Skip to main content

Improving EDS Performance with Digital Pulse Processing

  • Chapter
X-Ray Spectrometry in Electron Beam Instruments

Abstract

Direct digitization of the preamplifier output of a Si(Li) detector, with all subsequent pulse processing performed digitally, enhances throughput versus resolution performance Sensitivity, resolution, and especially pileup rejection for photons below 1 keV are also improved. Adaptive pulse shaping allows both low dead time operation with minimal loss of resolution and automatic adjustment to a wide range of beam current without requiring manual selection of processing time.

An overview of the operating principles of a digital pulse processor will be presented and compared with conventional approaches. Examples of spectra taken with the same spectrometer under the same conditions, changing only the pulse processors, will illustrate the advantages of adaptive digital processing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. Koeman, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 123,161 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Koeman, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 123,169 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Koeman, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 123,181(1975)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Lifshin, and M. F. Ciccarelli, in:Scanning Electron Microscopy 1973, IITRI Chicago, pp. 89–96 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. T. Lakatos, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B47, 307 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Georgiev and W. Gast, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 40, 772 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. P. L. Ryder, NBS Special Publication 604 (K. F. J. Heinrich, D. E. Newbury, and R. L. Myklebust, eds). National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, pp. 177–192 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. H. Schamber, NBS Special Publication 604 (K. F. J. Heinrich, D. E. Newbury, and R. L. Myklebust, eds.) National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, pp. 193–232 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  9. C. E. Fiori et. al, NBS Special Publication 604 (K.E J. Heinrich, D. E. Newbury, and R. L. Myklebust, eds.)National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, pp. 233–272 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. J. McCarthy and E H. Schamber, NBS Special Publication 604 (K. F. J. Heinrich, D. E. Newbury, and R. L. Myklebust, eds.) National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, pp. 273–296 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. C. Russ, NBS Special Publication 604 (K. E J. Heinrich, D. E. Newbury, and R. L. Myklebust, eds.) National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC., pp. 297–314 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. C. E. Fiori and C. R. Swyt, Microbeam Anal. 1,89 (1992).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. J. B. Reed, Microbeam Analysis-1990 (J. R. Michael and Peter Ingram, eds.) San Francisco Press, San Francisco, 181–184 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  14. P. J. Statham and T. Nashashibi, in: Microbeam Analysis-1988 (D. E. Newbury, ed.) San Francisco Press, San Francisco, pp. 50–54 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. J. Statham, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. 119, 425 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. I. Goldstein, D. E. Newbury, P. Echlin, D. C. Joy, A. D. Romig, Jr.C.E.Lyman, C. Fiori, and E. Lifshin, in: Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, Second Ed., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 296–298 (1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. G. E Knoll, Radiation Detection and Measurement,Second Ed., John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 575–577 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. C. Cottini, E. Gatti, and V. Svelto, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 24, 241 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. T. L. Mayhugh and J. E Pierce, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-29, 587 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. D. C. Joy, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 56, 1772 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. F. S. Goulding and D. A. Landis, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-29, 1125 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Kandiah, A. J. Smith, and G. White, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-22, 2058 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. V. Jordanov and G. F. Knoll, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 40, 764 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. F. S. Goulding, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 100,493 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Llacer, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 130, 565 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. E. Gatti and M. Sampietro, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A287, 513 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. C. E. Fiori and C. R. Swyt, in: Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Electron Microscopy Society of America (G. W. Bailey, J. Bentley, and J. A. Small, eds.) pp. 1770–1771 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. D. Scot and G. Love, Quantitative Electron-Probe Microanalysis, Ellis Horwood Ltd., Chichester, United Kingdom, pp. 95–96 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  29. R. A. Sareen, personal communication (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  30. J. I. Goldstein, D. E. Newbury, P. Echlin, D. C. Joy, A. D. Romig, Jr.,C.E.Lyman, C.Fiori, and E. Lifshin, Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, Second ed., Plenum Press, New York, pp. 59–60 (1992).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Ibid.,pp. 514–515.

    Google Scholar 

  32. P. J. Statham, NBS Special Publication 604 (K. E J. Heinrich, D. E. Newbury, and R. L. Myklebust, eds.) National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC, pp. 127–139 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  33. S. A. S. Audet, personal communication (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  34. J. J. McCarthy and M. Misenheimer, Microbeam Anal. 2, S178 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  35. J. I. Goldstein, D. E. Newbury, R Echlin, D. C. Joy, A. D. Roming, Jr.,C. E. Lyman, C. Fiori, and E. Lifshin, in: Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis, Second Ed., Plenum Press, New York, p. 337 (1992).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. J. J. McCarthy, M. W. Ales, and D. J. McMillan, in: Microbeam Analysis-1990, (J. R. Michael and Peter Ingram, eds.), San Francisco Press, San Francisco, pp. 79–84 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  37. C. E. Cox, B. G. Lowe, and R. A. Sareen, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 35, 28 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mott, R.B., Friel, J.J. (1995). Improving EDS Performance with Digital Pulse Processing. In: Williams, D.B., Goldstein, J.I., Newbury, D.E. (eds) X-Ray Spectrometry in Electron Beam Instruments. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1825-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1825-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5738-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1825-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics