Abstract
The manner in which subjects in laboratory research perceive, understand, and respond to the situations created for them has been a topic of widespread interest and great controversy throughout the history of psychology. One could argue, in fact, that no serious examination of human behavior can escape considering the subjects’ understanding of the situations in which they are studied: Regardless of whether people have an accurate understanding of their world, they base their actions (at least in part) on the world as they understand it (see Heider, 1958; Kelley, 1967, 1973; Kelly, 1955; Jones & Davis, 1965). Laboratory research is, of course, an attempt to create a highly controlled, well-specified situation in order to test propositions about subjects’ responses to that situation. This chapter will emphasize that a complete understanding of a subject’s actions in the laboratory requires a careful assessment of the subject’s perceptions of that situation, and also that careful attention be given to a number of potential pitfalls.* Both the essential nature of assessing the subject’s psychological state, and the dangers lurking in such assessment, can be demonstrated by considering as our starting point the role of the manipulation check in experimental research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adair, J. G., & Schachter, B. S. (1972). To cooperate or to look good? The subjects’ and experimenters’ perceptions of each others’ intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 74–85.
Adair, J. G., & Spinner, B. (1981). Subjects’ access to cognitive processes: Demand characteristics and verbal report. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 11, 31–52.
Adair, J. G., Spinner, B., Carlopio, J., & Lindsay, R. (1983). Where is the source of artifact? Subject roles or hypothesis learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1229–1231.
Anastasi, A. (1976). Psychological testing (4th ed.). New York: Macmillan Co.
Asher, H. B. (1963). Causal modeling (2nd ed.). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Betancourt, H., & Weiner, B. (1982). Attributions for achievement-related events, expectancy, and sentiments: A study of success and failure in Chile and the United States. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 13, 362–374.
Bracht, G. H., & Glass, G. V. (1968). The external validity of experiments. American Educational Research Journal, 5, 437–474.
Brunson, B. I., & Matthews, K. A. (1981). The Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern and reactions to uncontrollable stress: An analysis of performance strategies, affect, and attributions during failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 906–918.
Campbell, D. T. (1963). From description to experimentation: Interpreting trends as quasi-experiments. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Carlopio, J., Adair, J. G., Lindsay, R. C. L., & Spinner, B. (1983). Avoiding artifact in the search for bias: The importance of assessing subjects’ perceptions of the experiment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 693–701.
Carlsmith, J. M., Ellsworth, P. C., & Aronson, E. (1976). Methods of research in social psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Carlston, D. E., & Cohen, J. L. (1980). A closer examination of subject roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 857–870.
Carlston, D. E., & Cohen, J. L. (1983). Avoiding bias in the search for artifact: A reply to Carlopio, Adair, Lindsay, and Spinner. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1225–1228.
Christensen, L. (1977). The negative subject: Myth, reality, or a prior experimental experience effect?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 392–400.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Crano, W. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1986). Principles and methods of social research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive: Studies in evaluation dependence. New York: Wiley.
Edwards, A. L. (1957). Techniques of attitude scale construction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Elig, T. W., & Frieze, I. H. (1979). Measuring causal attributions for success and failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 621–634.
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87, 215–251.
Fillenbaum, S. (1966). Prior description and subsequent experimental performance: The “faithful” subject. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 532–537.
Fillenbaum, S., & Frey, R. (1970). More on the “faithful” behavior of suspicious subjects. Journal of Personality, 38, 43–51.
Gaito, J. (1980). Measurement scales and statistics: Resurgence of an old misconception. Psychological Bulletin, 87, 564–567.
Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York: Wiley.
Heise, D. R. (1975). Causal analysis. New York: Wiley.
Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and philosophy. New York: Harper & Row.
Henshel, R. L. (1980). The purposes of laboratory experimentation and the virtues of deliberate artificiality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16, 466–478.
Jones, E. E., & Davis, K. E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attribution process in person perception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 219–266). New York: Academic Press.
Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software, Inc.
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981a). Estimating the effects of social interventions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981b). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619.
Kazdin, A. E. (1980). Research design in clinical psychology. New York: Harper & Row.
Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 15, pp. 192–240). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.
Kenny, D. A. (1979). Correlation and causality. New York: Wiley.
Kidder, L. H., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Research methods in social relations (5th ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
Krantz, S. E., & Rude, S. (1984). Depressive attributions: Selection of different causes or assignment of dimensional meanings?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 193-203.
Kruglanski, A. W. (1975). The human subject in the psychology experiment: Fact and artifact. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8, pp. 101–147). New York: Academic Press.
Lana, R. E. (1969). Pretest sensitization. In R. Rosenthal & R. Rosnow (Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research (pp. 119–141). New York: Academic Press.
Lodge, M. (1981). Magnitude scaling: Quantitative measurement of opinions. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Masling, J. (1966). Role-related behavior of the subject and psychologist and its effects upon psychological data. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (Vol. 14, pp. 67–103). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (1985). Measurement scales and statistics: An examination of construct validity. Psychological Bulletin, 97, 85–93.
Meyer, J. P. (1980). Causal attributions for success and failure: A multivariate investigation of dimensionality, formation, and consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 704–718.
Meyer, J. P., & Koelbl, S. L. M. (1982). Students’ test performance: Dimensionality of causal attributions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 31–36.
Micheli, J. (1986). Measurement scales and statistics: A clash of paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 398–407.
Musante, L., MacDougall, J. M., & Dembroski, T. M. (1984). The Type A behavior pattern and attributions for success and failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 10, 544–553.
Nisbett, R. E., & Bellows, N. (1977). Verbal reports about causal influences on social judgments: Private access versus public theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 613–624.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84, 231–259.
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776–783.
Orne, M. T. (1973). Communication by the total experimental situation: Why it is important, how it is evaluated, and its significance for the ecological validity of findings. In P. Pliner, L. Krames, & T. Alloway (Eds.), Communication and affect. New York: Academic Press.
Ostrove, N. (1978). Expectations for success on effort-determined tasks as a function of incentive and performance feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 909–916.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609.
Pittman, T. S., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1985). Motivation and attribution: The effects of control deprivation on subsequent information processing. In J. H. Harvey & G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 117–141). New York: Academic Press.
Rhodewalt, F. (1984). Self-attribution, self-involvement, and the Type A coronary-prone behavior pattern. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 662–670.
Ronis, D. L., Hansen, R. D., & O’Leary, V. E. (1983). Understanding the meaning of achievement attributions: A test of derived locus and stability scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 702–711.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). When dissonance fails: On eliminating evaluation apprehension from attitude measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 28–42.
Rosenberg, M. (1969). The conditions and consequences of evaluation apprehension. In R. Rosenthal & R. Rosnow (Eds.), Artifact in behavioral research (pp. 279–349). New York: Academic Press.
Rosenthal, R., & Gaito, J. (1963). The interpretation of levels of significance by psychological researchers. Journal of Psychology, 55, 33–38.
Rosenthal, R., & Gaito, J. (1964). Further evidence for the cliff effect in the interpretation of levels of significance. Psychological Reports, 15, 570.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (Eds.). (1969). Artifact in behavioral research. New York: Academic Press.
Russell, D. (1982). The causal dimension scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 1137–1145.
Spinner, B., Adair, J. G., & Barnes, G. E. (1977). A reexamination of the faithful subject role. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 543–551.
Stacy, A. W., Widaman, K. F., Hays, R., & DiMatteo, M. R. (1985). Validity of self-reports of alcohol and other drug use: A multitrait-multimethod assessment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 219–232.
Stevens, S.S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103, 677–680.
Stevens, S. S. (1968). Measurement, statistics, and the sche-mapiric view. Science, 161, 849–856.
Strube, M. J. (1986, August). Type A behavior and post-performance attributions. Presented at the 94th meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
Strube, M. J., & Boland, S. M. (1986). Post-performance attributions and task persistence among Type A and B individuals: A clarification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 413–420.
Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F.G. (1984). Measurement scales and statistics: The misconception misconceived. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 394–401.
Valle, V. A., & Frieze, I. H. (1976). Stability of causal attributions as a mediator in changing expectations for success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 579–587.
Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1966). Unobtrusive measures: Nonreactive research in the social sciences. Chicago: Rand McNally.
Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D., Sechrest, L., & Grove, L. (1981). Nonreactive measures in the social sciences. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Weber, S. J., & Cook, T. D. (1972). Subject effects in laboratory research: An examination of subject roles, demand characteristics, and valid inference. Psychological Bulletin, 77, 273–295.
Wegener, B. (Ed.). (1982). Social attitudes and psychophysical measurement. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Weiner, B. (1979). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 3–25.
Weiner, B., Nierenberg, R., & Goldstein, M. (1976). Social learning (locus of control) versus attribution (causal stability) interpretations of expectancy of success. Journal of Personality, 44, 52–68.
White, P. (1980). Limitations on verbal reports of internal events: A refutation of Nisbett and Wilson and of Bern. Psychological Review, 87, 105–112.
Wilson, T. D. (1985). Strangers to ourselves: The origins and accuracy of beliefs about one’s own mental states. In J. H. Harvey & G. Weary (Eds.), Attribution: Basic issues and applications (pp. 9–36). New York: Academic Press.
Wilson, T. D., Dunn, D. S., Bybee, J. A., Hyman, D. B., & Rotondo, J. A. (1984). Effects of analyzing reasons on attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 5–16.
Wilson, T. D., Hull, J. G., & Johnson, J. (1981). Awareness and self-perception: Verbal reports on internal states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 53–71.
Wong, P. T. P., & Weiner, B. (1981). When people ask “why” questions, and the heuristics of attributional search. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 650–663.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1989 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Strube, M.J. (1989). Assessing Subjects’ Construal of the Laboratory Situation. In: Schneiderman, N., Weiss, S.M., Kaufmann, P.G. (eds) Handbook of Research Methods in Cardiovascular Behavioral Medicine. The Springer Series in Behavioral Psychophysiology and Medicine. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0906-0_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0906-0_33
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0908-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0906-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive