Abstract
EU climate change policy is pursued in a new international context as EU Member States are about to implement the Paris Agreement. The authors of this chapter argue that the EU presented a strong, united front in the process leading up to the Paris Agreement, but there are clear differences in terms of both ambition and approach in the actual climate change policies of EU member states, which are due to variation in political culture, values, and political institutions. With this in mind, the chapter considers the EU’s role as an actor in climate change policy with regard to its historical role, current position, and future status. The authors begin by examining Europe’s early industrialization, which led to an increase in both economic power and the level of emissions of greenhouse gases. Relying on a variety of statistics, the authors determine that Europe’s position looks very different today, and they emphasize that even though the EU maintains a united front in climate negotiations, climate policy differs widely among EU member states.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agell, J., Englund, P., & Södersten, J. (1996). Tax Reform of the Century: The Swedish Experiment. National Tax Journal, 49(4), 643–664.
Allen, R. C. (2009). The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Angelier, J. P., & Sterner, T. (1990). Tax Harmonization for Petroleum Products in the EC. Energy Policy, 18(6), 500–505.
Bäckstrand, K., & Elgström, O. (2013). The EU’s Role in Climate Change Negotiations: From Leader to ‘Leadiator’. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(10), 1369–1386.
Carlsson, F., & Johansson-Stenman, O. (2012). Behavioral Economics and Environmental Policy. Annual Review of Resource Economics., 4, 75–99.
Dunlap, R. E., & York, R. (2008). The Globalization of Environmental Concern and the Limits of the Postmaterialist Values Explanation: Evidence from Four Multinational Surveys. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 529–563.
Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. (2017). Finance Law 2018 and Second Rectifying Finance Law for 2017. Retrieved July 17, 2018, from http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/law/finance-law-2018-second-rectifying-finance-law-2017/.
Gupta, J. (2010). A History of International Climate Change Policy. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 1, 636–653.
Hammar, H., & Jagers, S. C. (2007). What Is a Fair CO2 Tax Increase? On Fair Emission Reductions in the Transport Sector. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 377–387.
Hammar, H., Löfgren, Å., & Sterner, T. (2004). Political Economy Obstacles to Fuel Taxation. The Energy Journal, 25(3), 1–17.
Harring, N. (2014). The Multiple Dilemmas of Environmental Protection: The Effects of Generalized and Political Trust on the Acceptance of Environmental Policy Instruments. Dissertation. Department of Political Science, University of Gothenburg.
Jagers, S. (2008). Människors oro – ett medel för radikal klimatpolitik? In P. Cramér, S. Gustavsson, & L. Oxelheim (Eds.), Europaperspektiv 2008: EU och den globala klimatfrågan. Stockholm: Santérus förlag.
Jagers, S. C., & Matti, S. (2018). Climate Policy Support in a Comparative Perspective: Exploring the Meaning and Significance of Political-Economic Contexts. Environmental Politics (Forthcoming).
Jagers, S. C., & Robertson, F. (2018). The Role of Trust in Large-Scale Collective Action. Journal of Social Medicine (forthcoming, in Swedish).
Kallbekken, S., & Saelen, H. (2011). Public Acceptance for Environmental Taxes: Self-interest, Environmental and Distributional Concerns. Energy Policy, 39, 2966–2973.
Kirk, E. A., Reeves, A. D., & Blackstock, K. L. (2007). Path Dependency and the Implementation of Environmental Regulation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 25(2), 250–268.
Matti, S. (2015). Climate Policy Instruments. In K. Bäckstrand & E. Lövbrand (Eds.), Research Handbook of Climate Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Povitkina, M. (2018). The Limits of Democracy in Tackling Climate Change. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 411–432.
Quitzow, L., Canzler, W., Grundmann, P., Leibenath, M., Moss, T., & Tilmann, R. (2016). The German Energiewende – What’s Happening? Introducing the Special Issue. Utilities Policy, 41, 163–171.
Smith, N., & Leiserowitz, A. (2013). The Role of Emotion in Global Warming Policy Support and Opposition. Risk Analysis, 34(5), 937–948.
Somanathan, E., Sterner, T., Sugiyama, T., Chimanikire, D., Essandoh-Yeddu, J., Fifita, S., Goulder, L., Jaffe, A., Labandeira, X., Managi, S., Mitchell, C., Montero, J. P., Steg, F., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.
Steg, L., Dreijerink, L., & Abrahamse, W. (2005). Factors Influencing the Acceptability of Energy Policies: A Test of VBN Theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 25(4), 415–425.
Sterner, T. (1994). Environmental Tax Reform: The Swedish Experience. European Environment, 4(6), 20–25.
Sterner, T. (2007). Fuel Taxes: An Important Instrument for Climate Policy. Energy Policy, 35(6), 3194–3202.
Tjernström, E., & Tietenberg, T. (2008). Do Differences in Attitudes Explain Differences in National Climate Change Policies? Ecological Economics, 65(2), 315–324.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jagers, S.C., Nilsson, F., Sterner, T. (2020). EU Climate Policy in a Changing World Order. In: Bakardjieva Engelbrekt, A., Bremberg, N., Michalski, A., Oxelheim, L. (eds) The European Union in a Changing World Order. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18001-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18001-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-18000-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-18001-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)