Abstract
Historical overexploitation of marine mammals, combined with present-day pressures, has resulted in severely depleted populations, with many species listed as threatened or endangered. Understanding breeding patterns of threatened marine mammals is crucial to assessing population viability, potential recovery and conservation actions. However, determining reproductive parameters of wild fully-marine mammals (cetaceans and sirenians) is challenging due to their wide distributions, high mobility, inaccessible habitats, cryptic lifestyles and in many cases, large body size and intractability. Consequently, reproductive biologists employ an innovative suite of methods to collect useful information from these species. This chapter reviews historic, recent and state-of-the-art methods to examine diverse aspects of reproduction in fully-aquatic mammals.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
Many marine mammal species have severely depleted populations from historical exploitation including commercial harvest and/or subsistence hunting, and other anthropogenic activities (e.g., incidental drowning through fisheries by-catch, vessel strike, pollution) (Fowler 1981, 1984; Clapham et al. 1999). An estimated 36 % of marine mammal species are now threatened cf. 25 % of terrestrial mammal taxa (Schipper et al. 2008). Recovery rates of these impacted populations are dependent on their capacity to survive and reproduce in the face of contemporary threats. Reproductive potential is the maximum reproductive capacity of a population when resources are unlimited, and this is probably rarely achieved by wild mammalian populations, and possibly never realized by marine mammals. More realistically, the potential of a population to maintain or increase its size through reproductive growth is contingent on a suite of factors including life history parameters (e.g., growth rate, age at maturity), reproductive cycles (e.g., timing of estrous, mating, gestation, birth, lactation, resting periods) and population size and structure (e.g., sex ratio, number of reproductively active adults), which is then tempered by how well individuals reproduce under various levels of resource limitation and external stressors, i.e., their reproductive fitness. Understanding reproductive patterns of marine mammals and the factors that influence their reproductive potential is critical if we are to identify and manage threats to population survival and growth.
Marine mammals are K-selected species meaning that most are long-lived and slow to mature with protracted reproductive parameters, low birth rates and relatively large investment in their young (Fowler 1981). These life history traits make reproductive studies of marine mammal species challenging to conduct (i.e., requiring long-term datasets) but paramount to conservation practice because most populations are vulnerable to extrinsic mortality. For instance, the past heavy exploitation and incidental by-catch of many cetacean species has caused marked changes to many reproductive parameters (Fowler 1981, 1984). Slow breeding (including increased age at first calving, reduced number of reproductively active females, low calf production, longer inter-birth intervals) is a common response of long-lived iteroparous species such as marine mammals to adverse environmental conditions (DeMaster 1981; Kraus et al. 2001; Hadley et al. 2006). Interestingly though, in some baleen whales, enhanced reproductive capacity (i.e., decreased age at sexual maturation, increased proportion of mature females in ovulation, and increased pregnancy rates) appears to have occurred, possibly in response to increased prey availability following reduction in whale numbers after commercial whaling (Lockyer 1984; Lockyer and Smellie 1985; Boyd et al. 1999).
Furthermore, many marine mammal species are distributed over wide latitudinal ranges, across multiple oceans or biogeographic regions (Schipper et al. 2008), so that reproductive parameters of demographically-isolated populations are likely to vary across environmental gradients. Intraspecific populations of marine mammals may therefore exhibit regional differences in asymptotic body size, pre-reproductive period, breeding frequency or season, length of reproductive cycles, and ultimately, reproductive potential and resilience. For example, eastern and northern spinner dolphin (Stenella longirostris) populations vary in body length, breeding seasonality, and ovulation rates (Perrin and Reilly 1984; Perrin et al. 1985). Populations of pantropical spotted dolphins (Stenella attenuata) north and south of the equator show differences in each of timing of breeding seasons, proportion of pregnant females (Barlow 1985), and the average body length/age at puberty (Chivers and Myrick 1993). For some cetacean species, differences in growth and reproductive parameters have been sufficiently distinctive to identify discrete management units (e.g., Botta et al. 2010). Population life history studies have led to a better understanding of the basic biology of marine mammal species, their relationships to local environments (Börjesson and Read 2003; Danil and Chivers 2006), and to their stock structure (Dizon et al. 1994), behavior (Whitehead and Mann 2000), mating systems (Murphy et al. 2005), and resilience to anthropogenic threats (Chivers and Myrick 1993; Wells et al. 2005). When working to conserve marine mammals, it is therefore imperative that life history parameters appropriate to the focal populations are understood and applied to population models. As a fundamental step, reproductive scientists need reliable and useful methodologies to assess reproductive processes of marine mammals.
Determining reproductive parameters of wild marine mammals offers particular challenges. Species that breed on land, such as pinnipeds (seals, sea lions, walrus), tend to be better understood because their terrestrial life stage(s) present opportunities to directly measure reproductive timing, pregnancy rates and recruitment into a population via sampling of individuals of different life stages including pups at haul-out sites (e.g., Boyd 2000; McKenzie et al. 2005; Gibbens et al. 2010; Oosthuizen et al. 2012). In contrast, fully aquatic marine mammals, i.e., cetaceans (dolphins, porpoises, whales) and sirenians (manatees and dugongs), offer relatively limited opportunities for direct observation because of their offshore and/or remote habitats, great mobility (including long breeding migrations), patchy distribution and/or cryptic natures that arise from their spending large proportions of their lives underwater and out of sight (Costa 1993). For these reasons, the reproductive scientist must employ a series of non-traditional, often indirect, methods to elucidate reproductive parameters. These differences in approach are reflected in the type and amount of reproductive information available for the major groups of marine mammals: information for the semi-aquatic pinnipeds is markedly more extensive (Atkinson 1997; Boyd et al. 1999), possibly because of greater access to individuals at particular life stages. For the entirely-aquatic cetaceans, the bottlenose dolphin’s reproductive biology is the best known due to its accessibility to researchers, i.e., it is the species most commonly held in aquaria and is found in coastal waters worldwide, often in close proximity to humans (Connor et al. 2000). In contrast, reproductive parameters of most other cetacean species are relatively unknown. This chapter reviews the historical, contemporary and state-of-the-art techniques that are applied to examine various aspects of reproductive biology in fully-aquatic marine mammals, i.e., cetaceans and sirenians (Table 11.1).
2 State of the Art: How to Study Reproduction in Fully Marine Mammals
2.1 Captive Fully-Marine Mammals
Marine mammals in captivity provide a unique opportunity to investigate species-specific behavior (e.g., vocalizations: Edds et al. 1993; Vergara et al. 2010; Ridgway et al. 2012; cognitive function: Mercado and deLong 2010; post-natal development: Lyamin et al. 2005; Favaro et al. 2013) and physiology (e.g., dive response: Kooyman et al. 1981) that normally would be challenging to study in the wild. Extrapolation of information gained from captive individuals to wild populations can be complicated (see Lambrechts et al. 1999; Jenssen et al. 2001), because extended periods spent in artificial environment may induce variation in physiological traits (e.g., Mellish et al. 2006), including reproduction. Nonetheless, significant insights into reproductive cycles of marine mammals have been made through captive breeding programs, where individuals’ reproductive status have been monitored in longitudinal studies of behavior and internal physiological state (e.g., Atkinson 1997; Boyd et al. 1999; Robeck et al. 2001).
Captive marine mammals for which reproductive parameters have been obtained, including within artificial breeding programs, comprise delphinids (dolphins, killer whales, false killer whales; e.g., O’Brien and Robeck 2012a; Robeck and Monfort 2006; Atkinson et al. 1999), monodontids (beluga; e.g., Steinman et al. 2012), sirenians (manatees, dugongs; e.g., Amaral et al. 2009; Burgess et al. 2013a) and pinnipeds (seals, sea lions, walrus; e.g., Atkinson and Gilmartin 1992; Myers et al. 2010; Kinoshita et al. 2012). Due to limitations of space and provision of adequate nutrition, marine mammals housed in zoological settings are typically small (<10 m long) and mostly tractable. Larger marine mammals, such as all mysticete cetaceans (Edds et al. 1993; Sumich et al. 2001), have not been held in captivity past reproductive age. A number of factors may affect the quality and robustness of reproductive data obtained from captive animals. First, numbers of captive individuals are usually small. Second, individuals are often segregated by sex and age so that natural social groupings may be fragmented or nonexistent. Furthermore, the effects of highly artificial physical surroundings on an animal’s reproductive behavior and functioning are not well understood.
Despite these limitations, observations of mating and subsequent parturition in captive animals have enabled at least initial estimates of age at maturity, reproductive seasonality, and length of gestation for many smaller species (McBride and Hebb 1948; McBride and Kritzler 1951; Essapian 1962; Cornell et al. 1987; Odell et al. 1995; Blanchet et al. 2006). More recently, training programs using operant conditioning along with advanced monitoring technologies (see Sects. 2.4 and 2.5) have enabled collection of serial biological samples and/or physical examinations under temporal regimes that are adequate to characterize reproductive cycles in live females and males (reviewed by O’Brien and Robeck 2012b).
A great advantage of captive marine mammals is that most can be trained to present voluntarily for collections of body fluids including blood (Robeck and Monfort 2006; Bauer et al. 2010), saliva (Pietraszek and Atkinson 1994; Hogg et al. 2005), respiratory mucus (Hogg et al. 2005), ocular secretions (Amaral et al. 2009), urine (Walker et al. 1988; Robeck et al. 1993, 2005a; Wakai et al. 2002), feces (Biancani et al. 2009), and milk (West et al. 2000), all of which may be useful for longitudinal monitoring of hormone profiles. The relatively non-invasive techniques of fecal sampling (and urinary sampling with training) can be conducted daily and offer the best prospect for examining endocrine-reproductive relationships. Such investigations of reproductive cycling have been enhanced by monitoring body temperature (Terasawa et al. 1999; Katsumata et al. 2006a, b), examining the reproductive tract using trans-abdominal ultrasound (Brook et al. 2000, 2001, 2004; Lacave et al. 2004), conducting vaginal cytology of females (Pietraszek and Atkinson 1994), collecting semen from males (Schroeder and Keller 1989; Robeck and Monfort 2006; O’Brien et al. 2008; Robeck et al. 2009; Yuen et al. 2009) and simultaneously documenting reproductive behavior (e.g., Tavolga and Essapian 1957; Shane et al. 1986).
Understanding the reproductive cycles of captive individuals has advanced husbandry practices including management of pregnant females and fetal health (Williamson et al. 1990; Lacave et al. 2004; Katsumata et al. 2006b), establishment of socially cohesive groupings (Shane et al. 1986; Waples and Gales 2002; O’Brien and Robeck 2006), contraception (Atkinson et al. 1993; Briggs 2000; Calle 2005) and captive breeding programs (Robeck et al. 2005b). It has enabled the development of assisted reproductive technologies including artificial insemination (Robeck et al. 2004, 2005b, 2009, 2010; O’Brien and Robeck 2006, 2010; O’Brien et al. 2008), estrous synchronization (Robeck et al. 2009), sperm sexing (O’Brien and Robeck 2006; O’Brien et al. 2009), and semen preservation (Robeck and O’Brien 2004; O’Brien et al. 2008; Yuen et al. 2009). Understanding the relationships between reproductive behavior and physiological events for marine mammals in captivity has enabled facilities to determine and/or manipulate readiness for breeding, and to ensure successful conception for several cetacean taxa (Cornell et al. 1987; Robeck et al. 2005b; O’Brien and Robeck 2012a, b). With the increasing need for aquaria to display animals born in captivity rather than wild-caught individuals, the success of captive breeding programs for marine mammals is necessary to sustain ex situ populations and manage genetic bottlenecks that can occur in reproductively-isolated facilities (reviewed by O’Brien and Robeck 2012b).
2.2 Dissection of Carcasses
Almost all of the information regarding basic reproductive patterns of wild cetaceans and sirenians has been derived from the examination of reproductive tracts recovered from carcasses obtained from hunted (e.g., Best 1969; Miyazaki 1984; Desportes et al. 1993; Dawbin 1997; Kwan 2002) or stranded animals (e.g., Calzada et al. 1996; Evans and Hindell 2004) or from those incidentally caught and killed in fishing nets (e.g., Read 1990; Van Waerebeek and Read 1994; Hohn et al. 1996) or shark nets (e.g., Marsh et al. 1984a, b; Cockcroft and Ross 1990). Early studies using post-mortem material provided information on gross morphology and anatomy of the reproductive tract (e.g., Harrison and Ridgway 1971). Functional morphology of reproductive tracts, histology of gonads and mammary glands, and embryology (van der Schoot 1995; Thewissen and Heyning 2007) have provided information on the timing of reproductive activity, conception, gestation, birth and lactation, and also information concerning age and/or body size-related life history parameters including first reproduction and numbers of offspring produced over lifetimes (e.g., cetaceans: Laws 1961; Ohsumi and Masaki 1975; Lockyer and Martin 1983; Marsh and Kasuya 1984, 1986; Kato and Sakuramoto 1991; Read and Hohn 1995; sirenians: Marsh et al. 1984a, b; Hernandez et al. 1995; Marmontel 1995; Kwan 2002). For example, sexual maturity in males can be determined through assessment of testicular development (including seminiferous tubule diameter, Sertoli and Leydig cell activity), relative weight and length of testes, stage of spermatogenesis and presence/abundance of sperm (e.g., Perrin and Henderson 1984; Perrin and Reilly 1984). More recently, immunocyto-chemical methods have been applied to examine maturation of gonads: these include screening for distribution of cytoskeletal proteins (e.g., smooth muscle actin and vimentin) as markers of testis development (Holt et al. 2004). For females, ovarian follicular activity is indicative of maturity, and previous ovulations have been confirmed by presence of corpus luteum and/or corpus albicans, since in many marine mammals, ovarian scars appear to be persistent (e.g., Marsh and Kasuya 1984; Perrin and Reilly 1984). Pregnancy rate and calving intervals can be determined though counts of placental scars (e.g., dugongs, Marsh et al. 1984a) or ovulatory scars (in cetaceans, most are thought to represent pregnancies, Boyd et al. 1999) regressed against age or body length at death. Timing of sexual activity is suggested by the presence of mature spermatozoa in males and ovarian activity in females (Perrin and Reilly 1984) and reproductive senescence through their absence (Marsh and Kasuya 1986).
Carcass analysis, for all of its value, is prone to both temporal and/or spatial biases (Boyd et al. 1999). Carcasses are usually sourced from places where hunting, harvest or other causes of mortality are most likely, or from areas where reportage or recovery of carcasses are most common (e.g., Chittleborough 1954; Marsh et al. 1984a, b; Marsh and Kasuya 1986; Desportes et al. 1993; Kwan 2002). In some cases, certain individuals or life stages are more likely to be sampled, e.g., the targeted fishery for dugongs where hunters preferentially take pregnant rather than resting females (Boyd et al. 1999); or samples obtained at certain times of the year, e.g., from baleen whales during the hunting season (Chittleborough 1954; Laws 1961). Further, the utility of a carcass depends on its degree of decomposition, so that if carcasses from warmer climates decompose faster, less information may be available for these than for animals from higher latitudes. However, the value of carcasses for studying reproduction and other facets of marine mammal biology cannot be understated. Indeed, for some rare marine mammal species, carcass recovery has been the only avenue for direct examination (e.g., Reyes et al. 1991; Thompson et al. 2012). In many cases, however, recoveries are too few to obtain useful information regarding reproductive biology. In contrast, for those species that strand en masse, recovery of multiple carcasses has yielded reproductive profiles of social groupings (e.g., Mignucci-Giannoni et al. 2000). When using carcass analysis to obtain information, there is significant value in establishing coordinated responses to marine mammal strandings (e.g., Thompson et al. 2012) at regional or national levels to ensure that, when rescue attempts fail, there is timely collection of tissues (including from reproductive tracts) and other vital data.
2.3 Direct Observations
Direct observations of reproductive activity and behavior at sea of free-ranging, fully marine mammals vary from single or opportunistic sightings (e.g., courtship: Preen 1989; birth: Stacey and Baird 1997; copulation: Adulyanukosol et al. 2007; naso-suckling: Gero and Whitehead 2007) through to longitudinal sightings (Glockner-Ferrari and Ferrari 1990; Scott et al. 1990; Whitehead 1993; Langtimm et al. 1998; Rathbun et al. 1995; Wells 2000; Rowntree et al. 2001; Burgess et al. 2012a, b). Unsurprisingly, the quality of these data varies markedly depending on approachability of the species and the observational methods applied. The observation methods should be selected carefully to meet the objectives and scale of the research project.
Distinguishing sexes of marine mammals through visual means can be challenging for species that exhibit no obvious sexual dimorphism in body size or morphology, e.g., most cetaceans and sirenians. Male marine mammals are testicond (ascrotal) with their testes permanently concealed in the abdomen (excluding otariid seals which have scrotal testes; Atkinson 1997) and the flaccid penis can be retracted into the body wall (Marsh et al. 1984b; Rommel et al. 1992) facilitating streamlining. Thus, for the majority of sexually-monomorphic species, the sex of most observed individuals remains unknown unless genetic sexing is accomplished. For most cetaceans and sirenians, mating has never been confirmed and courtship is difficult to interpret or recognize.
In fact, detailed information on patterns of courtship, mating and parturition in the wild only exists for a small number of fully-marine mammal species (e.g., Karczmarski et al. 1997; Stacey and Baird 1997; Hückstadt and Antezana 2001; Parks et al. 2007) and is mostly documented for pinnipeds that breed and give birth on land (e.g., Le Boeuf 1991; Cassini 1999; Acevedo et al. 2008; Karamanlidis et al. 2010). A general understanding of reproductive patterns for most entirely-aquatic species has largely been compiled from limited, often opportunistic, data and then analogized according to our knowledge of other mammalian species, e.g., primates (Wells 2003; Connor 2007). For some large odontocetes including beaked and bottlenose whales, their rarity, remote habitats and secretive habits ensure that they are rarely, if ever, observed alive (Heyning 1984; Thompson et al. 2012) so that their reproductive behavior remains a mystery. For many of the mysticete whales, direct observation is often fleeting and opportunistic, and rarely extensive or enlightening in terms of reproductive behavior. Exemplifying this point is the little we know about the reproductive habits of the largest animals that have ever existed, blue whales, Balaenoptera musculus (Yochem and Leatherwood 1985) despite having documented extensively various aspects of their ecology. Their elusive nature, deep-water habits and open geographic ranges (i.e., the only clear geographic boundaries to baleen whale movement are large continental land masses) have meant that breeding grounds of Southern Hemisphere populations remain unverified (Attard et al. 2012). However, for other large baleen whales (e.g., Kraus et al. 2001; Clapham 2008), some observations regarding reproductive behavior have been conducted at particular locations along predictable migration routes between feeding and breeding grounds or in breeding grounds themselves, particularly for species that travel along topographic features such as coastlines or continental shelves. Amongst the best known of the marine mammals are those that spend significant time in coastal habitats (including migratory whales, delphinids, manatees) or at known breeding aggregation points, e.g., around islands, sea mounts, reefs and along mid ocean ridges.
Direct observation methods usually include distant sightings from elevated platforms: vessels, aircraft or land-based vantage points. Even though some fully-marine mammals may be approached closely by boat at times (e.g., manatees, Hartman 1979; dugongs, Preen 1992), most of their reproductive activities probably occur underwater and are unavailable to observers, so that some inference may be required (e.g., sex of observed individuals). In contrast, indirect ‘observations’ rely on telemetry to track animals, and these methods call for capture and attachment of radio/satellite/GPS/acoustic tags or recoverable data loggers (e.g., Mate et al. 1998; Noad and Cato 2001; Deutsch et al. 2003). Information on location and movements of tagged individuals have been particularly useful for tracking breeding migrations, determining timing of reproductive cycles, or for examining smaller scale movements and social associations within breeding grounds (Mate et al. 1998, 2003; Russell et al. 2013).
Direct visual observations may also be conducted at the population level and may yield information regarding spatial distribution of animals, density and timing of breeding migrations, adult aggregations, breeding associations, and presence of neonates. In these cases, individual identity of group members is not always necessary. Examples of this approach include aerial surveys of humpback whale adults aggregating within breeding grounds (Andriolo et al. 2006), surveys of right whale nursery areas and adult aggregations (Rowntree et al. 2001; Parks et al. 2007) and calf counts for various taxa as an index of annual recruitment of breeding success (Perryman et al. 2002). Compilation of these observations over extended temporal scales gives information regarding reproductive timing and breeding patterns.
Behavioral observations are greatly enhanced through recognition of individuals. If individual animals can be distinguished and identified through discriminate marks (permanent pigmentation, dorsal fin shape and/or body scarring, genetic tags) or artificially-applied marks (physical tags), there is the opportunity for longitudinal studies of life history. Recognizable individuals allow for descriptions of basic activity patterns (resting, socializing, travelling, feeding) as well as interpretation of inter-specific behaviors, especially if sex and reproductive condition are known (e.g., Connor et al. 1992; Smolker et al. 1992; Brown et al. 1995). For example, long-term observations of known identified mother-calf pairs of Florida manatees at winter aggregation sites have provided insight into frequency of calving, intercalving period, growth rates of calves, duration of nursing, time to maturity and other reproductive measures critical to population modeling (Langtimm et al. 2004). The value of longitudinal sightings data lies not only in compilation of life history parameters relevant to reproductive biology (including reproductive and total life span if individuals are recognized from an early age), but in elucidation of social behaviors including social associations, mate selection, nurturing of young and other details about a species’ breeding behavior (Mann et al. 2000). Individual identification has become a staple of many field studies of cetaceans (reviewed by Würsig and Jefferson 1990).
Despite the technical difficulties in directly observing and identifying mammals in the pelagic environment, our understanding of reproductive behavior and social interactions is improving. New techniques that allow us to track individuals through time and space, such as the amplification of molecular markers from tissue biopsies for tagging as well as advanced telemetry and biologging (Block 2005; Bograd et al. 2010), are providing superior insights into social structure and social associations related to reproduction.
2.4 Endocrinology
Since most reproductive processes are mediated through hormones circulated in the bloodstream, and hormonal functions tend to be conserved across mammalian taxa, endocrine analysis is a useful means of assessing reproductive status (e.g., sexual maturity, pregnancy diagnosis) and reproductive activity (e.g., estrous cycles, seasonality), particularly for live individuals.
The most commonly measured hormone in marine mammals is progesterone (Table 11.2) since its diagnostic use indicates the onset of female sexual maturity or pregnancy. Understanding reproductive status of females provides vital information for the management of both wild (e.g., Gardiner et al. 1996; Atkinson et al. 1999; Rolland et al. 2005; Kellar et al. 2006; Tripp et al. 2008; Villegas-Amtmann et al. 2009; Burgess et al. 2012a) and captive populations (e.g., Pietraszek and Atkinson 1994; Atkinson et al. 1999; Biancani et al. 2009; O’Brien and Robeck 2012a). The other sex steroid hormones (Table 11.2) that are routinely measured are testosterone (Atkinson and Gilmartin 1992; Desportes et al. 1994; Kellar et al. 2009; Burgess et al. 2012b) and various forms of estrogen (e.g., Francis-Floyd et al. 1991; Pietraszek and Atkinson 1994; Robeck et al. 2005b). Gonadotropins including luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), and other protein hormones (Table 11.2) have primarily been measured in cases of assisted reproduction (i.e., artificial insemination or gamete harvesting), often requiring multiple samples collected daily (Robeck et al. 2004, 2009; Muraco et al. 2010); although some studies exploiting opportunistic sample collection have been reported (Suzuki et al. 2001; Watanabe et al. 2004; Hao et al. 2007)
In early studies, endocrine analysis relied on collecting blood samples to determine circulating hormone concentrations so that marine mammals held in captivity were sampled more frequently than those in the wild (Yoshioka et al. 1986; Cornell et al. 1987; Duffield et al. 1995). The first ground-breaking hormonal study on marine mammals investigated serum testosterone in two captive male bottlenose dolphins (Harrison and Ridgway 1971). Broad-scale blood sampling for endocrine analysis in field studies has been possible in few circumstances such as during haul-out of the semi-aquatic pinnipeds (e.g., Atkinson and Gilmartin 1992; Gardiner et al. 1996; Harcourt et al. 2010), or when sampling relatively small numbers of fully aquatic mammals during health assessments (e.g., Tripp et al. 2008) or even during lethal harvests (e.g., Suzuki et al. 2001; Kjeld et al. 2004, 2006). The need for physical restraint out-of-water to ensure collection of blood samples uncontaminated by seawater has hampered endocrine evaluations in most species, particularly of large or rare cetaceans. More recently however, sampling of media other than blood for hormone profiles has been increasingly recognized as a useful approach for free-ranging aquatic mammals (reviewed by Amaral 2010; Hunt et al. 2013).
Hormones are removed from circulation through metabolic processes and eventually excreted from the body through various pathways (depending on the species), providing alternative opportunities for measuring hormones and their byproducts. Hormone concentrations have been measured in a variety of body tissues and excreta from marine mammals, including saliva (Pietraszek and Atkinson 1994; Atkinson et al. 1999; Hogg et al. 2005; Amaral et al. 2009), milk (West et al. 2000), ocular secretion (Amaral et al. 2009), respiratory exudate (Hogg et al. 2005, 2009), adipose tissue (Mansour et al. 2002; Kellar et al. 2006, 2009; Pérez et al. 2011), muscle (Yoshioka et al. 1994), urine (Walker et al. 1988; Robeck et al. 1993; Wakai et al. 2002; Muraco et al. 2010) and feces (Larkin et al. 2005; Rolland et al. 2005; Biancani et al. 2009; Burgess et al. 2012a, b). These alternative endocrine approaches have already been widely applied to monitoring reproductive processes in captive individuals (see Sect. 2.1) and show promise for live, free-ranging populations. In fact, measuring levels of excreted hormones may offer advantages over blood levels because these represent averaged values pooled over time (i.e., integrated over the gut passage time for fecal samples), rather than a single point-in-time measure. However, it is important that for each new species under study, careful biochemical and biological validation of hormones in each sampled medium is conducted (Lasley and Kirkpatrick 1991). Furthermore, researchers must carefully consider the biology, ecology, and habits of the species, as well as the project’s scale, when deciding on which media are most appropriate (see Hunt et al. 2013).
To date, a few field studies have successfully sampled feces (Lanyon et al. 2005; Larkin et al. 2005; Rolland et al. 2005; Burgess et al. 2012a, b) or blubber (Kellar et al. 2006, 2009; Pérez et al. 2011) to assess reproductive hormone profiles of both sexes of live cetaceans and sirenians. Obviously, logistical difficulties arise with collection of such samples from elusive and large marine mammals (reviewed by Hunt et al. 2013). In some cases, floating feces voided by large whales have been sampled by dip-net during focal follows of, for example, right whales (Rolland et al. 2005; Hunt et al. 2006), sperm whales (Smith and Whitehead 2006; Marcoux et al. 2007), gray whales (Newell and Cowles 2006), blue and humpback whales (Lefebvre et al. 2002) either in feeding grounds or along migration routes. Sinking feces have also been collected from smaller cetaceans by snorkelers towed by boats traveling in close proximity to dolphin groups, although a large proportion of fecal material disperses too rapidly for collection (Parsons et al. 1999, 2003). One innovation to facilitate collection has been the use of ‘sniffer’ dogs trained to detect floating whale feces (Rolland et al. 2006). Another approach has been to collect feces of uncertain origin, either floating or as stools washed ashore, and then conduct molecular analysis for taxon and/or sex identity (Rolland et al. 2005). In live-capture studies of smaller marine mammals, fecal samples have been collected either opportunistically as they are voided during restraint (Lanyon et al. 2005, 2010b; Larkin et al. 2005) or directly by inserting a soft latex tube into the distal rectum (Biancani et al. 2009; Burgess et al. 2012a, b).
For blubber hormone analysis, remote biopsy darting has been used to obtain small cores of fatty hypodermis from free-swimming cetaceans (Kellar et al. 2006, 2009) and this also has potential application in pinnipeds (e.g., Hoberecht et al. 2006). One unique study on Weddell seals (Leptonychotes weddellii) analyzed hormones in urine samples that had become preserved in ice (Constable et al. 2006). However, the routine collection of fluid samples is logistically difficult when collecting in an aquatic environment, unless the mammal is first removed from the water.
Perhaps the most innovative approach for measuring hormone levels in marine mammals has been the use of respiratory exudate or ‘blow’, which is currently in the early stages of development (see Hunt et al. 2013). Cetaceans ventilate a larger percentage of the respiratory system with greater force than other mammals (Ridgway et al. 1969) and their lungs are heavily vascularized (Pabst et al. 1999), causing expulsion of a substantial volume of lung exudate droplets (along with respiratory gases) with each exhalation. Preliminary research on captive bottlenose dolphins and large free-ranging baleen whales (humpback whales Megaptera novaeangliae and North Atlantic right whales Eubalaena glacialis) has demonstrated that at least some exhaled blow samples (collected into a sampling device at the end of a cantilevered pole) contain detectable steroid hormones (Hogg et al. 2005, 2009). However, current analytical techniques only detect presence/absence and not quantitative concentrations of steroid hormones (see Trout 2008), suggesting that important methodological issues need to be addressed before hormone analysis of exhaled blow can be applied more widely to assess physiological state of free-ranging marine mammals (Hunt et al. 2013). The relative ease with which blow samples can be collected and the promise that these may be chemically analyzed to answer a number of biological questions (Acevedo-Whitehouse et al. 2010; Frère et al. 2010) have already led several researchers to begin collecting these samples (e.g., Gero and Whitehead 2007). Ultimately, less-invasive hormone monitoring (i.e., using non-blood samples) provides marine mammal scientists with the capability to conduct both basic and applied physiological-endocrine research that can be integrated with other disciplines including genetics, behavior, nutrition, animal health, ecology and evolution.
The discipline of conservation endocrinology is still evolving for free-ranging marine mammals, and will undoubtedly continue to provide new and valuable information to ensure the survival of viable marine mammal populations into the future. Exciting developments in wildlife endocrine studies are enabling us to move beyond assessing an individual’s reproductive status to being able to understand an individual’s reproductive potential (i.e., fertility status). Managers of marine mammal populations need to know not only how many individuals are present and/or how many are of breeding age (i.e., effective population size), but also understand an individual’s contribution to population growth. Most recently, sophisticated biomarkers (including anti-Müllerian hormone, AMH, inhibin A, inhibin B) have been developed to provide direct measures of gonadal function as well as fertility potential (ovarian reserve) in both female and male mammals (Table 11.2) (Lee and Donahoe 1993; Tremellen et al. 2006; Kumar et al. 2010). The first reports of detection of AMH and inhibin A and B in marine mammals, including Florida manatees (Wilson et al. 2011), bottlenose dolphins (Schwierzke-Wade et al. unpubl. data), beluga whales and dugongs (Wetzel et al. unpubl. data) suggest that these biomarkers offer promise as a means of evaluating the ‘reproductive quality’ of individuals comprising a population. With careful development and validation, the use of such biomarkers may provide insight into the effects of stressors on critical biological functions such as reproduction, which can then be used to inform effective and focused conservation efforts.
2.5 Diagnostic Imaging
Diagnostic imaging (ultrasonography and endoscopy) has been used to examine the urogenital tracts and implement advanced reproductive technologies (including artificial insemination) of terrestrial wildlife (Hildebrandt et al. 2003). These techniques have been applied to fully marine mammals, but in relatively limited ways due to the need for restraint and immobility during the procedures. Ultrasonography is a useful technique for examination and differentiation of internal soft tissues and compared to other reproductive imaging techniques is arguably the simplest, safest, less invasive and most cost effective method. It has been useful for obtaining vital information regarding reproductive activity and fetal development in mostly captive cetaceans (Brook 1997, 1999; Brook et al. 2001, 2004). Recent advances in ultrasound technologies have enabled researchers to examine gonadal activity through development of testes and ovarian follicles, monitor ovulatory cycles, implement artificial insemination, and estimate gestational age of fetuses and therefore parturition date for small captive marine mammals (Robeck et al. 1998, 2001, 2005b; Brook 1997; Brook et al. 2001, 2004; Lacave et al. 2004). Some captive cetaceans have been trained to station for ultrasound examination (Brook et al. 2001), whilst in a field situation, ultrasound may be applied to individuals removed from the water (Wells et al. 2004; Goldstein et al. 2006) or even restrained alongside a vessel if a portable device with waterproof transducer is deployed (Nichols 2005). For larger, but still tractable marine mammals, e.g., big males or individuals with thick blubber layers, ultrasonography may be relatively challenging and the outcome of examinations doubtful, whilst it is not practical for the largest free-ranging cetaceans.
Perhaps the greatest value of diagnostic sonography with respect to reproduction has been as an adjunct tool to physical examination and endocrinology. The use of ultrasonography for validation of reproductive state has been crucial in developing hormone-based diagnostic tests for pregnancy (e.g., in wild sirenians: Burgess et al. 2012a, Fig. 11.1) and for confirming pregnancy in captive cetaceans. Pseudo-pregnancy is possible in captive marine mammals (i.e., elevated hormone levels in animals that are not carrying a fetus) (Atkinson 1997; West et al. 2000) and it is only through the use of ultrasound examination, that true pregnancy can be discriminated from this condition (Robeck et al. 2001). Furthermore, ultrasound combined with endocrine monitoring offers insight into how hormonal changes directly relate to ovulation (Robeck et al. 2001). Interestingly, the first evidence of facultative-induced ovulation in a cetacean, the beluga, was determined using serial urinary hormone monitoring combined with ovarian ultrasound (Steinman et al. 2012). Reproductive cycles of both males and females of some cetacean taxa have been determined through routine repeat ultrasounds of the gonads (e.g., inshore bottlenose dolphins: Brook 1997; Indo-Pacific dolphins: Brook et al. 2004). As ultrasound devices become smaller, more robust and affordable, and their value apparent, their use in marine field situations is only likely to increase.
Endoscopy is a minor surgical procedure and, although more invasive than ultrasonography, allows direct visual internal examination through minimal tissue trauma. Laparoscopy of the abdominal cavity of marine mammals has been conducted for some captive cetaceans and pinnipeds, mostly as a diagnostic tool for disease or for removal of swallowed foreign objects, with limited application in reproductive studies (Dover and van Bonn 2001). Flexible endoscopes have also been used to guide practitioners during artificial insemination operations of captive cetaceans (Robeck et al. 1994; Robeck 2000; Dover and van Bonn 2001).
2.6 Gamete Collection and Cryopreservation
Spermatogenesis is an important indicator of the reproductive status of the male mammal, including the onset of sexual maturity, the start of breeding in seasonally reproducing species, and gamete quality. Studies of the morphology of spermatozoa have been extensive for land mammals but remain in their infancy for marine mammals because of limited access to gametes. Detailed studies of the gross morphology of spermatozoa from wild marine mammals have been mostly limited to samples collected post-mortem from the epididymis and/or vas deferens, e.g., in cetaceans (reviewed by Plön and Bernard 2006; Kita et al. 2001), pinnipeds (Cummins and Woodall 1985) and sirenians (Marsh et al. 1984b; Miller et al. 2001). Sperm rescued postmortem from urogenital tracts of variable states of decomposition (dependent on timely collection and preservation, e.g., Mogoe et al. 1998; Miller et al. 2002a; Hiwasa et al. 2009), often comprise small samples of variable quality and viability, which makes comparisons between both taxa and ontogenetic stages within a taxon challenging (see Plön and Bernard 2006). Semen ejaculates from live, free-ranging marine mammals can be obtained using electro-ejaculation techniques (e.g., gray seals Halichoerus grypus, Lawson et al. 1996) or passively through opportunistic collection of voluntary ejaculate (e.g., dugongs, Burgess et al. 2012b; JM Lanyon unpubl. data).
Live captive cetaceans have provided the most detailed knowledge of spermatozoa (in terms of morphology, ultrastructure, motility, viability) in fully marine mammals, with specimens collected via electro-ejaculation (Fleming et al. 1981; Lawson et al. 1996) or conditioned for voluntary semen collection after manual external stimulation (Keller 1986; Miller et al. 2002b; Robeck and O’Brien 2004; O’Brien et al. 2008). The latter method potentially produces higher quality samples more indicative of ejaculates produced during natural matings. Such knowledge has helped elucidate aspects of sperm development and maturation and the fertilization process in marine mammals, and has provided fundamental insights for the development of assisted reproductive technologies.
Assisted reproductive technologies, including semen cryopreservation (Robeck and O’Brien 2004), artificial insemination (Robeck et al. 2005b) and more recently, sex-sorting of spermatozoa (O’Brien and Robeck 2006; Montano et al. 2010), provide a number of benefits to captive breeding programs such as permitting easier genetic exchange between facilities without the need for translocation of animals (which can be risky, expensive and disruptive to the stability of social groups) as well as sex-ratio management. Thus, research into gamete collection and preservation is considered high priority for in situ management of captive marine mammals, particularly cetaceans (O’Brien and Robeck 2012b). Due to species-specific ejaculate characteristics and sperm biology, the composition of diluents used to preserve spermatozoa in vitro varies considerably across species (e.g., slightly higher osmolarity of diluents for cetaceans than for terrestrial animals) (reviewed by Fukui et al. 2007), and requires careful experimentation for each new species under study (e.g., Fukui et al. 1996; Robeck and O’Brien 2004; Robeck et al. 2004, 2009; O’Brien and Robeck 2010). Cryopreservation of ejaculated semen and formation of a genome (sperm) resource bank for captive populations has been achieved for bottlenose dolphins (Robeck and O’Brien 2004), killer whales (Robeck et al. 2004), Pacific white-sided dolphins (Robeck et al. 2009), belugas (O’Brien and Robeck 2010) and dugongs (T Keeley and R Bathgate unpubl. data). For wild populations, cryopreservation techniques have also been attempted for rescued spermatozoa from harvested common minke whales Balaenoptera acutorostrata (Mogoe et al. 1998) and Bryde’s whales Balaenoptera edeni (Hiwasa et al. 2009) as well as voluntary ejaculates from live dugongs (JM Lanyon unpubl. data).
The potential use of genome banks can be further enhanced by the development of viable methods for oocyte and embryo preservation. To date, all significant research on in vitro oocyte maturation, fertilization and embryo culture has been performed using salvaged post-mortem tissues from freshly harvested whale (mysticete) species (Asada et al. 2001a; Iwayama et al. 2005; Fukui et al. 2007; Watanabe et al. 2007; Bhuiyan et al. 2009). Advanced studies have experimented with frozen-thawed oocytes (Asada et al. 2001a) and vitrified oocytes (Asada et al. 2001b; Fujihira et al. 2006) and have examined the feasibility of using interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer to produce whale embryos (Lee et al. 2009; Bhuiyan et al. 2010). However, successful embryo preservation has not yet been reported for a marine mammal species.
It is easy to foresee that, as with terrestrial mammals, the collection and cryo-preservation of viable gametes, combined with studies to ensure fertility following thawing, will enable the indefinite storage of valuable genetic material from threatened and endangered marine mammals. These approaches are already useful for captive breeding of marine mammals (Robeck et al. 2004, 2009, 2010; O’Brien and Robeck 2006; O’Brien et al. 2008, 2009), and in the future, may also be of value for conservation of wild populations (reviewed by O’Brien and Robeck 2012b).
3 Case Study
3.1 Investigating Reproductive Biology of a Fully Aquatic Cryptic Species: The Dugong
Understanding reproductive status and potential is important for the effective management of vulnerable marine mammal species such as the dugong. Dugongs are challenging to study because they are fully aquatic, live in turbid coastal waters, spend almost all of their lives underwater foraging on benthic seagrasses (Marsh et al. 2011), are shy and elusive, and have few distinguishing features to discriminate individuals (Lanyon et al. 2002 cf. Anderson 1995). Until recently, all knowledge of the reproductive biology of dugongs (e.g., sexual maturation, gestation, reproductive activity, seasonality) was obtained from analysis of dugong carcasses recovered from tropical north Queensland, Australia (Marsh et al. 2011). Tissue samples obtained from dead dugongs of both sexes, all ages and reproductive states have formed the basis of descriptions of functional anatomy and histology of the reproductive system and timing of breeding cycles (Marsh et al. 1984a, b, c). Direct observations of social associations in wild dugongs including presumed reproductive behaviors (courtship, mating) are few (Preen 1989; Anderson 1997) and remain largely anecdotal because the sexes of individuals involved could not be confirmed. No dugongs have been bred in captivity, and no wild births have been witnessed.
Examination of known-aged reproductive tracts suggests that dugongs may be amongst the slowest reproducers of all the marine mammals, with life history parameters broadly similar to humans. Female dugongs in parts of north Queensland mature at 13–17 years, have one calf at a time and then a long intercalving period of 3–7 years (Marsh et al. 1984a). Male dugongs similarly mature late (>9 years) and have been described as discontinuous breeders due to asynchronous spermatogenesis (Marsh et al. 1984b, c). However, there is evidence of marked inter- and even intra-population variation in reproductive parameters (Marsh et al. 2011) so that dugongs elsewhere in the tropics or at different times, possibly under more favorable nutritional circumstances, appear to grow faster, mature earlier (4–7 years) and reproduce more frequently (Kwan 2002; Marsh and Kwan 2008). The geographically-biased and diverse nature of life history and reproductive parameters suggests that a regionally-specific approach to determining reproductive parameters may be particularly appropriate for this species. Dugongs have a wide geographic distribution between 26° and 27° north and south of the equator, yet until now, reproductive parameters of dugongs have not been determined in non-tropical regions (i.e., beyond 23° 27′ latitude) where seasons may be more pronounced than in the tropics. Such gaps in our knowledge of dugong populations existed due to a previous lack of non-lethal methodologies to collect quantitative data on reproductive status and activity. Therefore, novel research approaches were warranted to investigate reproductive processes in live wild populations.
Recently, the first long-term capture-mark-recapture population study of dugongs has offered an opportunity to examine reproductive biology in live, free-ranging animals (Lanyon et al. 2002, 2006, 2012). During this program, >1,500 sampling events of dugongs of both sexes and all body sizes, in a population of ~1,000 dugongs, were conducted over a decade. Dugongs were captured using an open water ‘rodeo’ technique (Lanyon et al. 2006) and sampled at the water surface for a short period (5–6 min) (Lanyon et al. 2010a, b). Life history and reproductive parameters for individual dugongs including growth rate, body size at reproductive maturity and reproductive status have been elucidated through an innovative sampling approach that includes integration of information on molecular identity (Broderick et al. 2007; McHale et al. 2008; Lanyon et al. 2009; Kellogg Hunter et al. 2011), body morphometrics (Lanyon et al. 2010b), body scarring (Athousis 2012) and fecal hormone analysis (Burgess et al. 2012a, b).
Since most reproductive processes are hormone-dependent, endocrine analysis is an effective and reliable non-lethal method for assessment of reproductive status (Schwarzenberger et al. 1996; Touma and Palme 2005). Concentrations of the steroid hormones testosterone, estrogen and progesterone were measured in fecal samples collected (via rectal tube) from dugongs of both sexes, all size classes and in all months over 10 years, using enzyme-immuno-assay (EIA) (Burgess et al. 2012a, b). All EIAs were biologically validated for this new species under study. Fecal hormone concentrations were examined against serum levels of a subsample of 50 dugongs sampled out-of-water to ensure that circulating concentrations in the blood were reliably reflected in the feces (Burgess et al. 2012a, b).
A pregnancy test for dugongs based on fecal progesterone in combination with body morphometrics (body length, maximum girth and teat length) was developed, validated through ultrasonography and then applied across the female population (Burgess et al. 2012a). Body size to first reproduction in females in this wild population could then be determined: compared to dugongs in tropical locations, these subtropical females grew slower, matured later but achieved greater asymptotic body size (Burgess et al. 2012a). For males, increases in fecal testosterone levels and tusk eruption (a secondary sex trait) characterized puberty, with further ontogenetic increases in testosterone indicating late onset of mature sexual activity (Burgess et al. 2012b). Temporal profiles of fecal hormone levels indicated discrete seasonality in reproductive activity, mating and pregnancy (spring-summer months), with synchronous peaks in male testosterone occurring in spring (Burgess et al. 2012b), coincident with heightened stress (fecal glucocorticoids), loss of body condition (Burgess et al. 2013b) and increased body scarring indicative of aggressive conspecific conflict (Athousis 2012; Burgess et al. 2013b): all consistent with competitive scramble mating that has been suggested for this species (Preen 1989). Interestingly, hormone profiles for recaptured individuals has confirmed discontinuous breeding in males but has also indicated the possibility of male senescence with advanced age (Burgess et al. 2012b).
Further longitudinal monitoring of individuals in this population will provide information on breeding cycles, interbreeding intervals and lifetime reproductive output in this long-lived species. This new integrated approach for investigating reproductive parameters in dugongs has wider application to other live populations of sirenians, and to cryptic marine mammals in general. This case study provides an example of how perseverance and evolving state-of-the-art science can make headway in understanding reproduction and associated processes in difficult-to-study marine mammals. Moreover, such vital data acquired on species’ and population life history can be integrated across scientific disciplines in order to answer more complicated questions (e.g., genealogy (kinship, paternity), reproductive fitness, evolutionary processes), and ultimately lead to better knowledge to assess conservation status and management of vulnerable species.
4 Future Priorities
Our knowledge of the reproductive biology of fully marine mammals is very uneven. For those few species that are commonly held captive or for which carcasses have been recovered and analyzed, we have a basic understanding of reproductive processes. However, for the vast majority of fully aquatic marine mammals we know very little. The rarest, largest and/or most elusive of whales will always offer extreme challenges to the reproductive practitioner and we may never discover a great deal about their reproductive behavior or details of reproductive patterns at a population level. However, for many other species, recent advances in reproductive technologies with more ‘remote’ collection procedures (e.g., molecular and endocrine analysis) present the opportunity to initiate focused and integrated programs. Of particular importance to this field has been the development of wildlife endocrinology over the past 20–30 years. Although initially developed with terrestrial wildlife in mind, the advent of technologies to collect and analyze body tissues other than blood has been nothing short of revolutionary. Now, marine mammal field biologists have opportunities to sample tissues in non-invasive (feces, sloughed skin, exhaled blow) or minimally invasive ways (biopsied skin, blubber) and develop reproductive hormonal profiles for live individuals or across free-ranging populations. With some ingenuity, creativity and a little perseverance, marine mammal biologists are applying these new technologies in innovative and sometimes remarkable ways. Furthermore, the expanding suite of parameters that can be measured (e.g., steroid and non-steroid hormones, and other sophisticated reproductive biomarkers in combination with genetics) permits ever more profound and meaningful questions in marine mammal reproductive science. For instance, fine-scale genetic tools are now being used in association with morphometric and endocrine data to reconstruct genealogies for dugong populations along the Australian coast (Cope et al. 2011). Such ground-breaking approaches will not only inform us as to social and reproductive connectedness (movements and mating events) within and between populations, but have the capacity to elucidate mating strategies (relatedness and mate choice) and other evolutionary processes in elusive, cryptic marine mammals.
With increasing human usage of the world’s oceans for commercial, recreational and strategic purposes, many populations of marine mammals are in a parlous state, and their survival depends on their ability to reproduce in degrading aquatic environments. Reproductive parameters, if these can be determined, provide vital information on natural population fecundity and reproductive capacity, potential population growth rate and minimum viable population size. Having a solid understanding of the way in which marine mammals reproduce will inform us as to what levels of mortality and disturbance, populations or even species can tolerate and help us identify those most at risk. We can only hope that the opportunity to collect and integrate reproductive data will not be a case of ‘too little, too late’ to save our marine mammal biota.
References
Aarseth JJ, Van’t Hof TJ, Stokkan K-A. Melatonin is rhythmic in newborn seals exposed to continuous light. J Comp Physiol B. 2003;173:37–42.
Acevedo J, Aguayo-Lobo A, Torres D. Fetus presentation and time taken for parturition in Antarctic fur seal, Arctocephalus gazelle, at Cape Shirreff, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 2008;31:1137–41.
Acevedo-Whitehouse K, Rocha-Gosselin A, Gendron D. A novel non-invasive tool for disease surveillance of free-ranging whales and its relevance to conservation programs. Anim Conserv. 2010;13:217–25.
Adulyanukosol K, Thongsukdee S, Hara T, Arai N, Tsuchiya M. Observations of dugong reproductive behavior in Trang Province, Thailand: further evidence of intraspecific variation in dugong behavior. Mar Biol. 2007;151:1887–91.
Archer R, Chauvet J, Chauvet MT. Isolation of finback whale oxytocin and vasopressin. Nature. 1964;201:191–2.
Amaral RS. Use of alternative matrices to monitor steroid hormones in aquatic mammals: a review. Aquat Mamm. 2010;36:162–71.
Amaral RS, Rosas FCW, Viau P, d’Affonse ca Neto JA, da Silva VMF, de Oliveira CA. Noninvasive monitoring of androgens in male Amazonian manatee (Trichechus inunguis): biologic validation. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2009;40:458–65.
Anderson PK. Shark Bay dugongs in summer. I: Lek mating. Behaviour. 1997;134:433–62.
Anderson PK. Scarring and photo identification of dugongs in Shark Bay, Western Australia. Aquat Mamm. 1995;21:205–11.
Andriolo A, Martins CCA, Engel MH, Pizzorno JL, Mas-Rosa S, Freitas AC, Morete ME, Kinas PG. The first aerial survey to estimate abundance of humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae) in the breeding ground off Brazil (Breeding Stock A). J Cetac Res Manage. 2006;8:307–11.
Asada M, Tetsuka M, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, Fukui Y. Improvement on in vitro maturation, fertilization and development of minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) oocytes. Theriogenology. 2001a;56:521–33.
Asada M, Wei H, Nagayama R, Tetsuka M, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, Fukui Y. An attempt at intracytoplasmic sperm injection of frozen-thawed minke whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) oocytes. Zygote. 2001b;9:299–307.
Athousis C. Body scarring as an indicator of tusk function in intraspecific social interactions in the dugong (Dugong dugon). Unpublished Honours Thesis, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia; 2012. 69 pages.
Atkinson S. Reproductive biology of seals. Rev Reprod. 1997;2:175–94.
Atkinson S, Combelles C, Vincent D, Nachtogall P, Pawloski J, Breese M. Monitoring of progesterone in captive female false killer whales, Pseudorca crassidens. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999;115:323–32.
Atkinson S, Gilmartin WG. Seasonal testosterone pattern in Hawaiian monk seals (Monachus schauinslandi). J Reprod Fertil. 1992;96:35–9.
Atkinson S, Gilmartin WG, Lasley BL. Testosterone response to a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist in Hawaiian monk seals (Monachus schauinslandi). J Reprod Fertil. 1993;97:35–8.
Atkinson S, Ragen TJ, Gilmartin WG, Becker BL, Johanos TC. Use of a GnRH agonist to suppress testosterone in wild male Hawaiian monk seals (Monachus schauinslandi). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1998;112:178–82.
Attard CRM, Beheregaray LB, Jenner KCS, Gill PC, Jenner M-N, Morrice MG, Robertson KM, Möller LM. Hybridization of Southern Hemisphere blue whale subspecies and a sympatric area off Antarctica: impacts of whaling or climate change? Mol Ecol. 2012;21:5715–27.
Barlow J. Variability, trends, and biases in reproductive rates of spotted dolphins, Stenella attenuata. Fish Bull. 1985;83:657–69.
Barrell GK, Montgomery GW. Absence of circadian patterns of secretion of melatonin or cortisol in Weddell seals under continuous natural daylight. J Endocrinol. 1989;122:445–9.
Bauer GB, Colbert DE, Gaspard III JC. Learning about manatees: a collaborative program between New College of Florida and Mote Marine Laboratory to conduct laboratory research for manatee conservation. Int J Comp Psychol. 2010;23:811–25.
Bergfelt DR, Steinetz BG, Lasano S, West KL, Campbell M, Adams GP. Relaxin and progesterone during pregnancy and the post-partum period in association with live and stillborn calves in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2011;170:650–6.
Best PB. The sperm whale (Physeter catodon) off the west coast of South Africa. 3. Reproduction in the male. Investig Rep Div Sea Fish South Afr. 1969;72:1–20.
Bhuiyan MM, Suzuki Y, Watanabe H, Lee E, Hirayama H, Matsuoka K, Fujise Y, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, Fukui Y. Production of sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis) cloned embryos by inter- and intra-species somatic cells nuclear transfer. J Reprod Dev. 2010;56:131–9.
Bhuiyan MMU, Suzuki Y, Watanabe H, Matsuoka K, Fujise Y, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, Fukui Y. Attempts at in vitro fertilization and culture of in vitro matured oocytes in sei (Balaenoptera borealis) and Bryde’s (B. edeni) whales. Zygote. 2009;17:19–28.
Biancani B, Da Dalt L, Lacave G, Romagnoli S, Gabai G. Measuring fecal progestogens as a tool to monitor reproductive activity in captive female bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Theriogenology. 2009;72:1282–92.
Blanchet M-A, Desportes G, Nance T, Vanman C. The description of the pregnancies, labours and pre- and post-partum events of two harbour seals in a zoological environment. Aquat Mamm. 2006;32:145–51.
Block BA. Physiological ecology in the 21st century: advancements in biologging science. Integr Comp Biol. 2005;45:305–20.
Bograd SJ, Block BA, Costa DP, Godley BJ. Biologging technologies: new tools for conservation. Introduction. Endanger Species Res. 2010;10:1–7.
Börjesson P, Read AJ. Variation in the timing of conception between populations of harbor porpoise. J Mammal. 2003;84:948–55.
Botta S, Secchi ER, Muelbert MMC, Danilewicz D, Negri MF, Cappozzo HL, Hohn AA. Age and growth of franciscana dolphins, Pontoporia blainvillei (Cetacea: Pontoporiidae) incidentally caught off southern Brazil and northern Argentina. J Mar Biol Assoc U K. 2010;90:1493–500.
Boyd IL. Changes in plasma progesterone and prolactin concentrations during the annual cycle, and role of prolactin in the maintenance of lactation and luteal development in the Antarctic fur seal (Arctocephalus gazella). J Reprod Fertil. 1991;91:637–47.
Boyd IL. State-dependent fertility in pinnipeds: contrasting capital and income breeders. Funct Ecol. 2000;14:623–30.
Boyd IL, Lockyer C, Marsh HD. Reproduction in marine mammals. In: Reynolds III JE, Rommel SA, editors. Biology of marine mammals. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1999. p. 218–86.
Briggs M. Contraception in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). In: Duffield DA, Robeck TR, editors. The bottlenose dolphin breeding workshop. Silver Springs, MD: American Zoological Association, Marine Mammal Taxon Advisory Group; 2000. p. 201–4.
Broderick D, Ovenden J, Slade R, Lanyon JM. Characterisation of 26 new microsatellite loci in the dugong (Dugong dugon). Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7:1275–7.
Brook FM. The use of diagnostic ultrasound in assessment of the reproductive status of the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops aduncus, in captivity and applications in management of a controlled breeding program. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong; 1997. 339 pages.
Brook FM. Sonographic ovarian and testicular evaluation in bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus aduncus. In: Duffield DA, Robeck TR, editors. Proceedings Bottlenose Dolphin Reproduction Workshop; June 1999; San Diego, California; 1999. p. 207–22.
Brook FM. Ultrasonographic imaging of the reproductive organs of the female bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus aduncus. Reproduction. 2001;121:419–28.
Brook FM, Kinoshita RE, Brown B, Metreweli C. Ultrasonographic imaging of the testis and epididymis of the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus aduncus. J Reprod Fertil. 2000;119:233–40.
Brook FM, Lim EHT, Chua FHC, Mackay B. Assessment of the reproductive cycle of the Indo-Pacific humpback dolphin, Sousa chinensis, using ultrasonography. Aquat Mamm. 2004;30:137–48.
Brook FM, van Bonn W, Jensen E. Ultrasonography. In: Dierauf LA, Gulland FMD, editors. CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001. p. 590–620.
Brown MR, Corkeron PJ, Hale PT, Schultz KW, Bryden MM. Evidence for a sex-segregated migration in the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae). Proc R Soc Lond B. 1995;259:229–34.
Burgess EA, Blanshard WH, Barnes A, Gilchrist S, Chua J, Lanyon JM. Reproductive hormone monitoring of dugongs in captivity: detecting the onset of sexual maturity in a cryptic marine mammal. Anim Reprod Sci. 2013a;140(3–4):255–67.
Burgess EA, Brown JL, Lanyon JM. Sex, scarring and stress: understanding seasonal costs in a cryptic marine mammal. Conserv Physiol. 2013b;1:cot014.
Burgess EA, Lanyon JM, Brown JL, Blyde D, Keeley T. Diagnosing pregnancy in free-ranging dugongs using fecal progesterone metabolite concentrations and body morphometrics: a population application. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2012a;177:82–92.
Burgess EA, Lanyon JM, Keeley T. Testosterone and tusks: maturation and seasonal reproductive patterns of live free-ranging dugongs (Dugong dugon) in a subtropical population. Reproduction. 2012b;143:683–97.
Calle PP. Contraception in pinnipeds and cetaceans. In: Asa CS, Porton IJ, editors. Wildlife contraception: issues, methods, and applications. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 2005. p. 168–76.
Calzada N, Aguilar A, Sorensen TB, Lockyer C. Reproductive biology of female striped dolphin (Stenella coeruleoalba) from the western Mediterranean. J Zool. 1996;240:581–91.
Cassini MH. The evolution of reproductive systems in pinnipeds. Behav Ecol. 1999;10:612–6.
Chittleborough RG. Aspects of reproduction in the male humpback whale Megaptera nodosa (Bonnaterre). Aust J Mar Freshwat Res. 1954;6:1–29.
Chivers SJ, Myrick Jr AC. Comparisons of age at sexual maturity and other reproductive parameters for two stocks of spotted dolphin, Stenella attenuata. Fish Bull. 1993;91:611–8.
Clapham PJ. The social and reproductive biology of humpback whales: an ecological perspective. Mammal Rev. 2008;26:27–49.
Clapham PJ, Young SB, Brownell RL. Baleen whales: conservation issues and the status of the most endangered populations. Mammal Rev. 1999;29:35–60.
Cockcroft VG, Ross GJB. Age, growth and reproduction of bottlenose dolphins Tursiops truncatus from the east coast of Southern Africa. Fish Bull. 1990;88:289–302.
Constable S, Parslow A, Dutton G, Rogers T, Hogg C. Urinary cortisol sampling: a non-invasive technique for examining cortisol concentrations in the Weddell seal, Leptonychotes weddelli. Zoo Biol. 2006;25:137–44.
Cope RC, Lanyon JM, Seddon JR, Pollett PK. Reconstructing family trees for free-ranging dugongs in southern Queensland, Australia. Published Abstract, International Sirenian Symposium, 19th International Biennial Conference on Marine Mammals; 2011 Nov 27; Tampa Florida; 2011.
Connor RC. Dolphin social intelligence: complex alliance relationships in bottlenose dolphins and a consideration of selective environments for extreme brain size evolution in mammals. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007;362:587–602.
Connor RC, Smolker RA, Richards AF. Two levels of alliance formation among male bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops sp.). Proc Natl Acad Sci. 1992;89:987–90.
Connor RC, Wells R, Mann J, Read A. The bottlenose dolphin: social relationships in a fission-fusion society. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PJ, Whitehead H, editors. Cetacean societies: field studies of whales and dolphins. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2000. p. 91–126.
Cornell LH, Asper ED, Antrim JE, Searles SS, Young WG, Goff T. Progress report: Results of a long-range captive breeding program for the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus and Tursiops truncatus gilli. Zoo Biol. 1987;6:41–53.
Costa DP. The secret lives of marine mammals: novel tools for studying their behaviour and biology at sea. Oceanography. 1993;6:120–8.
Cummins JM, Woodall PF. On mammalian sperm dimensions. J Reprod Fertil. 1985;75:153–75.
Danil K, Chivers SJ. Habitat based spatial and temporal variability in life history characteristics of female common dolphins (Delphinus delphis) in the eastern tropical Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2006;318:277–86.
Dawbin WH. Temporal segregation of humpback whales during migrations in Southern Hemisphere waters. Mem Queensl Mus. 1997;42:105–38.
de Bruyn PJN, Tosh CA, Bester MN, Cameron EZ, McIntyre T, Wilkinson IS. Sex at sea: alternative mating system in an extremely polygynous mammal. Anim Behav. 2011;82:445–51.
DeMaster DP. Estimating the average age of first birth in marine mammals. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 1981;38:237–9.
Desportes G, Saboureau M, Lacroix A. Reproductive maturity and seasonality of male long-finned pilot whales off the Faroe Islands. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1993;14:233–62.
Desportes G, Saboureau M, Lacroix A. Growth-related changes in testicular mass and plasma testosterone concentrations in long-finned pilot whales, Globicephala melas. Reproduction. 1994;102:237–44.
Deutsch CJ, Reid JP, Bonde RK, Easton DE, Kochman HI, O’Shea TJ. Seasonal movements, migratory behavior, and site fidelity of West Indian manatees along the Atlantic coast of the United States. Wildl Monogr. 2003;151:1–77.
Dizon AE, Perrin WF, Akin PA. Stocks of dolphins (Stenella spp. and Delphinus delphis) in the Eastern Tropical Pacific: a phylogeographic classification. NOAA Technical Report NMFS-SWFSC-TM-119; 1994.
Dover SR, van Bonn W. Flexible and rigid endoscopy in marine mammals. In: Dierauf LA, Gulland FMD, editors. CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001. p. 621–42.
Duffield DA, Odell DK, McBain JF, Andrews B. Killer whale (Orcinus orca) reproduction at SeaWorld. Zoo Biol. 1995;14:417–30.
Edds PL, Odell S, Tershy BR. Calls of a captive juvenile and free-ranging adult-calf pairs of Bryde’s whales, Balaenoptera edeni. Mar Mamm Sci. 1993;9:269–84.
Eisert R, Oftedal OT, Barrell GK. Milk composition in the Weddell seal Leptonychotes weddellii: evidence for a functional role of milk carbohydrates in pinnipeds. Physiol Biochem Zool. 2013;86:159–75.
Essapian FS. Observations of abnormalities of parturition in captive bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops truncatus, and concurrent behavior of other porpoises. J Mammal. 1962;44:405–14.
Evans K, Hindell MA. The age structure and growth of female sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) in southern Australian waters. J Zool. 2004;263:237–50.
Favaro L, Gnone G, Pessani D. Postnatal development of echolocation abilities in a bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Zoo Biol. 2013;32:210–5.
Fitzpatrick JL, Almbro M, Gonzalez-Voyer A, Kolm N, Simmons LW. Male contest competition and the coevolution of weaponry and testes in pinnipeds. Evolution. 2012;66:3595–604.
Fleming AD, Yanagimachi R, Yanagimachi H. Spermatozoa of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus. J Reprod Fertil. 1981;63:509–14.
Foote AD. Mortality rate acceleration and post-reproductive lifespan in matrilineal whale species. Biol Lett. 2008;4:189–91.
Fowler CW. Density dependence as related to life history strategy. Ecology. 1981;62:602–10.
Fowler CW. Density dependence in cetacean populations. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1984;6: 373–9.
Francis-Floyd R, White JR, Chen CL, Cardeilhac PT, Cichra CE. Serum progesterone and estradiol concentrations in captive manatess Trichechus manatus. J Aquat Anim Health. 1991;3:70–3.
Frère CH, Krzyszczyk E, Patterson EM, Hunter S, Ginsburg A, Mann J. Thar she blows! A novel method for DNA collection from cetacean blow. PLoS One. 2010;5:e12299.
Fujihira T, Kobayashi M, Hochi S, Hirabayashi M, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, Fukui Y. Developmental capacity of Antarctic minke whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) vitrified oocytes following in vitro maturation, and parthenogenetic activation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Zygote. 2006;14:89–95.
Fukui Y, Iwayama H, Matsuoka T, Nagai H, Koma N, Mogoe T, Ishikawa H, Fujise Y, Hirabayashi M, Hochi S, Kato H, Ohsumi S. Attempt at intracytoplasmic sperm injection of in vitro matured oocytes in common minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) captured during the Kushiro Coast Survey. J Reprod Dev. 2007;53:945–52.
Fukui Y, Mogoe T, Jung YG, Terawaki Y, Miyamoto A, Ishikawa H, Fujise Y, Ohsumi S. Relationships among morphological status, steroid hormones, and post-thawing viability of frozen spermatozoa of male minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata). Mar Mamm Sci. 1996;12:28–37.
Funasaka N, Yoshioka M, Suzuki M, Ueda K, Miyahara H, Uchida S. Seasonal difference of diurnal variations in serum melatonin, cortisol, testosterone, and rectal temperature in Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Aquat Mamm. 2011;37:433–42.
Gardiner KJ, Boyd IL, Racey PA, Reijnders PJH, Thompson PM. Plasma progesterone concentrations measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay useful for diagnosing pregnancy in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina). Mar Mamm Sci. 1996;12:265–73.
Gardiner KJ, Boyd IL, Follett BK, Racey PA, Reijnders PJH. Changes in pituitary, ovarian, and testicular activity in harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) in relation to season and sexual maturity. Can J Zool. 1999;77:211–21.
Gero S, Whitehead H. Suckling behavior in sperm whale calves: observations and hypotheses. Mar Mamm Sci. 2007;23:398–413.
Gibbens J, Parry LJ, Arnould JPY. Influences on fecundity in Australian fur seals (Arctocephalus pusillus doriferus). J Mammal. 2010;91:510–8.
Glockner-Ferrari DA, Ferrari MJ. Reproduction in the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) in Hawaiian waters, 1975–1988: the life history, reproductive rates and behavior of known individuals identified through surface and underwater photography. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1990;12:161–9.
Goldstein J, Reese E, Reif JS, Varela RA, McCulloch SD, Defran RH, Fair PA, Bossart GD. Hematologic, biochemical, and cytologic findings from apparently healthy Atlantic Bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) inhabiting the Indian River lagoon, Florida, USA. J Wildl Dis. 2006;42:447–54.
Hadley GL, Rotella JJ, Garrot RA, Nichols JD. Variation in probability of first reproduction of Weddell seals. J Anim Ecol. 2006;75:1058–70.
Hao YJ, Chen DQ, Zhao QZ, Wang D. Serum concentrations of gonadotropins and steroid hormones of Neophocaena phocaenoides asiaeorientalis in middle and lower regions of the Yangtze River. Theriogenology. 2007;67:673–80.
Harcourt RG, Turner E, Hall A, Waas JR, Hindell M. Effects of capture stress on free-ranging, reproductively active male Weddell seals. J Comp Physiol A. 2010;196:147–54.
Harrison RJ, Ridgway SH. Gonadal activity in some bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J Zool. 1971;165:355–66.
Hartman DS. Ecology and behavior of the manatee (Trichechus manatus) in Florida. Am Soc Mammalogists. 1979;5:1–153.
Hernandez P, Reynolds III JE, Marsh H, Marmontel M. Age and seasonality of spermatogenesis of Florida manatees. In: O’Shea TJ, Ackerman BB, Percival HF, editors. Population biology of the Florida manatee. Information and Technology Report 1. USA: National Biological Service; 1995. p. 84–97.
Heyning JE. Functional morphology involved in intraspecific fighting of the beaked whale, Mesoplodon carlhubbsi. Can J Zool. 1984;62:1645–54.
Hildebrandt TB, Brown JL, Hermes R, Göritz F. Ultrasound analysis of reproductive function in wildlife species. Conserv Biol. 2003;8:166–82.
Hiwasa M, Suzuki Y, Watanabe H, Bhuiyan MMU, Matsuoka K, Fujise Y, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, Fukui Y. Effects of semen extenders and storage temperatures on characteristics of frozen-thawed Bryde’s (Balaenoptera edeni) whale spermatozoa. J Reprod Dev. 2009;55: 599–606.
Hoberecht LK, Vos DJ, VanBlaricom GR. A remote biopsy system used to sample Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus) blubber. Mar Mamm Sci. 2006;22:683–9.
Hogg C, Rogers T, Shorter A, Barton K, Miller P, Nowacek D. Determination of steroid hormones in whale blow: it is possible. Mar Mamm Sci. 2009;25:605–18.
Hogg C, Vickers E, Rogers T. Determination of testosterone in saliva and blow of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B. 2005;814:339–46.
Hohn AA, Read AJ, Fernández S, Vidâl O, Findley LT. Life history of the vaquita, Phocoena sinus (Phocoenidae, Cetacea). J Zool (Lond). 1996;239:235–51.
Holt WV, Waller J, Moore A, Jepson PD, Deaville R, Bennett PM. Smooth muscle actin and vimentin as markers of testis development in the harbour porpoise (Phocoena phocoena). J Anat. 2004;205:201–11.
Hückstadt L, Antezana T. An observation of parturition in a stranded Kogia breviceps. Mar Mamm Sci. 2001;17:362–5.
Hunt KE, Moore MJ, Rolland RM, Kellar NM, Hall AJ, Kershaw J, Raverty SA, Davis CE, Yeates LC, Fauquier DA, Rowles TK, Kraus SD. Overcoming the challenges of studying conservation physiology in large whales: a review of available methods. Conserv Physiol. 2013;1:1–24.
Hunt KE, Rolland RM, Kraus SD, Wasser SK. Analysis of fecal glucocorticoids in the North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2006;148:260–72.
Hunt KE, Trites AW, Wasser SK. Validation of a fecal glucocorticoid assay for Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Physiol Behav. 2004;80:595–601.
Iwayama H, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, Fukui Y. Attempt at in vitro maturation of minke whale (Balaenoptera bonaerensis) oocytes using a portable CO2 incubator. J Reprod Dev. 2005;51:69–75.
Jenssen TA, Lovern MB, Congdo JD. Field-testing the protandry-based mating system for the lizard, Anolis carolinesis: does the model organism have the right model? Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2001;50:162–72.
Karamanlidis AA, Paravas V, Trillmich F, Dendrinos P. First observations of parturition and postpartum behavior in the Mediterranean monk seal (Monachus monachus) in the Eastern Mediterranean. Aquat Mamm. 2010;36:27–32.
Karczmarski L, Thornton M, Cockroft VG. Description of selected behaviours of humpback dolphins, Sousa chinensis. Aquat Mamm. 1997;23:127–34.
Kato H, Sakuramoto K. Age at sexual maturity of Southern minke whales: a review and some additional analyses. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1991;41:331–7.
Katsumata E, Furuta C, Katsumata H, Watanabe G, Taya K. Basal body temperature method for detecting ovarian cycle in the captive beluga (Delphinapterus leucas). J Reprod Dev. 2006a;52:59–63.
Katsumata E, Jaroenporn S, Katsumata H, Konno S, Maeda Y, Watanabe G, Taya K. Body temperature and circulating progesterone levels before and after parturition in killer whales (Orcinus orca). J Reprod Dev. 2006b;52:65–71.
Katsumata E, Ueda Y, Arai K, Katsumata H, Kishimoto M, Watanabe G, Taya K. Circulating testosterone and inhibin levels at different ages in the male beluga (Delphinapterus leucas). J Vet Med Sci. 2012;74:292–300.
Kellar NM, Trego ML, Marks CI, Chivers SJ, Danil K, Archer FI. Blubber testosterone: a potential marker of male reproductive status in short beaked common dolphins. Mar Mamm Sci. 2009;25:507–22.
Kellar NM, Trego ML, Marks CI, Dizon AE. Determining pregnancy from blubber in three species of delphinids. Mar Mamm Sci. 2006;22:1–16.
Keller KV. Training of the Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) for artificial insemination. Int Assoc Aquat Anim Med. 1986;14:22–4.
Kellogg Hunter M, Broderick D, Ovenden JR, Tucker KP, Bonde RK, McGuire PM, Lanyon JM. Characterization of highly informative cross-species microsatellite panels for the Australian dugong (Dugong dugon) and Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) including five novel primers. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011;10:368–77.
Kinoshita K, Kiwata M, Kuwano R, Sato N, Tanaka T, Nagata M, Taira H, Kusunoki H. Temporal association of serum progesterone concentrations and vaginal cytology in walruses (Odobenus rosmarus). Theriogenology. 2012;77:933–9.
Kita S, Yoshioka M, Kashiwagi M, Ogawa S, Tobayama T. Comparative external morphology of cetacean spermatozoa. Fish Sci. 2001;67:482–92.
Kjeld M, Alfredsson A, Ólafsson O, Tryland M, Christensen I, Stuen S, Árnason A. Changes in blood testosterone and progesterone concentrations of the North Atlantic minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) during the feeding season. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2004;61:230–7.
Kjeld M, Ólafsson O, Víkingsson GA, Sigurjónsson J. Sex hormones and reproductive status of the North Atlantic fin whales (Balaenoptera physalus) during the feeding season. Aquat Mamm. 2006;32:75–84.
Kooyman GL, Castellini MA, Davis RW. Physiology of diving in marine mammals. Annu Rev Physiol. 1981;43:343–56.
Kraus SD, Hamilton PK, Kenney RD, Knowlton AR, Slay CK. Reproductive parameters of the North Atlantic right whale. J Cetac Res Manage. 2001;2:231–6.
Kumar A, Kalra B, Patel A, McDavid L, Roudebush WE. Development of a second generation anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ELISA. J Immunol Methods. 2010;362:51–9.
Kwan D. Towards a sustainable indigenous fishery for dugongs in Torres Strait: a contribution of empirical data analysis and process. Unpublished PhD thesis, James Cook University, Australia; 2002. 282 pages.
Lacave G, Eggermont M, Verslycke T, Brook FM, Salbany A, Roque L, Kinoshita R. Prediction from ultrasonographic measurements of the expected delivery date in two species of bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus and Tursiops aduncus). Vet Rec. 2004;154:228–33.
Lambrechts MM, Perret P, Maistre M, Blondel J. Do experiments with captive non-domesticated animals make sense without population field studies? A case study in blue tit’s breeding time. Proc R Soc Lond B. 1999;266:1311–5.
Langtimm CA, O’Shea TJ, Pradel R, Beck CA. Estimates of annual survival probabilities for adult Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris). Ecology. 1998;79:981–97.
Langtimm CA, Beck CA, Edwards H, Fick-Child K, Ackerman BB, Barton S, Hartley WC. Survival estimates for Florida manatees from the photo-identification of individuals. Mar Mamm Sci. 2004;20:438–63.
Lanyon JM, Slade RW, Sneath HL, Broderick D, Kirkwood JM, Limpus D, Limpus CJ, Jessop T. A method for capturing dugongs (Dugong dugon) in open water. Aquat Mamm. 2006;32:196–201.
Lanyon JM, Smith K, Carrick FN. Reproductive steroids are detectable in the faeces of dugongs. Aust Zool. 2005;33:247–50.
Lanyon JM, Sneath HL, Kirkwood JM, Slade RW. Establishing a mark-recapture program for dugongs in Moreton Bay, south-east Queensland. Aust Mammal. 2002;24:51–6.
Lanyon JM, Sneath HL, Long T. Three skin sampling methods for molecular characterisation of free-ranging dugong (Dugong dugon) populations. Aquat Mamm. 2010a;36:298–306.
Lanyon JM, Sneath HL, Long T. Evaluation of exertion and capture stress in serum of wild dugongs, Dugong dugon. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2012;43:20–32.
Lanyon JM, Sneath HL, Long T, Bonde RK. Physiological response of wild dugongs (Dugong dugon) to out-of-water sampling for health assessment. Aquat Mamm. 2010b;36:46–58.
Lanyon JM, Sneath HL, Ovenden JR, Broderick D, Bonde RK. Sexing sirenians: validation of visual and molecular sex determination in both wild dugongs (Dugong dugon) and Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris). Aquat Mamm. 2009;35:187–92.
Larkin ILV, Gross TS, Reep RL. Use of faecal testosterone concentrations to monitor male Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris) reproductive status. Aquat Mamm. 2005;31: 52–61.
Lasley BL, Kirkpatrick JF. Monitoring ovarian function in captive and free-ranging wildlife by means of urinary and fecal steroids. J Zoo Wildl Med. 1991;22:23–31.
Laws RM. Reproduction, growth, and age of southern fin whales. Discov Rep. 1961;31:327–486.
Lawson JW, Parsons JL, Craig SJ, Eddingotn JD, Kimmins WC. Use of electroejaculation to collect semen samples from wild seals. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1996;209:1615–7.
Le Boeuf BJ. Pinniped mating systems on land, ice and in the water: emphasis on the Phocidae. In: Renouf D, editor. Behavior of pinnipeds. London, UK: Chapman and Hall; 1991. p. 45–65.
Lee E, Bhuiyan MMU, Watanabe H, Matsuoka K, Fujise Y, Ishikawa H, Fukui Y. Production of cloned sei whale (Balaenoptera borealis) embryos by interspecies somatic cell nuclear transfer using enucleated pig oocytes. J Vet Sci. 2009;10:285–92.
Lee MM, Donahoe PK. Müllerian inhibiting substance: a gonadal hormone with multiple functions. Endocr Rev. 1993;14:152–64.
Lefebvre KA, Bargu S, Kieckhefer T, Silver MW. From sanddads to blue whales: the pervasiveness of domoic acid. Toxicon. 2002;40:971–7.
Lockyer C. Review of baleen whale (Mysticeti) reproduction and implications for management. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1984;6:27–50.
Lockyer C, Martin AR. The sei whale off western Iceland: II Age, growth, and reproduction. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1983;33:465–76.
Lockyer C, Smellie CG. Assessment of reproductive status of female fin and sei whales taken off Iceland, from a histological examination of the uterine mucosa. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1985;35:343–8.
Lyamin O, Pryaslova J, Lance V, Siegel J. Continuous activity in cetaceans after birth. Nature. 2005;435:1177.
MacLeod CD. Intraspecific scarring in odontocete cetaceans: an indicator of male ‘quality’ in aggressive social interactions. J Zool. 1998;244:71–7.
Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H. Cetacean Societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2000. 448 pages.
Mansour AAH, McKay DW, Lien J, Orr JC, Banoub JH, ØIen N, Stenson G. Determination of pregnancy status from blubber samples in minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata). Mar Mamm Sci. 2002;18:112–20.
Marcoux M, Whitehead H, Rendell L. Sperm whale feeding variation by location, year, social group and clan: evidence from stable isotopes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2007;333:309–14.
Marmontel M. Age and reproduction in female Florida manatees. In: O’Shea TJ, Ackerman BB, Percival HF, editors. Population biology of the Florida manatee. Information and Technology Report 1. USA: National Biological Service; 1995. p. 98–119.
Marsh H, Heinsohn GE, Channells PW. Changes in the ovaries and uterus of the dugong, Dugong dugon (Sirenia: Dugongidae), with age and reproductive activity. Aust J Zool. 1984a;32:743–66.
Marsh H, Heinsohn GE, Glover TD. Changes in the male reproductive organs of the dugong, Dugong dugon (Sirenia: Dugondidae) with age and reproductive activity. Aust J Zool. 1984b;32:721–42.
Marsh H, Heinsohn GE, Marsh LM. Breeding cycle, life history and population dynamics of the dugong, Dugon dugon (Sirenia: Dugongidae). Aust J Zool. 1984c;32:767–88.
Marsh H, Kasuya T. Changes in the ovaries of the short-finned pilot whale, Globicephala macrorhynchus, with age and reproductive activity. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1984;6:331–5.
Marsh H, Kasuya T. Evidence for reproductive senescence in female cetaceans. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1986;8:57–74.
Marsh H, Kwan D. Temporal variability in the life history and reproductive biology of female dugongs in Torres Strait: the likely role of seagrass dieback. Cont Shelf Res. 2008;28:2152–9.
Marsh H, O’Shea TJ, Reynolds III JE. Ecology and conservation of the sirenia. Dugongs and manatees. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2011. 521 pages.
Mate BR, Gisiner R, Mobley J. Local and migratory movements of Hawaiian humpback whales tracked by satellite telemetry. Can J Zool. 1998;76:863–8.
Mate BR, Lagerquist BA, Urban-Ramirez J. A note on using satellite telemetry to document the use of San Ignacio Lagoon by gray whales (Eschrichtius robustus) during their reproductive season. J Cetac Res Manage. 2003;5:149–54.
McBride AF, Hebb DO. Behavior of the captive bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1948;41:111–23.
McBride AF, Kritzler H. Observations on pregnancy, parturition, and postnatal behavior in the bottlenose dolphin. J Mammal. 1951;32:251–66.
McHale M, Broderick D, Ovenden JR, Lanyon JM. A multiplexed PCR assay for gender assignment in dugong (Dugong dugon) and West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus). Mol Ecol Notes. 2008;8:669–70.
McKenzie J, Parry LJ, Page B, Goldsworthy SD. Estimation of pregnancy rates and reproductive failure in New Zealand fur seals (Arctocephalus forsteri). J Mammal. 2005;86:1237–46.
Mellish JE, Calkins DG, Christen DR, Horning M, Rea LD, Atkinson SK. Temporary captivity as a research tool: comprehensive study of wild pinnipeds under controlled conditions. Aquat Mamm. 2006;32:58–65.
Mercado III E, deLong CM. Dolphin cognition: representations and processes in memory and perception. Int J Comp Psychol. 2010;23:344–78.
Mignucci-Giannoni AA, Toyos-Gonzalez GM, Perez-Padilla J, Rodriguez-Lopez MA, Overing J. Mass stranding of pygmy killer whales (Feresa attenuata) in the British Virgin Islands. J Mar Biol Assoc U K. 2000;80:759–60.
Miller DL, Bossart GD, Nadji M, Tarpley R, Roberts B, O’Hara TM. A note on the possibility of identifying Leydig and Sertoli cells by immunohistochemistry in bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus). J Cetac Res Manage. 2002a;4:149–53.
Miller DL, Dougherty MM, Decker SJ, Bossart GD. Ultrastructure of the spermatozoa from a Florida manatee (Trichechus manatus latirostris). Anat Histol Embryol. 2001;30:253–6.
Miller DL, Styer EL, Decker SJ, Robeck T. Ultrastructure of the spermatozoa from three odonocetes: a killer whale (Orcinus orca), a Pacific white-sided dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) and a beluga (Delphinapterus leucas). Anat Histol Embryol. 2002b;31:158–68.
Miyazaki N. Further analyses of reproduction in the striped dolphin, Stenella coeruleoalba, off the Pacific coast of Japan. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1984;6:343–53.
Mogoe T, Fukui Y, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S. Effects of diluent composition and temperature on motility and viability after liquid storage and precryopreservation of minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) spermatozoa. Mar Mamm Sci. 1998;14:854–60.
Montano GA, Kraemer DC, Love CC, Robeck TR, O’Brien JK. Evaluation of motility, membrane status and DNA integrity of frozen-thawed bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) spermatozoa after sex-sorting and recyropreservation. Reproduction. 2010;143:799–813.
Muraco H, Clough P, Teets V, Arn D, Muraco M. Ovarian follicular dynamics during the luteinizing hormone surge in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Int J Comp Psychol. 2010;23:723–33.
Murphy S, Collet A, Rogan E. Mating strategy in the male common dolphin (Delphinus delphis): what gonadal development tells us. J Mammal. 2005;86:1247–58.
Myers MJ, Litz B, Atkinson S. The effects of age, sex, season and geographic region on circulating serum cortisol concentrations in threatened and endangered Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus). Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2010;165:72–7.
Newell CL, Cowles TJ. Unusual gray whale Eschrichtius robustus feeding in the summer of 2005 off the central Oregon Coast. Geophys Res Lett. 2006;33:L22S11.
Nichols C. Temporal change in dugong body condition and seagrass in Moreton Bay, a temperate environment. Unpublished Honours Thesis, The University of Queensland, Australia; 2005. 55 pages.
Noad M, Cato DH. A combined acoustic and visual survey of humpback whales off southeast Queensland. Mem Queensl Mus. 2001;47:507–23.
O’Brien JK, Robeck TR. Development of sperm sexing and associated assisted reproductive technology for sex pre-selection of captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). Reprod Fertil Dev. 2006;18:319–29.
O’Brien JK, Robeck TR. Preservation of beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) spermatozoa using a trehalose-based cryodiluent and directional freezing technology. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2010;22: 653–63.
O’Brien JK, Robeck TR. The relationship of maternal characteristics and circulating progesterone concentrations with reproductive outcome in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) after artificial insemination, with and without ovulation induction, and natural breeding. Theriogenology. 2012a;78:469–82.
O’Brien JK, Robeck TR. The value of ex situ cetacean populations in understanding reproductive physiology and developing assisted reproductive technology for ex situ and in situ species management and conservation efforts. Int J Comp Psychol. 2012b;23:227–48.
O’Brien JK, Steinman KJ, Robeck TR. Application of sperm sorting and associated reproductive technology for wildlife management and conservation. Theriogenology. 2009;71:98–101.
O’Brien JK, Steinman KJ, Schmitt TL, Robeck TR. Semen collection, characterisation and artificial insemination in the beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) using liquid-stored spermatozoa. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2008;20:770–83.
Odell DK, Bossart GD, Lowe MT, Hopkins TD. Reproduction of the West Indian manatee in captivity. In: O’Shea TJ, Ackerman BB, Percival HF, editors. Population biology of the Florida manatee. Information and Technology Report 1. USA: National Biological Service; 1995. p. 192–3.
Ohsumi S, Masaki Y. Biological parameters of the Antarctic minke whale at the virginal population level. J Fish Res Board Can. 1975;32:995–1004.
Oosthuizen WC, de Bruyn PJN, Bester MN. Unmarked individuals in mark-recapture studies: comparisons of marked and unmarked southern elephant seals at Marion Island. Austral Ecol. 2012;37:556–68.
Pabst DA, Rommel SA, McLellan WA. The functional morphology of marine mammals. In: Reynolds III JE, Rommel SA, editors. Biology of marine mammals. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1999. p. 15–72.
Panin M, Gabai G, Ballarin C, Peruffo A, Cozzi B. Evidence of melatonin secretion in cetaceans: plasma concentration and extrapineal HIOMT-like presence in the bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2012;177:238–45.
Parks SE, Brown MW, Conger LA, Hamilton PK, Knowlton AR, Kraus SD, Slay CK, Tyack PL. Occurrence, composition, and potential functions of North Atlantic right whale (Eubalaena glacialis) surface active groups. Mar Mamm Sci. 2007;23:868–87.
Parsons KM, Dallas JF, Claridge DE, Durban JW, Balcomb III KC, Thompson PM, Noble LR. Amplifying dolphin mitochondrial DNA from faecal plumes. Mol Ecol. 1999;8:1776–78.
Parsons KM, Durban JW, Claridge DE. Comparing two alternative methods for sampling small cetaceans for molecular analysis. Mar Mamm Sci. 2003;19:224–31.
Pérez S, García-López A, De Stephanis R, Giménez J, García-Tiscar S, Verborgh P, Mancera JM, Martínez-Rodriguez G. Use of blubber levels of progesterone to determine pregnancy in free-ranging live cetaceans. Mar Biol. 2011;158:1677–80.
Perrin WF, Henderson JR. Growth and reproductive rates in two populations of spinner dolphins, Stenella longirostris, with different histories of exploitation. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1984;6:417–30.
Perrin WF, Reilly SB. Reproductive parameters of dolphins and small whales of the family Delphinidae. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1984;6:97–133.
Perrin WF, Scott MD, Walker GJ, Cass VL. Review of geographical stocks of tropical dolphins (Stenella spp. and Delphinus delphis) in the eastern Pacific. In: NOAA Technical Report NMFS 28, US Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C.; 1985.
Perryman WL, Donahue MA, Perkins PC, Reilly SB. Gray whale calf production 1994–2000: are observed fluctuations related to changes in seasonal ice cover? Mar Mamm Sci. 2002;18:121–44.
Pietraszek J, Atkinson S. Concentrations of estrone sulfate and progesterone in plasma and saliva, vaginal cytology, and bioelectric impedance during the estrous cycle of the Hawaiian monk seal (Monachus schauinslandi). Mar Mamm Sci. 1994;10:430–41.
Plön S, Bernard RTF. A review of spermatozoan morphology in Cetacea with new data for the genus Kogia. J Zool. 2006;2006:466–73.
Preen AR. Observations of mating behaviour in dugongs (Dugong dugon). Mar Mamm Sci. 1989;5:382.
Preen AR. Interactions between dugongs and seagrasses in a sub-tropical environment. Unpublished PhD Thesis, James Cook University; Townsville, Queensland, Australia; 1992.
Rathbun GB, Reid JP, Bonde RK, Powell JA. Reproduction in free-ranging Florida manatees. In: O’Shea TJ, Ackerman BB, Percival HF, editors. Population biology of the Florida manatee. Information and Technology Report 1. USA: National Biological Service; 1995. p. 135–56.
Read AJ. Estimation of body condition in harbour porpoises, Phocoena phocoena. Can J Zool. 1990;68:1962–6.
Read AJ, Hohn AA. Life in the fast lane: the life history of harbor porpoises from the gulf of Maine. Mar Mamm Sci. 1995;11:423–40.
Reyes JC, Mead JG, Van Waerebeek K. A new species of beaked whale Mesoplodon peruvianus sp. N (Cetacea: Ziphiidae) from Peru. Mar Mamm Sci. 1991;7:1–24.
Ridgway S, Carder D, Jeffries M, Todd M. Spontaneous human speech mimicry by a cetacean. Curr Biol. 2012;22:860–1.
Ridgway SH, Scronce BL, Kanwisher J. Respiration and deep diving in the bottlenose porpoise. Science. 1969;166:1651–4.
Robeck TR. Advances in the understanding and manipulation of bottlenose dolphin reproduction. In: Duffield DA, Robeck TR, editors. Proceedings Bottlenose Dolphin Reproduction Workshop, San Diego, California; June 1999; 2000. p. 109–31.
Robeck TR, Atkinson SKC, Brook F. Reproduction. In: Dierauf LA, Gulland FMD, editors. CRC handbook of marine mammal medicine. 2nd ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001. p. 193–236.
Robeck TR, Curry BE, McBain JF, Kraemer DC. Reproductive biology of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) and the potential application of advanced reproductive technologies. J Zoo Wildl Med. 1994;25:321–36.
Robeck TR, McBain JF, Mathey S, Kraemer DC. Sonographic evaluation of the effects of exogenous gonadotrophin on follicular recruitment and ovulation induction in the Atlantic bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus. J Zoo Wildl Med. 1998;29:6–13.
Robeck TR, Monfort S. Characterization of male killer whale (Orcinus orca) sexual maturation and reproductive seasonality. Theriogenology. 2006;66:242–50.
Robeck TR, Monfort SL, Calle PP, Dunn JL, Jensen E, Boehm JR, Young S, Clark ST. Reproduction, growth and development in captive beluga (Delphinapterus leucus). Zoo Biol. 2005a;24:29–49.
Robeck TR, O’Brien JK. Effect of cryopreservation methods and precryopreservation storage on bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) spermatozoa. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:1340–8.
Robeck TR, Schneyer AL, McBain JF, Dalton LM, Walsh MT, Czekala NM, Kraemer DC. Analysis of urinary immunoreactive steroid metabolites and gonadotrophins for characterization of the estrous cycle, breeding period, and seasonal estrous activity of captive killer whales (Orcinus orca). Zoo Biol. 1993;12:173–87.
Robeck TR, Steinman KJ, Gearhart S, Reidarson TR, McBain JF, Monfort SL. Reproductive physiology and development of artificial insemination technology in killer whales (Orcinus orca). Biol Reprod. 2004;71:650–60.
Robeck TR, Steinman KJ, Montano GA, Katsumata E, Osborn S, Dalton L, Dunn JL, Schmidt TL, Reidarson TR, O’Brien JK. Deep intra-uterine artificial inseminations using cryopreserved spermatozoa in beluga (Delphinapterus leucas). J Theriogenol. 2010;74:989–1001.
Robeck TR, Steinman KJ, Ramirez K, Greenwell M, Van Bonn W, Yoshioka M, Katsumata E, Dalton L, Osborn S, O’Brien JK. Seasonality, estrous cycle characterization, estrus synchronization, semen cryopreservation and artificial insemination in the Pacific white-sided dolphin (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens). Reproduction. 2009;138:391–405.
Robeck TR, Steinman KJ, Yoshioka M, Jensen E, O’Brien JK, Katsumata E, Gili C, McBain JF, Sweeney J, Monfort SL. Estrous cycle characterization and artificial insemination using frozen-thawed spermatozoa in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). Reproduction. 2005b;129:659–74.
Rolland RM, Hamilton PK, Kraus SD, Davenport B, Gillett RM, Wasser SK. Faecal sampling using detection dogs to study reproduction and health in North Atlantic right whales (Eubalaena glacialis). J Cetac Res Manage. 2006;8:121–5.
Rolland RM, Hunt KE, Kraus SD, Wasser SK. Assessing reproductive status of right whales (Eubalaena glacialis) using fecal hormone metabolites. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2005;142: 308–17.
Rommel SA, Pabst DA, McLellan WA, Mead JG, Potter CW. Anatomical evidence for a countercurrent heat exchanger associated with dolphin testes. Anat Rec. 1992;232:150–6.
Rowntree VJ, Payne RS, Schell DM. Changing patterns of habitat use by southern right whales (Eubalaena australis) on their nursery ground at Península Valdés, Argentina, and in their long-range movements. J Cetacean Res Manag. 2001;2:133–43.
Russell DJF, McConnell B, Thompson D, Duck C, Morris C, Harwood J, Matthiopoulos J. Uncovering the links between foraging and breeding regions in a highly mobile mammal. J Appl Ecol. 2013;50:499–509.
Schaefer AM, Stavros H-CW, Bossart GD, Fair PA, Goldstein JD, Reif JS. Associations between mercury and hepatic, renal, endocrine, and hematological parameters in Atlantic bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) along the eastern coast of Florida and South Carolina. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2011;61:688–95.
Schipper J, Chanson JS, Chiozza F, et al. The status of the world’s land and marine mammals: diversity, threat, and knowledge. Science. 2008;322:225–30.
Schmitt TL, St. Aubin DJ, Schaeffer AM, Dunn JL. Baseline, diurnal variations and stress-induced changes of stress hormones in three captive beluga whales, Delphinapterus leucas. Mar Mamm Sci. 2010;26:635–47.
Schroeder JP, Keller KV. Seasonality of serum testosterone levels and sperm density in Tursiops truncatus. J Exp Zool. 1989;249:316–21.
Schwabe C, Büllesbach EE, Heyn H, Toshioka M. Cetacean relaxin: isolation and sequence of relaxins from Balaenoptera acutorostrata and Balaenoptera edeni. J Biol Chem. 1989;264: 940–3.
Shane SH, Wells RS, Würsig B. Ecology, behavior and social organization of the bottlenose dolphin: a review. Mar Mamm Sci. 1986;2:34–63.
Schwarzenberger F, Möstl E, Palme R, Bamberg E. Faecal steroid analysis for non-invasive monitoring of reproductive status in farm, wild and zoo animals. Anim Reprod Sci. 1996;42:515–26.
Scott EM, Mann J, Watson-Capps JJ, Sargeant BL, Connor RC. Aggression in bottlenose dolphins: evidence for sexual coercion, male-male competition, and female tolerance through analysis of tooth-rake marks and behaviour. Behaviour. 2005;142:21–44.
Scott MD, Wells RS, Irvine AB. A long-term study of bottlenose dolphins on the west coast of Florida. In: Leatherwood SJ, Reeves RR, editors. The bottlenose dolphin. San Diego, CA: Academic; 1990. p. 235–44.
Smith SC, Whitehead H. The diet of Galapagos sperm whales Physeter macrocephalus as indicated by fecal sample analysis. Mar Mamm Sci. 2006;16:315–25.
Smolker RA, Richards AF, Connor RC, Pepper JW. Sex differences in patterns of association among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behaviour. 1992;123:38–69.
Stacey PJ, Baird RW. Birth of a ‘resident’ killer whale off Victoria, British Columbia, Canada. Mar Mamm Sci. 1997;13:504–8.
Steinman KJ, O’Brien JK, Monfort SL, Robeck TR. Characterization of the estrous cycle in female beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) using urinary endocrine monitoring and transabdominal ultrasound: evidence of facultative induced ovulation. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2012;175:389–97.
Sumich J, Goff T, Perryman WL. Growth of two captive gray whale calves. Aquat Mamm. 2001;27:231–3.
Suzuki T, Mogoe T, Asada M, Miyamoto A, Tetsuka M, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, Fukui Y. Plasma and pituitary concentrations of gonadotropins (FSH and LH) in minke whale (Balaenoptera acutorostrata) during the feeding season. Theriogenology. 2001;55:1127–41.
Tavolga MC, Essapian FS. The behavior of the bottle-nosed dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): mating, pregnancy, parturition and mother-infant behavior. Zoologica. 1957;42:11–31.
Terasawa F, Yokoyama Y, Kitamure M. Rectal temperature before and after parturition in bottlenose dolphins. Zoo Biol. 1999;18:153–6.
Thewissen JGM, Heyning J. Embryogenesis and development in Stenella attenuata and other cetaceans. In: Miller D, editor. Reproductive biology and phylogeny of Cetacea: whales, dolphin and porpoises. Enfield, NH: Science Publishers, Inc.; 2007. p. 307–29.
Thompson KV, Baker CS, van Helden A, Patel S, Millar C, Constantine R. The world’s rarest whale. Curr Biol. 2012;22:905–6.
Touma C, Palme R. Measuring fecal glucocorticoid metabolites in mammals and birds: the importance of validation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2005;1046:54–74.
Tremellen KP, Kolo M, Gilmore A, Laekamge DN. Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2006;45:20–4.
Tripp KM, Verstegen JP, Deutsch CJ, Bonde RK, Rodriguez M, Morales B, Schmitt DL, Harr KE. Validation of a serum immunoassay to measure progesterone and diagnose pregnancy in the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus). Theriogenology. 2008;70:1030–40.
Tripp KM, Verstegen JP, Deutsch CJ, Bonde RK, de Wit M, Manire CA, Gaspard J, Harr KE. Evaluation of adrenocortical function in Florida manatees (Trichechus manatus latirostris). Zoo Biol. 2010;29:1–15.
Trout T. Comment on ‘Determination of testosterone in saliva and blow of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry’. J Chromatogr B. 2008;863:192–3.
Van der Schoot P. Studies on the fetal development of the gubernaclum in cetacea. Anat Rec. 1995;243:449–60.
Van Waerebeek K, Read AJ. Reproduction of dusky dolphins, Lagenorhynchus obscurus, from coastal Peru. J Mammal. 1994;75:1054–62.
Vergara V, Michaud R, Barrett-Lennard L. What can captive whales tell us about their wild counterparts? Identification, usage, and ontogeny of contact calls in belugas (Delphinapterus leucas). Int J Comp Psychol. 2010;23:278–309.
Villegas-Amtmann S, Atkinson S, Costa DP. Low synchrony in the breeding cycle of Galapagos sea lions revealed by seasonal progesterone concentrations. J Mammal. 2009;90: 1232–7.
Wakai Y, Hasegawa K, Sakamoto S, Asano S, Watanabe G, Taya K. Annual changes of urinary progesterone and estradiol-17β of the dugong (Dugong dugon) in captivity. Zool Sci. 2002;19:679–82.
Walker L, Cornell L, Dahl K, Czekala N, Dargen C, Joseph B, Hsueh A, Lasley B. Urinary concentrations of ovarian steroid hormone metabolites and bioactive follicle-stimulating hormone in killer whales (Orcinus orcus) during ovarian cycles and pregnancy. Biol Reprod. 1988;39:1013.
Waples KA, Gales NJ. Evaluating and minimising social stress in the care of captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Zoo Biol. 2002;21:5–26.
Watanabe H, Mogoe T, Asada M, Hayashi K, Fujise Y, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, Miyamoto A, Fukui Y. Relationship between serum sex hormone concentrations and histology of seminiferous tubules of captured baleen whales in the western North Pacific during the feeding season. J Reprod Dev. 2004;50:419–27.
Watanabe H, Tateno H, Kusakbe H, Matsuoka T, Kamiguchi Y, Fujise Y, Ishikawa H, Ohsumi S, Fukui Y. Fertilizability and chromosomal integrity of frozen-thawed Bryde’s whale (Balaenoptera edeni) spermatozoa intracytoplasmically injected into mouse oocytes. Zygote. 2007;15:9–14.
Wells RS. Reproduction in wild bottlenose dolphins: overview of the patterns observed during a long-term study. In: Duffield DA, Robeck TR, editors. Proceedings Bottlenose Dolphin Reproduction Workshop; June 1999; San Diego, California; 2000. p. 57–74.
Wells RS. Dolphin social complexity: lessons from long-term study and life history. In: de Waal FBM, Tyack PL, editors. Animal social complexity: intelligence, culture, and individualized societies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2003. p. 32–56.
Wells RS, Rhinehart HL, Hansen LJ, Sweeney JC, Townsend FI, Stone R, Casper DR, Scott MD, Hohn AA, Rowles TK. Bottlenose dolphins as marine ecosystem sentinels: developing a health monitoring system. Ecohealth. 2004;1:246–54.
Wells RS, Tornero V, Borrell A, Aguilar A, Rowles TK, Rhinehart HL, Hofmann S, Jarman WM, Hohn AA, Sweeney JC. Integrating potential life-history and reproductive success data to examine relationships with organochlorine compounds for bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Sarasota Bay, Florida. Sci Total Environ. 2005;349:106–19.
West K, Atkinson S, Carmichael M, Sweeney J, Krames B, Krames J. Concentrations of progesterone in milk from bottlenose dolphins during different reproductive states. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2000;117:218–24.
Wetzel DL, Reynolds III JE, Breuel KF, Roudebush WE. Validation of an inhibin-B ELISA for use in an endangered marine mammal, the West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus). Biol Reprod Suppl. 2009;215:97–7.
Whitehead H. The behaviour of mature male sperm whales on the Galapagos Islands breeding grounds. Can J Zool. 1993;71:689–99.
Whitehead H. Delayed competitive breeding in roving males. J Theor Biol. 1994;166:127–33.
Whitehead H, Mann J. Female reproductive strategies of cetaceans. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H, editors. Cetacean Societies: field studies of dolphins and whales. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2000. p. 219–46.
Williamson P, Gales NJ, Lister S. Use of real-time B-mode ultrasound for pregnancy diagnosis and measurement of fetal growth in captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). J Reprod Fertil. 1990;88:543–8.
Wilson RC, Reynolds III JE, Wetzel DL, Schwierzke-Wade L, Bonde RK, Breuel KF, Roudebush WE. Secretion of anti-Müllerian hormone in the Florida manatee Trichechus manatus latirostris, with implications for assessing conservation status. Endanger Species Res. 2011;14:107–12.
Würsig B, Jefferson TA. Methods of photo-identification for small cetaceans. Rep Int Whaling Comm. 1990;12:43–52.
Yoshioka M, Aida K, Hanyu I. Annual changes in serum reproductive hormone levels in captive bottlenose dolphins. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish. 1986;52:1939–46.
Yoshioka M, Okumura T, Aida K, Fujise Y. A proposed technique for quantifying muscle progesterone content in minke whales (Balaenoptera acutorostrata). Can J Zool. 1994;72:368–70.
Yochem PK, Leatherwood S. Blue whale Balaenoptera musculus (Linnaeus, 1758). In: Ridgway SH, Harrison R, editors. Handbook of marine mammals, The sirenians and baleen whales, vol. 3. London: Academic; 1985. p. 193–240.
Yuen QWH, Brook FM, Kinoshita RE, Ying MTC. Semen collection and ejaculate characteristics in the Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus). J Androl. 2009;30:432–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lanyon, J.M., Burgess, E.A. (2014). Methods to Examine Reproductive Biology in Free-Ranging, Fully-Marine Mammals. In: Holt, W., Brown, J., Comizzoli, P. (eds) Reproductive Sciences in Animal Conservation. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 753. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0820-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0820-2_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4939-0819-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4939-0820-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)