Abstract
Management of nature reserves, of multiple-use lands, and of captive breeding programs requires knowledge of the minimum population sizes below which the combined effects of random genetic changes and demographic variation would likely result in extinction. One prerequisite to estimating such minimum viable population sizes is the determination of the effects of inbreeding on fitness. Two hypotheses make distinct predictions about the relative tolerance of populations to inbreeding: If inbreeding depression results primarily from the expression of deleterious recessive alleles, then selection would have removed most such genes from populations with long histories of inbreeding, and those populations would be resistant to further inbreeding impacts. If inbreeding depression occurs because of a general selective advantage of heterozygosity throughout the genome, then previously inbred populations would have reduced fitness presently and would fare no better under future inbreeding than would large and heterogeneous populations. We tested the hypothesis that small, isolated populations of Peromyscus mice would show less depression in fitness when inbred than would large, central populations. Remnant, insular populations had one-quarter to one-third the genie diversity of large, central populations. Although the populations varied greatly in the rate of loss of fitness (measured as infant viability) when experimentally inbred, the severity of inbreeding depression did not correlate with initial genie diversity of the stocks or, therefore, with the size and degree of insularity of the wild populations. Neither simple theory of inbreeding depression could account for the varied responses of the populations. It remains an important task for conservation biologists to discover phylogenetic, ecological, or genetic predictors of genetically minimum viable population sizes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literature Cited
Ballou, J. 1983. Calculating inbreeding coefficients from pedigrees. In Genetics and conservation: A reference for managing wild animal and plant populations, ed. C.M. Schonewald-Cox, S.M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and W.L. Thomas, 509–20. Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin/Cummings.
Brewer, B.A. 1988. An investigation of protein electrophoresis as a predictor of inbreeding depression in captive populations of Peromyscus. In Dissertation Abstracts International 49: 5131. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Brewer, B.A., Lacy, R.C., Foster, M.L., Alaks, G. 1990. Inbreeding depression in insular and central populations of Peromyscus mice. J. Heredity 81: 257–66.
Bulger, J., Hamilton, W.J. III. 1988. Inbreeding and reproductive success in a natural chacma baboon, Papio cynocephalus ursinus, population. Anim. Behav. 36: 574–78.
Connor, J.L., Bellucci, M.J. 1979. Natural selection resisting inbreeding depression in captive wild housemice (Mus musculus). Evolution 33: 929–40.
Conway, W.G. 1986. The practical difficulties and financial implications of endangered species breeding programs. Int. Zoo Yearbook 24 /25: 210–19.
Darwin, C. 1868. The variation of animals and plants under domestication. London: John Murray.
Falconer, D.S. 1981. Introduction to quantitative genetics. New York: Longman.
Garten, C.T., Jr. 1976. Relationships between aggressive behavior and genie heterozygosity in the oldfield mouse, Peromyscus polionotus. Evolution 30: 59–72.
Gilpin, M.E., Soulé, M.E. 1986. Minimum viable populations: Processes of species extinction. In Conservation biology: The science of scarcity and diversity, ed. M.E. Soule, 19–34. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.
Groves, C.R., Clark, T.W. 1986. Determining minimum population size for recovery of the black-footed ferret. Great Basin Nat. Memoirs 8: 150–159.
Hamrick, J.L. 1983. The distribution of genetic variation within and among natural populations of plants. In Genetics and conservation: A reference for managing wild animal and plant populations, ed. C.M. Schonewald-Cox, S.M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and L. Thomas, 335–48. Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin/Cummings.
Humphrey, S.R., Barbour, D.B. 1981. Status and habitat of three subspecies of Peromyscus polionotus in Florida. J. Mamm. 62: 840–44.
Lacy, R.C. 1987. Loss of genetic diversity from managed populations: Interacting effects of drift, mutation, immigration, selection, and population subdivision. Cons. Biol. 1: 143–58.
Lacy, R.C., Clark, T.W. 1989. Genetic variability in black-footed ferret populations: Past, present, and future. In Conservation biology and the black- footed ferret, ed. U.S. Seal, E.T. Thome, M.A. Bogan, and S.H. Anderson, 83–103. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lerner, I.M. 1954. Genetic homeostasis. New York: J. Wiley and Sons.
Lynch, C.B. 1977. Inbreeding effects upon animals derived from a wild population of Mus musculus. Evolution 31: 526–37.
Meyers, J. M. 1983. Status, microhabitat, and management recommendations for Peromyscus polionotus on Gulf Coast beaches Report. Atlanta: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Mitton, J.B., Grant, M.C. 1984. Associations among protein heterozygosity, growth rate, and developmental homeostasis. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 479–99.
Morton, N.E., Crow, J.F., Muller, H.J. 1956. An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanguineous marriages. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 42: 855–63.
O’Brien, S.J., Evermann, J.F. 1988. Interactive influence of infectious disease and genetic diversity in natural populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 3: 254–59.
O’Brien, S.J., Roelke, M.E., Marker, L., Newman, A., Winkler, C.A., Meitzer, D., Colly, L., Evermann,J.F., Bush, M., Wildt, D.E. 1985. Genetic basis for species vulnerability in the cheetah. Science 227: 1428–34.
O’Brien, S.J., Wildt, D.E., Goldman, D., Merril, C.R., Bush, M. 1983. The cheetah is depauperate in genetic variation. Science 221: 459–62.
Ralls, K., Ballou, J.D., Templeton, A. 1988. Estimates of lethal equivalents and the cost of inbreeding in mammals. Cons. Biol. 2: 185–93.
Rao, P.S.S., Inbaraj, S.G. 1980. Inbreeding effects on fetal growth and development. J. Med. Genet. 17: 27–33.
Reed, J.M., Doerr, P.D., Walters, J.R. 1988. Minimum viable population size of the red-cockaded woodpecker. J. Wildl. Manage. 52: 385–91.
Rowley, I., Russell, E., Brooker, M. 1986. Inbreeding: Benefits may outweigh costs. Anim. Behav. 34: 939–41.
Selander, R.K. 1983. Evolutionary consequences of inbreeding. In Genetics and conservation: A reference for managing wild animal and plant populations, ed. C.M. Schonewald-Cox, S.M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and L. Thomas, 201–15. Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin/Cummings.
Selander, R.K., Smith, M.H., Yang, S.Y., Johnson, W.E., Gentry, J.B. 1971. Biochemical polymorphism and systematics in the Genus Peromyscus. I. Variation in the old-field mouse (Peromyscus polionotus). Studies in Genetics. VI. Univ. Texas Publ. 7103: 49–90.
Shaffer, M.L. 1981. Minimum population sizes for species conservation. Bio- Science 31: 131–34.
Shaffer, M.L. 1983. Determining minimum viable population sizes for the grizzly bear. Int. Conf. Bear Res. Manage. 5: 133–39.
Strong, L.C. 1978. Inbred mice in science. In Origins of inbred mice, ed. H.C. Morse, 45–67. New York: Academic Press.
Templeton, A.R., Read, B. 1983. The elimination of inbreeding depression in a captive herd of Speke’s gazelle. In Genetics and conservation: A reference for managing wild animal and plant populations, ed. C.M. Schonewald-Cox, S.M. Chambers, B. MacBryde, and L. Thomas, 241–61. Menlo Park, Calif.: Benjamin/Cummings.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1987. Recovery plan for the Choctawhatchee, Perdido Key and Alabama Beach Mouse. Atlanta: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
van Noordwijk, A.J., Scharloo, W. 1981. Inbreeding in an island population of the great tit. Evolution 35: 674–88.
Wallace, B. 1970. Genetic load: Its biological and conceptual aspects. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Wright, S. 1969. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 2. The theory of gene frequencies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wright, S. 1977. Evolution and the genetics of populations. Vol. 3. Experimental results and evolutionary deductions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1992 Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc. and Diane C. Fiedler
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lacy, R.C. (1992). The Effects of Inbreeding on Isolated Populations: Are Minimum Viable Population Sizes Predictable?. In: Fiedler, P.L., Jain, S.K. (eds) Conservation Biology. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6426-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-6426-9_11
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-6428-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-6426-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive