Abstract
It is a commonplace psycholinguistic observation that comprehension and production are not equivalent functions. In considering the development of these functions in the young child we have evidence that points in several directions, whether we look at phonology, syntax or lexis. In the realm of lexis — to which our observations will be confined — Huttenlocher (1974) and Benedict (1979) have shown that one-year-olds comprehend several words that they do not produce. However, when such words do begin to be produced their ranges of application often exceed the comprehension ranges — a result confirmed by Thomson & Chapman (1977). Although now such words are produced more freely than they are comprehended, it is not said that this development presents a case of production leading comprehension, since in the data so far examined comprehension is conventionally accurate while production is typically overextended. This neatly illustrates the fact that in describing the development of these functions we are dealing with two dinstinct ideals:-
-
(a)
coincidence of the ranges of application of a word in comprehension and production, and
-
(b)
correspondence of the ranges with the adult range.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BENEDICT H, 1979, Early lexical development: comprehension and production. Journal of Child Language 6: 183–200.
BERLIN B. & KAY P., 1969, Basic color terms: Their universality and evolution. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press.
CAMPBELL R.N. & BOWE T.E., 1978, Functional asymmetry in early child language. In “Salzburger Beiträge zur Linguistik 4”. G. Drachman ed., Salzburg: Wolfgang Neugebauer.
CLARK R., 1974, Performing without competence, Journal of Child Language 1:1–10.
DOCKRELL J.E., 1981, The child’s acquisition of unfamiliar words: an experimental study, Univ. Stirling Ph. D. Dissertation.
GENTNER D., 1978, On relational meaning. The acquisition of verb meaning, Child Development, 49: 988–999
HOOGENRAAD R., Grieve R., Baldwin P. & Campbell R.N., 1978, Comprehension as an active process. In “Recent advances in the psychology of language: Language development and mother-child interaction”, R.N. Campbell & P.T. Smith eds., New York: Plenum Press.
HUTTENLOCHER J., 1974, The origins of language comprehension. In “Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola symposium”, R.L. Solso ed., Potomac, Md.: Erlbaum.
KARMILOFF-SMITH A., 1978, The interplay between syntax, semantics and phonology in language acquisition processes, In “Recent advances in the psychology of language: Language development and mother-child interaction”, R.N. Campbell & P.T. Smith ed., New York: Plenum Press.
THOMSON J.R. & CHAPMAN R.S., 1977, Who is ‘Daddy’? The status of 2-year-olds overextended words in use and comprehension. Journal of Child Language, 4:359–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1982 Plenum Press, New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Campbell, R.N., Macdonald, T.B., Dockrell, J.E. (1982). The Relationship between Comprehension and Production and Its Ontogenesis. In: Lowenthal, F., Vandamme, F., Cordier, J. (eds) Language and Language Acquisition. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9099-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-9099-2_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-9101-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-9099-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive