Abstract
Whether in ethnographic or in archaeological contexts, the use of tools can be best understood in terms of “operational sequences” (Creswell 1976). Operational sequences involve four linked sets of activities; material procurement, manufacturing, utilization, and discard. Many analyses of Levantine Mousterian assemblages have attempted to reconstruct the adaptive context of stone tool production and use (Binford 1968; Jelinek 1982; Munday 1979; Marks 1988; BarYosef and Meignen 1992). Yet, most of these reconstructions have emphasized only the initial stages of the operational sequence. Actualistic studies suggest that tool utilization and discard behavior have a profound effect on the structure of the archaeological record (see examples in Schiffer 1987). Thus, our ignorance of Levantine Mousterian tool use and discard patterns presents a major obstacle to a comprehensive explanation of Levantine Mousterian industrial variability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shea, J.J. (1995). Lithic Microwear Analysis of Tor Faraj Rockshelter. In: Prehistoric Cultural Ecology and Evolution. Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2397-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-2397-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4419-3246-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4757-2397-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive