Abstract
It has long been recognized that, at the level of the firm, the decision to export and the decision to invest abroad are interrelated. They both concern different ways of supplying foreign markets. However, it was not until the mid 1980s that any attempts were made to incorporate FDI and multinational firms into general equilibrium trade models (e.g., Helpman, 1984, 1985; Markusen, 1984; Ethier, 1986). As was explained in , recent contributions in this area of research have stressed the interplay between proximity advantages and concentration advantages in determining whether firms choose to become multinationals or national exporting firms. If transport costs or other trade costs such as tariffs are high, the firm will have an incentive to locate production directly on the market where the good is sold. On the other hand, if there are strong scale economies at the level of the plant, the firm will have an incentive to concentrate production in a few sites, thus making it more likely that a foreign market will be supplied through exports (Brainard, 1993a; Markusen and Venables, 1996).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J.E. (1979). “A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation”. American Economic Review, 69:106–116.
Brainard, S.L. (1993a). A simple theory of multinational corporations and trade with a trade-off between proximity and concentration. NBER Working Paper No. 4269.
Brainard, S.L. (1993b). An empirical assessment of the factor proportions exploration of multinational sales. NBER Working Paper No. 4583.
Brainard, S.L. (1997). “An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade”. American Economic Review, 87:520–544.
Braunerhjelm, P., K. Ekholm, L. Grundberg, P. Karpaty (1996). Swedish multinational corporations: Recent trends in foreign activities. IUI Working Paper No. 462.
Ekholm, K. (1995). Multinational Production and Trade in Technological Knowledge. PhD thesis, University of Lund. Lund Economic Studies No. 58.
Ekholm, K. (1996). Relative and absolute factor endowments as determinants of the pattern of foreign production by multinational firms. Mimeo. The Research Institute of Industrial Economics. Stockholm.
Ethier, W.J. (1986). “The multinational firm”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101:806–833.
Helpman, E. (1984). “A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations”. Journal ofPolitical Economy, 92:451–471.
Helpman, E. (1985). “Multinational corporations and trade structure”. Review of Economic Studies, 52:443–457.
Helpman, E. (1988). “Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries”. In A.M. Spence and H.A. Hazard, editors, International Competitiveness. Ballinger.
Helpman, E. and P.R. Krugman (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Horst, T. (1972). “Firm and industry determinants of the decision to invest abroad: An empirical study”. Review of Economics and Statistics, 54:258–266.
Hummels, D. and J. Levinsohn (1995). “Monopolistic competition and international trade: Reconsidering the evidence”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110:799–836.
Kravis, I.B. and R.E. Lipsey (1982). “The location of overseas production and production for exports by U.S. multinational firms”. Journal of International Economics, 12:201–223.
Krugman, P.R. (1980). “Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade”. American Economic Review, 70:950–959.
Lall, S. (1980). “Monopolistic advantages and foreign involvement by U.S. manufacturing industry”. Oxford Economic Papers, 32:105–122.
Leamer, E. E. and J. Levinsohn (1996). “International trade theory: The evidence”. In G. Grossman and K. Rogoff, editors, Handbook of International Economics, volume 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Markusen, J.R. (1984). “Multinationals, multi-plant economies, and the gains from trade”. Journal of International Economics, 16:205–226.
Markusen, J.R. and A.J. Venables (1996). The theory of endowment, intra-industry, and multinational trade. NBER Working Paper No. 5529.
Summers, R. and A. Heston (1991). “The Penn World Tables (Mark 5): An expanded set of international comparisons, 1950-1988”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106:327–368.
Swedenborg, B. (1979). The Multinational Operations of Swedish Firms: An Analysis of Determinants and Effects. Stockholm: The Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research (IUI).
United Nations (1997). World Investment Report, 1997. New York: United Nations.
United Nations Development Programme (1991). Human Development Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Venables, A.J. (1987). “Customs union, tariff reform and imperfect competition”. European Economic Review, 31:103–110.
White, H. (1980). “A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity”. Econometrica, 48:817–838.
World Bank (1992). World Tables 1992. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ekholm, K. (1998). Proximity Advantages, Scale Economies, and the Location of Production. In: Braunerhjelm, P., Ekholm, K. (eds) The Geography of Multinational Firms. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5675-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5675-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7598-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5675-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive