Abstract
In this article I argue that strategy scholars have incorrectly borrowed from economists the assumption of organizational plasticity. Particularly in large firms, inertia, rather than plasticity, is the norm. Unfortunately, there can be no simple theory of inertia as its causes are multiple and varied. After sketching out the shapes of the most important sources of inertia, I turn to the problem of overcoming inertia—the question of organizational transformation. Starting with a simple model of organizational capabilities as existing on two levels (unit-based and rooted in coordination among units), I draw some preliminary conclusions about the shape of organizational transformation. In particular, I focus on the interplay between incentive intensity and coordinative capacity and argue that most transformations move through a sequence of phases in which coordinative capacity is first dramatically reduced and then rebuilt along new lines.
Financial support from INSEAD’s Corporate Renewal Initiative (CORE) is gratefully acknowledged. My understanding of the issues surrounding corporate transformation has benefitted from discussions with Sumantra Ghoshal, Chris Bartlett, and John Stopford.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Argyris, C. 1990. Overcoming organizational defenses: facilitating organizational learning. Needham, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Arrow, K.J. 1963. Social choice and individual values. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press (1st ed. 1951).
Baden-Fuller, C. and Stopford, J.M. 1994. Rejuvenating the mature business. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Barney, J.B. 1986. “Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy.” Management Science 32: 1231–1241.
Burgelman, R.A. 1991. “Intraorganizational ecology of strategy and organizational adaptation: theory and field research,” Organizational Science 2: 239–62.
Conner, K.R. 1991. “A historical comparison of resource-based theory and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: do we have a new theory of the firm?” Journal of Management 17: 121–54.
Elster, J. 1989. The cement of society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fallows, J. 1981. National defense. New York: Random House.
Frantz, R.S. 1988. X-efficiency: theory, evidence, and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Grant, R.M. 1991. “The resource-based theory of competitive advantage.” California Management Review 33: 114–135.
Hannan, M.T. and Freeman, J. “Structural inertia and organizational change.” American Sociological Review 49: 149–64.
Janus, I. 1972. Groupthink. New York: The Free Press.
Kreps, D.M. 1990. A course in microeconomic theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kuran, T. 1988. “The tenacious past: theories of personal and collective conservatism.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 10: 143–71.
Lippman, S.A., and Rumelt, R.P. 1982. “Uncertain imitability: and analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition.” Bell Journal of Economics. 13: 418–438.
Margolis, H. 1993. Paradigms and barriers: how habits of mind govern scientific beliefs. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Milgrom, P., and Holmstrom, B. 1990. “Multi-task principal-agent analyses: Incentive contracts, asset ownership and job design.” Working paper.
McKelvey, R.D. 1976. “Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control.” Journal of Economic Theory 16: 472–82.
Nelson, R.R., and Winter, S.G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Ouchi, W.G., and Wilkins, A.L. 1985. “Organizational culture.” Annual Review of Sociology 11: 457–83.
Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive strategies: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M.E. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
Postrel, S., and Rumelt, R.P. 1992. “Incentives, routines, and self-command.” Industrial and Corporate Change 1: 397–425. Powell, W.W., and DiMaggio, P.J. (eds.). 1991. The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Prahalad, C.K., and Hamel, G. 1990. “The core competence of the corporation,” Harvard Business Review 68: 79–91.
Rumelt, R.P. 1984. “Towards a strategic theory of the firm.” In R.B. Lamb (ed.), Competitive strategic management. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall: 556–570.
Rumelt, R.P. 1991. “How much does industry matter?” Strategic Management Journal 12: 167–186.
Sheehan, N. 1988. A bright and shining lie. New York: Vantage.
Shesple, K. 1979. “Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models.” American Journal of Political Science 23: 27–59.
Skinner, B.F. 1948. “Superstition in the pigeon.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 38: 168–172.
Smith, D. 1985. “The roots and future of modern-day military reform. Air University Review 16: 33–40.
Thompson, F. 1992. “First with the most: the boyd cycle and business strategy.” Working Paper, Willamette University, Oregon.
Teece, D.J. 1982. “Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3: 39–63.
Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., and Shuen, S. 1990. “Firm capabilities, resources, and the concept of strategy.” Working Paper, University of California, Berkeley.
Wernerfelt, B. 1984. “A resource-based view of the firm.” Strategic Management Journal 5: 171–180.
Williamson, O.E. 1985. The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, relational contracting. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rumelt, R.P. (1995). Inertia and Transformation. In: Montgomery, C.A. (eds) Resource-Based and Evolutionary Theories of the Firm: Towards a Synthesis. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2201-0_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5923-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-2201-0
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive