Abstract
Culture consists of behavior. The units are practices shared by members of a group and acquired as a result of membership in the group. Although it is common to define the units of culture as abstractions, such as culturgens or memes, these abstractions in no way help to explain a group’s practices. Instead, they only direct research away from the context and consequences that result in transmission of a practice from one group member to another. If culture is to be described as an evolutionary process, one must have a sufficiently general definition of “evolutionary process” to allow genetic evolution and cultural evolution to be examples. This may be accomplished by defining an evolutionary process as composed of variation (within a pool of replicators), transmission (by copying), and selection (by differential transmission). The replicators of cultural evolution are practices, which are units of operant behavior (i.e., behavior under control of consequences and context). Practices are transmitted from individual to individual by imitation and instruction. Instruction may be understood with the concept of a rule, which is a verbal discriminative stimulus (i.e., a verbally created context). Instruction consists of rule-giving, which results in rule-following on the part of the instructee. New rules come into a culture frequently as a result of rule-making, the generation of new rules on the basis of non-social stimuli. Selection in cultural evolution occurs because imitation and instruction of competing practices have differential consequences in the long run, consequences that impact reproductive potential. Since such long-term consequences have little effect on behavior, an adaptive practice (i.e., one that pays in the long run, called “self-control”) is strengthened in the short-term by social reinforcers delivered by rule-givers. A behavioral analysis focuses on environmental events that are observable and, so, susceptible to research. The postulating of fictitious inner entities, whether they be memes, “devices,” or “modules,” only impedes understanding of culture and cultural evolution. Natural selection, because it is short-sighted and opportunistic, may be expected to produce mechanisms that aid and abet valuable behavioral functions. The key to understanding cultural evolution lies in understanding practices in the light of their environmental contexts and short- and long-term consequences.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ainslie, G., & Herrnstein, R. J. (1981). Preference reversal and delayed reinforcement. Animal Learning & Behavior, 9, 476–482.
Alcock, J. (1998).Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach (6th ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
Baum, W. M. (1973). The correlation-based law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 20,137–153.
Baum, W. M. (1989). Quantitative prediction and molar description of the environment. The Behavior Analyst, 12,167–176.
Baum, W. M. (1994). Understanding behaviorism: Science, behavior, and culture. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
Baum, W. M. (1995). Rules, culture, and fitness. The Behavior Analyst, 18,1–21.
Baum, W. M. (1997). The trouble with time. In L. J. Hayes & P. M. Ghezzi (Eds.), Investigations in behavioral epistemology (pp. 47–59). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Baum,W. M. (1998). Why not ask, “Does the chimpanzee have a soul?”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21,116.
Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dawkins, R. (1982). The extended phenotype: The long reach of the gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene (New ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Epstein, R. (1984). Spontaneous and deferred imitation in the pigeon. Behavioural Processes, 9, 347–354.
Garrett, R. (1987). Practical reason and a science of morals. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 319–327). New York: Falmer Press.
Glenn, S. S. (1991). Contingencies and metacontingencies: Relations among behavioral, cultural, and biological evolution. In P. A. Lamal (Ed.), Behavioral analysis of societies and cultural practices (pp. 39–73). New York: Hemisphere.
Guerin, B. (1992). Behavior analysis and the social construction of knowledge. American Psychologist, 47,1423–1432.
Guerin, B. (1997). How things get done: Socially, non-socially; with words, without words. In L. J. Hayes & P. M. Ghezzi (Eds.), Investigations in behavioral epistemology (pp. 219–235). Reno, NV: Context Press.
Guerin, B. (1998). Religious behaviors as strategies for organizing groups of people: A social contingency analysis. The Behavior Analyst, 21, 53–72.
Harris, M. (1980). Cultural materialism. New York: Vintage Books.
Herrnstein, R. J., & Loveland, D. H. (1964). Complex visual concept in the pigeon.Science, 146,549–551.
Heyes, C. M. (1998). Theory of mind in nonhuman primates. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27,101–114.
.Honig, W. K., & Staddon, J. E. R. (Eds.). (1977). Handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65,185–241.
Logue, A.W. (1988). Research on self-control: An integrating framework. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11,665–709.
Logue, A. W. (1995). Self-control: Waiting until tomorrow for what you want today. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lumsden, C. J., & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind, and culture: The coevolutionary process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Moerk, E. L. (1996). Input and learning processes in first language acquisition. In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 26, pp. 181–228). New York: Academic Press.
Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. New York: HarperCollins.
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1992). Natural language and natural selection. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 451–493). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pulliam, H. R. (1983). On the theory of gene-culture co-evolution in a variable environment. In R. L. Mellgren (Ed.), Animal cognition and behavior (pp. 427–443). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland.
Rachlin, H. (1994). Behavior and mind: The roots of modern psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rachlin, H. (1995). Self-control: Beyond commitment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 18, 109–159.
Rachlin, H., & Green, L. (1972). Commitment, choice, and self-control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 17,15–22.
Simon, H. A. (1990). A mechanism for social selection and successful altruism. Science, 250, 1665–1668.
Skinner, B. F. (1961). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. In Cumulative record (Enlarged ed., pp. 347–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (Original work published 1935).
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1969). An operant analysis of problem solving. In Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis (pp. 133–171). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Knopf.
Skinner, B. F. (1981). Selection by consequences. Science, 213, 501–504.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 19–136). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Teitelbaum, P. (1977). Levels of integration of the operant. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 7–27). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Turvey, M. T. (1977). Contrasting orientations to the theory of visual information processing. Psychological Review, 84, 67–88.
Vaughan,W., Jr. (1988). Formation of equivalence sets in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 36–42.
Wasserman, E. A., DeVolder, C. L., & Coppage, D. J. (1992). Nonsimilarity-based conceptualization in pigeons via secondary or mediated generalization. Psychological Science, 3, 374–379.
Watkins, M. J. (1990). Mediationism and the obfuscation of memory. American Psychologist, 45, 328–335.
Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Zuriff, G. (1987). Naturalist ethics. In S. Modgil & C. Modgil (Eds.), B. F. Skinner: Consensus and controversy (pp. 309–318). New York: Falmer Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2000 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baum, W.M. (2000). Being Concrete About Culture and Cultural Evolution. In: Tonneau, F., Thompson, N.S. (eds) Perspectives in Ethology. Perspectives in Ethology, vol 13. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1221-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-1221-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-1-4613-5447-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4615-1221-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive