Abstract
In this chapter I explore the reciprocal relationship between the metaphysical views mathematicians hold and their mathematical activity. I focus on the set-theoretic pluralism debate, in which set theorists disagree about the implications of their formal mathematical work. As a first case study, I discuss how Woodin’s monist argument for an Ultimate-L feeds on and is fed by mathematical results and metaphysical beliefs. In a second case study, I present Hamkins’ pluralist proposal and the mathematical research projects it endows with relevance. These case studies support three claims: (1) the metaphysical views of mathematicians can shape what counts as relevant research; (2) mathematical results can shape the metaphysical beliefs of mathematicians; (3) metaphysical thought and mathematical activity develop in tandem in mathematical practices. This makes metaphysical thought an integral part of mathematical practices.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antos C, Friedman SD, Honzik R, Ternullo C (2015) Multiverse conceptions in set theory. Synthese 192(8):2463–2488
Baldwin J (2018) Model theory and the philosophy of mathematical practice. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Barton N (2019) Forcing and the universe of sets: must we lose insight? J Philos Log. online first
Blackburn P, de Rijke M, Venema Y (2001) Modal logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Block AC, Löwe B (2015) Modal logic and multiverses. RIMS Kokyuroku 1949:5–23
Bos H (2001) Redefining geometrical exactness. Springer, New York
Centrone S, Kant D, Sarikaya D (2019) Reflections on the foundations of mathematics. Springer, Cham
Chang H (2008) Contingent transcendental arguments for metaphysical principles. In: Massimi M (ed) Kant and the philosophy of science today. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 113–133
Chemla K (2012) The History of Mathematical Proof in Ancient Traditions, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Cutolo R (2019) The cofinality of the least Berkeley cardinal and the extent of dependent choice. Math Log Q 65(1):121–126
Davis J (2016) Universal graphs at $\aleph_ {\omega_1+ 1} $ and set-theoretic geology. arXiv preprint:1605.08811
Doxiadis A, Mazur B (2012) Circles disturbed: the interplay of mathematics and narrative. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Džamonja M, Kant D (2019) Interview with a set theorist. In: Centrone S, Kant D, Sarikaya D (eds) Reflections on the foundations of mathematics. Springer, Cham, pp 3–26
Friedman SD, Fuchino S, Sakai H (2018) On the set-generic multiverse. In: The Hyperuniverse Project and Maximality (pp 109–124). Birkhüuser, Cham
Friedman M (2018) On the history of folding in mathematics: a mathematization of the margins. Birkhäuser, Basel
Friedman M, Rittberg CJ (2019) On the material reasoning of folding paper. Synthese. online first
Friend M (2014) Pluralism in mathematics: a new position in philosophy of mathematics. Springer, Dordrecht
Fuchs G, Hamkins JD, Reitz J (2015) Set-theoretic geology. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 166(4):464–501
Gitman V, Johnstone TA (2014) On ground model definability. In: Infinity, computability, and metamathematics: Festschrift in honour of the 60th birthdays of Peter Koepke and Philip Welch. College Publications, Milton Keynes
Gödel K (1947) What is Cantor’s continuum problem? Am Math Monthly 54:515–525. reprinted in: Benacerraf P, Putnam H (1983) Philosophy of mathematics, 2nd edn. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, Cambridge
Gödel K (1995) Kurt Gödel, Collected Works Vol III, Feferman, S., Dawson Jr, J. W., Goldfarb, W., Parsons, C., Solovay, R. N. (eds), Oxford University Press
Golshani M, Mitchell W (2016) On a question of Hamkins and Löwe on the modal logic of collapse forcing. Pre-print. Available at: http://math.ipm.ac.ir/~golshani/Papers/On%20a%20question%20of%20Hamkins%20and%20Lowe%20on%20the%20modal%20logic%20of%20collapse%20forcing.pdf
Gowers WT (2000) The two cultures of mathematics. In: Arnold V et al (eds) Mathematics: frontiers and perspectives. American Mathematical Society, Providence, pp 65–78
Habič ME, Hamkins JD, Klausner LD, Verner J, Williams KJ (2019) Set-theoretic blockchains. Arch Math Logic 58(7–8):965–997
Hacking I (2014) Why is there philosophy of mathematics at all? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Hamkins JD, (2003) A simple maximality principle. J Symb Logic 68(2):527–550
Hamkins JD (2009) Second order set theory. In: Ramanujam R, Sarukkai S (eds) Logic and its applications, Third Indian Conference, ICLA, Chennai, India, Proceedings. Springer, Berlin
Hamkins JD (2012) The set-theoretic multiverse. Rev Symb Logic 5(3):416–449
Hamkins JD (2014) A multiverse perspective on the axiom of constructiblity. In: Chong C, Feng Q, Slaman TA, Woodin WH (eds) Infinity and truth. Lecture note series, Institute for Mathematical Sciences, National University of Singapore. World Scientific, Singapore
Hamkins JD (2015) Is the dream solution of the continuum hypothesis attainable? Notre Dame J Form Log 56(1):135–145
Hamkins JD, Lowe B (2008) The modal logic of forcing. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 360:1793–1817
Hamkins JD, Löwe B (2013) Moving up and down in the generic multiverse. In: Lodaya K (ed) Logic and its applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 139–147
Hamkins JD, Woodin WH (2005) The necessary maximality principle for c.c.c.-forcing is equiconsistent with a weakly compact cardinal. Math Log Q 51(5):493–498
Hamkins JD, Woodin WH (2017) The universal finite set. ArXiv e-prints (currently under review)
Hamkins JD, Reitz J, Woodin WH (2008) The ground axiom is consistent with V ≠HOD. Proc Am Math Soc 136(8):2943–2949
Hamkins JD, Leibman G, Löwe B (2015) Structural connections between a forcing class and its modal logic. Israel J Math 207:617–651
Inamdar TC (2013) On the Modal Logics of some Set Theoretic Constructions, MSc Thesis
Inamdar T, Löwe B (2016) The modal logic of inner models. J Symb Log 81(1):225–236
Jech T (2006) Set theory. 4th printing. Springer, New York
Johansen MW, Misfeldt M (2016) An empirical approach to the mathematical values of problem choice and argumentation. In: Larvor B (ed) Mathematical cultures, the London meetings. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 259–270
Kanamori A (2009) The higher infinite, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Kennedy J (2014) Interpreting Gödel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Kennedy J, Kossak R (2011) Set theory, arithmetic, and the foundations of mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Koellner P (2006) On the question of absolute undecidability. Philos Math 14:153–188
Koellner P (2011) Independence and large cardinals. The Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy. Available at https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/independence-large-cardinals/
Koellner P (2013) Hamkins on the multiverse. Available at: http://logic.harvard.edu/EFI_Hamkins_Comments.pdf
Koellner P, Woodin H (2009) Incompatible Ω-complete theories. J Symb Log 74(4):1155–1170
Koellner P, Woodin H (2010) Large cardinals from determinacy. In: Foreman M, Kanamori A (eds) Handbook of set theory. Springer, New York, pp 1951–2120
Kümmerle H (2019) Die Institutionalisierung der Mathematik als Wissenschaft im Japan der Meiji- und Taishō-Zeit. PhD thesis
Laver R (2007) Certain very large cardinals are not created in small forcing extensions. Ann Pure Appl Log 149(1–3):1–6
Maddy P (1988) Believing the axioms I & II. J Symb Log 53(2):481–511 & 53(3):736–764
Maddy P (1997) Naturalism in mathematics. Claredon Press, Oxford
Maddy P (2011) Defending the axioms: on the philosophical foundations of set theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Magidor M (2012) Some set theories are more equal. Pre-print. Available at: http://logic.harvard.edu/EFI_Magidor.pdf
Mander K (2008) The Euclidean diagram. In: Mancosu P (ed) The philosophy of mathematical practice. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Martin D, Steel J, (1987) A proof of projective determinacy. J Am Math Soc 2(1):71–125
Mitchel W, Steel J (1994) Fine structure and iteration trees. Lecture notes in logic, vol. 3, Springer
Netz R (1999) Shaping of deduction in Greek mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Netz R (2017) Mathematical concepts? A view from ancient history. In: de Freitas E, Sinclair N, Coles A (eds) What is a mathematical concept? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Parsons C (2008) Mathematical thought and its objects. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Plutarch (1961) Moralia, vol 9. Loeb classical library (trans: Minar Jr EL, Sandbach FH, Helmbold WC). Heinemann, London
Reitz J (2006) The Ground Axiom. PhD Thesis
Reitz J (2007) The Ground Axiom. Journal of Symbolic Logic 72(4):1299–1317
Rittberg CJ (2010) The modal logic of forcing. Diploma thesis. Available at: https://www.uni-muenster.de/imperia/md/content/logik/c.rittberg_the_modal_logic_of_forcing.pdf
Rittberg CJ (2015) How Woodin changed his mind: new thoughts on the continuum hypothesis. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 69(2):125–151
Rittberg CJ (2016a) Mathematical pull. In: Larvor B (ed) Mathematical cultures, the London meetings. Birkhäuser, Basel, pp 287–302
Rittberg CJ (2016b) Methods, goals and metaphysics in contemporary set theory. PhD thesis. Available at: https://uhra.herts.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2299/17218/13036561%20Rittberg%20Colin%20-%20Final%20submission.pdf?sequence=1
Rittberg CJ, Van Kerkhove B (2019) Studying mathematical practices: the dilemma of case studies. ZDM Math Educ 51(5):857–868
Rouse J (1996) Engaging science: how to understand its practices philosophically. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Scott D (1961) Measurable cardinals and constructible sets. Reprinted in: Sacks G (ed) Mathematical logic in the 20th century. Singapore University Press. Singapore. pp 411–426
Shelah S (2003) Logical dreams. Bull Am Math Soc 40(2):203–228
Shelah S (2014) Reflecting on logical dreams. In: Kennedy J (ed) Interpreting Gödel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 242–255
Steel J (2014) Gödel’s program. In: Kennedy J (ed) Interpreting Gödel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 153–179
Tanswell FS (2018) Conceptual engineering for mathematical concepts. Inquiry 61(8):881–913
Tao T (2018) There’s more to mathematics than rigour and proofs. Available at: https://terrytao.wordpress.com/career-advice/theres-more-to-mathematics-than-rigour-and-proofs/. Accessed May 2020
Ternullo C (2019) Maddy on the multiverse. In: Centrone S, Kant D, Sarikaya D (eds) Reflections on the foundations of mathematics. Springer, Cham, pp 43–78
Usuba T (2017) The downward directed grounds hypothesis and very large cardinals. J Math Log 17(2):1750009
Väänänen J (2014) Multiverse set theory and absolutely undecidable propositions. In: Kennedy J (ed) Interpreting Gödel. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 180–208
Van Heijenoort J (1967) From Frege to Gödel: a source book in mathematical logic. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
von Neumann J (1925) Eine Axiomatisierung der Mengenlehre. Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik 154:219–240
Woodin WH (2004) Recent development’s on Cantor’s continuum hypothesis. In: Proceedings of the continuum in philosophy and mathematics. Carlsberg Academy, Copenhagen
Woodin WH (2010a) Strong axioms of infinity and the search for V. In: Proceedings of the international congress of mathematicians, Hyderabad
Woodin WH (2010b) Suitable extender models. I. J Math Log 10:101–339
Woodin WH (2010c) Ultimate L, talk given at the University of Pennsylvania. Available at: http://philosophy.sas.upenn.edu/WSTPM/Woodin
Woodin WH (2011a) Suitable extender models II. J Math Log 11(2):115–436
Woodin WH (2011b) The realm of the infinite. In: Heller M, Woodin WH (eds) Infinity. New research frontiers. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 89–118
Woodin WH (2011c) The transfinite universe. In: Baaz M, Papadimitriou CH, Putnam HW, Scott DS, Harper CL Jr (eds) Kurt Gödel and the foundations of mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 449–474
Woodin WH (2011d) The continuum hypothesis, the generic multiverse of sets, and the Ω-conjecture. In: Kennedy J, Kossak R (eds) Set theory, arithmetic, and the foundations of mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 13–42
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Carolin Antos, Neil Barton, Deborah Kant, Juliette Kennedy, Daniel Kuby, Benedikt Löwe, and Deniz Sarikaya for helpful remarks on draft versions of this paper. Research for this paper has been funded by the Centre for Mathematical Cognition at Loughborough University and the Research Foundation - Flanders (FWO), project G056716N.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Rittberg, C.J. (2020). Mathematical Practices Can Be Metaphysically Laden. In: Sriraman, B. (eds) Handbook of the History and Philosophy of Mathematical Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19071-2_22-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19071-2_22-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-19071-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-19071-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MathematicsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering