Skip to main content

Proximity Advantages, Scale Economies, and the Location of Production

  • Chapter
The Geography of Multinational Firms

Part of the book series: Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation ((ESTI,volume 12))

Abstract

It has long been recognized that, at the level of the firm, the decision to export and the decision to invest abroad are interrelated. They both concern different ways of supplying foreign markets. However, it was not until the mid 1980s that any attempts were made to incorporate FDI and multinational firms into general equilibrium trade models (e.g., Helpman, 1984, 1985; Markusen, 1984; Ethier, 1986). As was explained in , recent contributions in this area of research have stressed the interplay between proximity advantages and concentration advantages in determining whether firms choose to become multinationals or national exporting firms. If transport costs or other trade costs such as tariffs are high, the firm will have an incentive to locate production directly on the market where the good is sold. On the other hand, if there are strong scale economies at the level of the plant, the firm will have an incentive to concentrate production in a few sites, thus making it more likely that a foreign market will be supplied through exports (Brainard, 1993a; Markusen and Venables, 1996).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, J.E. (1979). “A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation”. American Economic Review, 69:106–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, S.L. (1993a). A simple theory of multinational corporations and trade with a trade-off between proximity and concentration. NBER Working Paper No. 4269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, S.L. (1993b). An empirical assessment of the factor proportions exploration of multinational sales. NBER Working Paper No. 4583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, S.L. (1997). “An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade”. American Economic Review, 87:520–544.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braunerhjelm, P., K. Ekholm, L. Grundberg, P. Karpaty (1996). Swedish multinational corporations: Recent trends in foreign activities. IUI Working Paper No. 462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K. (1995). Multinational Production and Trade in Technological Knowledge. PhD thesis, University of Lund. Lund Economic Studies No. 58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekholm, K. (1996). Relative and absolute factor endowments as determinants of the pattern of foreign production by multinational firms. Mimeo. The Research Institute of Industrial Economics. Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethier, W.J. (1986). “The multinational firm”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101:806–833.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1984). “A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations”. Journal ofPolitical Economy, 92:451–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1985). “Multinational corporations and trade structure”. Review of Economic Studies, 52:443–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. (1988). “Imperfect competition and international trade: Evidence from fourteen industrial countries”. In A.M. Spence and H.A. Hazard, editors, International Competitiveness. Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman, E. and P.R. Krugman (1985). Market Structure and Foreign Trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst, T. (1972). “Firm and industry determinants of the decision to invest abroad: An empirical study”. Review of Economics and Statistics, 54:258–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummels, D. and J. Levinsohn (1995). “Monopolistic competition and international trade: Reconsidering the evidence”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110:799–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravis, I.B. and R.E. Lipsey (1982). “The location of overseas production and production for exports by U.S. multinational firms”. Journal of International Economics, 12:201–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P.R. (1980). “Scale economies, product differentiation and the pattern of trade”. American Economic Review, 70:950–959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1980). “Monopolistic advantages and foreign involvement by U.S. manufacturing industry”. Oxford Economic Papers, 32:105–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leamer, E. E. and J. Levinsohn (1996). “International trade theory: The evidence”. In G. Grossman and K. Rogoff, editors, Handbook of International Economics, volume 3. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R. (1984). “Multinationals, multi-plant economies, and the gains from trade”. Journal of International Economics, 16:205–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen, J.R. and A.J. Venables (1996). The theory of endowment, intra-industry, and multinational trade. NBER Working Paper No. 5529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R. and A. Heston (1991). “The Penn World Tables (Mark 5): An expanded set of international comparisons, 1950-1988”. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106:327–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedenborg, B. (1979). The Multinational Operations of Swedish Firms: An Analysis of Determinants and Effects. Stockholm: The Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research (IUI).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (1997). World Investment Report, 1997. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme (1991). Human Development Report. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venables, A.J. (1987). “Customs union, tariff reform and imperfect competition”. European Economic Review, 31:103–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (1980). “A heteroscedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroscedasticity”. Econometrica, 48:817–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1992). World Tables 1992. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ekholm, K. (1998). Proximity Advantages, Scale Economies, and the Location of Production. In: Braunerhjelm, P., Ekholm, K. (eds) The Geography of Multinational Firms. Economics of Science, Technology and Innovation, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5675-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5675-6_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-7598-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-5675-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics