Skip to main content

Big Bang Deregulation and Japanese Corporate Governance: A Survey of the Issues

  • Chapter
Crisis and Change in the Japanese Financial System

Part of the book series: Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions ((IFMI,volume 12))

Abstract

In November 1996, Japanese Prime Minister Hashimoto announced a Big Bang policy to deregulate Japanese financial markets. Following a period of planning, implementation of the Big Bang began in April 1998 when all remaining restrictions on foreign exchange transactions were removed. It is scheduled to continue through March 2001. A listing of the deregulation agenda is dominated by measures to remove restrictions on how banks and securities firms do business and allow cross-entry of banks, securities firms, and insurers into each others’ businesses (Table 12.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aoki, Masahiko. 1994. “The contingent governance of teams: An analysis of institutional complementarity.” International Economic Review 35:3 (Aug) 657–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aoki, Masahiko and Hugh Patrick. 1994. The Japanese Main Bank System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglof, Erik and Enrico Perotti. 1994. “The governance structure of the Japanese financial keiretsu.”Journal of Financial Economics 36:2 (Oct) 259–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethel, Jennifer E, Julia Porter Liebeskind, and Tim Opler. 1998. “Block share purchases and corporate performance.” Journal of Finance 53:2 (Apr) 605–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagat, Sanjai and Bernard Black. 1996 Mar. “Do independent directors matter?” Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, Bernard S. 1997. “Shareholder activism and corporate governance in the United States.” Forthcoming in Peter Newman, editor, The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics and the Law. Stockton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blommestein, Hans. 1997. “The impact of institutional investors on OECD financial markets.” Financial Market Trends 68 (Nov) 15–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickley, James A, Sanjai Bhagat, and Ronald C Lease. 1985. “The impact of long-range managerial compensation plans on shareholder wealth.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 7:1-3 (Apr) 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Business Roundtable. 1997Sep. Statement on Corporate Governance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, J, KC Chan and T Yamada. 1997. “The performance of Japanese mutual funds.” Review of Financial Studies 10:2 (Summer) 237–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comment, Robert and Gregg A Jarrell. 1991. “The relative signaling power of Dutch-auction and fixed-price self-tender offers and open-market share repurchases.” Journal of Finance 46:4 (Sep) 1243–1271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corporate Governance Forum of Japan. 1997. “Corporate governance principles B, A Japanese view (Interim report).” Working paper, 30 Oct 1997. (Available at http://paperhost.ssrn.com/papers/9804/98041401.pdf).

  • Del Guercio, Diane and Jennifer Hawkins. Forthcoming. “The motivation and impact of pension fund activism.” Journal of Financial Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenn, George W and Nellie Liang. 1998. “Good news and bad news about share repurchases.” Finance and Economics Discussion Series Working Paper 1998-4, Federal Reserve Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Kenneth R and James M Poterba. 1991. “Were Japanese stock prices too high?” Journal of Financial Economics 29, 337–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukao, Mitsuhiro. 1995. Financial Integration, Corporate Governance and the Performance of Multinational Companies. The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukao, Mitsuhiro. 1998. “Japanese financial instability and weaknesses in the corporate governance structure.” Conference Paper 98-2-6, Keio University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorton, Gary and Matthias Kahl. 1998 Mar. “Rich investors, institutional investors, and dynamic corporate control.” Working paper, Wharton School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanazaki, Masaharu and Akiyoshi Horiuchi. 1998. “A vacuum of governance in the Japanese bank management.” Discussion Paper CIRJE-F-29, Center for International Research on the Japanese Economy, University of Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi, Takeo, Anil Kashyap, and David Scharfstein. 1990. “The role of banks in reducing the costs of financial distress in Japan.” Journal of Financial Economics 27:1 (Sep) 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, Takatoshi. 1992. The Japanese Economy. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Jun-Koo and Anil Shivdasani. 1996. “Does the Japanese governance system enhance shareholder wealth? Evidence from the stock-price effects of top management turnover.” Review of Financial Studies 9:4 (Winter) 1061–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Jun-Koo and Rene M Stulz. 1996. “How Different Is Japanese Corporate Finance? An Investigation of the Information Content of New Security Issues.” Review of Financial Studies 9:1 (Spring) 109–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Steven N. 1994. “Top executive rewards and firm performance: A comparison of Japan and the US.” Journal of Political Economy 102:3 (Jun) 510–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Steven N. 1995. “The homogeneity of Japanese boards.” Directors & Boards 19:3 (Spring) 31–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Steven N. 1997a. “Corporate governance and corporate performance: A comparison of Germany, Japan and the US.” In Donald H Chew, editor, Studies in International Corporate Finance and Governance Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Steven N. 1997b. “The Evolution of US Corporate Governance: We Are All Henry Kravis Now.” Working paper, University of Chicago Graduate School of Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, Steven N and Bernadette A Minton. 1994. “Appointments of outsiders to Japanese boards: Determinants and implications for managers.” Journal of Financial Economics 36:2 (Oct) 225–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karpoff, Jonathan M. 1998. “The Impact of Shareholder Activism on Target Companies: A Survey of Empirical Findings.” Working paper, University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kato, Takeo and Mark Rockel. 1992. “Experiences, Credentials, and Compensation in the Japanese and US Managerial Labor Markets: Evidence from New Micro Data.” Journal of the Japanese and International Economy 6:1 (Mar) 30–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kester, W Carl. 1991. Japanese takeovers: The global contest for corporate control, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kojima, Kenji. 1997. Japanese corporate governance: An international perspective. Kobe, Japan: Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubo, Katsuyuki. 1998. “The determinants of executive compensation and its effect on company performance in Japan and in the UK.” Paper presented at the Workshop on Corporate Governance, Contracts, and Managerial Incentives, Berlin, 2-4 July 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, Robert N and Steven A Zimmer. 1989. “Explaining international differences in the cost of capital.” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review 14:2 (Summer) 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehran, Hamid. 1995. “Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance”. Journal of Financial Economics 38:2, 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milhaupt, Curtis J. 1996“A relational theory of Japanese corporate governance: Contract, culture, and the rule of law.” Harvard International Law Journal 37:1 (Winter) 3–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morck, Randall and Masao Nakamura. 1999. “Banks and corporate control in Japan.” Journal of Finance 54:1 (Feb) 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morinaga, Teruki and Mitsuhiro Fukao. 1997. “The current state of the Japanese corporate pension system and its problems.” Working paper, Keio University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakatani, Iwao. 1984. “The economic role of financial corporate grouping.” In Masahiko Aoki, editor, The Economic Analysis of the Japanese Firm. North Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell, Stephen J. 1996. “Competition and corporate performance“ Journal of Political Economy 104:4 (Aug) 724–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okumura, Hiroshi. 1989. “Stock cornering, takeovers, and tender offers: The economics of stock acquisitions.” In Yukio Yanagida et al, editors, Law and Investment in Japan. East Asian Legal Studies Program, Harvard Law School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opler, Tim C and Jonathan Sokobin. 1997. “Does coordinated institutional shareholder activism work? An analysis of the activities of the Council of Institutional Investors.” Working paper, Ohio State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck, Charles. 1998. Top Executive Compensation in 1996. The Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prowse, Stephen D. 1990. “Institutional investment patterns and corporate financial behavior in the United States and Japan.” Journal of Financial Economics 27:1 (Sep) 43–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prowse, Stephen D. 1992. “The structure of corporate ownership in Japan.” Journal of Finance 47:3(July) 1121–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramseyer, J Mark. 1987. “Takeovers in Japan: Opportunism, ideology, and corporate control.” UCLA Law Review 35:1, 21–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • SDP = Securities Data Publishing. The Merger Yearbook: US/International Edition 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahan, Philip E. 1998 Jun. “Securities class actions, corporate governance and managerial agency problems.” Working paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, David E. 1997. “Foreign direct investment and keiretsu: Rethinking U.S. and Japanese policy.” In Robert C Feenstra, editor, The Effects of U.S. Trade Protection and Promotion Policies. University of Chicago Press for NBER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbach, Michael S. 1988. “Outside directors and CEO turnover.” Journal of Financial Economics 20:1-2, 431–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gibson, M.S. (2000). Big Bang Deregulation and Japanese Corporate Governance: A Survey of the Issues. In: Hoshi, T., Patrick, H. (eds) Crisis and Change in the Japanese Financial System. Innovations in Financial Markets and Institutions, vol 12. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4395-4_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4395-4_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-6977-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-4395-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics