Skip to main content

Polysubject Jurisdictional Blockchain: Electronic Registration of Facts to Reduce Economic Conflicts

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT

Abstract

The article was prepared for the purpose of scientific substantiation of the need for a systemic reduction of conflict among economic agents through a preventive-prophylactic approach. To achieve this target, the authors, developing the content of the article, methodologically rely on the materialistic, positivistic world outlook, apply a number of general scientific, special scientific and special methods. The conflict nature of economic activity, expressed in legal disputes of economic entities, adversely affects the economic dynamics in general, forever breaks the established economic and contractual relations between them, in particular. Quite often, litigations arise between business entities due to the unequal understanding by the parties of the sequence, timing and amount of fulfillment of their obligations regarding the supply of goods, the performance of work, the provision of services, and the exercise of property rights. And also because of the different interpretations of those documents that the parties draw up in the execution of transactions. Huge material and time resources are spent on proving one or another circumstance, on upholding one or another position arising from the interpretation by the party of its specific obligations under the transaction. The preventive-prophylactic approach provides for the initial reduction of potentially conflicting points in the implementation of bilateral relations through electronic registration of the facts of the activities of economic entities themselves, which after such registration are considered identically understood and recognized by the parties, are considered proven and cannot be disputed. It is discussed that it is necessary to do this, both at the stage of concluding a bilateral agreement and further, successively in the stages of the fulfillment of obligations by each party. As a result, the number of potentially conflicting moments that could arise in economic contractual relations decreases in the process of interaction between the parties and tends to zero by the deadline for the transaction. Technically preventive-prophylactic approach to reducing the conflict of economic activities involves the continuous maintenance of a distributed register of electronic registration of facts of economic and contractual relations by several public entities and the parties themselves. The specified distributed registry is legally valid at the national level, the database on registration of facts of economic and contractual relations is duplicated and stored on servers of a number of judicial and executive authorities. The facts of economic and contractual relations for specific transactions that are electronically registered in the specified distributed registry are not subject to dispute. As a result, business entities initially have an extremely narrow field for mutual misunderstanding and for litigation on certain issues of economic activity, the potential for conflict in their contractual relationships is reduced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Economic Forum Survey Report. (2015). Deep shift—Technology tipping points and societal impact. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GAC15_Technological_Tipping_Points_report_2015.pdf#page=24.

  2. Iansiti, M., & Lakhani, K. R. (2017). The truth about blockchain. Harvard Business Review (Issue: January–February), 118–127.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Order of the Government of the Russian Federation of 28.07.2017 No. 1632-r.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Inshakova, A. O., Goncharov, A. I., & Kazachenok, O. P. (2018). The imperatives of financial policy in the sphere of the digital economy: impacts on increasing investment activity and tax potential of Russian regions. In Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference «Competitive, Sustainable and Secure Development of the Regional Economy: Response to Global Challenges» (CSSDRE 2018), pp. 337–342. Amsterdam: Atlantis Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The reported study was funded by RFBR according to the research project No. 18-29-16132.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnessa O. Inshakova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kalinina, A.E., Inshakova, A.O., Goncharov, A.I. (2019). Polysubject Jurisdictional Blockchain: Electronic Registration of Facts to Reduce Economic Conflicts. In: Popkova, E. (eds) Ubiquitous Computing and the Internet of Things: Prerequisites for the Development of ICT. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 826. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13397-9_24

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics