Abstract
With the introduction of the REACH legislation in the European Union, there is a requirement for property and toxicity data on chemicals produced in or imported into the EU at levels of 1 tonne/year or more. This has meant an increase in the in silico prediction of such data. One of the chief predictive approaches is QSAR (quantitative structure–activity relationships), which is widely used in many fields.
A QSAR approach that is increasingly being used is that of artificial neural networks (ANNs), and this chapter discusses its application to the range of physicochemical properties and toxicities required by REACH. ANNs generally outperform the main QSAR approach of multiple linear regression (MLR), although other approaches such as support vector machines sometimes outperform ANNs. Most ANN QSARs reported to date comply with only two of the five OECD Guidelines for the Validation of (Q)SARs.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
European Parliament: Regulation (EC) N° 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006 concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=oj:l:2006:396:0001:0849:en:pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2014
Hansch C, Clayton JM (1973) Lipophilic character and activity of drugs II: the parabolic case. J Pharm Sci 62:1–23
Cronin MTD, Gregory BW, Schultz TW (1998) Quantitative structure-activity analyses of nitrobenzene toxicity to Tetrahymena pyriformis. Chem Res Toxicol 11:902–908
Devillers J (ed) (1996) Neural networks in QSAR and drug design. Academic, London
Gasteiger J, Engel T (2003) Chemoinformatics—a textbook. Wiley, Weinheim
Witten IH, Frank E (2005) Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco
Devillers J (1996) Strengths and weaknesses of the backpropagation neural network QSPR studies. In: Devillers J (ed) Neural networks in QSAR and drug design. Academic, London, pp 1–46
ECHA Guidance on information requirements and safety assessment. Chapter R.6. QSARs and grouping of chemicals, 2008. Available at http://echa.europa.eu/documents/10162/13632/information_requirements_r6_en.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2014
OECD Principles for the Validation of (Q)SARs. Available at http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/37/37849783.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan 2014
OECD Environment Directorate, Joint Meeting of the Chemicals Committee and the Working Party on Chemicals, Pesticides and Biotechnology. Available at http://www.olis.oecd.org/olis/2004doc.nsf/LinkTo/NT00009192/$FILE/JT00176183.PDF. Accessed 5 Jan 2014
Fjodorova N, Novich M, Vrachko M et al (2008) Directions in QSAR modeling for regulatory use in OECD member countries, EU and in Russia. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 26:201–236
Devillers J (2005) A new strategy for using supervised artificial neural networks in QSAR. SAR QSAR Environ Res 16:433–442
Baskin II, Palyulin VA, Zefirov NS (2008) Neural networks in building QSAR models. In: Livingstone DS (ed) Artificial neural networks: methods and protocols. Humana Press, New York, pp 137–158
Devillers J (2009) Artificial neural network modeling of the environmental fate and ecotoxicity of chemicals. In: Devillers J (ed) Ecotoxicology modeling. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–28
Gleeson MP, Modi S, Bender A et al (2012) The challenges involved in modelling toxicity data in silico: a review. Curr Pharm Des 18:1266–1291
Moore DRJ, Breton RL, MacDonald DB (2003) A comparison of model performance for six quantitative structure-activity relationship packages that predict acute toxicity to fish. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1799–1809
Fatemi MH, Abraham MH, Haghdadi M (2009) Prediction of biomagnification factors for some organochlorine compounds using linear free energy relationship parameters and artificial neural networks. SAR QSAR Environ Res 20:453–465
Tan N-X, Li P, Rao H-B et al (2010) Prediction of the acute toxicity of chemical compounds to the fathead minnow by machine learning approaches. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 100:66–73
Dearden JC, Cronin MTD, Kaiser KLE (2009) How not to develop a quantitative structure-activity or structure-property relationship (QSAR/QSPR). SAR QSAR Environ Res 20:241–266
Baskin II, Ait AO, Halberstam NM et al (2002) An approach to the interpretation of backpropagation neural network models in QSAR studies. SAR QSAR Environ Res 13:35–41
Guha R, Jurs PC (2005) Interpreting computational neural network QSAR models: a measure of descriptor importance. J Chem Inf Model 45:800–806
Guha R, Stanton DT, Jurs PC (2005) Interpreting computational neural network QSAR models: a detailed interpretation of the weights and biases. J Chem Inf Model 45:1109–1121
Chaudhry Q, Piclin N, Cotterill J et al (2010) Global QSAR models of skin sensitisers for regulatory purposes. Chem Cent J 4(Suppl 1):S1–S6
Johnson SR (2008) The trouble with QSAR (or how I learned to stop worrying and embrace fallacy). J Chem Inf Model 48:25–26
Enoch SJ, Madden JC, Cronin MTD (2008) Identification of mechanisms of toxic action for skin sensitisation using a SMARTS pattern based approach. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:555–578
Vračko M, Bandelj V, Barbier P et al (2006) Validation of counter propagation neural network models for predictive toxicology according to the OECD principles: a case study. SAR QSAR Environ Res 17:265–284
Worth AP (2010) The role of QSAR methodology in the regulatory assessment of chemicals. In: Puzyn T, Leszczynski J, Cronin MTD (eds) Recent advances in QSAR studies: methods and applications. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 367–382
(Q)SAR Model Reporting Format. Available at http://qsardb.jrc.it/qmrf. Accessed 16 Jan 2014
ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7a. Endpoint specific guidance, in Guidance for the Implementation of REACH, ECHA, Helsinki, 2012. Available at http://echa.europa.eu/support/guidance-on-reach-and-clp-implementation/consultation-procedure. Accessed 25 Jan 2014
Regulation (EC) No. 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2006. Available at http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CONSLEG:2006. Accessed 25 Jan 2014
Dearden JC, Rotureau P, Fayet G (2013) QSPR prediction of physico-chemical properties for REACH. SAR QSAR Environ Res 24:279–318
Taskinen J, Yliruusi J (2003) Prediction of physicochemical properties based on neural network modelling. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 55:1163–1183
Godavarthy SS, Robinson RL, Gasem KAM (2006) An improved structure-property model for predicting melting-point temperatures. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:5117–5126
Karthikeyan M, Glen RC, Bender A (2005) General melting point prediction based on a diverse compound data set and artificial neural networks. J Chem Inf Model 45:581–590
Hall LH, Story CT (1996) Boiling point and critical temperature of a heterogeneous data set. QSAR with atom type electrotopological state indices using artificial neural networks. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 36:1004–1014
Chalk AJ, Beck B, Clark T (2001) A quantum mechanical/neural network model for boiling points with error estimation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:457–462
Gakh AA, Gakh EG, Sumpter BG et al (1994) Neural network-graph theory approach to the prediction of the physical properties of organic compounds. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 34:832–839
Valderrama JO, Reátegui A, Rojas RE (2009) Density of ionic liquids using group contribution and artificial neural networks. Ind Eng Chem Res 48:3254–3259
McClelland HE, Jurs PC (2000) Quantitative structure-property relationships for the prediction of vapor pressures of organic compounds from molecular structure. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 40:967–975
Chalk AJ, Beck B, Clark T (2001) A temperature-dependent quantum mechanical/neural net model for vapor pressure. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:1053–1059
Roosta A, Setoodeh P, Jahanmiri A (2012) Artificial neural network modeling of surface tension for pure organic compounds. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:561–566
Gharagheizi F, Eslamimanesh A, Mohammadi AH et al (2011) Use of artificial neural network-group contribution method to determine surface tension of pure compounds. J Chem Eng Data 56:2587–2601
Dearden JC (2006) In silico prediction of aqueous solubility. Expert Opin Drug Discov 1:31–52
Yan A, Gasteiger J (2003) Prediction of aqueous solubility of organic compounds based on a 3D structure representation. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43:429–434
Katritzky AR, Wang Y, Sild S et al (1998) QSPR studies on vapor pressure, aqueous solubility, and the prediction of water-air partition coefficients. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 38:720–725
Bruneau P (2001) Search for predictive generic model of aqueous solubility using Bayesian neural nets. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:1605–1616
Livingstone DJ (2003) Theoretical property predictions. Curr Top Med Chem 3:1171–1192
Klopman G, Zhu H (2005) Recent methodologies for the estimation of n-octanol-water partition coefficients and their use in the prediction of membrane transport properties of drugs. Mini Rev Med Chem 5:127–133
Chen H-F (2009) In silico log P prediction for a large data set with support vector machines, radial basis neural networks and multiple linear regression. Chem Biol Drug Des 74:142–147
Tetko IV, Tanchuk VY, Villa AEP (2001) Prediction of n-octanol-water partition coefficients from PHYSPROP database using artificial neural networks and E-state indices. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:1407–1421
Kier LB, Hall LH (1999) Molecular structure description: the electrotopological state. Academic, New York
Katritzky AR, Stoyanova-Slavova IB, Dobchev DA et al (2007) QSPR modelling of flash points: an update. J Mol Graph Model 26:529–536
Gharagheizi F, Alamdari RF, Angaji MT (2008) A new neural network-group contribution method for estimation of flash point temperature of pure components. Energy Fuel 22:1628–1635
Gharagheizi F (2010) Chemical structure-based model for estimation of the upper flammability limit of pure compounds. Energy Fuel 24:3867–3871
Gharagheizi F (2009) Prediction of upper flammability limit percent of pure compounds from their molecular structures. J Hazard Mater 167:507–510
Gharagheizi F (2008) Quantitative structure-property relationship for prediction of the lower flammability limit of pure compounds. Energy Fuel 22:3037–3039
Gharagheizi F (2009) A new group contribution-based model for estimation of lower flammability limit of pure compounds. J Hazard Mater 170:595–604
Cho SG, No KT, Goh EM et al (2005) Optimization of neural networks architecture for impact sensitivity of energetic molecules. Bull Korean Chem Soc 26:399–408
Wang R, Jiang J, Pan Y et al (2009) Prediction of impact sensitivity of nitro energetic compounds by neural network based on electrotopological-state indices. J Hazard Mater 166:155–186
Tetteh J, Metcalfe E, Howells SL (1996) Optimisation of radial basis and backpropagation neural networks for modelling auto-ignition temperature by quantitative structure-property relationships. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 32:177–191
Pan Y, Jiang J, Wang R et al (2008) Prediction of auto-ignition temperatures of hydrocarbons by neural network based on atom-type electrotopological-state indices. J Hazard Mater 157:510–517
Liu GS, Yu JG (2005) QSAR analysis of soil sorption coefficients for polar organic chemicals: substituted anilines and phenols. Water Res 39:2048–2055
Goudarzi N, Goodarzi M, Araujo MCU et al (2009) QSPR modeling of soil sorption coefficients (Koc) of pesticides using SPA-ANN and SPA-MLR. J Agric Food Chem 57:7153–7158
Luan F, Ma W, Zhang H et al (2005) Prediction of pKa for neutral and basic drugs based on radial basis function neural networks and the heuristic method. Pharm Res 22:1454–1460
CODESSA software. Available at www.semichem.com. Accessed 26 Jan 2014
Habibi-Yangjeh A, Danandeh-Jenagharad M, Nooshyar M (2005) Prediction acidity constant of various benzoic acids and phenols in water using linear and nonlinear QSPR models. Bull Korean Chem Soc 26:2007–2016
Kauffman GW, Jurs PC (2001) Prediction of surface tension, viscosity and thermal conductivity for common organic solvents using quantitative structure-property relationships. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 41:408–418
Artemenko NV, Baskin II, Palyulin VA et al (2001) Prediction of physical properties of organic compounds using artificial neural networks within the substructure approach. Doklady Chem 381:317–320
Modarresi H, Modarress H, Dearden JC (2007) QSPR model of Henry’s law constant for a diverse set of organic chemicals based on genetic algorithm-radial basis function network approach. Chemosphere 66:2067–2076
Gharagheizi F, Abbasi R, Tirandazi B (2010) Prediction of Henry’s law constant of organic compounds in water from a new group-contribution-based method. Ind Eng Chem Res 49:10149–10152
ECHA Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7b. Endpoint specific guidance, in Guidance for the Implementation of REACH, ECHA, Helsinki, 2012. Available at http://echa.europa.eu/support/guidance-on-reach-and-clp-implementation/consultation-procedure. Accessed 17 Jan 2014
Salina AG, Patlewicz G, Worth AP (2008) A review of QSAR models for skin and eye irritation and corrosion. QSAR Comb Sci 27:49–59
Golla S, Madihally S, Robinson RL et al (2009) Quantitative structure-property relationships modeling of skin irritation. Toxicol In Vitro 23:176–184
Barratt MD (1996) Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSARs) for skin corrosivity of organic acids, bases and phenols: principal components and neural networks analysis of extended datasets. Toxicol In Vitro 10:85–94
Barratt MD (1997) QSARs for the eye irritation potential of neutral organic chemicals. Toxicol In Vitro 11:1–8
Patlewicz GY, Rodford RA, Ellis G et al (2000) A QSAR model for the eye irritation of cationic surfactants. Toxicol In Vitro 14:79–84
Patlewicz G, Roberts DW, Uriarte E (2008) A minireview of available skin sensitization (Q)SARs/expert systems. Chem Res Toxicol 21:521–541
Devillers J (2000) A neural network SAR model for allergic contact dermatitis. Toxicol Methods 10:181–193
Cronin MTD, Basketter DA (1994) Multivariate QSAR analysis of a skin sensitization database. SAR QSAR Environ Res 2:159–179
Golla S, Madihally S, Robinson RL et al (2009) Quantitative structure-property relationship modeling of skin sensitization: a quantitative prediction. Toxicol In Vitro 23:454–465
Benigni R (ed) (2003) Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models of mutagens and carcinogens. CRC Press, Boca Raton
Xu C, Cheng F, Chen L et al (2012) In silico prediction of chemical Ames mutagenicity. J Chem Inf Model 52:2840–2847
Leong MK, Lin S-W, Chen H-B et al (2010) Predicting mutagenicity of aromatic amines by various machine learning approaches. Toxicol Sci 116:498–513
Tsakovska I, Lessigiarska I, Netzeva T et al (2008) A mini review of mammalian toxicity (Q)SAR models. QSAR Comb Sci 27:41–48
Devillers J (2004) Prediction of mammalian toxicity of organophosphorus pesticides from QSTR modelling. SAR QSAR Environ Res 15:501–510
Funar-Timofei S, Ionescu D, Suzuki T (2010) A tentative quantitative structure-toxicity relationship study of benzodiazepine drugs. Toxicol In Vitro 24:184–200
Kaiser KLE, Niculescu SP (2001) Modeling acute toxicity of chemicals to Daphnia magna: a probabilistic neural network approach. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:420–431
Kahn I, Sild S, Maran U (2007) Modeling the toxicity of chemicals to Tetrahymena pyriformis using heuristic multilinear regression and heuristic back-propagation neural networks. J Chem Inf Model 47:2271–2279
Izadiyan P, Fatemi MH, Izadiyan M (2013) Elicitation of the most important structural properties of ionic liquids affecting ecotoxicity in limnic green algae: a QSAR approach. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 87:42–48
Domine D, Devillers J, Chastrette M et al (1993) Estimating pesticide field half-lives from a backpropagation neural network. SAR QSAR Environ Res 1:211–219
Jing G-H, Li X-L, Zhou Z-M (2011) Quantitative structure-biodegradability relationship study about the aerobic biodegradation of some aromatic compounds. Chin J Struct Chem 30:368–375
Liu H, Papa E, Walker JD et al (2007) In silico screening of estrogen-like chemicals based on different nonlinear classification models. J Mol Graph Model 26:135–144
Roncaglioni A, Piclin N, Pintore M et al (2008) Binary classification models for endocrine disrupter effects mediated through the estrogen receptor. SAR QSAR Environ Res 19:697–733
Wajima T, Fukumura K, Yano Y et al (2002) Prediction of human clearance from animal data and molecular structural parameters using multivariate regression analysis. J Pharm Sci 91:2489–2499
Chow H-H, Tolle KM, Roe DJ et al (1997) Application of neural networks to population pharmacokinetic data analysis. J Pharm Sci 86:840–845
Singh KP, Gupta S, Rai P (2013) Predicting acute aqueous toxicity of structurally diverse chemicals in fish using artificial intelligence approaches. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 95:221–232
Gong Z, Xia B, Zhang R et al (2008) Quantitative structure-activity relationship study on fish toxicity of substituted benzenes. QSAR Comb Sci 27:967–976
Okey RW, Martis MC (1999) Molecular level studies of the origin of toxicity: determination of key variables and selection of descriptors. Chemosphere 38:1419–1427
Halberstam NM, Baskin II, Palyulin VA et al (2002) Quantitative structure-conditions-property relationship studies. Neural network modelling of the acid hydrolysis of esters. Mendeleev Commun 12(5):185–186
Dewhurst I, Renwick AG (2013) Evaluation of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC)—challenges and approaches. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 65:168–177
Meng Y, Lin B-L (2008) A feed-forward artificial neural network for prediction of the aquatic ecotoxicity of alcohol ethoxylate. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 71:172–186
Fatemi MH, Jalali-Heravi M, Konuze E (2003) Prediction of bioconcentration factor using genetic algorithm and artificial neural network. Anal Chim Acta 486:101–108
Zhao C, Boriani E, Chana A et al (2008) A new hybrid system of QSAR models for prediction bioconcentration factors (BCF). Chemosphere 73:1701–1707
Devillers J, Pham-Delègue MH, Decourtye A et al (2002) Structure-toxicity modelling of pesticides to honey bees. SAR QSAR Environ Res 13:641–648
Song JS, Moon T, Nam KD et al (2008) Quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) studies for fungicidal activities of thiazoline derivatives against rice blast. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 18:2133–2142
Fjodorova N, Vračko M, Tušar M et al (2010) Quantitative and qualitative models for carcinogenicity prediction for non-congeneric chemicals using CP NN method for regulatory uses. Mol Divers 14:581–594
Singh KP, Gupta S, Rai P (2013) Predicting carcinogenicity of diverse chemicals using probabilistic neural network modelling approaches. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 272:465–475
Dearden JC (2010) Expert systems for toxicity prediction. In: Cronin MTD, Madden JC (eds) In silico toxicology: principles and applications. Royal Society of Chemistry, London, pp 478–507
Lapenna S, Fuart-Gatnick M, Worth A (2010) Review of QSAR models and software tools for predicting acute and chronic systemic toxicity. Available at http://ihcp.jrc.ec.europa.eu/our_labs/predictive_toxicology/doc/EUR_24639_EN.pdf/view. Accessed 25 Jan 2014
Molecular Modeling Pro. Available at http://www.chemsw.com/Software-and-Solutions/Laboratory-Software/Drawing-and-Modeling-Tools/Molecular-Modeling-Pro.aspx. Accessed 25 Jan 2014
Joback KG, Reid RC (1987) Estimation of pure-component properties from group-contributions. Chem Eng Commun 57: 233–243
ADMET Predictor. http://www.simulations-plus.com. Accessed 28 Jan 2014
ChemSilico. Available at www.chemsilico.com. Accessed 28 Jan 2014
TOPKAT. Available at www.accelrys.com. Accessed 28 Jan 2014
TerraBase. Available at www.terrabase-inc.com. Accessed 28 Jan 2014
Kaiser KLE (2003) Neural networks for effect prediction in environmental health issues using large datasets. QSAR Comb Sci 22:185–190
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Dr. T.I. Netzeva and Dr. A.P. Worth for valuable comments on the draft manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this protocol
Cite this protocol
Dearden, J.C., Rowe, P.H. (2015). Use of Artificial Neural Networks in the QSAR Prediction of Physicochemical Properties and Toxicities for REACH Legislation. In: Cartwright, H. (eds) Artificial Neural Networks. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1260. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2239-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-2239-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-2238-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-2239-0
eBook Packages: Springer Protocols