Abstract
From local level ethnobiological research, patterns have been identified in the relationships between human groups and natural resources. Although these patterns are consistent, they are unknown at a wider spatiotemporal scale, as well as the variables and the causal mechanisms that originate them. One of the factors that could be influencing the lack of study of social-ecological patterns is the ignorance of new macro-scale analysis perspectives; as well as the absence of a semantic, conceptual, and analytical framework. For this reason, it is proposed to establish a semantic-conceptual framework of areas in which ethnobiology can be developed at a macro-scale, which is the application of meta-analysis and the development of macro-ethnobiology. Both perspectives develop larger-scale research (space-time) and are based on the analysis of local information (primary information), identify variables, use statistical analysis, and determine processes and patterns by analyzing data heterogeneity. However, both disciplines have different goals, as well as the use of analysis tools. For the adequate development of any of these two approaches in ethnobiology, it is essential to conceptually know the discipline, select the primary information under quality criteria, fulfill with the theoretical assumptions of statistical tests, make an adequate interpretation of data variation and have the support of experts. It is not about proposing new disciplines, but broadening the study approach of ethnobiology, revaluing primary information, analyzing variables together and identifying social-ecological processes and patterns. We consider that on a broader scale, the analysis is workable for the understanding of social-ecological relationships.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Wolverton S (2013) Ethnobiology 5: interdisciplinarity in an era of rapid environmental change. EBL 4:21–25
Albuquerque UP, Ferreira-Júnior W (2017) What do we study in evolutionary ethnobiology? Defining the theoretical basis for a research program. Evol Biol 44(2):206–215
Berlin B (1973) Folk systematics in relation to biological classification and nomenclature. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 4:259–271
Berlin B, Breedlove DE, Raven PH (1973) General principles of classification and nomenclature in folk biology. Am Anthropol 75:214–242
Berlin B, Boster JS (1981) The perceptual bases of ethnobiological classification: evidence from Aguaruna Jívaro ornithology. J Ethnobiol 1(1):95–108
Brown CH (1985) Mode of subsistence and folk biological taxonomy. Curr Anthropol 26(1):43–64
Hunn E (1982) The utilitarian factor in folk biological classification. Am Anthropol 84(4):830–847
Caballero J, Casas A, Cortes L et al (1998) Patrones en el conocimiento, uso y manejo de plantas en pueblos indígenas de México. Estud Ataca 16:181–195
Casas A, Parra F, Blancas J (2015) Evolution of humans and by humans. In: Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM, Casas A (eds) Evolutionary ethnobiology. Springer, New York, pp 21–36
Alves R (2012) Relationships between faunal and people and the role of ethnozoology in animal conservation. Ethnobiol Conserv 1(2):1–69
Boa E (2004) Non-wood forest product 17: wild edible fungi. A global overview of their use and importance to people. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, p 148
Albuquerque UP, Medeiros P (2012) Systematic reviews and meta-analysis applied to ethnobiological research. Ethnobiol Conserv 1(6):1–8
Campos J, Sobral A, Silva J et al (2016) Insularity and citation behavior of scientific articles in young fields: the case of ethnobiology. Scientometrics 109(2):1037–1055
Molares S, Ladio A (2012) The usefulness of edible and medicinal fabaceae in Argentine and Chilean Patagonia: environmental availability and other sources of supply. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 1:1–12
Stepp JR, Castaneda H, Cervone S (2005) Mountains and biocultural diversity. Mt Res Dev 25(3):223–227
Loh J, Harmon D (2005) A global index of biocultural diversity. Ecol Indic 5:321–241
Harmon D, Loh J (2010) The index of linguistic diversity: a new quantitative measure of trends in the status of the world’s languages. LD&C 4:97–151
Gavin MC, Stepp JR (2014) Rapoport’s rule revisited: geographical distributions of human languages. PLoS One 9(9):e107623
Gorenflo LJ, Romaine S, Mittermeier R et al (2012) Co-occurrence of linguistic and biological diversity in biodiversity hotspots and high biodiversity wilderness areas. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(21):8032–8037
Moreno-Estrada A, Gignoux CR, Fernández-López JC et al (2014) Human genetics. The genetics of Mexico recapitulates Native American substructure and affects biomedical traits. Science 344(6189):1280–1285
Mace R, Holden CJ (2005) A phylogenetic approach to cultural evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 20(3):116–121
Burger JR, Allen CD, Brown JH et al (2012) The macroecology of sustainability. PLoS Biol 10(6):e1001345
Vázquez L-B, Gaston KJ (2006) People and mammals in Mexico: conservation conflicts at a national scale. Biodivers Conserv 15(8):2397–2414
Vellend M, Verheyen K, Flinn KM et al (2007) Homogenization of forest plant communities and weakening of species-environment relationships via agricultural land use. J Ecol 95(3):565–573
Cardinale BJ, Duffy JE, Gonzalez A et al (2012) Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486:59–67
Santini L, González-Suárez M, Rondinini C et al (2017) Shifting baseline in macroecology? Unravelling the influence of human impact on mammalian body mass. Divers Distribut 23(6):640–649
Tao T, Abades S, Teng S et al (2017) Macroecological factors shape local-scale spatial patterns in agriculturalist settlements. Proc R Soc 284(1866):20172003
Brown JH, Burnside WR, Davison AD et al (2011) Energetic limits to economic growth. Bioscience 61(1):19–26
Brown JH, Burger JR, Burnside WR et al (2014) Macroecology meets macroeconomics: resouce scarcity and global sustainability. Ecol Eng 65:24–32
Burnside WR, Brown JH, Burger O et al (2012) Human macroecology: linking pattern and process in big-picture human ecology. Biol Rev 87(1):194–208
Mace GM (2012) The limits to sustainability science: ecological constraints or endless innovation? PLoS Biol 10(6):1–2
Ehrlich PR, Ehrlich AH (2013) Can a collapse of global civilization be avoided? Proc R Soc 280:20122845
Albuquerque UP, Hanazaki N (2009) Five problems in current ethnobotanical research and some suggestions for strengthening them. Hum Ecol 37:653–661
Saslis-Lagoudakis CH, Clarke AC (2013) Ethnobiology: the missing link in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 28(2):67–68
Albuquerque UP, Ferreira-Júnior WS, Santoro FR et al (2015) Niche construction theory and ethnobiology. In: Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM, Casas A (eds) Evol Ethnobiol. Springer, New York, pp 73–87
Albuquerque UP, Santos-Gonçalves PH, Ferreira-Júnior W et al (2018) Humans as niche constructors: revisiting the concept of chronic anthropogenic disturbances in ecology. PECON 16(1):1–11
Torres-Avilez W, Medeiros P, Albuquerque UP (2016) Effect of gender on the knowledge of medicinal plants: systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2016:6592363
Higgins JPT, Green S (2009) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Ver. 5.0.2. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ
Lortie CJ (2014) Formalized synthesis opportunities for ecology: systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Oikos 123(8):897–902
Egger M, Smith GD (1997) Meta-analysis: potentials and promise. BMJ 315:1371–1374
Stewart G (2009) Meta-analysis in applied ecology. Biol Lett 6:78–81
Arnqvist G, Wooster D (1995) Meta-analysis: synthesizing research findings in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 10(6):236–240
Gates S (2002) Review of methodology of quantitative reviews using meta-analysis in ecology. J Anim Ecol 71:547–557
Kueffer C, Niinemets U, Drenovsky RE et al (2011) Fame, glory and neglect in meta-analyses. Trends Ecol Evol 26(10):493–494
Koricheva J, Gurevitch J (2014) Uses and misuses of meta-analysis in plant ecology. J Ecol 102:828–844
ArchMiller AA, Bauer EF, Koch RE et al (2015) Formalizing the definition of meta-analysis in molecular ecology. Mol Ecol 24(16):4042–4051
Peterman RM (1995) Statistical power of methods of meta-analysis. Trends Ecol Evol 10(11):460
Higgins JPT, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ et al (2009) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560
Beninde J, Veith M, Hochkirch A (2015) Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta-analysis of factors determining intra-urban biodiversity variation. Ecol Lett 18(6):581–592
Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, p 944
Gaston KJ (2004) Macroecology and people. Basic Appl Ecol 5(4):303–307
Gaston KJ (2005) Biodiversity and extinction: species and people. Prog Phys Geogr 29(2):239–247
Gaston KJ (2006) Biodiversity and extinction: macroecological patterns and people. Prog Phys Geogr 30(2):258–269
Gaston KJ, Evans KL (2004) Birds and people in Europe. Proc R Soc 271(1548):1649–1655
Gavin MC, McCarter J, Mead A et al (2015) Defining biocultural approaches to conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 30(3):140–145
Brown JH (1999) Macroecology: progress and prospect. Oikos 87:3–14
Kühn I, Böhning-Gaese K, Cramer W et al (2008) Macroecology meets global change research. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17(1):3–4
Keith SA, Webb TJ, Böhning-Gaese K et al (2012) What is macroecology? Biol Lett 8:904–906
Pärtel M, Bennett JA, Zobel M (2016) Macroecology of biodiversity: disentangling local and regional effects. New Phytol 211(2):404–410
Maldonado C, Molina CI, Zizka A et al (2015) Estimating species diversity and distribution in the era of big data: to what extent can we trust public databases? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:973–984
Brown JH, Maurer BA (1989) Macroecology: the division of food and space among species on continents. Science 243(4895):1145–1150
Brown JH (2003) Macroecología. Fondo de Cultura Económica. Distrito Federal, p 397
Gaston KJ, Blackburn TM (2000) Pattern and process in macroecology (eds). Blackwell Science, Malden, p 377
Blackburn TM, Gaston K (2002) Macroecology is distinct from biogeography. Nature 418:723
Beck J, Ballesteros-Mejia L, Buchmann CM et al (2012) What’s on the horizon for macroecology? Ecography 35:673–683
Brown JH, Stevens GC, Kaufman DM (1996) The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries, and internal structure. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 27(1):597–623
Hawkins BA, Portes EE, Diniz-Filho JA (2003) Productivity and history as predictors of the latitudinal diversity gradient of terrestrial birds. Ecology 84(6):1608–1623
Koleff P, Soberón J, Arita HT et al (2008) Patrones de diversidad espacial en grupos selectos de especies. In: Soberón J, Halffter G, Llorente-Bousquets J (eds) Capital natural de México vol I, conocimiento de la biodiversidad. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Distrito Federal, pp 323–364
Rosenzweig ML (1995) Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 436
Marquet PA (2009) Macroecological perspectives on communities and ecosystems. In: Levin SA (ed) The Princeton guide to ecology. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp 386–394
Stephens PR, Altizer S, Smith KF et al (2016) The macroecology of infectious diseases: a new perspective on global-scale drivers of pathogen distributions and impacts. Ecol Lett 19:1159–1171
Gaston K (1990) Patterns in geographical ranges of species. Biol Rev 65(2):105–129
Diniz-Filho JAF, Gouveia SF, Lima-Ribeiro MS (2013) Evolutionary macroecology. Front Biogeogr 5:195–203
Bini LM, Villalobos F, Diniz-Filho JA (2014) Explorando patrones en rasgos macroecológicos utilizando regresión secuencial de autoverctores filogenéticos. Ecosistemas 23(1):21–26
Villalobos F, Carotenuto F, Raia P et al (2016) Phylogenetic fields through time: temporal dynamics of geographic co-occurrence and phylogenetic structure within species ranges. Phil Trans R Soc A 371(1691):20150220
Peterson AT, Ortega-Huerta MA, Sánchez-Cordero V et al (2002) Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. Nature 416:626–629
Peterson AT, Soberón J (2012) Species distribution modeling and ecological niche modeling: getting the concepts right. Nat Conserv 10:102–107
Olalla-Tarraga MA, González-Suárez M, Bernardo-Madrid R et al (2017) Contrasting evidence of phylogenetic trophic niche conservatism in mammals worldwide. J Biogeogr 44:99–110
Tucker CM, Cadotte MW, Carvalho SB et al (2016) A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology. Biol Rev 29(2):698–715
Tittensor DP, Enquist B, Worm B (2016) A neural-metabolic theory of latitudinal biodiversity. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 25(6):630–641
McGill BJA (2003) A test of the unified neutral theory of biodiversity. Nature 422:881–885
Calderón-Patrón J, Moreno M, Pineda C et al (2013) Vertebrate dissimilarity, turnover and nestedness in a highly beta-diverse Region: the role of spatial grain size, dispersal ability and distance. PLoS One 8(12):e82905
Calderón-Patrón JM, Goyenechea I, Ortiz-Pulido R et al (2016) Beta diversity in a highly heterogeneous area: disentangling species and taxonomic dissimilarity for terrestrial vertebrates. PLoS One 11(8):1–15
Blackburn TM (2004) Method in macroecology. Basic Appl Ecol 5(5):401–412
Rodríguez P, Villalobos F, Sánchez-Barradas A et al (2017) La macroecología en México: historia, avances y perspectivas. Rev Mex Biodivers 88:52–64
Stepp JR, Cervone S, Castaneda H et al (2004) Development of a GIS for global biocultural diversity. Policy Matters 13:267–271
Skutnabb-Kangas T (2011) Language ecology. In: Östman JO, Verschueren J (eds) Pragmatics in practice. John Benjamins Publishing Company, Amsterdam, pp 176–198
Gavin MC, Sibanda N (2012) The island biogeography of languages. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 21(10):958–967
Gillman LN, Wright SD, Cusens J et al (2015) Latitude, productivity and species richness. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 24:107–117
Arita HT, Christen JA, Rodríguez P et al (2008) Species diversity and distribution in presence-absence matrices: mathematical relationships and biological implications. Am Nat 172(4):519–532
Sutherland WJ, Adams WM, Aronson RB et al (2009) An assessment of the 100 questions of greatest importance to the conservation of global biological diversity. Conserv Biol 23:557–567
Sutherland WJ, Freckleton RP, Godfray HCJ et al (2013) Identification of 100 fundamental ecological questions. J Ecol 101:58–67
Grierson CS, Barnes RS, Chase MW et al (2011) One hundred important questions facing plant science research. New Phytol 192:6–12
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Gutiérrez-Santillán, T.V. et al. (2019). The Spatiotemporal Scale of Ethnobiology: A Conceptual Contribution in the Application of Meta-Analysis and the Development of the Macro-Ethnobiological Approach. In: Albuquerque, U., de Lucena, R., Cruz da Cunha, L., Alves, R. (eds) Methods and Techniques in Ethnobiology and Ethnoecology . Springer Protocols Handbooks. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8919-5_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8919-5_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-8918-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-8919-5
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols