Skip to main content

The Methodology of Phylogenetic Inference Above the Species Level

  • Chapter
Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution

Part of the book series: NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series ((NSSB,volume 14))

Abstract

The determination of the relationships of organisms in time and space is the process called phylogenetic inference. The process is termed an inference because one cannot directly observe evolution above the species level, and therefore, one must infer such relationships. Furthermore, it is impossible to devise experiments to directly test such relationships, but that does not mean that they cannot be falsified by new data, such as the discovery of new fossils or recent organisms, or the re-analysis of the characters of previously known organisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Avise, J.C. and Ayala, F.J., 1975, Genetic change and rates of cladogenesis. Genetics 81: 757–773.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ayala, F.J., 1975, Genetic differentiation during the speciation process. Evol. Biol., 8: 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannikov, A.G., 1958, Die Biologie des Froschzahnmolches Ranodon sibiricus Kessler. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. f. Syst., 83: 2 E2 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J., 1965, The role of adaptive mechanisms in the origin of higher levels of organization. Syst. Zool., 14: 272–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, W.J., 1973, Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary classification. Syst. Zool., 22: 375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonde, N., 1975, Origin of “higher groups”: viewpoints of phylogenetic systematics, Prob. Actuels Paleo., Evol. Vert., Colloques Inter. C.N.R.S., 218: 293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camin, J.H. and Sokal, R.R., 1965, A method for deducing branching sequences in phylogeny. Evol., 19: 311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, C.L., 1923, Classification of the lizards. Bull. Amer. Mus. Nat. Hist., 48: 289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cracraft, J., 1974, Phylogenetic models and classification. Syst. Zool., 23: 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, E.R., 1941, The “opercularis” muscle of salamanders. J. Morph., 69: 207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J.L., 1976, Spinal nerves and their bearing on salamander phylogeny. J. Morph., 148: 305.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and Gould, S.J., 1972, Punctuated equilibria: An alternative to phyletic gradualism, in “Models in Paleobiology” (T.J.M. Schopf, ed.), pp. 82–115, Freeman, Cooper, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge, N. and Tattersall, I., 1975, Evolutionary models, phylogenetic reconstruction, and another look at hominid phylogeny. Contrib. Primat., 5: 218–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R., 1964, Fossil vertebrates from the Late Cretaceous Lance Formation, eastern Wyoming, Univ. Calif. Publ. Geol. Scis., 49: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R., 1975, Lower Vertebrates from the Fort Union Formation, Late Paleocene, Big Horn Basin, Wyoming. Herpetologica 31: 365–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estes, R., Hecht, M. and Hoffstetter, R., 1967, Paleocene amphibians from Cernay, France. Amer. Mus. Novitates., 2295: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch, W.M. and Margoliash, E., 1970, The usefulness of amino acid and nucleotide sequences in evolutionary studies. Evol. Biol., 4: 67–109.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gingerich, P.D., 1976, Paleontology and phylogeny: patterns of evolution at the species level in Early Tertiary mammals. Amer. J. Sci., 276: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goin, C.J. and Goin, O.B., 1962, “Introduction to herpetology,” W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, C.W., Jr., 1976, Phylogenetic inference in paleontology. J. Paleo., 50: 180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, M.K., 1957, A case of parallel evolution in salamanders. Proc. Zool. Soc., Calcutta, Mookerjee Memor., Vol: 283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, M.K., 1974, Morphological transformation, the fossil record, and the mechanisms of evolution: A debate, Part I. Evol. Biol., 8: 295–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, M.K., 1976, Phylogenetic inference and methodology as applied to the vertebrate record. Evol. Biol., 9: 335–363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, M.K. and Edwards, J.L., 1976, The determination of parallel or monophyletic relationships: the proteid salamanders a test case. Amer. Natur., 110: 653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennig, W., 1966, “Phylogenetic systematics,” University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herre, W., 1935, Die Schwanzlurche der mitteleocanen (oberlutetischen) Braunkohle des Geiseltales und die Phylogenie der Urodelen unter Einschluss der fossilen Formen. Zoologica, 33: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer, W.R., 1975, A preliminary analysis of the intergeneric relationships of the frog family Leptodactylidae. Smithsonian Contribution to Zoology, 233: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffstetter, R., 1955 Squamates de type moderne, “Traite de paleontologie, 5. Amphibiens, reptiles et oiseaux,” (J. Piveteau, ed.), pp. 606–662, Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffstetter, R., 1962, Revue des recentes acquisitions concernant l’histoire et la systematique des squamates. Colloques Inter. C. N. R. S., 104: 243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffstetter, R., 1964, Les Sauria du Jurassique superieur et specialment les Gekkota de Baviere et de Mandchourie, Senskenbergiana Biol., 45: 281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffstetter, R. and Gasc, J.P., 1969, Vertebrae and ribs of modern reptiles, in “Biology of the Reptilia, vol. 1” (C. Gans, A. d’A. Bellairs and T.S. Parsons, eds.), pp. 201–310, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holder, L.A., 1960, The comparative morphology of the axial skeleton in the Australian Gekkonidae. J. Linnean Soc. Zool., 44: 300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inger, R.F., 1967, The development of frogs, Evol., 21: 369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N. and Jardine, C.J., 1967, Numerical Homology. Nature 216 (5112): 301–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, M.C. and Wilson, A.C., 1975, Evolution at two levels in humans and chimpanzees. Science, 188: 107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kluge, A.G. and Farris, J.S., 1969, Quantitative phyletics and the evolution of anurans. Syst. Zool., 18: 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurten, B., 1963, Return of a lost structure in the evolution of felid dentition. Soc. Scienti. Fenn. Comment. Biol., 26: 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, J., Jr., 1963, The cranial osteology of neotenic and transformed salamanders and its bearing on interfamial relationships, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, H. and Rabb, G.B., 1970, Character analysis: an empirical approach applied to advanced snakes. J. Zool., London 161: 525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, H. and Rabb, G.B., 1972, Phyletic analysis of fifty characters of advanced snakes, Fieldiana, Zool., 63: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1963, Animal species and evolution, The Belknap Press, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 797 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., 1965, Numerical phenetics and taxonomic theory. Syst. Zool., 14: 73.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H.M., 1975, Fossils and the mosaic nature of human evolution. Science 190: 425.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McKenna, M.C., 1975, Toward a phylogenetic classification of the Mammalia, in “Phylogeny of the primates” (W.P. Luckett and F.S. Szalay, eds.), pp. 21–46, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michener, C.D. and Sokal, R.R., 1957, A quantitative approach to a problem in classification. Evol., 11: 130–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, L.A., 1972, The phylogenetic significance of notochorsal centra in amphibians and reptiles: a comparative study of vertebral morphology and development in Leiopelma (Amphibia: Anura) and the Gekkota (Reptilia: Lacertilia), unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Univ. of Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, L.A., 1973, The concept of primitiveness and its bearing on the phylogenetic classification of the Gekkota. Proc. Linnean Soc. New South Wales 97: 275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monath, T., 1965, The opercular apparatus of salamanders. J. Morph., 116: 149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morescalchi, A., 1975, Chromosome evolution in the caudate Amphibia. Evol. Biol., 8: 339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morescalchi, A. and Olmo, E., 1974, Sirenids: a family of polyploid urodeles? Experientia 30: 491.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, G.J., 1971, Paraphyly and polyphyly: redefinitions. Syst. Zool., 20: 471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, G.K., 1925, An outline of the relation of ontogeny to phylogeny within the Amphibia. II, Amer. Mus. Novitates 166: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, G.K., 1931, G.K., 1931, “The biology of the Amphibia,” reprint by Dover Publications, New York, 1954.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, G.L., 1957, The bearing of larval evolution on some problems in frog classification. Syst. Zool., 6: 79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilbeam, D. and Gould, S.J., 1974, Size and scaling in human evolution. Science 186: 892.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Regal, P.J., 1966, Feeding specializations and the classification of terrestrial salamanders. Evol., 20: 392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, P., 1962, Gliding lizards from the Upper Keuper of Great Britain, Proc. Geol. Soc., 1601: 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, D.J., Fleming, H.S. and Estabrook, G., 1967, Use of computers in studies of taxonomy and evolution. Evol. Biol., 1: 169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, A.S., 1956, “Osteology of the reptiles,” Univ. of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, B. and Hecht, M.K., 1975, Introduction and historical background, symposium on higher levels of organization. Syst. Zool., 14: 245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, B., Hecht, M.K. and Eldredge, N., 1972, Phylogeny and paleontology. Evol. Biol., 6: 31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G., 1961, “Principles of animal taxonomy,” Colombia Univ. Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G.G., 1975, Recent advances in methods of phylogenetic inference, in “Phylogeny of the primates” (W.P. Luckett and F.S. Szalay, eds.), pp. 3–19, Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath, P.H.A. and Sokal, R.R., 1973, “Numerical taxonomy,” W.H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokol, O., 1975, The phylogeny of anuran larvae: a new look. Copeia 1975:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starrett, P.H., 1975, Evolutionary patterns in larval morphology, in “Evolutionary biology of the anurans” (J.L. Vial, ed.), pp. 251–271, Univ. of Missouri Press, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Throckmorton, L.H., 1968, Concordance and discordance of taxonomic characters in Drosophila classification. Syst. Zool., 17: 355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, G., 1954, On the classification and evolution of geckos. Proc. Zool. Soc. London 1954: 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, G., 1955, Classification of geckos. Nature 175:1089. Underwood, G., 1957, On lizards of the family Pygopodidae. A contribution to the morphology and phylogeny of the Squamata. J. Morph., 100: 207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake, D.B., 1966, Comparative osteology and evolution of the lungless salamanders, family Plethodontidae. Mem. South Calif. Acad. Sci., 4: 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O., 1965, A consistency test for phylogenies based on contemporaneous species. Syst. Zool., 14: 214.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1977 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hecht, M.K., Edwards, J.L. (1977). The Methodology of Phylogenetic Inference Above the Species Level. In: Hecht, M.K., Goody, P.C., Hecht, B.M. (eds) Major Patterns in Vertebrate Evolution. NATO Advanced Study Institutes Series, vol 14. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8851-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-8851-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-8853-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-8851-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics