Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design ((AEBD,volume 3))

Abstract

As part of a general management theory, Frederick Taylor’s Principles of Scientific Management (1911) marked a great turning point in our thinking about how the planning, design, and management of the workplace affects individual and organizational performance. With respect to physical design, Taylor did much more than simply suggest how factors such as office layout affect work patterns. He articulated a fundamental philosophy of office planning and design that almost 80 years later is still a powerful force influencing how offices are designed and planned in North America. Its hallmark was efficiency. Furniture and plant layouts that minimized “wasted” movement (and thus wasted time and money) were the goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, C., Ishikawa, S., &Silverstein, M. (1975). The Oregon experiment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. J. (1976). The flow of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T. J., Becker, F., &Steele, F. (1987). The Steelcase CDC: Building for innovation. Grand Rapids, MI: Steelcase, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R. M. (1944). Work methods manual. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, R. M. (1949). Motion and time study (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, A., &Valins, S. (1979). Architecture and social behavior: Psychological studies of social behavior. New York: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1974). Design for living: The residents’ view of multi-family housing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Program on Urban and Regional Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1977). Housing messages. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson &Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1981). Workspace: Creating environments in organizations. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1982). The successful office. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1982). The successful office. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Becker, F. (1986a). Work in its physical context: The politics of space and time. In M. Dolden &R. Ward (Eds.), The impact of the work environment on productivity. Washington, DC: Architectural Research Centers Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1986b). Loosely coupled settings: A strategy for computer-aided work decentralizations. In B. Star &L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1987, November). New facilities for architects. Architects’ Journal ,pp. 82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1988a). Saunas and beer: Good multinational business. Leaders, 11(2) ,82–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1988b, February). Form follows process at dynamic Lloyd’s of London. Facility Design and Management ,pp. 54–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1988c, January). Managing facility management. Premises Management ,pp. 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1988d). The changing facilities organization. Haverhill, England: PROJECT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1988e, June). The FM performance profile. Premises Management ,pp. 17–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (1988f). Managing innovation: Computer and organizational ecology. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-computer interaction. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F. (in press). The total workplace: Facilities management and the elastic organization. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F., &Hoogesteger, A. (1986). Employee adjustment to an office relocation. Human Ecology Forum, 15(4) ,6–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F., &Spitznagel, J. (1986). Managing multi-national facilities. Report to International Facility Management Association, Houston, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F., &Steele, F. (1990). The total workplace. Facilities, 8(3) ,9–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, F., &Syme, J. (1987). Managing an office relocation. Report to International Facility Management Association, Houston, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, L. (1954). Group standards, cohesiveness, and productivity. Human Relations, 7 ,509–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brill, M. (1984). Using office design to increase productivity (Vol. 1). Buffalo, NY: Workplace Design and Productivity, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, G. (1983). Health and safety aspects of office automation: The European scene. Proceedings of the world congress on the human aspects of automation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, M. J., &Kaplan, A. (1972). The office environment: space planning and effective behavior. Human Factors, 14 ,373–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caker, A., Hart, D. J., &Stewart, T. F. M., (1980). Visual display terminals: A manual covering ergonomics, workplace designs, task organization, health and safety. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. E. (1979). Interior office design and visitor response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64 ,648–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clearwater, Y. (1980). Comparison of effects of open and closed office design on job satisfaction and productivity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, G. J. (Eds.). (1975). Alternative learning environments. Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson &Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, R., Goodnight, J. A., Poag, C. K., Cohen, S., Nichol, G. T., &Worley, P. (1986). Easing the transition to kindergarten: The affective and cognitive effects of different spatial familiarization experiences. Environment and Behavior, 18(3) ,330–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, C. C. (1975). Easter Hill Village. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dainoff, M. J., &Happ, A. (1981). Visual fatigue and occupational stress in VDT operators. Human Factors ,23(4), 421–438.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., Becker, F., Duffy, F., &Sims, W (1985). ORBIT-2: Organizations, buildings, and information technology. Norwalk, CT: The Harbinger Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEGW. (January 1988). Three cities compared: London, Tokyo, New York. Report to Rosehaugh Stanhope Developers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DEGW. (December 1987). The space requirements of professional firms in the City of London. Report to Rosehaugh Stanhope Developers, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIO International Research Team. (1983). A contingency model of participative decision making: An analysis of 56 decisions in three Dutch organizations. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 56 ,1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolden, M., &Ward, R. (Eds.). (1986). The impact of the work environment on productivity. Washington, DC: Architectural Research Centers Consortium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, F., Cave, C., &Worthington, J. (Eds.). (1976). Planning office space. London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekuan, S. (1982). From office culture to office environment: A comparative study. Tokyo, Japan: GK Industries.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, P., Becker, F., &Jockusch, P. (1987). Achieving office quality: A report of international research on the nature of office quality and its relation to the processes of development, design, procurement, and management. London, England: Building Use Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L., Schachter, S., &Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francescato, G. (1979). Residents’ satisfaction in HUD-assisted housing: Design and management factors. Washington, DC: US Department of Housing and Urban Development, US Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fried, M., &Gleicher, P. (1961). Some sources of residential satisfaction in an urban “slum.” Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 28 ,305–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frogatt, C. (1985). Analysis of innovative space and furniture allocation policies at the Union Carbide Corporation. Unpublished master’s thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. (1961). Planning and social life: Friendship and neighbor relations in suburban communities. Journal of the American Institute of Planners ,27(2), 134–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gans, H. J. (1968). People and plans. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, D., &Singer, J. (1972). Urban stress: Experiments on noise and social stressors. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., &Associates. (1981). The Steelcase national study of office environments: Comfort and productivity in the office of the 80s. Grand Rapids, MI: Steelcase, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L., &Associates. (1987). The office environment index. Grand Rapids, MI: Steelcase, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, P., &Bales, R. (1963). Seating position and small-group interaction. Sociometry, 20, 480–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedge, A. (1989). Environmental conditions and health in offices. International Review of Ergonomics ,3, 87–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homan, G. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justa, F. C., &Golan, M. B. (1977). Office design: Is privacy still a problem? Journal of Architectural Research ,6(2), 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leduc, N. F. (1979, September). Communicating through computers: Impact in a small business group. Telecommunications Policy ,pp. 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1972). What time is this place? Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makower, J. (1981). Office hazards: How your job can make you sick. Washington, DC: Tüden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslow, A., &Mintz, M. (1956). Effects of aesthetic surroundings: Initial effects of three aesthetic conditions upon perceiving “energy” and “well-being” in faces. Journal of Psychology, 41 ,247–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelson, W. (1977). Environmental choice, human behavior, and residential satisfaction. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, P. C., &McElroy, J. C. (1981). Interior office design and visitor response: A constructive replication. Journal of Applied Psychology ,66(5), 646–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naisbett, J. (1982). Megatrends: Ten new directions transforming our lives. New York: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, O. (1975). Design guidelines for creating defensible space. Washington, DC: National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., &Brass, D. J. (1979). Employee reactions to an open-plan office: A naturally-occurring experiment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24 ,267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, A. K. (1958). Productivity and Social Organization: The Ahmedabad experiment. London: Tanistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roethlisberger, F. J., &Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the worker ,Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauser, W., Arauz, C., &Chambers, R. (1978). Exploring the relationship between level of office noise and salary recommendations: a preliminary research note. Journal of Management, 4 ,57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, S., Ellertson, N., McBride, D., &Gregory, D. (1951). An experimental test of cohesiveness and productivity. Human Relations, 4 ,229–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherrod, D. (1974). Crowding, perceived control, and behavioral aftereffects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 4 ,171–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R. (1961). Leadership and group geography. Sociometry, 24 ,99–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R. (1967). Small group ecology. Psychological Bulletin, 67 ,145–152.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R. (1969). Personal space. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R. (1972). Design awareness. San Francisco: Rinehart Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R. (1974). Tight spaces: Hard architecture and how to humanize it. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R. (1983). Social design. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, R. (1986). The measurement of productivity. In M. Dolan and R. Ward (Eds.), The impact of the work environment on productivity. Washington, DC: Architectural Research Center’s Consortium, American Institute of Architects.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, F. (1973). Physical settings and organizational development. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, F. (1977). The feel of the work place: Understanding and improving organizational climate. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, F. (1986). Making and managing high quality work places. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steers, S. (1976). When is an organization effective? Organizational Dynamics, 5 ,50–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinzor, B. (1950). The spatial factor in face-to-face discussion groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45 ,552–555.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Strodbeck, F. L., &Hook, L. H. (1961). The social dimensions of a twelve-man jury table. Sociometry, 24 ,397–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, E. (1986). Work places: The psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundstrom, E., Burt, R., &Kamp, D. (1980). Privacy at work: Architectural correlates of job satisfaction and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 23 ,101–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. (1911). Principles of scientific management. New York: Harper &Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Techau, D. A. (1987). Organizational culture and the spatial ecology of areas. Unpublished masters thesis, Department of Design and environmental analysis, New York State College of Human Ecology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viteles, M. S., &Smith, K. R. (1941). A psychological and physiological study of the accuracy, variability, and volume of work of young men in hot spaces with different noise levels. (ASHVE Report). Washington, DC: Bureau of Ships, U.S. Navy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, R. E., &Vittori, W. (1983). New information technology: Organizational problem or opportunity? Office Technology and People, 1 ,249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wandersman, A. (1979). User participation: A study of types of participation, effects, mediators, and individual differences. Environment and Behavior, 11 ,465–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. (1978). The social psychology of organizing (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1948). Human relations in the restaurant industry. New York: McGraw-HilL

    Google Scholar 

  • Working Women (1981). Warning: Health hazards for office workers-An overview of problems and solutions in occupational health in the office. Cleveland: Working Women Education Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, J. ,&Konya, A. (1988). Fitting out the workplace. London: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeisel, J. (1974). Fundamental values in planning with the nonpaying client. In J. Lang, C. Burnette, W. Moleski, &D. Vachon (Eds.), Designing for human behavior (pp. 293–301). Stroudsburg, PA: Dowden, Hutchinson &Ross.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zube, E. H., &Sell, J. L. (1986). Human dimensions of environmental change. Journal of Planning Literature, 1(2) ,162–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweigenhaft, R. L. (1976). Personal space in the faculty office: Desk placement and the student-faculty interaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64 ,529–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1991 Plenum Press, New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Becker, F. (1991). Workplace Planning, Design, and Management. In: Zube, E.H., Moore, G.T. (eds) Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design. Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design, vol 3. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5814-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-5814-5_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4684-5816-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4684-5814-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics