development of treatment modalities for functional impairments in our patients. Several lines of evidence have demonstrated that cognitive and behavioral aspects of the disorder are present in unaffected relatives. The concept of an endophenotype implies that certain phenotypes, be it cognitive, behavioral, or neurophysiologic, are present in patients with schizophrenia, but less so in unaffected relatives, and absent in healthy controls . Like many aspects of the disorder, daily functioning has been thought to be a heritable and measurable trait of the disorder [1,2,3]. Therefore, as a putative endophenotype, if it can be reliably quantified, it can be directly compared to other aspects of the disorder and can be investigated in genome-wide studies [2].
Various tools have been developed to assess social and occupational functioning, but there is a lack of a generally accepted tool for assessing functional capacity [4, 5]. Outcomes in schizophrenia are commonly measured in terms of level of independence, employment, interpersonal relationships, and quality of life. Currently, the University of California, San Diego Performance Skills Assessment (UPSA) is the most widely applied tool for clinical and research studies of schizophrenia and other mental disorders [6,7,8], as it has been shown to have stable psychometric properties and has been translated into several other languages [9]. A common caveat for most studies is that functionality is ascertained in terms of relative functioning at the time of assessment. That being said, functional capacity is seldom a static process; it can vary by clinical state and as our patient’s age. Therefore, investigators have also attempted to ascertain measures of lifetime achievement and functionality, to better bridge this gap [10].
Neurocognition and Executive Dysfunction in the Schizophrenias
Global Cognitive Impairment
Clinicians have long appreciated the effects of cognitive dysfunction in the daily lives of patients with schizophrenia. Decades of research of cognitive functioning in schizophrenia have revealed consistent deficits across virtually all cognitive domains tested (i.e., IQ, working memory, executive function, episodic memory, sustained attention, processing speed, etc.); further, these observations have been relatively consistent, despite variation in neuropsychological instruments over time [11]. Global cognitive deficits have been reported early in the schizophrenia spectrum, although deficits to verbal memory, processing speed, and working memory are particularly salient as early as first-episode psychosis [12]. Global impairment has been related to poor global impairment in domains such as everyday care [13] and social and occupational functioning [14]. It is also of interest that neuropsychological impairments are not static, as the rate of cognitive decline rapidly accelerates at age 65, which is in stark contrast of normal aging [15], suggesting that schizophrenia portends a stage of accelerated brain aging.
Neurocognitive Effects on Clinical and Psychosocial Outcomes
Outcomes in schizophrenia are generally defined as either clinical or psychosocial outcomes. Clinical outcomes commonly refer to response to neuroleptic medications. Symptomatic remission is construed as a measurable reduction in positive and at times negative symptoms. Psychosocial outcomes attempt to quantify independent living, employment, interpersonal relationships, and overall success in the community.
Clinical Outcomes
Neuroleptic medications revolutionized the treatment of schizophrenia, whereby patients who were previously confined to lifelong institutionalization were able to participate in community living and had the opportunity to thrive. Broadly speaking, clinical outcomes refer to a patient’s response to antipsychotic medications, i.e., symptomatic remission, and, by extension, the ability to keep community-dwelling patients living outside the confines of locked psychiatric units. Poorer performance on verbal memory and working memory predicted worse clinical outcomes in first-episode psychosis (FEP) 6 months after their first hospitalization, whereas processing speed and executive functions had little predictive value [16]. At 3-year follow-up, verbal memory appeared to predict symptomatic remission for FEP [17]. In chronic patients with schizophrenia, other neurocognitive measures such as verbal fluency [18] and gross metrics of executive function [19] predicted symptomatic remission. In contrast, in a relatively homogenous population cohort, a generalized pattern of cognitive deficits was shown to be associated with non-remission [20], which again is consistent with the notion of a global cognitive impairment . Of note, symptomatic remission has shown benefit to quality of life measures and other clinical outcomes, but generally has little significance on cognitive functioning [21].
Psychosocial Outcomes
Cognitive deficits are prominent at all stages of schizophrenia. Generally speaking, poor neuropsychological performance predicts worse psychosocial functioning [22,23,24]. Executive dysfunction and deficits to other cognitive domains negatively impact multiple aspects of psychosocial functioning, beginning from the most basic management of activities of daily living (ADLs) [13, 25] to broader community functioning [26]. Other neurocognitive variables have been implicated in other measures of psychosocial functioning, such as verbal memory and working memory, which predicted employment status in chronic patients with schizophrenia [18].
A striking feature of the schizophrenia spectrum is that neurocognitive deficits are present early on in the illness course. Of these, executive function, verbal memory, and processing speed were significantly worse for patients with poor outcomes compared to those with relatively good outcome in ultrahigh-risk (UHR) populations [24]. Further, UHR populations who demonstrate worse deficits to attention and working memory are more likely to convert to manifest psychosis [27], with worse verbal memory predicting faster time-to-conversion [28]. Ultimately, clinically high-risk populations suffer worse clinical and psychosocial trajectories, such that individuals who do not convert to full-blown psychotic illness still experience attenuated positive symptoms and poorer social and role functioning than healthy age-matched controls [29].
In first-episode schizophrenia, baseline executive functioning also predicted global functioning at 1-year follow-up [30]. Further, verbal memory impairment predicted long-term remission of psychosis at 3-year follow-up, which also portended better social functioning [17]. Curiously, negative symptoms have been thought of as possible mediators of cognitive functions on psychosocial outcomes such that one study suggested that negative symptoms may contribute to the impact of verbal memory deficits in relation to social and occupational functioning during early psychosis [31]. The relationships between neurocognitive measures, negative symptomatology, and psychosocial function are complex, but similar patterns are seen in chronic schizophrenia [32, 33].
In chronic schizophrenia, there are similar patterns for cognitive metrics as UHR and FEP; however, graduated distributions of disability and cognitive deficits exist varying by stage of psychotic illness. A small but interesting longitudinal study assessed the long-term functional outcome 15 years’ post cognitive testing. It suggested that verbal memory deficits strongly predicted community functioning and integration, whereas executive functions predict total duration of hospitalizations over the 15-year period [26]. This complex pattern of phenotypic variation suggests that cognitive metrics may co-segregate, but they may also have phenotypic exclusivity. Executive function as measured by performance on WCST predicted better social functioning during an eight-month rehabilitation program [34]. Further, executive functions would go on to predict general functioning, but specifically occupational and household functioning, in a group of 96 patients 1 year after discharge from an inpatient unit [14].
Generally, cognitive dysfunction predicts poorer psychosocial function. Interestingly, in a Swedish population cohort study of over 500 patients with schizophrenia, baseline executive function was an independent predictor of premature death on 20-year follow-up [35]. In the duration of the study, roughly 13% of patients passed by age 60.5, which is 20 years earlier than the national mean. Curiously, these deaths were not attributable to suicide, as the rate was less than 0.01%. This study is also important as it shows that symptomatic remission has little to no predictive value in determining the longitudinal status of survival in this patient population. It is also worth mentioning that in treatment-refractory populations, which generally have more pronounced deficits to executive function, cognitive flexibility, verbal fluency, and processing speed than other patients with schizophrenia, these effects also appear to be modulated by negative symptoms [36].
Interventions for Cognitive and Psychosocial Functioning
Cholinergic Systems
Central cholinergic tone is critical to learning and memory. Antipsychotic medications are plighted with affinity toward multiple receptor types, which lead to a multitude of side effects. Among these are anticholinergic effects which can negatively affect cognition and affect the outcomes of intensive cognitive training [37]. Adjunctive acetylcholinesterase inhibitors, such as donezepil, have some evidence to support their use in improving executive function as well as other cognitive deficits [38]. Other forms of cholinergic modulations, particularly through alpha-7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors, are being investigated. An alpha-7 receptor agonist, encenicline, was shown to enhance several domains of cognitive functioning , improved negative symptoms, and daily functioning in a phase 2 clinical trial [39]. Mechanistically, alpha-7 nicotinic receptors are thought to enhance cognition through modulation of NMDA receptors and dorsolateral prefrontal circuit engagement [40].
Glutamatergic Systems
The glutamatergic system has shown great promise for novel therapeutics for cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia [41]. Interestingly, minocycline via putative neuromodulatory and neuroinflammatory mechanisms has shown to be beneficial to negative symptoms and social and occupational functioning. It has led to improvements in executive functions after six-month follow-up early in the course of schizophrenia [42]. A small study suggested that L-carnosine improved executive functions, such as cognitive flexibility and set-shifting [43], although this was limited by tolerability. Other glutamatergic modulators , such as D-serine, have shown modest improvement in negative symptoms and executive functions [44] and composite MATRICS battery scores at higher doses [45]. However exciting these studies may be, they are limited by small sample sizes and lack of robust replication. That being said, the modulation of NMDA-mediated signaling has functional implications on learning and memory and therefore is a promising target for cognitive enhancement strategies in schizophrenia [46]. Medications targeting NMDA receptors, such as memantine, have shown promise in schizophrenia. Memantine initially showed no benefit to cognitive symptoms, but has shown some benefit in negative symptoms in clozapine-treated patients [47, 48]. Recent work suggests that memantine may be used to augment cognitive training strategies [49] and that it may be clinically useful in treatment-refractory subtypes of schizophrenia [50].
Cognitive Remediation
Although much emphasis has been placed on the potential of cognitive remediation for the cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia, much work needs to be done to refine pipeline and stratify patients based on neurophysiologic parameters. Wherein some studies do support a role for cognitive remediation , others studies suggests that the benefits of intensive cognitive training is only limited to the tasks at hand and do not generalize to other cognitive domains as they were intended. Overall, this places some doubt as to whether such intensive, and costly, trials produce clinically meaningful benefit [51,52,53]. Interestingly, patients who had significant improvement in verbal memory and executive functioning as a result of cognitive remediation had longer time-to-relapse, which provides evidence of cognitive remediation having sustained effects on clinical course [54]. Therefore, much work has been aimed at using biomarker-based strategies to identify individuals likely to benefit from the cognitive remediation [33].
Conclusions
Neurocognitive deficits have a profound impact on many facets of neurobehavioral and psychosocial outcomes in schizophrenia [55, 56]. With the concept of the schizophrenias—genetically and phenotypically distinct disease entities—resurfacing and that of a biologically informed nosology, we are at a time where cognitive and functional outcome measures can inform treatment strategies. Over the course of the years, several neuropsychological batteries and tests have been devised to assess for cognitive and psychosocial functioning. Currently, the most well-adopted batteries for cognitive studies are MATRICS consensus battery and CogState schizophrenia battery. These tools have been developed for sole purpose of ascertaining reliable cognitive metrics for pharmacologic and cognitive interventions. Similarly, various measures of psychosocial functioning exist, the most widely applied being the UCSD Performance Skills Assessment. The benefit of standardized metrics would be to leverage direct comparisons on a population level. As both neurocognitive domains and overall global functioning have been reported as heritable traits, these can be theoretically studied through a genomic lens. Further, parsing and identifying subsets of patients who suffer from worse neurocognitive and psychosocial functioning profiles can lead to targeted therapies and interventions for those individuals most at need.
The cognitive deficits seen in the schizophrenias are present at all stages of the disorder and can be the defining clinical feature in certain cases. Investigators have vigorously studied the cognitive sequelae of the schizophrenias across the world and have found generalized deficits across all neurocognitive domains; hence, the concept of the global cognitive impairment [11] has been proposed.
Intuitively, one would presume that poorer neurocognitive performance portends worse prognosis and psychosocial functioning. However, this leaves much to desire in terms of mechanistic strategies for intervention and cognitive rehabilitation programs. Several studies have implicated various aspects of cognition with features of psychosocial and treatment outcomes; however, executive function, verbal memory, and processing speed appear to be individual measures with the most promise for targeted neurocognitive interventions, as they consistently relate to psychosocial and clinical outcomes across all stages of schizophrenia. It is important to note that cognitive dysfunction extrapolates to the most basic day-to-day functions, such as grooming and hygiene, to keeping up with their medications, to more complex tasks required for occupational and physical well-being. Further, the finding that baseline neurocognitive deficits were independent predictors of premature death in chronic psychosis only underscores the impact of neurocognitive functioning in the lives of our patients.
Currently, pharmacologic strategies for improving cognitive functioning in schizophrenia are limited, but there are many active areas of research, including augmenting glutamatergic and cholinergic signaling pathways, which are promising. The future holds promise for cognitive remediation, as new studies are showing novel ways of augmenting cognitive remediation with targeted pharmacology [49, 57], and recent advances in neurostimulation techniques are paving the way for neuroplasticity-mediated therapies. The ultimate goal of the research is to improve the way our patients think, feel, and live their lives.
References
Vassos E, Sham PC, Cai G, Deng H, Liu X, Sun X, et al. Correlation and familial aggregation of dimensions of psychosis in affected sibling pairs from China. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193:305–10.
McGrath JA, Avramopoulos D, Lasseter VK, Wolyniec PS, Fallin MD, Liang K-Y, et al. Familiality of novel factorial dimensions of schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2009;66:591–600.
Savage RM, Wiener HW, Nimgaonkar V, Devlin B, Calkins ME, Gur RE, et al. Heritability of functioning in families with schizophrenia in relation to neurocognition. Schizophr Res. 2012;139:105–9.
Bromley E, Brekke JS. Assessing function and functional outcome in schizophrenia. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;4:3–21.
Harvey PD. Assessing disability in schizophrenia: tools and contributors. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75:e27.
Heinrichs RW, Statucka M, Goldberg J, McDermid Vaz S. The University of California Performance Skills Assessment (UPSA) in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2006;88:135–41.
Mausbach BT, Harvey PD, Goldman SR, Jeste DV, Patterson TL. Development of a brief scale of everyday functioning in persons with serious mental illness. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:1364–72.
Moore RC, Fazeli PL, Patterson TL, Depp CA, Moore DJ, Granholm E, et al. UPSA-M: feasibility and initial validity of a mobile application of the UCSD performance-based skills assessment. Schizophr Res. 2015;164:187–92.
Velligan DI, Fredrick M, Mintz J, Li X, Rubin M, Dube S, et al. The reliability and validity of the MATRICS functional assessment battery. Schizophr Bull. 2014;40:1047–52.
Joseph J, Kremen WS, Glatt SJ, Franz CE, Chandler SD, Liu X, et al. Assessment of Lifespan Functioning Attainment (ALFA) scale: a quantitative interview for self-reported current and functional decline in schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2015;65:102–7.
Schaefer J, Giangrande E, Weinberger DR, Dickinson D. The global cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: consistent over decades and around the world. Schizophr Res. 2013;150:42–50.
Fatouros-Bergman H, Cervenka S, Flyckt L, Edman G, Farde L. Meta-analysis of cognitive performance in drug-naïve patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2014;158:156–62.
Evans JD, Heaton RK, Paulsen JS, Palmer BW, Patterson T, Jeste DV. The relationship of neuropsychological abilities to specific domains of functional capacity in older schizophrenia patients. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;53:422–30.
Wittorf A, Wiedemann G, Buchkremer G, Klingberg S. Prediction of community outcome in schizophrenia 1 year after discharge from inpatient treatment. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008;258:48–58.
Friedman JI, Harvey PD, Coleman T, Moriarty PJ, Bowie C, Parrella M. Six-year follow-up study of cognitive and functional status across the lifespan in schizophrenia: a comparison with Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158:1441–8.
Bodnar M, Malla A, Joober R, Lepage M. Cognitive markers of short-term clinical outcome in first-episode psychosis. Br J Psychiatry. 2008;193:297–304.
Chang WC, Ming Hui CL, Yan Wong GH, Wa Chan SK, Ming Lee EH, Hai Chen EY. Symptomatic remission and cognitive impairment in first-episode schizophrenia: a prospective 3-year follow-up study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74:e1046–53.
Hofer A, Bodner T, Kaufmann A, Kemmler G, Mattarei U, Pfaffenberger NM, et al. Symptomatic remission and neurocognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia. Psychol Med. 2011;41:2131–9.
Andreou C, Roesch-Ely D, Veckenstedt R, Bohn F, Aghotor J, Köther U, et al. Predictors of early stable symptomatic remission after an exacerbation of schizophrenia: the significance of symptoms, neuropsychological performance and cognitive biases. Psychiatry Res. 2013;210:729–34.
Helldin L, Kane JM, Karilampi U, Norlander T, Archer T. Remission and cognitive ability in a cohort of patients with schizophrenia. J Psychiatr Res. 2006;40:738–45.
Brissos S, Dias VV, Balanzá-Martinez V, Carita AI, Figueira ML. Symptomatic remission in schizophrenia patients: relationship with social functioning, quality of life, and neurocognitive performance. Schizophr Res. 2011;129:133–6.
Niendam TA, Bearden CE, Zinberg J, Johnson JK, O’Brien M, Cannon TD. The course of neurocognition and social functioning in individuals at ultra high risk for psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2007;33:772–81.
Lin A, Wood SJ, Nelson B, Brewer WJ, Spiliotacopoulos D, Bruxner A, et al. Neurocognitive predictors of functional outcome two to 13 years after identification as ultra-high risk for psychosis. Schizophr Res. 2011;132:1–7.
Carrión RE, McLaughlin D, Goldberg TE, Auther AM, Olsen RH, Olvet DM, et al. Prediction of functional outcome in individuals at clinical high risk for psychosis. JAMA Psychiat. 2013;70:1133–42.
Semkovska M, Bédard M-A, Godbout L, Limoge F, Stip E. Assessment of executive dysfunction during activities of daily living in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2004;69:289–300.
Fujii DE, Wylie AM. Neurocognition and community outcome in schizophrenia: long-term predictive validity. Schizophr Res. 2003;59:219–23.
Seidman LJ, Shapiro DI, Stone WS, Woodberry KA, Ronzio A, Cornblatt BA, et al. Association of neurocognition with transition to psychosis: baseline functioning in the second phase of the north American prodrome longitudinal study. JAMA Psychiat. 2016;73:1239–48.
Seidman LJ, Giuliano AJ, Meyer EC, Addington J, Cadenhead KS, Cannon TD, et al. Neuropsychology of the prodrome to psychosis in the NAPLS consortium: relationship to family history and conversion to psychosis. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010;67:578–88.
Addington J, Cornblatt BA, Cadenhead KS, Cannon TD, McGlashan TH, Perkins DO, et al. At clinical high risk for psychosis: outcome for nonconverters. Am J Psychiatry. 2011;168:800–5.
Sawada K, Kanehara A, Eguchi S, Tada M, Satomura Y, Suga M, et al. Identifying neurocognitive markers for outcome prediction of global functioning in ultra-high-risk for psychosis and first episode psychosis. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2017;71:318–27.
Jordan G, Lutgens D, Joober R, Lepage M, Iyer SN, Malla A. The relative contribution of cognition and symptomatic remission to functional outcome following treatment of a first episode of psychosis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75:e566–72.
Ventura J, Hellemann GS, Thames AD, Koellner V, Nuechterlein KH. Symptoms as mediators of the relationship between neurocognition and functional outcome in schizophrenia: a meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2009;113:189–99.
Thomas ML, Green MF, Hellemann G, Sugar CA, Tarasenko M, Calkins ME, et al. Modeling deficits from early auditory information processing to psychosocial functioning in schizophrenia. JAMA Psychiat. 2017;74:37–46.
Woonings FMJ, Appelo MT, Kluiter H, Slooff CJ, van den Bosch RJ. Learning (potential) and social functioning in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2003;59:287–96.
Helldin L, Hjärthag F, Olsson A-K, Harvey PD. Cognitive performance, symptom severity, and survival among patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder: a rospective 15-year study. Schizophr Res. 2015;169:141–6.
Frydecka D, Beszłej JA, Gościmski P, Kiejna A, Misiak B. Profiling cognitive impairment in treatment-resistant schizophrenia patients. Psychiatry Res. 2016;235:133–8.
Vinogradov S, Fisher M, Warm H, Holland C, Kirshner MA, Pollock BG. The cognitive cost of anticholinergic burden: decreased response to cognitive training in schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2009;166:1055–62.
Singh J, Kour K, Jayaram MB. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database System Rev. 2012;1:CD007967.
Keefe RSE, Meltzer HA, Dgetluck N, Gawryl M, Koenig G, Moebius HJ, et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of encenicline, an α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor agonist, as a treatment for cognitive impairment in schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40:3053–60.
Yang Y, Paspalas CD, Jin LE, Picciotto MR, Arnsten AFT, Wang M. Nicotinic α7 receptors enhance NMDA cognitive circuits in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:12078–83.
Thomas EHX, Bozaoglu K, Rossell SL, Gurvich C. The influence of the glutamatergic system on cognition in schizophrenia: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;77:369–87.
Levkovitz Y, Mendlovich S, Riwkes S, Braw Y, Levkovitch-Verbin H, Gal G, et al. A double-blind, randomized study of minocycline for the treatment of negative and cognitive symptoms in early-phase schizophrenia. J Clin Psychiatry. 2010;71:138–49.
Chengappa KNR, Turkin SR, DeSanti S, Bowie CR, Brar JS, Schlicht PJ, et al. A preliminary, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of L-carnosine to improve cognition in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2012;142:145–52.
Tsai G, Yang P, Chung LC, Lange N, Coyle JT. D-serine added to antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 1998;44:1081–9.
Kantrowitz JT, Malhotra AK, Cornblatt B, Silipo G, Balla A, Suckow RF, et al. High dose D-serine in the treatment of schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2010;121:125–30.
Tsai GE. Ultimate translation: developing therapeutics targeting on N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor. Adv Pharmacol. 2016;76:257–309.
de Lucena D, Fernandes BS, Berk M, Dodd S, Medeiros DW, Pedrini M, et al. Improvement of negative and positive symptoms in treatment-refractory schizophrenia: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial with memantine as add-on therapy to clozapine. J Clin Psychiatry. 2009;70:1416–23.
Veerman SRT, Schulte PFJ, Deijen JB, de Haan L. Adjunctive memantine in clozapine-treated refractory schizophrenia: an open-label 1-year extension study. Psychol Med. 2017;47:363–75.
Light GA, Zhang W, Joshi YB, Bhakta S, Talledo JA, Swerdlow NR. Single-dose memantine improves cortical oscillatory response dynamics in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2017;42:2633–9.
Lieberman JA, Papadakis K, Csernansky J, Litman R, Volavka J, Jia XD, et al. A randomized, placebo-controlled study of memantine as adjunctive treatment in patients with schizophrenia. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009;34:1322–9.
Dickinson D, Tenhula W, Morris S, Brown C, Peer J, Spencer K, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of computer-assisted cognitive remediation for schizophrenia. Am J Psychiatry. 2010;167:170–80.
d’Amato T, Bation R, Cochet A, Jalenques I, Galland F, Giraud-Baro E, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of computer-assisted cognitive remediation for schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2011;125:284–90.
Gomar JJ, Valls E, Radua J, Mareca C, Tristany J, del Olmo F, et al. A multisite, randomized controlled clinical trial of computerized cognitive remediation therapy for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2015;41:1387–96.
Trapp W, Landgrebe M, Hoesl K, Lautenbacher S, Gallhofer B, Günther W, et al. Cognitive remediation improves cognition and good cognitive performance increases time to relapse–results of a 5 year catamnestic study in schizophrenia patients. BMC Psychiatry. 2013;13:184.
Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:321–30.
Bowie CR, Reichenberg A, Patterson TL, Heaton RK, Harvey PD. Determinants of real-world functional performance in schizophrenia subjects: correlations with cognition, functional capacity, and symptoms. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163:418–25.
Swerdlow NR, Tarasenko M, Bhakta SG, Talledo J, Alvarez AI, Hughes EL, et al. Amphetamine enhances gains in auditory discrimination training in adult schizophrenia patients. Schizophr Bull. 2017;43:872–80.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Molina, J., Tsuang, M.T. (2020). Neurocognition and Treatment Outcomes in Schizophrenia. In: Shrivastava, A., De Sousa, A. (eds) Schizophrenia Treatment Outcomes. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19847-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19847-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19846-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19847-3
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)