Abstract
Taste responses of Dipterans have been extensively investigated for more than three decades. V.G. Dethier (1955) used the proboscis extention test to measure the natural preferences of the flies to different chemicals. He found that blowflies accepted sugars and rejected common salt or quinine. If a mixture of an attractant and a repellent was presented, the fly’s response was determined by the ratio of the two substances. Hodgson, Lettvin and Roeder (1955) first recorded the electrical responses of the Dipteran chemoreceptors. Since then a number of workers have attempted to correlate the electrophysiological and behavioral responses of a variety of flies. (See review by Hodgson, 1974.) It is evident that taste discrimination in insects, as in mammals, is based upon a small set of categoric distinctions, but the exact nature of the sensory code remains unknown (Perkel and Bullock, 1969).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Deak, I.I., 1976, Demonstration of sensory neurones in the ectopic cuticle of spineless aristapedia (ssa), a homeotic mutant of Drosophila, Nature, 260: 252.
DenOtter, C.J., 1972, Interactions between ions and receptor membrane in insect taste cells, J. Insect Physiol., 18: 398.
Dethier, V., 1955, The physiology and histology of the contact chemoreceptors of the blowfly, Quart. Rev. Biol., 30: 348.
Dethier, V.G., 1968, Chemosensory input and taste discernment in blowfly, Science, 161: 389.
Falk, R.,and Atidia, J., 1975, Mutations affecting taste perception in Drosophila melanogaster, Nature, 254: 325.
Falk, R., Bleiser-Avivi, N., and Atidia, J., 1976, Labellar taste organs of Drosophila melanogaster, J. Morphol., 150: 327.
Hodgson, E.S., 1974, Chemoreception, in: “Physiology of Insecta”, Vol. II, M. Rockstein, eds., Academic Press, New York, pp. 127–161.
Hodgson, E.S., Lettvin, J.Y.,and Roeder, K.E., 1955, Physiology of a primary chemoreceptor unit, Science, 122: 417.
Isono, K.,and Kikuchi, T., 1973, A recessive autosomal mutation of a glucose receptor in labellar sensory hairs of Drosophila melanogaster, Jap. J. Genetics, 48: 421.
Isono, K.,and Kikuchi, T., 1974, Behavioral and electrical responses to sugars in Drosophila melanogaster, Jap. J. Genetics, 49: 113.
Perkel, D.H.,and Bullock, T.H., 1969, Neural coding, Neurosci. Res. Symp. Summ., 3: 405.
Rodrigues, V.,and Siddiqi, O., 1978, Genetic analysis of chemosensory pathway, Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 87B: 147.
Shimada, I., and Isono, K., 1978, The specific receptor site for aliphatic carboxylate anion in the labellar sugar receptor of the fleshfly, J. Insect Physiol., 24: 807.
Tompkins, L., 1979, Developmental analysis of two mutations affecting chemotactic behavior in Drosophila melanogaster, Dev. Biol., 73: 174.
Tompkins, L.,and Sanders, T.G., 1977, Genetic analysis of chemosensory mutants of Drosophila melanogaster, Genetics, 86 suppl. S64
Tompkins, L., Cardosa, M.J., White, F.V.,and Sanders, T.G., 1979, Isolation and analysis of chemosensory behavior mutants in Drosophila melanogaster, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 76: 884.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1980 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siddiqi, O., Rodrigues, V. (1980). Genetic Analysis of a Complex Chemoreceptor. In: Siddiqi, O., Babu, P., Hall, L.M., Hall, J.C. (eds) Development and Neurobiology of Drosophila . Basic Life Sciences, vol 16. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7968-3_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-7968-3_25
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-7970-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-7968-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive