Skip to main content

Miocene Hominoid Mandibles

Functional and Phylogenetic Perspectives

  • Chapter
Function, Phylogeny, and Fossils

Part of the book series: Advances in Primatology ((AIPR))

Abstract

It is axiomatic in vertebrate paleontology that mandibles and mandibular fragments are among the most frequently recovered specimens from fossil localities. The dense, cohesive structure of the mandibular corpus and embedded tooth roots improve the likelihood that they will survive, in some form, the vagaries of deposition and postdepositional diagenetic processes. This is as true in the hominoid fossil record as it is in other areas of paleontology, a fact that mandates continuing analysis of the factors that mediate mandibular size and shape. As is true for all mammals, the morphology of primate mandibles is influenced in many ways, including patterns of food procurement, masticatory mechanics, cranial growth trajectories, and body size. Such influences can be analyzed to reconstruct functional/behavioral patterns, and, to a more limited extent, provide data useful in phylogenetic assessments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, P. J. 1978. A revision of the Miocene Hominoidea of East Africa. Bull. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Geol. 30: 85–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. S., Rose, R. M., and Gordon, T. P. 1974. Behavioral and environmental events influencing primate testosterone levels. J. Hum. Evol. 3: 517–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonis, L. de, and Koufos, G. D. 1993. The face and the mandible of Ouranopithecus macedoniensis: Description of new specimens and comparisons. J. Hum. Evol. 24: 469–491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonis, L. de, and Melentis, J. 1977. Les primates hominoides du Ballesien de Macedoine (Greece). Etude de la Machoire inferieure. Geobios 10: 849–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonis, L. de, and Melentis, J. 1980. Nouveles remarquest sur l’anatomie d’un Primate hominoide du Miocene: Ouranopithecus macedoniensis. Implications sur la phylogenie de Hominides. C. R. Acad. Sci. 290: 755–758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonis, L. de, Johanson, D., Melentis, J. and White, T. 1981. Variations metriques de la denture chez les Hominides primitifs: Comparaison entre Australopithecus afarensis et Ouranopithecus macedoniensis. C. R. Acad. Sci. 292: 373–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B. 1989. The Mandibles of Sivapithecus. Ph.D. dissertation, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, B., Ward, S. C., and Hill, A. 1995. New Kenyapithecus partial skeleton from the Tugen Hills, Baringo District, Kenya. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 20: 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., and Povirk, G. 1996. Assessing errors introduced by modeling the anisotropic human mandible isotropically with finite element method. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. Suppl. 22: 83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conroy, G. C., Pickford, M., Senut, B., van Couvering, J., and Mein, P. 1992. Otavipithecus namibiensis, first Miocene hominoid from southern Africa. Nature 356: 144–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daegling, D. J. 1989. Biomechanics of cross-sectional size and shape in the hominoid mandibular corpus. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 80: 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daegling, D. J., Ravosa, M. J., Johnson, K. R., and Hylander, W. 1992. Influence of teeth, alveoli, and periodontal ligaments on torsional rigidity in human mandibles. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 89: 59–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., and Wilson, M. 1983. Sex, Evolution, and Behavior. Willard Grant Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, V. H., and Burstein, A. H. 1965. Load capacity of tubular bone. In: Biomechanics and Related Bio-Engineering Topics. Pergamon, London, p. 382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, V. H., and Burstein, A. H. 1970. Orthopaedic Biomechanics. Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B. M. F. 1978. Orangutan Adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve, Central Borneo. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. R. 1979. Cuckoldry in sunfishes. (Lepomis: Centrarchidae). J. Zool. 57: 1507–1509.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. R., and Charnov, E. L. 1980. Alternative male life histories in bluegill sunfish. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 77: 6937–6940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hylander, W. L. 1979. The functional significance of primate mandibular form. J. Morphol. 160: 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hylander, W. L. 1984. Stress and strain in the mandibular symphysis of primates: A test of competing hypotheses. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 64: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hylander, W. L. 1985. Mandibular function and biomechanical stress and scaling. Am. Zool. 25: 315–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylander, W. L. 1988. Implications of in vivo experiments for interpreting the functional significance of “robust” australopithecine jaws. In: F. Grine (ed.), Evolutionary History of the “Robust” Australopithecines, pp. 55–83. Aldine De Gruyter, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishida, H., Pickford, M., Nakaya, H., and Nakano, Y. 1984. Fossil anthropoids from Nachola and Samburu Hills, Samburu District, Kenya. Afr. Stud. Monogr. Suppl. 2: 73–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J. 1988. A new large ‘species of Sivapithecus from the Siwaliks of Pakistan. J. Hum. Evol. 17: 305–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J., and Pilbeam, D. 1986. The dryopithecines: Taxonomy, comparative anatomy, and phylogeny of Miocene large hominoids. In: D. R. Swindler and J. Irwin (eds.), Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. I: Systematics, Evolution and Anatomy, pp. 361–411. Liss, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley, S. 1982. Causes of non-breeding and the development of the secondary sexual characteristics in the male orang utan: A hormonal study. In: L. E. M. de Boer (ed.), The Orangutan. Its Biology and Conservation, pp. 215–229. Junk, The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koufos, G. D. 1993. Mandible of Ouranopithecus macedoniensis (Hominidae, Primates) from a new Late Miocene locality of Macedonia (Greece). Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 91: 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey, R. E., and Walker, A. C. 1985. New higher primates from the Miocene of Buluk, Kenya. Nature 318: 173–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leakey, R. E., Leakey, M. G., and Walker, A. C. 1988. Morphology of Afropithecus turkanensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, C. O., Burstein, A. H., and Heiple, K. G. 1976. The biomechanical analysis of bone strength: A method and its application to platycnemia. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 44: 489–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrossin, M., and Benefit, B. R. 1993. Recently recovered Kenyapithecus mandible and its implications for great ape and human origins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 1962–1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, J. 1974. The behavior and ecology of wild orangutan populations. In: D. A. Hamburg and E. R. McCown (eds.), The Great Apes, pp. 257–274. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maple, T. L. 1980. Orang-utan Behavior. Litton Educational Publishing, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickford, M. 1982. New higher primate fossils from the middle Miocene deposits at Majiwa and Kaloma, western Kenya. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 58: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickford, M. 1985. A new look at Kenyapithecus based on recent discoveries in western Kenya. J. Hum. Evol. 14: 113–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravosa, M. J. 1991. Structural allometry of the prosimian mandibular corpus and symphysis. J. Hum. Evol. 20: 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remis, M. 1994. Feeding Ecology and Positional Behavior of Western Lowland Gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) in the Central African Republic. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijksen, H. D. 1978. A field study on Sumatran orang utans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii Lesson 1827): Ecology, behavior, and conservation. H. Veenman & Zonen B. V. Wageningen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S. 1977. Feeding behavior of orangutans of the Kutai Nature Reserve, East Kalimantan. In: T. H. Clutton-Brock (ed.), Primate Ecology: Studies of Feeding and Ranging Behavior in Lemurs, Monkeys, and Apes. pp. 383–413. Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S. 1978. Diets, densities, and distributions of Bornean primates. In: G. G. Montgomery (ed.), The Ecology of Arboreal Folivores, pp. 465–478. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S. 1988. Diversity and consistency in ecology and behavior. In: J. H. Schwartz (ed.), Orang-utan Biology, pp. 21–51. Oxford University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S., and Mitani, J. C. 1987. Orangutans: Sexual dimorphism in a solitary species. In: B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, and T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), Primate Societies, pp. 146–154. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B. T. 1985. The ontogeny of sexual dimorphism in the African apes. Am. J. Primatol. 8: 183–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, B. T. 1986. Ontogenetic approaches to sexual dimorphism. Hum. Evol. 1: 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, E. L., and Meinel, W. 1983. Mandibular ontogeny in the Miocene great ape Dryopithecus. Int. J. Primatol. 4: 331–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. 1983. The mandibular corpus of female primates: Taxonomic, dietary, and allometric correlates of interspecific variations in size and shape. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 61: 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. F., and Kowalski, C. J. 1972. On the growth of the mandible. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 36: 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1997 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brown, B. (1997). Miocene Hominoid Mandibles. In: Begun, D.R., Ward, C.V., Rose, M.D. (eds) Function, Phylogeny, and Fossils. Advances in Primatology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0075-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0075-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4899-0077-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4899-0075-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics