Abstract
Cancer immunotherapies have gained significant momentum over the past decade, particularly with the advent of checkpoint inhibitors and CAR T-cells. While the latter personalized targeted immunotherapy has revolutionized the field, a need for off-the-shelf therapies remains. The ability of NK cells to quickly lyse antibody-coated tumors and potently secrete cytokines without prior priming has made NK cells ideal candidates for antigen-specific immunotherapy. NK cells have been targeted to tumors through two main strategies: mono-specific antibodies and bi/tri-specific antibodies. Mono-specific antibodies drive NK cell antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) of tumor cells. Bi/tri-specific antibodies drive re-directed lysis of tumor cells through binding of a tumor antigen and direct binding and crosslinking of the CD16 receptor on NK cells, thus bypassing the need for binding of the Fc portion of mono-specific antibodies. This chapter focuses on the generation of bi- and tri-specific killer engagers (BiKEs and TriKEs) meant to target NK cells to tumors. BiKEs and TriKEs are smaller molecules composed of 2–3 variable portions of antibodies with different specificities, and represent a novel and more versatile strategy compared to traditional bi- and tri-specific antibody platforms.
Access provided by CONRICYT – Journals CONACYT. Download protocol PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Key words
1 Overview
Targeted cancer immunoth erapies are currently a subject of great clinical interest and potential [1]. While a great deal of interest has recently been placed upon generation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) expressing T cells from monoclonal antibodies shown to target human malignancies [2], and even more recently upon generation of CAR-expressing natural killer (NK) cells [3, 4], these approaches require a personalized approach that is expensive, time consuming, and difficult to apply on a large scale. There is a clear need for targeted off-the-shelf therapies that augment the current monoclonal antibody approach. This chapter focuses on generation of bi- and tri-specific killer engagers (BiKEs and TriKEs) meant to target NK cells to the tumor synapse and induce their activation at that site (Fig. 1). Unlike full-length bi- and tri-specific antibodies, BiKEs and TriKEs are small molecules containing two (BiKE) or three (TriKE) single chain variable fragments (scFv) from antibodies of different specificity.
1.1 Mediation of NK Cell Function Through CD16 and ADCC
NK cells are ideal candidates for immune cell-targeted therapies because they do not require prior sensitization to lyse tumor targets and to release pro-inflammatory cytokines, are not HLA-restricted, and can mediate graft-versus-leukemia (or tumor) without inducing graft-versus-host disease [5, 6]. Although NK cells possess a variety of activating receptors and can mediate function in several different ways, their role in antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) is of particular relevance in this chapter. ADCC is mediated by CD16 (FcγRIII), the low affinity receptor for IgG Fc [7]. Two isoforms of CD16 exist in humans, CD16A and CD16B [8]. CD16A is expressed in NK cells, macrophages, and placental trophoblasts as a polypeptide-anchored transmembrane protein while CD16B is expressed in neutrophils in a GPI-anchored form [9–12]. Although the extracellular portion of CD16A and CD16B share a high level of homology (95–97 %), CD16A can trigger killing of tumor targets and cytokine production while CD16B cannot [9, 13–15].
In human NK cells, CD16 is mostly expressed in the CD56dim subset, although populations of CD56bright CD16+ NK cells have been observed after transplant [16, 17]. Engagement of CD16 through encounter with the Fc portion of antibodies or direct crosslinking by anti-CD16 antibody results in signals through the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif (ITAM) of the associated FcεRIγ and CD3ζ chain subunits, leading to cytokine and cytotoxic responses [18–20]. Unlike other activating receptors present in human NK cells, CD16 can robustly mediate activation without the need for co-engagement of other receptors [21]. These signaling properties allow for NK CD16-mediated targeting of antibody-coated cells in natural settings of viral infection, autoimmunity and the onset of some forms of tumors [22–24]. The latter has been exploited in the clinic by generating monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting specific tumor antigens to drive ADCC against those tumors [25–29].
1.2 Potential Advantages of BiKEs and TriKEs Over Conventional Antibodies
Driving ADCC through mAbs has resulted in significant clinical success. Specific targeting of tumors with BiKEs and TriKEs has the potential to build upon this success and improve efficacy. Binding affinity appears to be an important component of ADCC. This impression is supported by increased rituximab-driven cytotoxicity of B cell tumors mediated by NK cells containing the CD16A-158VV or VF allotypes which, when compared to the CD16A-158FF allotype, display decreased affinity for the Fc portions of antibodies [30]. Therefore, BiKEs and TriKEs might improve NK cell function by generating a stronger interaction through binding with anti-CD16 than that produced by binding of CD16 to the natural Fc portion of antibodies. This increase in affinity and cytotoxicity was demonstrated in a study comparing natural binding of CD16 to the Fc portion of an anti-HER2 antibody versus binding of CD16 through an anti-HER2 x anti-CD16 bi-specific antibody. Data showed a 3.4 fold increase in affinity in the bi-specific antibody versus binding of the native anti-HER2 Fc [31]. The efficacy of therapeutic mAbs in vivo, in contrast to their high ADCC efficacy in vitro, is further attenuated by the presence of physiologic serum IgG levels in plasma. In the in vivo setting, ADCC potency is diminished by saturation of CD16 receptors, thus competing for binding with the therapeutic mAb [32]. Such competition for binding of the Fc portion of therapeutic antibodies requires high serum levels of the mAb to be sustained over several months of treatment in order to achieve in vivo efficacy [33, 34]. BiKEs and TriKEs bypass this obstacle by binding the CD16 receptor directly. An additional benefit that BiKEs and TriKEs may have over mAbs is superior biodistribution as a consequence of their smaller size, particularly in the treatment of solid tumors [35–37]. In addition to these advantages, BiKEs and TriKEs are non-immunogenic, have quick clearance properties and can be engineered quickly to target known tumor antigens. These attributes make them an ideal pharmaceutical platform for potentiated NK cell-based immunotherapies .
1.3 Bi- and Tri-specific Reagents Targeting NK Cells and Tumors
Over the past two decades multivalent antibodies, and more recently BiKEs and TriKEs, have been used to target tumor antigens and CD16 on NK cells [38]. While approaches for assembly of multivalent antibodies and the current methodology for BiKE and TriKE engineering has evolved, the function of these reagents remains unchanged. Bi-specific and Tri-specific reagents have been generated to engage CD16 on the NK cell and the following tumor antigens: CD20 and CD19 on B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas [39–47], CD19 and CD33 on mixed lineage leukemia [48], CD33 or CD33 and CD123 on acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) [49–51], HLA Class II on lymphoma [52], CD30 on Hodgkin’s disease [53–62], EGF-R on EGF-R+ tumors [63, 64], HER2/neu on metastatic breast cancer and other HER2 expressing tumors [31, 65–71], and MOV19 on ovarian cancer [72]. Our group has contributed to the field through generation and testing of BiKEs and TriKEs that target CD16 and CD19/CD22 on B cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas [73], CD33 on AML [74] and MDS/MDSCs [75], and EpCAM on prostate, breast, colon, head, and neck carcinomas [76]. Activation through the BiKEs and TriKEs elicited potent cytotoxicity and cytokine secretion. In the case of the CD16 × CD19 × CD22 TriKE, the CD107a response to primary CLL and ALL exceeded that of rituximab. The CD16 × CD33 BiKE was capable of overcoming HLA-mediated inhibition with primary refractory AML blasts and restored function of NK cells from MDS patients. Encouraged by their translational potential, we are currently producing some versions of these reagents for clinical use. Basic reagent production methods are described in the next section.
2 Methodology
2.1 Selection of Variable Fragment Source and Linkers
BiKE design is a complex process. This section provides an overview of the entire methodology (summarized in Fig. 2). Once a target of interest has been defined, the first step in the design of BiKEs requires selection of a source for the variable fragments. Sequences for relevant fragments can be obtained from published work, hybridomas, B cells from immunized animals, phage display and other such display technology. For bacterial expression systems, phage display is ideal because the constructs are selected in bacteria, essentially pre-screening their function in the system of expression. The next step involves selection of a proper linker. BiKEs combine two different antigen-binding sites with a short flexible linker. The antigen-binding domains are single-chain variable fragments (scFv), which consist of heavy and light variable domains, also fused with a flexible linker (VH-linker-VL) [35]. The main linker design is important to the function of the BiKE by allowing separation of the functional domains as well as providing flexibility to bind the two (or three in the case of the TriKE) epitopes on the different targeted cells [77]. The (SGGG)4 linker is one of the first flexible linkers used in the construction of single-chain variable fragments (scFv) [78]. Another commonly used linker, the 218s linker (GSTSGSGKPGSGEGSTKG), is reported to improve proteolytic stability and reduce aggregation [79]. To reduce immunogenicity, our group utilized an HMA linker (PSGQAGAAASESLFVSNHAY) between the antiCD16 and the tumor antigen scFv [76].
2.2 Selection of Vector and Expression System
Once the components of the BiKE have been determined, selection of an appropriate vector for expression follows. We and other investigators focus on plasmid expression systems in bacteria and mammalian cells to create BiKEs, but there are other less utilized expression systems, such as lentivirus or sleeping beauty, which will not be discussed in this section. For bacterial expression systems, the pET vector is the system most commonly used in conjunction with the Rosetta 2(DE3) host cells (Novagen). The Rosetta 2(DE3) cells contain an IPTG- inducible T7 RNA polymerase, which is compatible with the pET vectors. Another feature of this strain is that it has been engineered to express a “universal” set of transfer RNAs as a way to mitigate the need for codon optimization. For transient mammalian expression systems, the pTT5 vector can be utilized in conjunction with the HEK293-E6 suspension cells or the pcDNA3.1 system can be used with the HEK293 Freestyle cells (Invitrogen). Reported yields have been higher in the HEK293-E6 system [80]. These cells express a truncated variant of the Epstein Barr virus (EBV) for which pTT5 vector contains the short EBV oriP for episomal replication. These two systems display advantages in yields and ease of use but a number of other systems utilizing different vectors can also be applied [80, 81].
2.3 Cloning the BiKE/TriKE Components into Expression Vector
Upon selection of a vector, one can begin cloning the BiKE components into the vector backbone. Significant advances have been made in the recombination technique. While there are several ways to clone DNA fragments into the vector backbone, we and others favor Gibson assembly because it is cost and time efficient [82]. Gibson assembly utilizes in vitro homologous recombination through insertion of a DNA fragment into a vector, where insertion is directed by homologous regions that are present at the end of the insert DNA and the linearized vector DNA [83]. An advantage of Gibson assembly over standard restriction cloning is that it requires little to no restriction enzyme utilization and multiple pieces can be cloned in one reaction. With the advent of this method, together with recent access to inexpensive high-fidelity synthetic DNA, it is now possible to construct BiKE expression plasmids in a few days of labor.
2.4 Expression and Isolation of the BiKEs/ TriKEs
Following preparation, the BiKE expression vector can then be chemically transduced into E. coli or transfected into mammalian cells through lipid or chemical means and, to a lesser extent, through electroporation . The advantage of E. coli versus the mammalian system is that it allows for quick, easy, robust, and inexpensive expression of the BiKEs [84]. An important difference between the bacterial and mammalian systems is that in the mammalian system, fully functional proteins are secreted and can be harvested from the supernatant. A disadvantage of bacteria is that most recombinant proteins are found in an insoluble form, termed an inclusion body [85]. To resolve this problem, lysis of the bacteria and isolation of the inclusion bodies through centrifugation followed by solubilization with strong denaturing reagents is required. The protein then must be refolded. Refolding is carried out at low protein concentrations. Conditions for refolding of the recombinant protein must be optimized (i.e., pH, ionic strength, temperature, and redox environment). The protein can then be isolated through size exclusion chromatography or through the use of an affinity tag, such as histidine-tags [85, 86]. As discussed, both systems have advantages and disadvantages. While the bacterial system is quick, easy, and robust, the mammalian system does not require re-folding and can be utilized to generate smaller amounts of functional protein quickly for initial screening. Another consideration possibly favoring the mammalian approach is that most therapeutic recombinant proteins gaining FDA approval are made in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells [87].
2.5 Testing the BiKEs and TriKEs
Flow cytometry is used to evaluate binding of the constructs to their respective targets. Prior to incorporation into the full bi- or tri-specific constructs containing the anti-CD16 variable portion and the linker/s, individual variable portions containing a His-tag or similar small tag are incubated with cells expressing the antigen of interest or cells expressing an irrelevant antigen, to evaluate non-specific binding. A biotinylated anti-His antibody is then used to recognize the His-tag on the variable portion, followed by addition of fluorescently labeled streptavidin to attain fluorescent conjugation. To ensure that the variable fragment is binding to the desired antigen, binding is then compared to fluorescently labeled commercial antibodies to the antigen of choice. Alternatively, the variable portion can be biotinylated or fluorescently labeled directly. However, this approach may increase risk of altering binding to the antigen. If the variable construct is designed from a known antibody for which fluorescently labeled forms already exist, the construct can be tested in a competition assay. In such assays, increasing concentrations of construct are bound to the cells expressing the specific antigen prior to addition of the known fluorescently labeled antibody. Specific binding is then measured by a decrease in binding of the fluorescently labeled full antibody form, indicating binding of the variable fragment to the antigen.
Once specific binding has been confirmed, the variable portion is incorporated into a full BiKE or TriKE construct and the functional activity of the construct is evaluated by two different methods. First, the ability of NK cells to degranulate in response to targets coated in the construct is assessed by a redirected lysis assay . Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) or purified NK cells are co-cultured with targets at a range of effector to target (E:T) ratios (1:1 to 20:1) in the presence or absence of a saturating concentration of the BiKE/TriKE of interest. Higher ratios are required for PMBCs when compared to purified NK cells. Effectors, targets, and constructs are incubated together for several hours (usually 4) and then surface LAMP-1 (CD107a), used to evaluate degranulation, and intracellular IFN-γ and TNF-α, used to evaluate cytokine secretion, are assessed on the NK cells by flow cytometry . Irrelevant targets are used as a negative control in this assay, while full length antibodies that direct ADCC towards the antigen of choice are used as a positive/comparative control.
While this assay determines the level to which NK cells are activated, it does not reflect the level of target cell killing in response to the NK cell activation . To evaluate target cell killing a cytotoxicity assay, such as a chromium release assay, is performed. In this assay, target cells are labeled with radioactive Chromium-51 (51Cr) prior to co-culture with PBMCs or purified NK cells and the BiKE/TriKE. E:T ratios in this assay range from 20:1 to 0.625:1. Wells containing targets without NK cells are plated for use as maximum (10 % SDS mediated lysis) and minimum (no treatment) release groups. These groups are used for the calculation of percent targets killed. During the incubation, as target cells are killed they release 51Cr into the supernatant while the targets that remain alive keep the 51Cr sequestered inside the cell. 51 Cr release is then assessed on a gamma counter and the percent of targets killed is calculated. Controls similar to those mentioned in the flow-based assay are also included. Once the specificity and efficacy of the BiKEs/TriKEs has been determined, the constructs can now be tested with clinical samples and/or in more complex in vivo killing assays utilizing NSG mice, engrafted xenogeneic tumors, and transferred human NK cells.
3 Future Directions
Although current BiKE and TriKE constructs display great translational potential, efforts are currently underway to further improve their efficacy. One obstacle that could limit the efficacy of BiKEs and TriKEs, as well as all other antibody therapy mediated through NK cells, is CD16 expression. NK cell-mediated ADCC by therapeutic antibodies depends on ligation of CD16, on the NK cell, with the Fc portion of the antibody [88]. BiKEs and TriKEs, as well as other formats of bi- and tri-specific antibodies, mediate redirected lysis of the target and NK cell function through direct binding and crosslinking of the CD16 receptor. This bears relevance because CD16 is rapidly clipped from the surface of NK cells activated through CD16 by matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), in particular ADAM-17 [89–92]. Activation through cytokines can also result in the clipping of CD16 [93]. Loss of surface CD16 expression on activated NK likely results in a diminished capacity to mediate subsequent rounds of ADCC. To address this concern, we and others are currently evaluating MMP-specific inhibitors as a means to prevent CD16 clipping during NK cell activation [94, 95]. We have demonstrated that inhibition of ADAM-17 results in superior function post CD16 crosslinking and can potentiate rituximab-mediated responses in vitro. We have also shown that ADAM-17 inhibition can enhance BiKE mediated killing against myeloid targets in vitro [74]. These results indicate that co-treatment with ADAM-17 inhibitor may be a good strategy to enhance BiKE/TriKE function in the clinic.
A different approach to circumvent the CD16 problem is to target other receptors on the NK cells with the BiKEs and TriKEs. CD16 was originally selected owing to its ability to potently activate NK cells and overcome inhibitory signaling [21]. This was highlighted in the BiKE system showing that the CD16 × CD33 BiKE could overcome HLA-mediated inhibition in primary AML blasts and could restore NK cell function from MDS patients, whose natural cytotoxicity is thought to be impaired [74, 75]. However, co-engagement of other receptors, particularly NKG2D and 2B4, has been shown to induce activation similar to that provided by CD16 alone [21]. There is also potential for TriKEs engaging CD16, a tumor antigen, and another NK cell activating or co-stimulatory receptor. For instance, co-engagement of CD16 with DNAM-1, CD2, or 2B4 was shown to potentiate function in NK cells from MDS patients [75]. Co-administration of cytokines may also enhance BiKE mediated NK cell function. Several cytokines, including IL-15, IL-2, IL-21, and IL-12 have prominent roles in NK cell development, proliferation, survival, and/or activation . Encouraged by these attributes, trials are underway to implement them in the clinic [96]. Besides the aforementioned attributes, some of these cytokines have been shown to also potentiate ADCC, making them an interesting co-therapeutic approach.
While personalized CAR-T cell therapies have recently enjoyed a great deal of clinical success [2], there remains a clear need for off-the shelf reagents that enhance targeting of the immune system to tumor antigens. Directing targeting of NK cells is a compelling therapeutic approach on the basis of their ability to quickly kill tumors and secrete cytokines without prior priming [5]. BiKEs and TriKEs are an important conduit for achieving this since they are relatively easy to produce, drive potent NK cell activation through CD16 crosslinking, and can be utilized to target almost any tumor antigen for which an antibody has been designed. This is true regardless of whether the antibody displays activating properties because the activation is driven through the CD16 scFv. To date our group has primarily focused on non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (through CD19 and CD22), AML and MDS (through CD33), and breast, colon, and lung carcinomas (through EpCAM) [73–76]. Notably, there are an abundance of promising tumor antigens for which therapeutic antibodies have been designed that could be incorporated into BiKE and TriKE platforms [37]. These include CD30 (Hodgkin’s lymphoma), CD52 (CLL), CEA (breast, colon, and lung), gpA33 (colorectal), CAIX (renal cell), Mucins (breast, colon, lung, and ovarian), PSMA (prostate), VEGFR (epithelium-derived solid tumors), VEGF and Integrins αVβ3 and α5β1 (tumor vasculature), EGFR (breast, lung, colon, glioma, and head and neck), and ERBB2 and ERBB3 (breast, lung, colon, ovarian, and prostate). This list, by no means comprehensive, enumerates several important hematological and solid tumors that potentially could be targeted through the powerful BiKE platform.
References
Masters GA, Krilov L, Bailey HH et al (2015) Clinical cancer advances 2015: Annual report on progress against cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 33:786–809
Caruana I, Diaconu I, Dotti G (2014) From monoclonal antibodies to chimeric antigen receptors for the treatment of human malignancies. Semin Oncol 41:661–666
Hermanson DL, Kaufman DS (2015) Utilizing chimeric antigen receptors to direct natural killer cell activity. Front Immunol 6:195
Glienke W, Esser R, Priesner C et al (2015) Advantages and applications of CAR-expressing natural killer cells. Front Pharmacol 6:21
Vivier E, Raulet DH, Moretta A et al (2011) Innate or adaptive immunity? The example of natural killer cells. Science 331:44–49
Velardi A (2012) Natural killer cell alloreactivity 10 years later. Curr Opin Hematol 19:421–426
Anegon I, Cuturi MC, Trinchieri G et al (1988) Interaction of Fc receptor (CD16) ligands induces transcription of interleukin 2 receptor (CD25) and lymphokine genes and expression of their products in human natural killer cells. J Exp Med 167:452–472
Ravetch JV, Bolland S (2001) IgG Fc receptors. Annu Rev Immunol 19:275–290
Selvaraj P, Carpen O, Hibbs ML et al (1989) Natural killer cell and granulocyte Fc gamma receptor III (CD16) differ in membrane anchor and signal transduction. J Immunol 143:3283–3288
Perussia B, Ravetch JV (1991) Fc gamma RIII (CD16) on human macrophages is a functional product of the Fc gamma RIII-2 gene. Eur J Immunol 21:425–429
Klaassen RJ, Ouwehand WH, Huizinga TW et al (1990) The Fc-receptor III of cultured human monocytes. Structural similarity with FcRIII of natural killer cells and role in the extracellular lysis of sensitized erythrocytes. J Immunol 144:599–606
Nishikiori N, Koyama M, Kikuchi T et al (1993) Membrane-spanning Fc gamma receptor III isoform expressed on human placental trophoblasts. Am J Reprod Immunol 29:17–25
Ravetch JV, Perussia B (1989) Alternative membrane forms of Fc gamma RIII(CD16) on human natural killer cells and neutrophils. Cell type-specific expression of two genes that differ in single nucleotide substitutions. J Exp Med 170:481–497
Lanier LL, Ruitenberg JJ, Phillips JH (1988) Functional and biochemical analysis of CD16 antigen on natural killer cells and granulocytes. J Immunol 141:3478–3485
Wirthmueller U, Kurosaki T, Murakami MS et al (1992) Signal transduction by Fc gamma RIII (CD16) is mediated through the gamma chain. J Exp Med 175:1381–1390
Cooper MA, Fehniger TA, Caligiuri MA (2001) The biology of human natural killer-cell subsets. Trends Immunol 22:633–640
Beziat V, Duffy D, Quoc SN et al (2011) CD56brightCD16+ NK cells: a functional intermediate stage of NK cell differentiation. J Immunol 186:6753–6761
Vivier E, Nunes JA, Vely F (2004) Natural killer cell signaling pathways. Science 306:1517–1519
Vivier E, Morin P, O’Brien C et al (1991) Tyrosine phosphorylation of the Fc gamma RIII(CD16): zeta complex in human natural killer cells. Induction by antibody-dependent cytotoxicity but not by natural killing. J Immunol 146:206–210
Nimmerjahn F, Ravetch JV (2008) Fcgamma receptors as regulators of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 8:34–47
Bryceson YT, Ljunggren HG, Long EO (2009) Minimal requirement for induction of natural cytotoxicity and intersection of activation signals by inhibitory receptors. Blood 114:2657–2666
Shore SL, Nahmias AJ, Starr SE et al (1974) Detection of cell-dependent cytotoxic antibody to cells infected with herpes simplex virus. Nature 251:350–352
Laszlo A, Petri I, Ilyes M (1986) Antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC)-reaction and an in vitro steroid sensitivity test of peripheral lymphocytes in children with malignant haematological and autoimmune diseases. Acta Paediatr Hung 27:23–29
Natsume A, Niwa R, Satoh M (2009) Improving effector functions of antibodies for cancer treatment: Enhancing ADCC and CDC. Drug Des Devel Ther 3:7–16
Albertini MR, Hank JA, Sondel PM (2005) Native and genetically engineered anti-disialoganglioside monoclonal antibody treatment of melanoma. Cancer Chemother Biol Response Modif 22:789–797
Garcia-Foncillas J, Diaz-Rubio E (2010) Progress in metastatic colorectal cancer: growing role of cetuximab to optimize clinical outcome. Clin Trans Oncol 12:533–542
Garnock-Jones KP, Keating GM, Scott LJ (2010) Trastuzumab: A review of its use as adjuvant treatment in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive early breast cancer. Drugs 70:215–239
Navid F, Santana VM, Barfield RC (2010) Anti-GD2 antibody therapy for GD2-expressing tumors. Curr Cancer Drug Targets 10:200–209
Winter MC, Hancock BW (2009) Ten years of rituximab in NHL. Expert Opin Drug Saf 8:223–235
Congy-Jolivet N, Bolzec A, Ternant D et al (2008) Fc gamma RIIIa expression is not increased on natural killer cells expressing the Fc gamma RIIIa-158V allotype. Cancer Res 68:976–980
Moore GL, Bautista C, Pong E et al (2011) A novel bispecific antibody format enables simultaneous bivalent and monovalent co-engagement of distinct target antigens. MAbs 3:546–557
Preithner S, Elm S, Lippold S et al (2006) High concentrations of therapeutic IgG1 antibodies are needed to compensate for inhibition of antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity by excess endogenous immunoglobulin G. Mol Immunol 43:1183–1193
Baselga J, Albanell J (2001) Mechanism of action of anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies. Ann Oncol 12(Suppl 1):S35–S41
Berinstein NL, Grillo-Lopez AJ, White CA et al (1998) Association of serum Rituximab (IDEC-C2B8) concentration and anti-tumor response in the treatment of recurrent low-grade or follicular non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol 9:995–1001
Holliger P, Hudson PJ (2005) Engineered antibody fragments and the rise of single domains. Nat Biotechnol 23:1126–1136
Chames P, Van Regenmortel M, Weiss E et al (2009) Therapeutic antibodies: successes, limitations and hopes for the future. Br J Pharmacol 157:220–233
Scott AM, Wolchok JD, Old LJ (2012) Antibody therapy of cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 12:278–287
Ferrini S, Cambiaggi A, Cantoni C et al (1992) Targeting of T or NK lymphocytes against tumor cells by bispecific monoclonal antibodies: role of different triggering molecules. Int J Cancer 7:15–18
Glorius P, Baerenwaldt A, Kellner C et al (2013) The novel tribody [(CD20)(2)xCD16] efficiently triggers effector cell-mediated lysis of malignant B cells. Leukemia 27:190–201
Kipriyanov SM, Cochlovius B, Schafer HJ et al (2002) Synergistic antitumor effect of bispecific CD19 x CD3 and CD19 x CD16 diabodies in a preclinical model of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Immunol 169:137–144
Kellner C, Bruenke J, Stieglmaier J et al (2008) A novel CD19-directed recombinant bispecific antibody derivative with enhanced immune effector functions for human leukemic cells. J Immunother 31:871–884
Kellner C, Bruenke J, Horner H et al (2011) Heterodimeric bispecific antibody-derivatives against CD19 and CD16 induce effective antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity against B-lymphoid tumor cells. Cancer Lett 303:128–139
Portner LM, Schonberg K, Hejazi M et al (2012) T and NK cells of B cell NHL patients exert cytotoxicity against lymphoma cells following binding of bispecific tetravalent antibody CD19 x CD3 or CD19 x CD16. Cancer Immunol Immunother 61:1869–1875
Bruenke J, Barbin K, Kunert S et al (2005) Effective lysis of lymphoma cells with a stabilised bispecific single-chain Fv antibody against CD19 and FcgammaRIII (CD16). Br J Haematol 130:218–228
Johnson S, Burke S, Huang L et al (2010) Effector cell recruitment with novel Fv-based dual-affinity re-targeting protein leads to potent tumor cytolysis and in vivo B-cell depletion. J Mol Biol 399:436–449
Schlenzka J, Moehler TM, Kipriyanov SM et al (2004) Combined effect of recombinant CD19 x CD16 diabody and thalidomide in a preclinical model of human B cell lymphoma. Anticancer Drugs 15:915–919
Schubert I, Kellner C, Stein C et al (2012) A recombinant triplebody with specificity for CD19 and HLA-DR mediates preferential binding to antigen double-positive cells by dual-targeting. MAbs 4:45–56
Schubert I, Kellner C, Stein C et al (2011) A single-chain triplebody with specificity for CD19 and CD33 mediates effective lysis of mixed lineage leukemia cells by dual targeting. MAbs 3:21–30
Silla LM, Chen J, Zhong RK et al (1995) Potentiation of lysis of leukaemia cells by a bispecific antibody to CD33 and CD16 (Fc gamma RIII) expressed by human natural killer (NK) cells. Br J Haematol 89:712–718
Singer H, Kellner C, Lanig H et al (2010) Effective elimination of acute myeloid leukemic cells by recombinant bispecific antibody derivatives directed against CD33 and CD16. J Immunother 33:599–608
Kugler M, Stein C, Kellner C et al (2010) A recombinant trispecific single-chain Fv derivative directed against CD123 and CD33 mediates effective elimination of acute myeloid leukaemia cells by dual targeting. Br J Haematol 150:574–586
Bruenke J, Fischer B, Barbin K et al (2004) A recombinant bispecific single-chain Fv antibody against HLA class II and FcgammaRIII (CD16) triggers effective lysis of lymphoma cells. Br J Haematol 125:167–179
Hombach A, Jung W, Pohl C et al (1993) A CD16/CD30 bispecific monoclonal antibody induces lysis of Hodgkin’s cells by unstimulated natural killer cells in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cancer 55:830–836
Renner C, Pfreundschuh M (1995) Treatment of heterotransplanted Hodgkin’s tumors in SCID mice by a combination of human NK or T cells and bispecific antibodies. J Hematother 4:447–451
Sahin U, Kraft-Bauer S, Ohnesorge S et al (1996) Interleukin-12 increases bispecific-antibody-mediated natural killer cell cytotoxicity against human tumors. Cancer Immunol Immunother 42:9–14
Renner C, Hartmann F, Pfreundschuh M (1997) Treatment of refractory Hodgkin’s disease with an anti-CD16/CD30 bispecific antibody. Cancer Immunol Immunother 45:184–186
Hartmann F, Renner C, Jung W et al (1997) Treatment of refractory Hodgkin’s disease with an anti-CD16/CD30 bispecific antibody. Blood 89:2042–2047
Hartmann F, Renner C, Jung W et al (1998) Anti-CD16/CD30 bispecific antibodies as possible treatment for refractory Hodgkin’s disease. Leuk Lymphoma 31:385–392
da Costa L, Renner C, Hartmann F et al (2000) Immune recruitment by bispecific antibodies for the treatment of Hodgkin disease. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 46(Suppl):S33–S36
Renner C, Hartmann F, Jung W et al (2000) Initiation of humoral and cellular immune responses in patients with refractory Hodgkin’s disease by treatment with an anti-CD16/CD30 bispecific antibody. Cancer Immunol Immunother 49:173–180
Reiners KS, Kessler J, Sauer M et al (2013) Rescue of impaired NK cell activity in Hodgkin lymphoma with bispecific antibodies in vitro and in patients. Mol Ther 21:895–903
Arndt MA, Krauss J, Kipriyanov SM et al (1999) A bispecific diabody that mediates natural killer cell cytotoxicity against xenotransplantated human Hodgkin’s tumors. Blood 94:2562–2568
Ferrini S, Cambiaggi A, Sforzini S et al (1993) Use of anti-CD3 and anti-CD16 bispecific monoclonal antibodies for the targeting of T and NK cells against tumor cells. Cancer Detect Prev 17:295–300
Elsasser D, Stadick H, Stark S et al (1999) Preclinical studies combining bispecific antibodies with cytokine-stimulated effector cells for immunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 19:1525–1528
Weiner LM, Clark JI, Davey M et al (1995) Phase I trial of 2B1, a bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting c-erbB-2 and Fc gamma RIII. Cancer Res 55:4586–4593
Weiner LM, Clark JI, Ring DB et al (1995) Clinical development of 2B1, a bispecific murine monoclonal antibody targeting c-erbB-2 and Fc gamma RIII. J Hematother 4:453–456
Shahied LS, Tang Y, Alpaugh RK et al (2004) Bispecific minibodies targeting HER2/neu and CD16 exhibit improved tumor lysis when placed in a divalent tumor antigen binding format. J Biol Chem 279:53907–53914
Xie Z, Shi M, Feng J et al (2003) A trivalent anti-erbB2/anti-CD16 bispecific antibody retargeting NK cells against human breast cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 311:307–312
Stockmeyer B, Valerius T, Repp R et al (1997) Preclinical studies with Fc(gamma)R bispecific antibodies and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-primed neutrophils as effector cells against HER-2/neu overexpressing breast cancer. Cancer Res 57:696–701
Weiner LM, Holmes M, Adams GP et al (1993) A human tumor xenograft model of therapy with a bispecific monoclonal antibody targeting c-erbB-2 and CD16. Cancer Res 53:94–100
Weiner LM, Holmes M, Richeson A et al (1993) Binding and cytotoxicity characteristics of the bispecific murine monoclonal antibody 2B1. J Immunol 151:2877–2886
Ferrini S, Prigione I, Miotti S et al (1991) Bispecific monoclonal antibodies directed to CD16 and to a tumor-associated antigen induce target-cell lysis by resting NK cells and by a subset of NK clones. Int J Cancer 48:227–233
Gleason MK, Verneris MR, Todhunter DA et al (2012) Bispecific and trispecific killer cell engagers directly activate human NK cells through CD16 signaling and induce cytotoxicity and cytokine production. Mol Cancer Ther 11:2674–2684
Wiernik A, Foley B, Zhang B et al (2013) Targeting Natural Killer Cells to Acute Myeloid Leukemia In Vitro with a CD16 x 33 Bispecific Killer Cell Engager and ADAM17 Inhibition. Clin Cancer Res 19:3844–3855
Gleason MK, Ross JA, Warlick ED et al (2014) CD16xCD33 bispecific killer cell engager (BiKE) activates NK cells against primary MDS and MDSC CD33+ targets. Blood 123:3016–3026
Vallera DA, Zhang B, Gleason MK et al (2013) Heterodimeric Bispecific Single-Chain Variable-Fragment Antibodies Against EpCAM and CD16 Induce Effective Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity Against Human Carcinoma Cells. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 28(4):274–282
Chen X, Zaro JL, Shen WC (2013) Fusion protein linkers: property, design and functionality. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 65:1357–1369
Huston JS, Levinson D, Mudgett-Hunter M et al (1988) Protein engineering of antibody binding sites: recovery of specific activity in an anti-digoxin single-chain Fv analogue produced in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 85:5879–5883
Whitlow M, Bell BA, Feng SL et al (1993) An improved linker for single-chain Fv with reduced aggregation and enhanced proteolytic stability. Protein Eng 6:989–995
Jager V, Bussow K, Wagner A et al (2013) High level transient production of recombinant antibodies and antibody fusion proteins in HEK293 cells. BMC Biotechnol 13:52
Sorensen HP, Mortensen KK (2005) Advanced genetic strategies for recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol 115:113–128
Nakayama H, Shimamoto N (2014) Modern and simple construction of plasmid: saving time and cost. J Microbiol 52:891–897
Gibson DG, Benders GA, Andrews-Pfannkoch C et al (2008) Complete chemical synthesis, assembly, and cloning of a Mycoplasma genitalium genome. Science 319:1215–1220
Gopal GJ, Kumar A (2013) Strategies for the production of recombinant protein in Escherichia coli. Protein J 32:419–425
Burgess RR (2009) Refolding solubilized inclusion body proteins. Methods Enzymol 463:259–282
Lichty JJ, Malecki JL, Agnew HD et al (2005) Comparison of affinity tags for protein purification. Protein Expr Purif 41:98–105
Kim JY, Kim YG, Lee GM (2012) CHO cells in biotechnology for production of recombinant proteins: current state and further potential. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93:917–930
Reff ME, Carner K, Chambers KS et al (1994) Depletion of B cells in vivo by a chimeric mouse human monoclonal antibody to CD20. Blood 83:435–445
Harrison D, Phillips JH, Lanier LL (1991) Involvement of a metalloprotease in spontaneous and phorbol ester-induced release of natural killer cell-associated Fc gamma RIII (CD16-II). J Immunol 147:3459–3465
Borrego F, Lopez-Beltran A, Pena J et al (1994) Downregulation of Fc gamma receptor IIIA alpha (CD16-II) on natural killer cells induced by anti-CD16 mAb is independent of protein tyrosine kinases and protein kinase C. Cell Immunol 158:208–217
Grzywacz B, Kataria N, Verneris MR (2007) CD56(dim)CD16(+) NK cells downregulate CD16 following target cell induced activation of matrix metalloproteinases. Leukemia 21:356–359, author reply 359
Liu Q, Sun Y, Rihn S et al (2009) Matrix metalloprotease inhibitors restore impaired NK cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection. J Virol 83:8705–8712
Edsparr K, Speetjens FM, Mulder-Stapel A et al (2010) Effects of IL-2 on MMP expression in freshly isolated human NK cells and the IL-2-independent NK cell line YT. J Immunother 33:475–481
Romee R, Foley B, Lenvik T et al (2013) NK cell CD16 surface expression and function is regulated by a disintegrin and metalloprotease-17 (ADAM17). Blood 121:3599–3608
Zhou Q, Gil-Krzewska A, Peruzzi G et al (2013) Matrix metalloproteinases inhibition promotes the polyfunctionality of human natural killer cells in therapeutic antibody-based anti-tumour immunotherapy. Clin Exp Immunol 173:131–139
Romee R, Leong JW, Fehniger TA (2014) Utilizing cytokines to function-enable human NK cells for the immunotherapy of cancer. Scientifica (Cairo) 2014:205796
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Felices, M., Lenvik, T.R., Davis, Z.B., Miller, J.S., Vallera, D.A. (2016). Generation of BiKEs and TriKEs to Improve NK Cell-Mediated Targeting of Tumor Cells. In: Somanchi, S. (eds) Natural Killer Cells. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1441. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3684-7_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3684-7_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Humana Press, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-3682-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-3684-7
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols