Skip to main content

The Mouse Lymphoma Assay

  • Protocol
  • First Online:
Genetic Toxicology

Part of the book series: Methods in Molecular Biology ((MIMB,volume 817))

Abstract

The mouse lymphoma TK assay (MLA) is part of an in vitro battery of tests designed to predict risk assessment prior to in vivo testing. The test has the potential to detect mutagenic and clastogenic events at the thymidine kinase (tk) locus of L5178Y mouse lymphoma tk +/− cells by measuring resistance to the lethal nucleoside analogue triflurothymidine (TFT). Cells may be plated for viability and mutation in semi-solid agar (agar assay) or in 96-well microtitre plates (microwell assay). When added to selective medium containing TFT, wild-type tk +/− cells die, but TFT cannot be incorporated into the DNA of mutant tk −/− cells, which survive to form colonies that may be large (indicative of gene mutation) or small (indicative of chromosomal mutation) in nature. Mutant frequency is expressed as the number of mutants per 106 viable cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Protocol
USD 49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OECD (1997) “In Vitro Mammalian Cell Gene Mutation Test”, in: OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Test Guideline 476. OECD Paris (http://titania.sourceoecd.org/vl=1382924/cl=17/nw=1/rpsv/cw/vhosts/oecdjournals/1607310x/v1n4/contp1-1.htm)

  2. ICH, Topic S2B Genotoxicity: A Standard Battery for Genotoxocity Testing of Pharmaceuticals, International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Step 4 Guideline, Brussels, July, 1997 http://www.ich.org/cache/compo/502-272%2D1.html

  3. Law LW (1952) Increase in incidence of leukemia in hybrid mice bearing thymic transplants from a high leukemic strain. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 12(4):789–805

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fischer GA (1958) Studies of the culture of leukemic cells in vitro. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 76(3):673–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Liechty MC, Hassanpour Z, Hozier JC and Clive D (1994) Use of microsatellite DNA polymorphisms on mouse chromosome 11 for in vitro analysis of thymidine kinase gene mutations. Mutagenesis 9:423–427

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clive D, Flamm WG, Machesko MR and Bernheim NJ (1972) A mutational assay system using the thymidine kinase locus in mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Research 16:77–87

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clive D (1973) Recent Developments with the L5178Y TK Heterozygote Mutagen Assay System. Environmental Health Perspectives 6:119–125.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moore-Brown MM, Clive D, Howard BE et al. (1981) The utilization of trifluorothymidine (TFT) to select for thymidine kinase-deficient (TK−/−) mutants from L5178Y/TK+/− mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Research 85:363–378

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Applegate ML, Moore MM, Broder CC, Burrell A., Juhn G., Kasweck KL, Lin P-F, Wadhams A and Hozier JC (1990) Molecular dissection of mutations at the heterozygous thymidine kinase locus in mouse lymphoma cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 87:51–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Moore MM, Clive D, Hozier JC et al. (1985) Analysis of trifluorothymidine-resistant (TFTr) mutants of L5178Y/TK+/− mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Research 151:161–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Clive D and Spector JFS (1975) Laboratory procedure for assessing specific locus mutations at the TK locus in cultured L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Research 31:17–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clive D and Voytek P (1977) Evidence for chemically-induced structural gene mutations at the thymidine kinase locus in cultured L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Research 44:269–278.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clive D, Johnson KO, Spector JFS et al. (1979) Validation and characterization of the L5178Y/TK+/− mouse lymphoma mutagen assay system. Mutation Research 59:61–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Cole J, Arlett CF, Green MHL et al. (1983) A comparison of the agar cloning and microtitration techniques for assaying cell survival and mutation frequency in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Research 111:371–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mitchell AD, Myhr BC, Rudd CJ et al. (1988) Evaluation of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay: Methods used and chemicals evaluated. Environmental Mutagen­esis 12:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mitchell AD, Rudd CJ and Caspary WJ (1988) Evaluation of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay: Intralaboratory results for sixty-three coded chemicals tested at SRI international. Environmental Mutagenesis 12:37–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Caspary WJ, Daston DS, Myhr BC, et al. (1988) Evaluation of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay: Interlaboratory reproducibility and assessment. Environmental Mutagenesis 12:195–229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Caspary WJ, Lee YJ, Poulton S, et al. (1988) Evaluation of the L5178y mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay: Quality-control guidelines and response categories. Environmental Mutagenesis 12:19–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Myhr BC and Caspary WJ (1988) Evaluation of the L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell mutagenesis assay: Intralaboratory results for sixty-three coded chemicals tested at Litton Bionetics, Inc. Environmental Mutagenesis 12:103–194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sawyer J, Moore MM, Clive D and Hozier J (1985) Cytogenetic characterization of the L5178Y TK+/− 3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cell line. Mutation Research 147:243–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sawyer JR, Binz RL, Wang J and Moore MM (2006) Multicolor spectral karyotyping of the L5178Y TK+/− 3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cell line. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 47:127–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Clive D, Turner NT, Krehl R and Eyre J (1985) The mouse lymphoma assay may be used as a chromosome aberration assay. Environmental Mutagenesis 7 (suppl. 3):33

    Google Scholar 

  23. ICH, Topic S2A Genotoxicity: Guidance on Specific Aspects of Regulatory Genotoxicity Tests for Pharmaceuticals, International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Reguirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use, Harmonised Tripartite Guideline CPMP/ICH/141/95, Approved September 1995 (http://www.ich.org/cache/compo/502-272-1.html)

  24. Liechty MC, Scalzi JM, Sims KR et al. (1998) Analysis of large and small clone L5178Y tk −/− mouse lymphoma mutants by loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and by whole chromosome 11 painting: detection or recombination. Mutagenesis 13 (5): 461–474

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Honma M, Hayashi M, Shimada H et al. (1999) Evaluation of the mouse lymphoma tk assay (microwell method) as an alternative to the in vitro chromosomal aberration test. Mutagenesis 14:5–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Moore MM, Honma M, Clements J et al. (2000). Mouse Lymphoma Thymidine Kinase Locus Gene Mutation Assay: International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures Workgroup Report. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 35:185–190

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Moore MM, Honma M, Clements J et al. (2002). Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay: follow-up International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures, New Orleans, Louisiana, April 2000. Environmental & Molecular Mutagenesis 40:292–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Moore MM, Honma M, Clements J et al. (2003). Mouse Lymphoma Thymidine Kinase Locus Gene Mutation Assay: International Workshop on Genotoxicity Test Procedures Workgroup Report-Plymouth. UK 2002. Mutation Research 540:127–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Moore MM, Honma M, Clements J et al. (2006). Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay: Follow-up meeting of the international workshop on Genotoxicity testing-Aberdeen, Scotland, 2003-Assay acceptance criteria, positive controls, and data evaluation. Environmental & Molecular Mutagenesis 47:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Moore MM, Honma M, Clements J et al. (2007). Mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase gene mutation assay: Meeting of the International Workshop on Genotoxicity Testing, San Francisco, 2005, recommendations for 24-h treatment. Mutation Research 627:36–40

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Clive D, Bolcsfoldi G, Clements J, Cole J, Honma M, Majeska J, Moore M, Müller L, Myhr B, Oberly T, Ouldelhkim M-C, Rudd C, Shimada H, Sofuni T, Thybaud V and Wilcox P (1995), Consensus agreement regarding protocol issues discussed during the mouse lymphoma workshop: Portland, Oregon, May 7, 1994, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis 25:165–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Han T, Wang J, Tong W, et al. (2006) Microarray analysis distinguished differential gene expression patterns from large and small colony Thymidine kinase mutants of L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. BMC Bioinformatics 7 (Suppl 2):S9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Moore MM and Howard BE (1982) Quantitation of small colony trifluorothymidine-resistant mutants of L5178Y/TK+/− mouse lymphoma cells in RPMI-1640 medium. Mutation Research 104:287–294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brusick D (1986) Genotoxic effects in cultured mammalian cells produced by low pH treatment conditions and increased ion concentrations. Environmental Mutagenesis 8:879-886

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Scott D, Galloway SM, Marshall RR, Ishidate M Jr, Brusick D, Ashby J and Myhr BC (1991) Genotoxicity under extreme culture conditions. A report from ICPEMC Task Group 9. Mutation Research 257:147–204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Robinson WD, Green MHL, Cole J, Garner RC, Healy MJR and Gatehouse D (1990) Statistical evaluation of bacterial/mammalian fluctuation tests. In Statistical Evaluation of Mutagenicity Test Data (Ed Kirkland DJ) Cambridge University Press, pp 102–140

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gyapay G, Morissette J, Vignal A, Dib C, Fizames C, Millasseau P, Marc S, Bernardi G, Lathrop M and Weissenbach J (1994) The 1993-94 Genethon human genetic linkage map. Nat Genet 7:246–339

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Love JM, Knight AM, McAleer MA and Todd JA (1990) Towards construction of a high resolution map of the mouse genome using PCR-analysed microsatellites. Nucl. Acids Res. 18:4123–4130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Liechty MC, Crosby H, Murthy A, Davis LM, Caspary WJ and Hozier JC (1996) Identification of a heteromorphic microsatellite within the thymidine kinase gene in L5178Y mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Research 371:265–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Clive D, Glover P, Applegate M and Hozier J (1990) Molecular aspects of chemical mutagenesis in L5178Y/tk+/− mouse lymphoma cells. Mutagenesis 5:191–197

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Hozier J, Sawyer J, Moore M, Howard .B and Clive D (1981) Cytogenetic analysis of the L5178Y/TK+/− mouse lymphoma mutagenesis assay system. Mutation Research 84:169–181

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hozier J, Sawyer J, Clive D and Moore M (1982) Cytogenetic distinction between the TK+ and TK− chromosomes in the L5178Y TK+/− 3.7.2C mouse-lymphoma cell line. Mutation Research 105:451–456

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Hozier J, Sawyer J, Clive D and Moore M (1985) Chromosome 11 aberrations in small colony L5178Y TK+/− mutants early in their clonal history. Mutation Research 147:237–242

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Moore MM, Clive D, Howard .BE, Batson AG and Tumer NT (1985) In situ analysis of trifluorothymidine-resistant (TFTr) mutants of L5178Y/TK+/− mouse-lymphoma cells. Mutation Research 151 147–159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Moore MM, Clive D, Hozier JC, Howard .BE, Batson AG, Turner NT and Sawyer J. (1985) Analysis of trifluorothymidine-resistant (TFT′) mutants of L5178Y TK+/− mouse lymphoma cells. Mutation Research 151:161–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Blazak WF, Stewart BE, Galperin I, Allen KL, Rudd CJ, Mitchell AD and Caspary WJ (1986) Chromosome analysis of trifluorothymidine-resistant L5178Y mouse lymphoma cell colonies. Environmental Mutagenesis 8:229–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Liechty MC, Rauchfuss HS, Lugo MH and Hozier JC (1993) Sequence analysis of tka(−)-1 and tkb(+)-1 alleles in L5178Y tk+/− mouse-lymphoma cells and spontaneous tk−/− mutants Mutation Research 286:299–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Soriano C, Creus A and Marcos R (2008) Arsenic trioxide mutational spectrum analysis in the mouse lymphoma assay. Mutation Research 646:1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Chang C, Simmons DT, Martin MA and Mora PT (1979) Identification and partial characterization of new antigens from simian virus 40-transformed mouse cells. J Virol 31:463–471

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Kress M, May E, Cassingena R and May P (1979) Simian virus 40-transformed cells express new species of proteins precipitable by anti-simian virus 40 tumor serum. J. Virol. 31:472–483

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Lane DP and Crawford LV (1979) T antigen is bound to a host protein in SV40-transformed cells. Nature 278, 261–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Linzer DIH and Levine AJ (1979) Characterization of a 54 K dalton cellular SV40 tumor antigen resent in SV40-transformed cells and in infected embryonal carcinoma cells. Cell 17: 43–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Melero JA, Stitt DT, Mangel WF and Carroll RB (1979) Identification of new polypeptide species (48-55 K) immunoprecipitable by antiserum to purified large T antigen and present in simian virus 40-infected and transformed cells. J. Virol. 93:466–480.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. DeLeo A, Jay G, Appella E, Dubois GC, Law LW and Old LJ (1979) Detection of a transformation-related antigen in chemically induced sarcomas and other transformed cells of the mouse. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 76:2420–2424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Crawford LV, Pim DC and Bulbrook RD (1982) Detection of antibodies against the cellular protein p53 in sera from patients with breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer 30: 403–408.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Maltzman W and Czyzyk L (1984) UV irradiation stimulates levels of p53 cellular tumor antigen in nontransformed mouse cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 4:1689–1694

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Benchimol S., Matlashewski G. and Crawford L. (1984) The use of monoclonal antibodies for selection of a low-abundance mRNA: p53. Biochem Soc Trans 12(4):708–711

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Wolf D and Rotter V (1985) Major deletions in the gene encoding the p53 tumor antigen cause lack of p53 expression in HL-60 cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 82:790–794.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Caron de Fromentel C, May-Levin F, Mouriesse H, Lemerle J, Chandrasekaran K and May P (1987) Presence of circulating antibodies against cellular protein p53 in a notable proportion of children with B-cell lymphoma. Int. J. Cancer 39:185–189

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Harris SL and Levine AJ (2005) The p53 pathway: positive and negative feedback loops. Oncogene 24:2899–2908

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Colman MS, Afshar, CA and Barrett JC (2000) Regulation of p53 stability and activity in response to genotoxic stress. Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research 462:179–188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Jin S and Levine AJ (2001) The p53 functional circuit. J Cell Sci 114:4139–4140.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Levine AJ, Hu W and Feng Z (2006) The P53 pathway: what questions remain to be explored? Cell Death Differ 13:1027–1036.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Storer RD, Kraynak AR, McKelvey TW, Elia MC, Goodrow TL and DeLuca JG (1997) The mouse lymphoma L5178Y TK+/− cell line is heterozygous for a codon 170 mutation in the p53 tumor suppressor gene. Mutation Research 373:157–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Clark LS, Hart DW, Vojta PJ, Harrington-Brock K, Barrett JC, Moore MM and TIndall KR (1998) Identification and chromosomal assignment of two heterozygous mutations in the Trp53 gene in L5178Y Tk(+/−)-3.7.2C mouse lymphoma cells. Mutagenesis 13:427–434

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Kirkland D, Aardema M, Henderson L and Müller L (2005). Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens: I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity. Mutation Research 584:1–256

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Kirkland D, Aardema M, Müller L and Hayashi M (2006). Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens: II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles. Mutation Research 608:29–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Kirkland D, Pfuhler S, Tweats D et al. (2007). How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop. Mutation Research 628:31–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melvyn Lloyd .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this protocol

Cite this protocol

Lloyd, M., Kidd, D. (2012). The Mouse Lymphoma Assay. In: Parry, J., Parry, E. (eds) Genetic Toxicology. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 817. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-421-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-421-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-61779-420-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-61779-421-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Protocols

Publish with us

Policies and ethics